FloTrac/Vigileo system monitoring in acute-care surgery: current and future trends

References

• Eissa D, Carton EG, Buggy DJ. Anaesthetic management of patients with severe sepsis. Br. J. Anaesth. 105(6), 734–743 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhananker SM, Ramamoorthy C, Geiduschek JM et al. Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in children: update from the Pediatric Perioperative Cardiac Arrest Registry. Anesth. Analg. 105(2), 344–350 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth. Analg. 112(6), 1392–1402 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JM. Use of echocardiography for hemodynamic monitoring. Crit. Care Med. 30(6), 1361–1364 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cholley BP, Singer M. Esophageal Doppler: noninvasive cardiac output monitor. Echocardiography 20(8), 763–769 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nusmeier A, van der Hoeven JG, Lemson J. Cardiac output monitoring in pediatric patients. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 7(4), 503–517 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendjelid K. When to recalibrate the PiCCOsystem? From a physiological point of view, the answer is simple. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 53(5), 689–690 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie C, Moores C, Thomson AJ, Nimmo AF. The effect of anaesthesia and aortic clamping on cardiac output measurement using arterial pulse power analysis during aortic aneurysm repair. Anaesthesia 65(12), 1194–1199 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hadian M, Kook Kim H, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit. Care 14(6), R212 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer J, Boldt J, Poland R, Peterson A, Manecke GR Jr. Continuous arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output using the FloTrac/Vigileo: a review and meta-analysis. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 23(3), 401–406 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conway DH, Hussain OA, Gall I. A comparison of noninvasive bioreactance with oesophageal Doppler estimation of stroke volume during open abdominal surgery: an observational study. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. (2013) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fagnoul D, Vincent JL, Backer DD. Cardiac output measurements using the bioreactance technique in critically ill patients. Crit. Care 16(6), 460 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marqué S, Cariou A, Chiche JD, Squara P. Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring. Crit. Care 13(3), R73 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit. Care Med. 37(9), 2642–2647 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Lu B, Sheng X, Jin N. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Anesth. 25(6), 904–916 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenij LJ, de Waal EE, Buhre WF. Arterial waveform analysis in anesthesia and critical care. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 24(6), 651–656 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renner J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P et al. Effect of elevated PEEP on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in a pediatric animal model. Paediatr. Anaesth. 18(12), 1170–1177 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P et al. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit. Care 14(3), R118 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheeren TW, Wiesenack C, Gerlach H, Marx G. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy guided by stroke volume and its variation in high-risk surgical patients: a prospective randomized multicentre study. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 27(3), 225–233 (2013) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsingh DS, Sanghvi C, Gamboa J, Cannesson M, Applegate RL 2nd. Outcome impact of goal directed fluid therapy during high risk abdominal surgery in low to moderate risk patients: a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 27(3), 249–257 (2012) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lichtenstein D. Lung ultrasound in acute respiratory failure an introduction to the BLUE-protocol. Minerva Anestesiol. 75(5), 313–317 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecconi M, Monti G, Hamilton MA et al. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 78(5), 527–533 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 29(2), 64–69 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannesson M, Tran NP, Cho M, Hatib F, Michard F. Predicting fluid responsiveness with stroke volume variation despite multiple extrasystoles. Crit. Care Med. 40(1), 193–198 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasdev S, Chauhan S, Choudhury M, Hote MP, Malik M, Kiran U. Arterial pressure waveform derived cardiac output FloTrac/Vigileo system (third generation software): comparison of two monitoring sites with the thermodilution cardiac output. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 26(2), 115–120 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Backer D, Marx G, Tan A et al. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 37(2), 233–240 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teng S, Kaufman J, Pan Z, Czaja A, Shockley H, da Cruz E. Continuous arterial pressure waveform monitoring in pediatric cardiac transplant, cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension patients. Intensive Care Med. 37(8), 1297–1301 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fakler U, Pauli Ch, Balling G et al. Cardiac index monitoring by pulse contour analysis and thermodilution after pediatric cardiac surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 133(1), 224–228 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476), 307–310 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 15(2), 85–91 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della RG, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies—with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit. Care 13(1), 201 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth. Analg. 111(5), 1180–1192 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, Genoni M, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br. J. Anaesth. 99(3), 329–336 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mutoh T, Ishikawa T, Nishino K, Yasui N. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol. 21(3), 218–225 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutoh T, Ishikawa T, Kobayashi S, Suzuki A, Yasui N. Performance of Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system during hyperdynamic therapy for delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surg. Neurol. Int. 3, 99 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br. J. Anaesth. 99(3), 337–342 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krejci V, Vannucci A, Abbas A, Chapman W, Kangrga IM. Comparison of calibrated and uncalibrated arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitors during orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 16(6), 773–782 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biancofiore G, Critchley LA, Lee A et al. Evaluation of a new software version of the FloTrac/Vigileo (version 3.02) and a comparison with previous data in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplant surgery. Anesth. Analg. 113(3), 515–522 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsai YF, Su BC, Lin CC, Liu FC, Lee WC, Yu HP. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis: validation of the third-generation software in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 44(2), 433–437 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M et al. A comparison of third-generation semi-invasive arterial waveform analysis with thermodilution in patients undergoing coronary surgery. Scientific World Journal 2012, 451081 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mahjoub Y, Lakhdari M, Lorne E et al. Assessment of an uncalibrated pressure waveform device’s ability to track cardiac output changes due to norepinephrine dose adjustments in patients with septic shock: a comparison with Doppler echocardiography. Ann. Fr. Anesth. Reanim. 31(9), 677–681 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su BC, Tsai YF, Chen CY et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation: validity of a third-generation device. Transplant. Proc. 44(2), 424–428 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br. J. Anaesth. 108(4), 615–622 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meng L, Tran NP, Alexander BS et al. The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal Doppler cardiac output measurements. Anesth. Analg. 113(4), 751–757 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metzelder S, Coburn M, Fries M et al. Performance of cardiac output measurement derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy. Br. J. Anaesth. 106(6), 776–784 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slagt C, de Leeuw MA, Beute J et al. Cardiac output measured by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis by recently released software version 3.02 versus thermodilution in septic shock. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 27(2), 171–177 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marqué S, Gros A, Chimot L et al. Cardiac output monitoring in septic shock: evaluation of the third-generation Flotrac-Vigileo(®). J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 27(3), 273–279 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suehiro K, Tanaka K, Funao T et al. Systemic vascular resistance has an impact on the reliability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system in measuring cardiac output and tracking cardiac output changes. Br. J. Anaesth. 111(2), 170–177 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Singer M, Chiche JD. Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med. 35(10), 1801–1808 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar