The composite of hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate: a review of preclinical evaluation and clinical applications

References

• Albrektsson T, Hard tissue response. In: Handbook of Biomaterial Properties. Black J, Hastings G (Eds). Chapman & Hall, London, UK (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Markovic M, Takagi S, Chow LC. Formation of macropores in calcium phosphate cements through the use of mannitol crystals. Bioceramics 192–1, 773–776 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Takagi S, Chow LC. Formation of macropores in calcium phosphate cement implants. J. Mat. Sci. Mater. Med. 12(2), 135–139 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohner M. Calcium orthophosphates in medicine: from ceramics to calcium phosphate cements. Injury 31 (Suppl. 4), 37–47 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeGeros RZ, Parsons JR, Daculsi G et al. Significance of the porosity and physical chemistry of calcium phosphate ceramics: biodegradation-rioresorption. In: Bioceramics: Material Characteristics versus in vivo Behaviour (Vol. 523). Ducheyne P, Lemons JE ( Eds). Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 268–271 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Jarcho M. Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 157, 259–278 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frayssinet P, Fages J, Bonel G, Rouquet N. Biotechnology, material sciences and bone repair. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 8, 17–25 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Perry CR. Bone repair techniques, bone graft, and bone graft substitutes. Clin. Orthop. 360, 71–86 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay BKB, Patel VV, Bradford DS. Calcium sulfate- and calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes - Mimicry of the mineral phase of bone. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 30(4), 615–623 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khan SN, Tomin E, Lane JM. Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 31(3), 389–398 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeGeros RZ. Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 395, 81–98 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hench LL. Bioactive materials: the potential for tissue regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 41(4), 511–518 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner M. Physical and chemical aspects of calcium phosphates used in spinal surgery. Eur. Spine J. 10, S114–S121 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dreesmann H. Knochenplombierung bei Hohlenforigen Defekten des Knochens. Beitr. Klin. Chir. 9, 804–810 (1892).
   Google Scholar
• Nyström G. Plugging bone cavities with rivanol-plaster porridge. Acta Chir. Scand. 63, 296 (1928).
   Google Scholar
• Edberg E. Some experiences of filling osseous cavities with plaster. Acta Chir. Scand. 67, 313–319 (1931).
   Google Scholar
• Nielson A. The filling of infected and sterile bone cavities by means of plaster of paris. Acta Chir. Scand. 91, 17–27 (1944).
   Google Scholar
• Kovacevic B. Ein Beitrag zum Problem der Hamartogenen Osteomyelitis. Arch. klin. Chir. 276, 432–443 (1953).
   Google Scholar
• Peltier LF. The use of plaster of paris to fill defects in bone. Clin. Orthop. 21, 1–29 (1961).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blaha JD. Calcium sulfate bone-void filler. Orthopedics 21(9), 1017–1019 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gitelis S, Piasecki P, Turner T, Haggard W, Charters J, Urban R. Use of a calcium sulfate-based bone graft substitute for benign bone lesions. Orthopedics 24(2), 162–166 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly CM, Wilkins RM, Gitelis S, Hartjen C, Watson JT, Kim PT. The use of a surgical grade calcium sulfate as a bone graft substitute: results of a multicenter trial. Clin. Orthop. 382, 42–50 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Turner TM, Urban RM, Gitelis S, Kuo KN, Andersson GBJ. Radiographic and histologic assessment of calcium sulfate in experimental animal models and clinical use as a resorbable bone-graft substitute, a bone-graft expander, and a method for local antibiotic delivery - One institution's experience. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 83A, 8–18 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Sidqui M, Collin P, Vitte C, Forest T N. Osteoblast adherence and resorption activity of isolated osteoclasts on calcium-sulfate hemihydrate. Biomaterials 16(17), 1327–1332 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bignon A, Chouteau J, Chevalier J et al. Effect of micro- and macroporosity of bone substitutes on their mechanical properties and cellular response. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 14(12), 1089–1097 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggli PSM, Moller WP, Schenk RKM. Porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate cylinders with two different pore size ranges implanted in the cancellous bone of rabbits: a comparative histomorphometric and histologic study of bony ingrowth and implant substitution. [Report]. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 232, 127–138 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing KA, Annaz B, Saeed S, Revell PA, Buckland T. Microporosity enhances bioactivity of synthetic bone graft substitutes. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 16(5), 467–475 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmström J. On Bone Regeneration in Porous Bioceramics. Thesis. University of Gothenburg (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hing KA, Saeed S, Annaz B, Buckland T, Revell PA. Microporosity affects bioactivity of macroporous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes. Key Eng. Mater. 273–276 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Annaz B, Hing KA, Kayser M, Buckland T, Silvio LD. Porosity variation in hydroxyapatite and osteoblast morphology: a scanning electron microscopy study. J. Microsc. 215(1), 100–110 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rouahi M, Gallet O, Champion E, Dentzer J, Hardouin P, Anselme K. Influence of hydroxyapatite microstructure on human bone cell response. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 78A(2), 222–235 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Boyde A, Corsi A, Quarto R, Cancedda R, Bianco P. Osteoconduction in large macroporous hydroxyapatite ceramic implants: evidence for a complementary integration and disintegration mechanism. Bone 24(6), 579–589 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hing KA, Best SM, Tanner KE, Bonfield W, Revell PA. Mediation of bone ingrowth in porous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 68A(1), 187–200 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M. Injectable Calcium Sulphate and Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes. Thesis. Lund University (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Wang JS, Wielanek L, Tanner KE, Lidgren L. Biodegradation and biocompatability of a calcium sulphate-hydroxyapatite bone substitute. J. Bone Joint Surg. Brit. 86B(1), 120–125 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Voor MJ, Borden J, Burden RL Jr, Waddell SW. Cancellous bone defect healing with a novel calcium sulfate - hydroxyapatite composite injectable bone substitute. Presented at: 56th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, New Orleans (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Wang JS, Zhang M, McCarthy I, Tanner KE, Lidgren L. Biomechanics and bone integration on injectable calcium sulphate and hydroxyapatite in large bone defect in rat. Presented at: 52nd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Chicago (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg F, Lidén E, Sandell V. Antibiotic elution and bone remodeling with a novel bone substitute impregnated with gentamicin. Presented at: 31st Annual Meeting of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society, Montreux (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Rawlings CE III, Wilkins RH, Hanker JS, Georgiade NG, Harrelson JM. Evaluation in cats of a new material for cranioplasty: a composite of plaster of Paris and hydroxylapatite. J. Neurosurg. 69, 269–275 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang JS, Goodman S, Aspenberg P. Bone formation in the presence of phagocytosable hydroxyapatite particles. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 304, 272–279 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Sato S, Koshino T, Saito T. Osteogenic response of rabbit tibia to hydroxyapatite particle-Plaster of Paris mixture. Biomaterials 19, 1895–1900 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur. Spine J. 10(2), S96–S101 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Härtter S. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Einfluβ von Kalziumsulfat auf die Knochenheilung bei Kaninchen. Thesis. Fachverlag Köhler, Giessen (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Wielanek L, Wang JS, Tanner KE, Lidgren L. Factors influencing the compressive strength of an injectable calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite cement. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 14(5), 399–404 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JS, Nilsson M, McCarthy I, Tanner KE, Lidgren L. Resorption and bone ingrowth of injectable bone substitute: a comparative study in rabbit. Presented at European Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Meeting, Helsinki (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Ricci JL, Alexander H, Nadkarni P et al. Biological mechanism of calcium-sulfate replacement by bone. In: Bone Engineering. Davies JE ( Ed.). Em Squared Inc., 332–344 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Cabañas MV, Rodríguez-Lorenzo LM, Vallet-Regí M. Setting behavior and in vitro bioactivity of hydroxyapatite/calcium sulfate cements. Chem. Mater. 14(8), 3550–3555 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Payne JM, Cobb CM, Rapley JW, Killoy WJ, Spencer P. Migration of human gingival fibroblasts over guided tissue regeneration barrier materials. J. Periodontol. 67(3), 236–244 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park EK, Lee YE, Choi JY et al. Cellular biocompatibility and stimulatory effects of calcium metaphosphate on osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived stromal cells. Biomaterials 25(17), 3403–3411 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas MV , Puleo DA. Calcium sulfate: Properties and clinical applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater. 88B, 597–610 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strocchi R, Orsini G, Iezzi G et al. Bone regeneration with calcium sulfate: evidence for increased angiogenesis. J. Oral Implantol. 28(6), 273–278 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 150(3698), 893–899 (1965).
   Google Scholar
• Hench LL. Biomaterials: a forecast for the future. Biomaterials 19(16), 1419–1423 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh WR, Morberg P, Yu Y et al. Response of a calcium sulfate bone graft substitute in a confined cancellous defect. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 406, 228–236 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Lazáry Á, Balla B, Kósa JP et al. Effect of gypsum on proliferation and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 mouse osteoblastic cells. Biomaterials 28(3), 393–399 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang JS, Zampelis V, Lidgren L, Isaksson H, Tägil M. The effect of a biphasic injectable bone substitute on the interface strength in a rabbit knee prosthesis model. Presented at European Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Meeting, Amsterdam (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Truedsson A, Wang JS, Lindberg P, Gordh M, Sunzel B, Warfvinge G. Bone substitute as an on-lay graft on rat tibia. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 21(4), 424–429 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abramo A, Geijer M, Kopylov P, Tägil M. Osteotomy of distal radius fracture malunion using a fast remodeling bone substitute consisting of calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 92B(1), 281–286 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tieghi RM, Consorti GM, Clauser LCM. Contouring of the forehead irregularities (washboard effect) with bone biomaterial. [Miscellaneous Article]. J. Craniofacial Surg. 23(3), 932–933 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schindler OS, Cannon SR, Briggs TWR, Blunn GW. Use of a novel bone graft substitute in peri-articular bone tumours of the knee. The Knee 14(6), 458–464 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauschmann M, Vogl T, Verheyden A et al. Bioceramic vertebral augmentation with a calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite composite (Cerament™ SpineSupport) in vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis. Eur. Spine J. 19(6), 887–892 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marcia S, Boi C, Dragani M et al. Effectiveness of a bone substitute (CERAMENTâ„¢) as an alternative to PMMA in percutaneous vertebroplasty: 1-year follow-up on clinical outcome. Eur. Spine J. 21(1), 112–118 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Masala S, Nano G, Marcia S, Muto M, Fucci FPM, Simonetti G. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures augmentation by injectable partly resorbable ceramic bone substitute (Cerament™ SpineSupport): a prospective nonrandomized study. Neuroradiology 54(6), 589–596 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siemund R, Nilsson LT, Cronqvist M, Stromqvist B. Initial Clinical experience with a new biointegrative cement for vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Intervent. Neuroradiol. 15(3), 335–340 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karr JC. Clinical case presentation: metatarsal delayed union management in diabetic foot patient with Cerament™|Bone Void Filler. J. Diabet. Foot Complications 2(3), 65–68 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Karr JC. Management of a diabetic patient presenting with forefoot osteomyelitis: the use of cerament™|bone void filler impregnated with vancomycin – an off label use. J. Diabet. Foot Complications 1(4), 94–100 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Hatten HP, Voor MJ. Bone healing using a bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute demonstrated in human vertebroplasty and with histology in a rabbit cancellous bone defect model. Intervent. Neuroradiol. 18(1), 105–113 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abramo A, Tägil M, Geijer M, Kopylov P. Osteotomy of dorsally displaced malunited fractures of the distal radius: no loss of radiographic correction during healing with a minimally invasive fixation technique and an injectable bone substitute. Acta Orthop. 79(2), 262–268 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 26(14), 1511–1515 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvarez L, Pérez-Higueras A, Quiñones D, Calvo E, Rossi RE. Vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral tumors: postprocedural outcome and quality of life. Eur. Spine J. 12(4), 356–360 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prather H, Van Dillen L, Metzler JP, Riew KD, Gilula LA. Prospective measurement of function and pain in patients with non-neoplastic compression fractures treated with vertebroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. 88(2), 334–341 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin WC, Lee YC, Lee CH et al. Refractures in cemented vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a retrospective analysis. Eur. Spine J. 17(4), 592–599 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uppin AA, Hirsch JA, Centenera LV, Pfiefer BA, Pazianos AG, Choi IS. Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. Radiology 226(1), 119–124 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin WC, Cheng TT, Lee YC et al. New vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty: retrospective analysis of risk factors. J. Vasc. Intervent. Radiol. 19(2), 225–231 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar