Use of computerized decision support systems to improve antibiotic prescribing

References

• Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. Br. Med. J.317, 465–468 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elson RB. Clinical practice guidelines: the role of technology in perspective. Dis. Manage. Health Outcomes63–74 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Buchan H. Gaps between best evidence and practice: causes for concern. Med. J. Aust.180, S48–S49 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Electronic Decision Support Taskforce. Electronic Decision Support for Australia’s Health Sector. Commonwealth of Australia: National Health Information Management Advisory Council (NHIMAC). November (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Kushniruk A, Patel V, Fleiszer D. Analysis of medical decision making: a cognitive perspective on medical informatics. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.193–197 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Sintchenko V, Coiera EW. Which clinical decisions benefit from automation? A task complexity approach. Int. J. Med. Inform.70, 309–316 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buising KL, Thursky KA, Bak N et al. Antibiotic prescribing in response to bacterial isolates in the intensive care unit. Anaesth. Intensive Care33, 571–577 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrak RM, Sexton DJ, Butera ML et al. The value of an infectious diseases specialist. Clin. Infect. Dis.36, 1013–1017 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deery HG II. Negotiating with administration – or how to get paid for doing hospital epidemiology. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.18, 209–214 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluckiger U, Zimmerli W, Sax H, Frei R, Widmer AF. Clinical impact of an infectious disease service on the management of bloodstream infection. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.19, 493–500 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler VG Jr, Sanders LL, Sexton DJ et al. Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia according to compliance with recommendations of infectious diseases specialists: experience with 244 patients. Clin. Infect. Dis.27, 478–486 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doern GV, Vautour R, Gaudet M, Levy B. Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification. J. Clin. Microbiol.32, 1757–1762 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez J, Hernandez CJ, Nunez ML, Ruiz GJ, Canteras M, Valdes M. The influence of an infectious diseases consultant on the appropriateness of antibiotic treatment in a general hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.38, 309–314 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byl B, Clevenbergh P, Jacobs F et al. Impact of infectious diseases specialists and microbiological data on the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy for bacteremia. Clin. Infect. Dis.29, 60–66; discussion 67–68 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellman JS, Decarolis D, Schullo-Feulner A, Nelson DB, Filice GA. Information resources used in antimicrobial prescribing. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.11, 281–284 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA280, 1339–1346 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierl L, Feistle M, Muller H, Sliva K, Varnholt D, Villain S. Task-specific authoring functions for end-users in a hospital information system. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.48, 145–150 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortliffe EH, Davis R, Axline SG, Buchanan BG, Green CC, Cohen SN. Computer-based consultations in clinical therapeutics: explanation and rule acquisition capabilities of the MYCIN system. Comput. Biomed. Res.8, 303–320 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schurink CA, Lucas PJ, Hoepelman IM, Bonten MJ. Computer-assisted decision support for the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases in intensive care units. Lancet Infect. Dis.5, 305–312 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu VL, Fagan LM, Wraith SM et al. Antimicrobial selection by a computer. A blinded evaluation by infectious diseases experts. JAMA242, 1279–1282 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans RS, Burke JP, Classen DC et al. Computerized identification of patients at high risk for hospital-acquired infection. Am. J. Infect. Control20, 4–10 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC et al. A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. N. Engl. J. Med.338, 232–238 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner H Jr, Reimer L, Suvinier D, Li L, Nelson M. Modeling empiric antibiotic therapy evaluation of QID. Proc. AMIA Symp.440–444 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lisboa PJ. A review of evidence of health benefit from artificial neural networks in medical intervention. Neural. Netw.15, 11–39 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cundell DR, Silibovsky RS, Sanders R, Sztandera LM. Generation of an intelligent medical system, using a real database, to diagnose bacterial infection in hospitalized patients. Int. J. Med. Inform.63(1–2), 31–40 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Bailey TC, Troy McMullin S. Using information systems technology to improve antibiotic prescribing. Crit. Care Med.29, N87–N91 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuperman GJ, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. Effective drug-allergy checking: methodological and operational issues. J. Biomed. Inform.36, 70–79 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barenfanger J, Short MA, Groesch AA. Improved antimicrobial interventions have benefits. J. Clin. Microbiol.39, 2823–2828 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grau S, Monterde J, Carmona A et al. Monitoring of antimicrobial therapy by an integrated computer program. Pharm. World Sci.21, 152–157 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jozefiak ET, Lewicki JE, Kozinn WP. Computer-assisted antimicrobial surveillance in a community teaching hospital. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.52, 1536–1540 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inaraja MT, Paloma JM, Giraldez J, Idoate AJ, Hualde S. Computer-assisted antimicrobial-use monitoring. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm.43, 664–670 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann. Intern. Med.120, 135–142 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications – clinical decision support systems literature review. Int. J. Med. Inform.64, 15–37 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Br. Med. J.330, 765 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay C, Brown E, Hartman G, Davey P. Room for improvement: a systematic review of the quality of evaluations of interventions to improve hospital antibiotic prescribing. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.52, 764–771 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch. Intern. Med.163, 1409–1416 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffman RN, Liaw Y, Brandt CA, Corb GJ. Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.6, 104–114 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton R, Dovey S, Harvey E, Freemantle N. Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. Med. J.318, 984–990 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea S, Dumouchel W, Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for the preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.3, 399–409 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickling K, Begg E, Moore ML. A prospective randomised trial comparing individualised pharmacokinetic dosage prediction for aminoglycosides with prediction based on estimated creatinine clearance in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med.15, 233–237 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg EJ, Atkinson HC, Jeffery GM, Taylor NW. Individualised aminoglycoside dosage based on pharmacokinetic analysis is superior to dosage based on physician intuition at achieving target plasma drug concentrations. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.28, 137–141 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destache CJ, Meyer SK, Bittner MJ, Hermann KG. Impact of a clinical pharmacokinetic service on patients treated with aminoglycosides: a cost–benefit analysis. Ther. Drug Monit.12, 419–426 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton ME, Ash CL, Hill DP Jr, Handy T, Shepherd MD, Vasko MR. A controlled trial of the cost benefit of computerized bayesian aminoglycoside administration. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.49, 685–694 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.10, 523–530 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee F, Teich JM, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.3, 42–55 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Rittenberg E et al. A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests. Am. J. Med.106, 144–150 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ153, 1423–1431 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim I, Gorman P, Greenes RA et al. Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.8, 527–534 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronsky D, Haug PJ. Assessing the quality of clinical data in a computer-based record for calculating the pneumonia severity index. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.7, 55–65 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chertow GM, Lee J, Kuperman GJ et al. Guided medication dosing for inpatients with renal insufficiency. JAMA286, 2839–2844 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson DA. Antibiotic guidelines: improved implementation is the challenge. Med. J. Aust.176, 513–514 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDC. Campaign to prevent antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep.51, 343 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bravata DM, Sundaram V, McDonald KM et al. Evaluating detection and diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism response. Emerg. Infect. Dis.10, 100–108 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joch J, Dudeck J. Decision support for infectious diseases – a working prototype. Int. J. Med. Inform.64, 331–340 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heininger A, Niemetz AH, Keim M, Fretschner R, Doring G, Unertl K. Implementation of an interactive computer-assisted infection monitoring program at the bedside. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.20, 444–447 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM, Maharry K, Kohler RB, McDonald CJ. A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. N. Engl. J. Med.345, 965–970 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijnders BJ, Vandecasteele SJ, Van Wijngaerden E, De Munter P, Peetermans WE. Use of semiautomatic treatment advice to improve compliance with Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for treatment of intravascular catheter-related infection: a before–after study. Clin. Infect. Dis.37, 980–983 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans RS, Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Lundsgaarde HP, Burke JP. Improving empiric antibiotic selection using computer decision support. Arch. Intern. Med.154, 878–884 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans RS, Larsen RA, Burke JP et al. Computer surveillance of hospital-acquired infections and antibiotic use. JAMA256, 1007–1011 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards MJ, Robertson MB, Dartnell JG et al. Impact of a web-based antimicrobial approval system on broad-spectrum cephalosporin use at a teaching hospital. Med. J. Aust.178, 386–390 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas PJ, de Bruijn NC, Schurink K, Hoepelman A. A probabilistic and decision-theoretic approach to the management of infectious disease at the ICU. Artif. Intell. Med.19, 251–279 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman WW, Aronsky D, Fiszman M, Haug PJ. Contribution of a speech recognition system to a computerized pneumonia guideline in the emergency department. Proc. AMIA Symp.131–135 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sintchenko V, Coiera E, Iredell JR, Gilbert GL. Comparative impact of guidelines, clinical data, and decision support on prescribing decisions: an interactive web experiment with simulated cases. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.11, 71–77 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shojania KG, Yokoe D, Platt R, Fiskio J, Ma’luf N, Bates DW. Reducing vancomycin use utilizing a computer guideline: results of a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.5, 554–562 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sintchenko V, Iredell JR, Gilbert GL, Coiera E. Handheld computer-based decision support reduces patient length of stay and antibiotic prescribing in critical care. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.12, 398–402 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paskovaty A, Pflomm JM, Myke N, Seo SK. A multidisciplinary approach to antimicrobial stewardship: evolution into the 21st century. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents25, 1–10 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Evans RS, Burke JP. Implementing antibiotic practice guidelines through computer-assisted decision support: clinical and financial outcomes. Ann. Intern. Med.124, 884–890 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Burke JP. Evaluation of a computer-assisted antibiotic-dose monitor. Ann. Pharmacother.33, 1026–1031 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans RS. The HELP system: a review of clinical applications in infectious diseases and antibiotic use. MD Comput.8, 282–288 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans RS, Pestotnik SL. Applications of medical informatics in antibiotic therapy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.349, 87–96 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dean NC, Suchyta MR, Bateman KA, Aronsky D, Hadlock CJ. Implementation of admission decision support for community-acquired pneumonia. Chest117, 1368–1377 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. Antibiotic-related ADEs plummet and pharmacy costs shrink with computer-aided decision support. Clin. Resour. Manag.1, 151–153 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burke JP. Maximizing appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical patients: an update from LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City. Clin. Infect. Dis.33(Suppl. 2), S78–S83 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds P. Critical intervention. Surgical ICU of a Utah academic hospital benefits from software’s antibiotic recommendations and alerts. Health Manag. Technol.24, 28–29 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tettelbach WH, Ergonul MO, Samore M, Rubin M, Evans RS. Evaluation of antibiotic orders supported by computer assistance. ICAAC. CA, USA, Abstract O-1006 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Doolan DF, Bates DW, James BC. The use of computers for clinical care: a case series of advanced U.S. sites. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.10, 94–107 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teich JM, Glaser JP, Beckley RF et al. The Brigham integrated computing system (BICS): advanced clinical systems in an academic hospital environment. Int. J. Med. Inform.54, 197–208 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA274, 29–34 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushal R, Bates DW. Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) with clinical decision support systems. In: Making Health Care Safer: A Criticial Analysis of Patient Safety Practices. Kaveh GS, Bradford WD, McDonald MM, Wachter RM (Eds). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, MD, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Gainer A, Pancheri K, Zhang J. Improving the human computer interface design for a physician order entry system. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc.847 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horsky J, Kuperman GJ, Patel VL. Comprehensive analysis of a medication dosing error related to CPOE. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.12, 377–382 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA293, 1197–1203 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classen DC. Clinical decision support systems to improve clinical practice and quality of care. JAMA280, 1360–1361 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff GD, Klass D, Peterson J, Shah G, Bates DW. Linking laboratory and pharmacy: opportunities for reducing errors and improving care. Arch. Intern. Med.163, 893–900 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff D, Thornton J. Pharmacy–laboratory interactions: a unique method to control antibiotic costs. Hosp. Pharm.24, 26–29 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pastel DA, Chang S, Nessim S, Shane R, Morgan MA. Department of pharmacy-initiated program for streamlining empirical antibiotic therapy. Hosp. Pharm.27, 596–603 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schentag JJ, Paladino JA, Birmingham MC, Zimmer G, Carr JR, Hanson SC. Use of benchmarking techniques to justify the evolution of antibiotic management programs in healthcare systems. J. Pharm. Technol.11, 203–210 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klapp D, Ingram W, Curry W. Computer-assisted antibiotic use review. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm.38, 692–695 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scarafile PD, Campbell BD, Kilroy JE, Mathewson HO. Computer-assisted concurrent antibiotic review in a community hospital. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm.42, 313–315 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thursky KA, Buising KL, Bak N et al. Reduction of broad-spectrum antibiotic use with computerized decision support in an intensive care unit. Int. J. Qual. Health Care (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibovici L, Gitelman V, Yehezkelli Y et al. Improving empirical antibiotic treatment: prospective, nonintervention testing of a decision support system. J. Intern. Med.242, 395–400 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas KW, Dayton CS, Peterson MW. Evaluation of internet-based clinical decision support systems. J. Med. Internet Res.1, E6 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Braune S, Wegscheider K, Zielinski W, Muller-Lissner S. [An experimental evaluation of a hospital’s internal clinical guideline system. Randomized, controlled crossover pilot study on the efficacy of Intranet-based guidelines for General Internal Medicine at the Park Clinic Weissensseein Berlin]. Z. Arztl. Fortbild. Qualitatssich.97, 283–286 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stolte JJ, Ash J, Chin H. The dissemination of clinical practice guidelines over an intranet: an evaluation. Proc. AMIA Symp.960–964 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dayton CS, Ferguson JS, Hornick DB, Peterson MW. Evaluation of an internet-based decision-support system for applying the ATS/CDC guidelines for tuberculosis preventive therapy. Med. Decis. Making20, 1–6 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. Therapeutic guidelines: antibiotic. Version 12 Edition. Therapeutic Guidelines Limited, Melbourne, Australia (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Grayson ML, Melvani S, Kirsa SW et al. Impact of an electronic antibiotic advice and approval system on antibiotic prescribing in an Australian teaching hospital. Med. J. Aust.180, 455–458 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett JG. E-prescribing of antibiotics: using the Hopkins antibiotic guide. ICAAC. Washington, DC, USA (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Schentag JJ, Ballow CH, Fritz AL et al. Changes in antimicrobial agent usage resulting from interactions among clinical pharmacy, the infectious disease division, and the microbiology laboratory. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.16, 255–264 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical Advisory Board. Computerised Physician Order Entry: Lessons from Pioneering Institutions. Washington, DC, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Meadows G, Chaiken BP. Computerized physician order entry: a prescription for patient safety. Nurs. Econ.20, 76–77 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milstein A, Galvin RS, Delbanco SF, Salber P, Buck CR Jr. Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative. Eff. Clin. Pract.3, 313–316 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glowacki RC, Schwartz DN, Itokazu GS, Wisniewski MF, Kieszkowski P, Weinstein RA. Antibiotic combinations with redundant antimicrobial spectra: clinical epidemiology and pilot intervention of computer-assisted surveillance. Clin. Infect. Dis.37, 59–64 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar