Engineering perspective on the evolution of push/pull-based dialysis treatments

References

• Kalorama Information. Worldwide Market for Dialysis Equipment, Supplies, and Sevices (2nd Edition). Kalorama Information, NY, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sichart JM,Moeller S. Utilization of hemodiafiltration as treatment modality in renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease patients–a global perspective. Contrib. Nephrol. 175, 163–169 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The United States Renal Data System (USRDS). Part 2, 252–266 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Locatelli F,Manzoni C,Vigano S,Cavalli A,Di Filippo S. Hemodiafiltration – state of the art. Contrib. Nephrol. 168, 5–18 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penne EL, van der Weerd NC, van den Dorpel MA et al. Short-term effects of online hemodiafiltration on phosphate control: a result from the randomized controlled Convective Transport Study (CONTRAST). Am. J. Kidney Dis. 55, 77–87 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellicano R, Polkinghorne KR, Kerr PG. Reduction in beta2-microglobulin with super-flux versus high-flux dialysis membranes: results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 52, 93–101 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van holder R, Pedrini LA. All high-flux membranes are equal but some high-flux membranes are less equal than others. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 23, 1481–1483 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daugirdas JT, Van Stone JC. Physiologic principles and urea kinetic modeling In: Handbook of Dialysis.Daugirdas JT, Blake PG, Ing TS (Eds). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PA, USA, 15–45 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 347, 2010–2019 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli F, Martin-Malo A, Hannedouche T et al. Effect of membrane permeability on survival of hemodialysis patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 20, 645–654 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tattersall J, Canaud B, Heimburger O et al. High-flux or low-flux dialysis: a position statement following publication of the Membrane Permeability Outcome study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 25, 1230–1232 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grooteman MP, van den Dorpel MA, Bots ML et al. Effect of online hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 23, 1087–1096 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ok E, Asci G, Toz H et al. Mortality and cardiovascular events in online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) compared with high-flux dialysis: results from the Turkish OL-HDF Study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 28, 192–202 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaslaki LR, Berta K, Major L et al. On-line hemodiafiltration does not induce inflammatory response in end-stage renal disease patients: results from a multicenter cross-over study. Artif. Organs. 29, 406–412 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaslaki L, Major L, Berta K et al. On-line haemodiafiltration versus haemodialysis: stable haematocrit with less erythropoietin and improvement of other relevant blood parameters. Blood Purif. 24, 163–173 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lornoy W, Becaus I, Billiouw JM et al. On-line haemodiafiltration. Remarkable removal of beta2-microglobulin. Long-term clinical observations. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 15(Suppl. 1), 49–54 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward RA, Schmidt B, Hullin J, Hillebrand GF, Samtleben W. A comparison of on-line hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: a prospective clinical study. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11, 2344–2350 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Pino CJ, Humes HD. Substitution-free hemodiafiltration. Asaio. J. 58, 514–521 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ronco C, Brendolan A, Feriani M et al. A new scintigraphic method to characterize ultrafiltration in hollow fiber dialyzers. Kidney Int. 41, 1383–1393 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ronco C, Brendolan A, Lupi A, Metry G, Levin NW. Effects of a reduced inner diameter of hollow fibers in hemodialyzers. Kidney Int. 58, 809–817 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dellanna F, Wuepper A, Baldamus CA. Internal filtration–advantage in haemodialysis? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 11(Suppl. 2), 83–86 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sato Y, Mineshima M, Ishimori I et al. Effect of hollow fiber length on solute removal and quantification of internal filtration rate by Doppler ultrasound. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 26, 129–134 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Usuda M, Shinzato T, Sezaki R et al. New simultaneous HF and HD with no infusion fluid. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs 28, 24–27 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheung AC, Kato Y, Leypoldt JK, Henderson LW. Hemodiafiltration using a hybrid membrane system for self-generation of diluting fluid. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs. 28, 61–65 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shinzato T, Sezaki R, Usuda M et al. Infusion-free hemodiafiltration: simultaneous hemofiltration and dialysis with no need for infusion fluid. Artif. Organs. 6, 453–456 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Albertini B, Miller JH, Gardner PW, Shinaberger JH. High-flux hemodiafiltration: under six hours/week treatment. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs. 30, 227–231 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Albertini B. Double high-flux hemodiafiltration. Contrib. Nephrol. 158, 161–168 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maeda K, Kobayakawa H, Fujita Y et al. Effectiveness of push/pull hemodiafiltration using large-pore membrane for shoulder joint pain in long-term dialysis patients. Artif. Organs. 14, 321–327 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shinzato T, Kobayakawa H, Maeda K. Comparison of various treatment modes in terms of beta 2-microglobulin removal: hemodialysis, hemofiltration, and push/pull HDF. Artif. Organs. 13, 66–70 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsuruta K, Andoh F, Kurahara I et al. A simple method for clinical application of push/pull hemodiafiltration. Contrib. Nephrol. 108, 71–78 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shinzato T, Fujisawa K, Nakai S et al. Newly developed economical and efficient push/pull hemodiafiltration. Contrib. Nephrol. 108, 79–86 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maeda K, Shinzato T. Push/pull hemodiafiltration: technical aspects and clinical effectiveness. Nephron. 71, 1–9 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shinzato T, Miwa M, Kobayakawa H et al. Effectiveness of new push/pull hemodiafiltration for arthralgia in long-term hemodialysis patients. Contrib. Nephrol. 112, 111–118 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shinzato T, Miwa M, Nakai S et al. Alternate repetition of short fore- and backfiltrations reduces convective albumin loss. Kidney Int. 50, 432–435 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Combarnous F, Tetta C, Cellier CC et al. Albumin loss in on-line hemodiafiltration. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 25, 203–209 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miwa M, Shinzato T. Push/pull hemodiafiltration: technical aspects and clinical effectiveness. Artif. Organs. 23, 1123–1126 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shinzato T, Maeda K. Push/pull hemodiafiltration. Contrib. Nephrol. 158, 169–176 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dapper F, Neppl H, Wozniak G et al. Effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion mode during extracorporeal circulation–a comparative clinical study. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 40, 345–351 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orime Y, Shiono M, Hata H et al. Cytokine and endothelial damage in pulsatile and nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass. Artif. Organs. 23, 508–512 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim KM, Park JY, Lee JC et al. Quantitative analysis of pulsatile flow contribution to ultrafiltration. Artif. Organs. 33, 69–73 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Runge TM, Briceno JC, Sheller ME et al. Hemodialysis: evidence of enhanced molecular clearance and ultrafiltration volume by using pulsatile flow. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 16, 645–652 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruperez M, Lopez-Herce J, Sanchez C et al. Comparison of a tubular pulsatile pump and a volumetric pump for continuous venovenous renal replacement therapy in a pediatric animal model. Asaio. J. 51, 372–375 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee K, Lee SR, Min BG. Pulse push/pull hemodialysis: in vitro study on new dialysis modality with higher convective efficiency. Artif. Organs. 32, 406–411 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee K, Min BG, Mun CH, Lee SR, Won YS. Pulse push/pull hemodialysis in a canine renal failure model. Blood Purif. 26, 491–497 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gura V, Macy AS, Beizai M, Ezon C, Golper TA. Technical breakthroughs in the wearable artificial kidney (WAK). Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4, 1441–1448 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Depner TA, Rizwan S, Stasi TA. Pressure effects on roller pump blood flow during hemodialysis. ASAIO Trans. 36, M456–459 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Teruel JL, Fernandez Lucas M, Marcen R et al. Differences between blood flow as indicated by the hemodialysis blood roller pump and blood flow measured by an ultrasonic sensor. Nephron85, 142–147 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee K, Lee DW, Min BG, Lee KK, Yun YM. Development of a new method for pulse push/pull hemodialysis. ASME J. Med. Dev. 5, 031004(031006 pages)(2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lee K, Mun CH, Lee SR et al. Hemodialysis using a valveless pulsatile blood pump. Asaio. J. 54, 191–196 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee K, Min BG, Lee KK, Yun YM, Blagg CR. Evaluation of a new method for pulse push/pull hemodialysis: comparison with conventional hemodialysis. Asaio. J. 58, 232–237 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy T, Ahrenholz P, Falkenhagen D, Klinkmann H. Volumetrically controlled ultrafiltration. Current experiences and future prospects. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 5, 131–135 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penne EL, Visser L, van den Dorpel MA et al. Microbiological quality and quality control of purified water and ultrapure dialysis fluids for online hemodiafiltration in routine clinical practice. Kidney Int. 76, 665–672 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar