Management of catheter-related infection

References

• Pratt RJ, Pellowe CM, Wilson JA et al. EPIC2: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. J. Hosp. Infect.65(Suppl. 1), S1–S64 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuera F, Rangel-Frausto MS, Rosenthal VD et al. Attributable cost and length of stay for patients with central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in Mexico City intensive care units: a prospective, matched analysis. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.28(1), 31–35 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N. Engl. J. Med.355(26), 2725–2732 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin. Proc.81(9), 1159–1171 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep.51(RR-10), 1–29 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report. Data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am. J. Infect. Control32(8), 470–485 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eggimann P. Diagnosis of intravascular catheter infection. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.20(4), 353–359 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggimann P, Pittet D. Infection control in the ICU. Chest120(6), 2059–2093 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Team-based prevention of catheter-related infections. N. Engl. J. Med.355(26), 2781–2783 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eggimann P. Prevention of intravascular catheter infection. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.20(4), 360–369 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin. Infect. Dis.32(9), 1249–1272 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington T, Elliott TS. Diagnosis of central venous catheter related infection in adult patients. J. Infect.51(4), 267–280 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.15(2), 167–193 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacometti A, Cirioni O, Ghiselli R et al. Comparative efficacies of quinupristin–dalfopristin, linezolid, vancomycin, and ciprofloxacin in treatment, using the antibiotic-lock technique, of experimental catheter-related infection due to Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49(10), 4042–4045 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouza E, Alvarado N, Alcala L, Perez MJ, Rincon C, Munoz P. A randomized and prospective study of 3 procedures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter withdrawal. Clin. Infect. Dis.44(6), 820–826 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linares J. Diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection: conservative techniques. Clin. Infect. Dis.44(6), 827–829 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calandra T, Cohen J. The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit. Care Med.33(7), 1538–1548 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren DK, Quadir WW, Hollenbeak CS, Elward AM, Cox MJ, Fraser VJ. Attributable cost of catheter-associated bloodstream infections among intensive care patients in a nonteaching hospital. Crit. Care Med.34(8), 2084–2089 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorente L, Jimenez A, Iribarren JL, Jimenez JJ, Martin MM, Mora ML. The micro-organism responsible for central venous catheter related bloodstream infection depends on catheter site. Intensive Care Med.32(9), 1449–1450 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pottecher T, Gauzit R. [Should we use catheter replacement with the aid of wire introducer?]. Ann. Fr. Anesth. Reanim.24(3), 294–297 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timsit JF. [Updating of the 12th Consensus Conference of the Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise (SRLF): catheter related infections in the intensive care unit]. Ann. Fr. Anesth. Reanim.24(3), 315–322 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen AB, Fowler VG Jr, Corey GR et al. Cost–effectiveness of transesophageal echocardiography to determine the duration of therapy for intravascular catheter-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Ann. Intern. Med.130(10), 810–820 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fowler VG Jr, Li J, Corey GR et al. Role of echocardiography in evaluation of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: experience in 103 patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.30(4), 1072–1078 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham J, Mansour C, Veledar E, Khan B, Lerakis S. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis: the Grady Memorial Hospital experience with methicillin-sensitive S aureus and methicillin-resistant S aureus bacteremia. Am. Heart J.147(3), 536–539 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weems JJ Jr, Steinberg JP, Filler S et al. Phase II, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing the safety and pharmacokinetics of tefibazumab to placebo for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.50(8), 2751–2755 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermel LA. New technologies to prevent intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infections. Emerg. Infect. Dis.7(2), 197–199 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD et al. Practice guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis.30(4), 662–678 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nucci M, Anaissie E. Should vascular catheters be removed from all patients with candidemia? An evidence-based review. Clin. Infect. Dis.34(5), 591–599 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Wetering, van Woensel JB. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing early central venous catheter Gram positive infections in oncology patients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1, CD003295 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Segarra-Newnham M, Martin-Cooper EM. Antibiotic lock technique: a review of the literature. Ann. Pharmacother.39(2), 311–318 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safdar N, Maki DG. Use of vancomycin-containing lock or flush solutions for prevention of bloodstream infection associated with central venous access devices: a meta-analysis of prospective, randomized trials. Clin. Infect. Dis.43(4), 474–484 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feely T, Copley A, Bleyer AJ. Catheter lock solutions to prevent bloodstream infections in high-risk hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Nephrol.27(1), 24–29 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou PF, Chang CC, Wen YK, Yang Y. Antibiotic lock technique reduces the incidence of temporary catheter-related infections. Clin. Nephrol.65(6), 419–422 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Opilla MT, Kirby DF, Edmond MB. Use of ethanol lock therapy to reduce the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections in home parenteral nutrition patients. J. Parenter. Enteral. Nutr.31(4), 302–305 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Onland W, Shin CE, Fustar S, Rushing T, Wong WY. Ethanol-lock technique for persistent bacteremia of long-term intravascular devices in pediatric patients. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med.160(10), 1049–1053 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Percival SL, Kite P, Eastwood K et al. Tetrasodium EDTA as a novel central venous catheter lock solution against biofilm. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.26(6), 515–519 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raad I, Hanna H, Maki D. Intravascular catheter-realted infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management. Lancet Infect. Dis.7, 645–647 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar