Progress in biopolymer-based biomaterials and their application in controlled drug delivery

References

• Halperin A, Fragneto G, Schollier A, Sferrazza M. Primary versus ternary adsorption of proteins onto PEG brushes. Langmuir 23(21), 10603–10617 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heuberger M, Drobek T, Spencer ND. Interaction Forces and morphology of a protein-resistant poly(ethylene glycol) layer. Biophys. J. 88(1), 495–504 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van TSR, Hennink WE. Biodegradable dextran hydrogels for protein delivery applications. Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 4(2), 147–164 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peng S, Derrien TL, Cui J, Xu C, Luo D. From cells to DNA materials. Mater. Today 15, 190–194 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH et al. The Path Forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311, 484–489 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheller J, Gohrs K-H, Grosse F, Conrad U. Production of spider silk proteins in tobacco and potato. Nat. Biotechnol. 19(6), 573–577 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming TJ. Polypeptide and polypeptide hybrid copolymer synthesis via NCA polymerization. Adv. Polym. Sci. 202, 1–18 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kricheldorf HR. Polypeptides and 100 years of chemistry of α-amino acid N-carboxyanhydrides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45(35), 5752–5784 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plante OJ, Palmacci ER, Seeberger PH. Automated solid-phase synthesis of oligosaccharides. Science 291(5508), 1523–1527 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statz AR, Kuang J, Barron AE, Szleifer I, Messersmith PB. Experimental and theoretical investigation of chain length and surface coverage on fouling of surface grafted polypeptoids. Biointerphases 4, FA22–FA32 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farrugia A. Safety of plasma volume expanders. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 51(3), 292–300 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herold DA, Keil K, Bruns DE. Oxidation of polyethylene glycols by alcohol dehydrogenase. Biochem. Pharmacol. 38(1), 73–76 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostuni E, Chapman RG, Holmlin RE, Takayama S, Whitesides GM. A survey of structure-property relationships of surfaces that resist the adsorption of protein. Langmuir 17(18), 5605–5620 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knop K, Hoogenboom R, Fischer D, Schubert US. Poly(ethylene glycol) in drug delivery: pros and cons as well as potential alternatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49(36), 6288–6308 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohrn R, Potthast A, Rosenau T, Sixta H, Kosma P. Synthesis and testing of a novel fluorescence label for carboxyls in carbohydrates and cellulosics. Synlett 20, 3087–3090 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Satoh H, Hayashi M, Satoh T, Kakuchi T, Kaga H, Takahashi K. Formation of anhydrosugars from polysaccharides in ionic liquids by microwave irradtion. In: Ionic Liquid Applications: Pharmaceutics, Therapeutics, and Biotechnology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 145–154 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Rudra JS, P.K. T, Hildeman DA, Jung JP, Collier JH. Immune responses to coiled coil supramolecular biomaterials. Biomaterials 31, 8475–8483 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin. Immunol. 20, 86–100 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoulders MD, Raines RT. Collagen structure and stability. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 929–958 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Yao K, Liu L et al. Evaluation of porous collagen membrane in guided tissue regeneration. Artif. Cell. Blood Sub. 27(3), 245–253 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damink LHHO, Dijkstra PJ, van Luyn JA, van Wachem PB, Nieuwenhuis P, Feijen J. Cross-linking of dermal sheep collagen using a water-soluble carbodiimide Biomaterials 17, 765–773 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damink LHHO, Dijkstra PJ, van Luyn MJA, van Wachem PB, Nieuwenhuis P, Feijen J. Glutaraldehyde as a cross-linking agent for collagen-based biomaterials. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 6(8), 460–472 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Hey KB, Lachs CM, Raxworthy MJ, Wood EJ. Crosslinked fibrous collagen for use as a dermal implant - control of the cytotoxic effect of glutaraldehyde and dimethylsuberimidate Bioetchnol. Appl. Biochem. 12(1), 85–93 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Jayakrishnan A, Jameela SR. Glutaraldehyde as a fixative in bioprostheses and drug delivery matrices. Biomaterials 17(5), 471–484 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeugolis DI, Khew ST, Yew ESY et al. Electro-spinning of pure collagen nanofibers – just an expensive way to make gelatin? Biomaterials 29(15), 2293–2305 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Giner S, Gimeno-Alcaniz JV, Ocio MJ, Lagaron JM. Comparative performance of electrospun collagen nanofibers cross-linked by means of different methods. Appl. Mater. Inter. 1, 218–223 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn AK, Yannas IV, Bonfield W. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of collagen J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 71B(2), 343–354 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra T, Sailakshmi G, Gnanamani A, Mandal AB. Di-carboxylic acid cross-linking interactions improves thermal stability and mechanical strength of reconstituted type I collagen. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 105(1), 325–330 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Usha R, Sreeram KJ, Rajaram A. Stabilization of collagen with EDC/NHS in the presence of L-lysine: a comprehensive study. Colloid. Surf. B 90, 83–90 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Xu L, Huang X, Wei S, Zhai M. Structural study and preliminary biological evaluation on the collagen hydrogel crosslinked by γ-irradiation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100A(11), 2960–2969 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins CL, Raines RT. Insights on the conformational stability of collagen. Nat. Prod. Rep. 19(1), 49–59 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotch FW, Raines RT. Self-assembly of synthetic collagen triple helices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3028–3033 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cejas MA, Kinney WA, Chen C et al. Collagen-related peptides: self-assembly of short, single strands into a functional biomaterial of micrometer scale. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 2202–2203 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires MM, Chmielewski J. Self-assembly of collagen peptides into microflorettes via metal coordination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 2706–2712 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodsky B, Baum J. Structural biology: modelling collagen diseases. Nature 453, 998–999 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuivaniemi H, Tromp G, Prockop DJ. Mutations in collagen genes: causes of rare and some common diseases in humans. FASEB J. 5, 2052–2060 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotch FW, Guzei IA, Raines RT. Stabilization of the collagen triple helix by O-methylation of hydroxyproline residues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 2952–2953 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoulders MD, Guzei IA, Raines RT. 4-Chloroprolines: synthesis, conformational analysis, and effect on the collagen triple helix. Biopolymers 89(5), 443–454 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shoulders MD, Hodges JA, Raines RT. Reciprocity of steric and stereoelectronic effects in the collagen triple helix. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128(25), 8112–8113 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoulders MD, Raines RT. Modulating collagen triple-helix stability with 4-chloro, 4-fluoro, and 4-methylprolines. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 611, 251–252 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamazaki CM, Kadoya Y, Hozumi K et al. A collagen-mimetic triple helical supramolecule that evokes integrin-dependent cell responses. Biomaterials 31, 1925–1934 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamazaki CM, Asada S, Kitagawa K, Koide T. Artificial collagen gels via self-assembly of de novo designed peptides. Peptide Science 90(6), 816–823 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Yamada S, Nagaoka H, Terajima M, Tsuda N, Hayashi Y, Yamauchi M. Effects of fish collagen peptides on collagen post-translational modifications and mineralization in an osteoblastic cell culture system. Dent. Mater. J. 32, 88–95 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banwell EF, Abelardo ES, Adams DJ et al. Rational design and application of responsive a-helical peptide hydrogels. Nat. Mater. 8, 596–600 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papapostolou D, Smith AM, Atkins EDT et al. Engineering nanoscale order into a designed protein fiber. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104(26), 10853–10858 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tronci G, Neffe AT, Pierce BF, Lendlein A. An entropy-elastic gelatin-based hydrogel system. J. Mater. Chem. 20(40), 8875–8884 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Pierce BF, Pittermann E, Ma N et al. Viability of human mesenchymal stem cells seeded on crosslinked entropy-elastic gelatin-based hydrogels. Macromol. Biosci. 12, 312–321 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu X, Ma L, Wang C, Gao C. Gelatin hydrogel prepared by photo-initiated polymerization and loaded with TGF-b1 for cartilage tissue engineering. Macromol. Biosci. 9, 1194–1201 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, Hwang CM, Yamanlar S, Khademhosseini A. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels Biomaterials 31(21), 5536–5544 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovsianikov A, Deiwick A, van Vlierberghe S et al. Laser fabrication of three-dimensional CAD scaffolds from photosensitive gelatin for applications in tissue engineering Biomacromolecules 12(4), 851–858 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce BF, Tronci G, Roessle M, Neffe AT, Jung F, Lendlein A. Photocrosslinked co-networks from glycidylmethacrylated gelatin and poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylates. Macromol. Biosci. 12(4), 484–493 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierce BF, Neffe AT, Lendlein A. Using mass spectrometry to investigate the structural features of photocrosslinked co-networks based on Gelatin and Poly(ethylene glycol) Methacrylates. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1403, 145–150 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Elvin CM, Vuocolo T, Brwonlee AG et al. A highly elastic tissue sealant based on photopolymerised gelatin. Biomaterials 31, 8323–8331 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara M, Koshimizu N, Yoshida M, Haug IJ, Ulset AST, Christensen BE. Cross-linking and depolymerisation of g-irradiated fish gelatin and porcine gelatin studied by SEC-MALLS and SDS-PAGE: a comparative study. J. Biomater. Sci. 21, 877–892 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffe AT, Zaupa A, Pierce BF, Hofmann D, Lendlein A. Knowledge-based tailoring of gelatin-based materials by functionalization with Tyrosine-derived groups. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 31(17), 1534–1539 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaupa A, Neffe AT, Pierce BF, Lendlein A, Hofmann D. A molecular dynamic analysis of gelatin as an amorphous material: prediction of mechanical properties of gelatin systems. Int. J. Artif. Organs 34(2), 139–151 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaupa A, Neffe AT, Pierce BF, Nochel U, Lendlein A. Influence of tyrosine-derived moieties and drying conditions on the formation of helices in gelatin. Biomacromolecules 12(1), 75–81 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neffe AT, Loebus A, Zaupa A, Stoetzel C, Mueller FA, Lendlein A. Gelatin functionalization with tyrosine derived moieties to increase the interaction with hydroxyapatite fillers. Acta Biomater. 7(4), 1693–1701 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jung F, Goers J, Roch T et al. Physically crosslinked gelatins do not induce angiogenesis or thrombus formation in the developing vasculature in the avian chorioallantoic membrane. Clin. Hemorheol. microcirc. 50, 55–63 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roch T, Pierce BF, Zaupa A, Jung F, Neffe AT, Lendlein A. Reducing the endotoxin burden of desaminotyrosine- and desaminotyrosyl tyrosine-functionalized gelatin. Macromol. Symp. 309–310, 182–189 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kuhbier JW, Allmeling C, Reimers K et al. Interactions between spider silk and cells--NIH/3T3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames. PloS ONE 5(8), e12032 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt H, Hillmer A, Reimers K et al. Artificial skin-culturing of different skin cell lines for generating an artificial skin substitute on cross-weaved spider silk fibres. PloS ONE 6(7), e21833 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence BD, Marchant JK, Pindrus MA, Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL. Silk film biomaterials for cornea tissue engineering. Biomaterials 30(7), 1299–1308 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal BB, Das S, Choudhury K, Kundu SC. Implication of silk film RGD availability and surface roughness on cytoskeletal organization and proliferation of primary rat bone marrow cells. Tissue Eng. A 16(7), 2391–2403 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wray LS, Hu X, Gallego J et al. Effect of processing on silk-based biomaterials: Reproducibility and biocompatibility. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 998, 89–101 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence BD, Omenetto FG, Chui K, Kaplan DL. Processing methods to control silk fibroin film biomaterial features. J. Mater. Sci. 43(21), 6967–6985 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai-ngam K, Boonkitapattarakul K, Jaipaew J, Mai-ngam B. Evaluation of the properties of silk fibroin films from the non-mulberry silkworm samia cynthia ricini for biomaterial design. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 22, 2001–2022 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Hu X, Wang X et al. Water-insoluble silk films with silk I structure. Acta Biomater. 6(4), 1380–1387 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Wang B. Biodegradation of Silk Biomaterials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10, 1514–1524 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee OJ, Lee JM, Kim JH et al. Biodegradation behavior of silk fibroin membranes in repairing tympanic membrane perforations. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100A, 2018–2026 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Zhang X, Hu X, Kaplan DL. Green Process to Prepare Silk Fibroin/Gelatin Biomaterial Scaffolds. Macromol. Biosci. 10, 289–298 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta S, Park SH, Seok GE et al. Quantifying osteogenic cell degradation of silk biomaterials. Biomacromolecules 11, 3592–3599 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SM, Pippel E, Gosele U et al. Greatly increased toughness of infiltrated spider silk. Science 324(5926), 488–492 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajkhowa R, Gil ES, Kluge J et al. Reinforcing silk scaffolds with silk particles. Macromol. Biosci. 10(6), 599–611 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva SS, Maniglio D, Motta A, Mano JF, Reis RL, Migliaresi C. Genipin-modified silk-fibroin nanometric nets. Macromol. Biosci. 8, 766–774 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim YB, Lee M. Nanostructures of b-sheet peptides: steps towards bioactive functional materials. J. Mater. Chem. 18, 723–727 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecek J, Yang J. Peptide-directed self-assembly of hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 5, 805–816 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowerman CJ, Nilsson BL. Review self-assembly of amphipathic β-sheet peptides: insights and applications. Peptide Sci. 98(3), 169–184 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Krishna OD, Kiick KL. Protein- and peptide-modified synthetic polymeric biomaterials. Peptide Sci. 94, 32–48 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Cabello JC, Martin L, Alonso M, Arias FJ, Testera AM. “Recombinamers” as advanced materials for the post-oil age. Polymer 50(22), 5159–5169 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracalello A, Santopietro V, Vassalli M et al. Design and production of a chimeric resilin-, elastin-, and collagen-like engineered polypeptide. Biomacromolecules 12(8), 2957–2965 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An B, DesRochers TM, Qin G et al. The influence of specific binding of collagen-silk chimeras to silk biomaterials on hMSC behavior. Biomaterials 34, 402–412 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Celebi B, Cloutier M, Balloni R, Manotovani D, Bandiera A. Human elastin-based recombinant biopolymers improve mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Macromol. Biosci. 12(11), 1546–1554 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang B, Yu G, Zhao X, Jiao G, Ren S, Chai W. Mechanism of mild acid hydrolysis of galactan polysaccharides with highly ordered disaccharide repeats leading to a complete series of exclusively odd-numbered oligosaccharides. FEBS J. 276(7), 2125–2137 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holme HK, Davidsen L, Kristiansen A, Smidsroed O. Kinetics and mechanisms of depolymerization of alginate and chitosan in aqueous solution. Carbohyd. Polym. 73(4), 656–664 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spuch C, Antequera D, Portero A et al. The effect of encapsulated VEGF-secreting cells on brain amyloid load and behavioral impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Biomaterials 31(21), 5608–5618 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Du KT, Fang Q et al. The use of human mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated in RGD modified alginate microspheres in the repair of myocardial infarction in the rat. Biomaterials 31(27), 7012–7020 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz C, Lecommandoux S. Polysaccharide-containing block copolymers: synthesis, properties and applications of an emerging family of glycoconjugates. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 31, 1664–1684 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prabaharan M, Mano JF. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels based on polysaccharide incorporated with thermo-responsive polymers as novel biomaterials. Macromol. Biosci. 6, 991–1008 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elchinger PH, Faugeras PA, Boens B et al. Polysaccharide: the “Click” chemistry impact. Polymers 3, 1607–1651 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskin JM, Bertozzi CR. Copper-free click chemistry: bio-orthogonal reagents for tagging azides. Aldrichimica Acta 43(1), 15–23 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Piluso S, Hiebl B, Gorb SN, Kovalev A, Lendlein A, Neffe AT. Hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels crosslinked by copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition with tailorable mechanical properties. Int. J. Artif. Organs 34(2), 192–197 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iha RK, Wooley KL, Nystrom AM, Burke DJ, Kade MJ, Hawker CJ. Applications of orthogonal “Click” chemistries in the synthesis of functional soft materials. Chem. Rev. 109(11), 5620–5686 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergy J, Fournier A, Hachet E, Auzely-Velty R. Modification of polysaccharides via thiol-ene chemistry: a versatile route to functional biomaterials. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 50, 4019–4028 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebsch N, Arany PR, Mao AS et al. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat. Mater. 9(6), 518–526 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffe AT, Kobuch KA, Maier M et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a multifunctional hyaluronic acid based hydrogel system for local application on the retina. Macromol. Symp. 309–310, 229–235 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Voepel J, Edlund U, Albertsson AC. Alkenyl-functionalized precursors for renewable hydrogels design. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 47, 3595–3606 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Voepel J, Edlund U, Albertsson AC, Percec V. Hemicellulose-based multifunctional macroinitiator for single-electron-transfer mediated living radical polymerization. Biomacromolecules 12, 253–259 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voepel J, Edlund U, Albertsson AC. A versatile single-electron-transfer mediated living radical polymerization route to glacatoglucomannan graft-copolymers with tunable hydrophilicity. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 49, 2366–2372 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Fleet R, McLeary JB, Grumel V, Weber WG, Matahwa H, Sanderson RD. RAFT mediated polysaccharide copolymers. Eur. Polym. J. 44, 2899–2911 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Östmark E, Nyström D, Malmström E. Unimolecular Nanocontainers Prepared by ROP and Subsequent ATRP from Hydroxpropylcellulose. Macromolecules 41, 4405–4415 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Wang DA, Varghese S, Sharma B et al. Multifunctional chondrointinsulphate for cartilage tissue-biomaterial integration. Nat. Mater. 6(5), 385–392 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wathier M, Stoddart SS, Sheehy MJ, Grinstaff MW. Acidic polysaccharide mimics via ring-opening metathesis polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132(45), 15887–15889 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cobucci-Ponzano B, Moracci M. Glycosynthases as tools for the production of glycan analogs of natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 29, 697–709 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeman NC. DNA in a material world. Nature 421(6921 Suppl.), 427–431 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldkamp U, Sacca B, Niemeyer CM. Dendritic DNA building blocks for amplified detection assays and biomaterials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 5996–6000 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee JB, Roh YH, Ho Um S et al. Multifunctional nanoarchitectures from DNA-based ABC monomers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 430–436 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanderson K. What to make with DNA origami. Nature 464, 158–159 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwak M, Herrmann A. Nucleic acid amphiphiles: synthesis and self-assembled nanostructures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 5475–5755 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Schnitzler T, Herrmann A. DNA Block Copolymers: functional materials for nanoscience and biomedicine. Acc. Chem. Res. 45(9), 1419–1430 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anaya M, Kwak M, Musser AJ, Müllen K, Herrmann A. Tunable Hydrophobicity in DNA micelles. Design, synthesis, and characterization of a new family of DNA amphiphiles. Chem. Eur. J. 16, 12852–12859 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campolongo MJ, Kahn JS, Cheng W, Yang D, Gupton-Campolongo T, Luo D. Adaptive DNA-based materials for switching, sensing, and logic devices. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 6113–6121 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Albertsson AC, Voepel J, Edlund U, Dahlman O, Soderqvist-Lindblad M. Design of renewable hydrogel release systems from fiberboard mill wastewater. Biomacromolecules 11(5), 1406–1411 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isoda K, Kanayama N, Miyamoto D, Takarada T, Maeda M. RAFT-generated poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-DNA block copolymers for temperature-responsive formation of polymer micelles React. Funct. Polym. 71, 367–371 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Alemdaroglu FE, Zhuang W, Zöphel L et al. Generation of multiblock Copolymers by PCR: Synthesis, Visualization and Nanomechanical Properties. Nano Lett. 9, 3658–3662 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayaz MS, Kwak M, Alemdaroglu FE, Wang J, Berger R, Herrmann A. Synthesis of DNA block copolymers with extended nucleic acid segments by enzymatic ligation: cut and paste large hybrid architectures. Chem. Communc. 47, 2243–2245 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellas E, Seiberg M, Garlick J, Kaplan DL. In vitro 3D full-thickness skin equivalent tissue model using silk and collagen biomaterials. Macromol. Biosci. 12(12), 1627–1636 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC. Chondrogenic differentiation of rat MSCs on porous scaffolds of silk fibrin/chitosan blends. Biomaterials 33, 2848–2857 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Fuentes M, Giger E, Meinel L, Merkle HP. The effect of hyaluronic acid on silk fibroin conformation. Biomaterials 29, 633–642 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Wang X, Rnjak J, Weiss AS, Kaplan DL. Biomaterials derived from silk-tropoelastin protein systems. Biomaterials 31, 8121–8131 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Li D, Zhou F, Gao C. Biological hydrogel synthesized from hyaluronic acid, gelatin and chondroitin sulfate by click chemistry. Acta Biomater. 7, 1618–1626 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz C, Louguet S, Le Meins JF, Lecommandoux S. Polysaccharide-block-polypeptide copolymer vesicles: towards synthetic viral capsides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 2572–2575 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soontornworajit B, Zhou J, Zhang ZY, Wang Y. Aptamer-functionalized in situ injectable hydrogel for controlled protein release. Biomacromolecules 11(10), 2724–2730 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orive G, Hernandez RM, Murua A, Pedraz JL. Recent advances in the use of encapsulated cells for effective delivery of therapeutics. Ther. Deliv. 1(3), 387–396 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park N, Um SH, Funabashi H, Xu JF, Luo D. A cell-free protein-producing gel. Nat. Mater. 8(5), 432–437 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crescenzi V, Cornelio L, Di Meo C, Nardecchia S, Lamanna R. Novel hydrogels via click chemistry: synthesis and potential biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8(6), 1844–1850 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong JK, Hempel G, Koling S et al. Antibody against poly(ethylene glycol) adversely affects PEG-asparaginase therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Cancer 110(1), 103–111 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu XH, Ma L, Wang CC, Gao CY. Gelatin hydrogel prepared by photo-initiated polymerization and loaded with TGF-beta 1 for cartilage tissue engineering. Macromol. Biosci. 9(12), 1194–1201 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein-Barash H, Stefanescu CF, Kohane DS. An in situ cross-linking hybrid hydrogel for controlled release of proteins. Acta Biomater. 8(5), 1703–1709 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan H, Rubin JP, Marra KG. Direct synthesis of biodegradable polysaccharide derivative hydrogels through aqueous Diels-Alder chemistry. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 32, 905–911 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira LSM, Feijen J, van Blitterswijk CA, Dijkstra PJ, Karperien M. Enzyme-catalyzed crosslinkable hydrogels: Emerging strategies for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33(5), 1281–1290 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemdaroglu FE, Alemdaroglu NC, Langguth P, Herrmann A. DNA block copolymer micelles - a combinatorial tool for cancer Nanotechnology. Adv. Mater. 20(5), 899–902 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ingle NP, Malone B, Reineke TM. Poly(glycoamidoamine)s: a broad class of carbohydrate-containing polycations for nucleic acid delivery. Trends. Biotechnol. 29(9), 443–453 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jayakumar R, Chennazhi KP, Muzzarelli RAA, Tamura H, Nair SV, Selvamurugan N. Chitosan conjugated DNA nanoparticles in gene therapy. Carbohyd. Polym. 79(1), 1–8 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Zhang Z, Zhou C, Jiao Y. Hydrophobic modifications of cationic polymers for gene delivery. Prog. Polym. Sci. 35(9), 1144–1162 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wischke C, Zimmermann J, Wessinger B et al. Poly(I:C) coated PLGA microparticles induce dendritic cell maturation. Int. J. Pharmaceut. 365(1–2), 61–68 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haidar ZS, Hamdy RC, Tabrizian M. Protein release kinetics for core-shell hybrid nanoparticles based on the layer-by-layer assembly of alginate and chitosan on liposomes. Biomaterials 29(9), 1207–1215 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabanel JM, Hildgen P. Preparation of hydrogel hollow particles for cell encapsulation by a method of polyester core degradation. J. Microencapsulation 21(4), 413–431 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wenk E, Hu X et al. Silk coatings on PLGA and alginate microspheres for protein delivery. Biomaterials 28(28), 4161–4169 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wischke C, Borchert H-H, Zimmermann J, Siebenbrodt I, Lorenzen DR. Stable cationic microparticles for enhanced model antigen delivery to dendritic cells. J. Controlled Release 114(3), 359–368 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balabushevich NG, Izumrudov VA, Larionova NI. Protein microparticles with controlled stability prepared via layer-by-layer adsorption of biopolyelectrolytes. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 54(7), 540–551 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Qi W, Yan XH, Fei JB, Wang AH, Cui Y, Li JB. Triggered release of insulin from glucose-sensitive enzyme multilayer shells. Biomaterials 30(14), 2799–2806 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geest BG, Dejugnat C, Prevot M, Sukhorukov GB, Demeester J, De Smedt SC. Self-rupturing and hollow microcapsules prepared from bio-polyelectrolyte-coated microgels. Adv. Funct. Mater. 17(4), 531–537 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Kim YS, Kim S et al. Hydrophobically modified glycol chitosan nanoparticles as carriers for paclitaxel J. Control. Release 111(1–2), 228–234 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang KS, Lu K, Yeh CS et al. Microfluidic controlling monodisperse microdroplet for 5-fluorouracil loaded genipin-gelatin microcapsules. J. Control. Release 137(1), 15–19 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altimari I, Spizzirri UG, Iemma F, Curcio M, Puoci F, Picci N. pH-sensitive drug delivery systems by radical polymerization of gelatin derivatives. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 125(4), 3006–3013 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang ZS, van Leeuwen HP, Stuart MAC, Norde W, Kleijn JM. Uptake and release kinetics of lysozyme in and from an oxidized starch polymer microgel. Soft Matter 7(21), 10377–10385 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Jay SM, Saltzman WM. Controlled delivery of VEGF via modulation of alginate microparticle ionic crosslinking. J. Control. Release 134(1), 26–34 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mørch ÝA, Donati I, Strand BL, Skjåk-Bræk G. Molecular engineering as an approach to design new functional properties of alginate. Biomacromolecules 8(9), 2809–2814 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen KA, Schirmer BC, Aachmann FL, Skjåk-Bræk G, Draget KI, Christensen BE. Novel alginates prepared by independent control of chain stiffness and distribution of G-residues: structure and gelling properties. Carbohyd. Polym. 77(4), 725–735 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Lendlein A, Neffe AT, Pierce BF, Vienken J. Why are so few degradable polymeric biomaterials currently established in clinical applications? Int. J. Artif. Organs 34(2), 71–75 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lendlein A, Wischke C. How to accelerate biomaterial development? Strategies to support the application of novel polymer-based biomaterials in implantable devices. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 8(5), 533–537 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen P-Y, McKittrick J, Meyers MA. Biological materials: functional adaptations and bioinspired designs. Prog. Mater. Sci. 57(8), 1492–1704 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky SL, Matsudeira P, Baltimore D, Darnell J. Molecular Cell Biology. W.H. Freeman, New York, NY (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Birk DE, Silver FH, Trelstad RL. Cell Biology of Extracellular Matrix. Hay ED ( Ed.). Plenum Press, NY, USA, 222 (1991).
   Google Scholar