Non-invasive assessment of gestational hemodynamics: benefits and limitations of impedance cardiography versus other techniques

References

• Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, Marcus H, Diamond G, Chonette D. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N. Engl. J. Med. 283(9), 447–451 (1970).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters SG, Afessa B, Decker PA, Schroeder DR, Offord KP, Scott JP. Increased risk associated with pulmonary artery catheterization in the medical intensive care unit. J. Crit. Care 18(3), 166–171 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M et al. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366(9484), 472–477 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura HO, Taler SJ, Strobeck JE. Hypertension as a hemodynamic disease: the role of impedance cardiography in diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic decision making. Am. J. Hypertens. 18(2 Pt 2), 26S–43S (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp. Med. 37(12), 1208–1212 (1966).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Secher NJ, Arnsbo P, Andersen LH, Thomsen A. Measurements of cardiac stroke volume in various body positions in pregnancy and during Caesarean section: a comparison between thermodilution and impedance cardiography. Scand. J. Clin. Lab Invest. 39(6), 569–576 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaki DI, Greenspoon JS, Ouzounian JG. Measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy by thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution. A preliminary report. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 161(3), 680–684 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomsin K, Mesens T, Molenberghs G, Gyselaers W. Impedance cardiography in uncomplicated pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: a reliability study. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 32(7), 630–634 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomsin K, Mesens T, Molenberghs G, Gyselaers W. Venous pulse transit time in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Reprod. Sci. 19(4), 431–436 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moertl MG, Schlembach D, Papousek I et al. Hemodynamic evaluation in pregnancy: limitations of impedance cardiography. Physiol. Meas. 33(6), 1015–1026 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank O. The basic shape of the arterial pulse. First treatise: mathematical analysis. 1899. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 22(3), 255–277 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Linton RA, Band DM, Haire KM. A new method of measuring cardiac output in man using lithium dilution. Br. J. Anaesth. 71(2), 262–266 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valtier B, Cholley BP, Belot JP, de la Coussaye JE, Mateo J, Payen DM. Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output in critically ill patients using transesophageal Doppler. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 158(1), 77–83 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schober P, Loer SA, Schwarte LA. Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology. Anesth. Analg. 109(2), 340–353 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 113(5), 1220–1235 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 15(2), 167–184 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu BA, Andrade MJ, Badano LP et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for training, competence, and quality improvement in echocardiography. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 10(8), 893–905 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart WJ, Aurigemma GP, Bierman FZ et al. Guidelines for training in adult cardiovascular medicine. Core Cardiology Training Symposium (COCATS). Task Force 4: training in echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 25(1), 16–19 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M et al. A comparison of the Nexfin(R) and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia 67(4), 377–383 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keren H, Burkhoff D, Squara P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 293(1), H583–H589 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein DP. A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: theory and rationale. Crit. Care Med. 14(10), 904–909 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sramek BB. Cardiac output by electrical impedance. Med. Electron. 13(2), 93–97 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernstein DP. Continuous noninvasive real-time monitoring of stroke volume and cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance. Crit. Care Med. 14(10), 898–901 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petter H, Erik A, Bjorn E, Goran R. Measurement of cardiac output with non-invasive Aesculon impedance versus thermodilution. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging. 31(1), 39–47 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qiu-Jin X, Zhen W, Ming-Xing K, Ping W, Pei L, Jian-Feng J. Thoracic impedance change equation deduced on the basis of parallel impedance model and Ohm's law. Med. Phys. 39(2), 1042–1045 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van de Water JM, Miller TW, Vogel RL, Mount BE, Dalton ML. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology? Chest 123(6), 2028–2033 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomsin K, Mesens T, Molenberghs G, Gyselaers W. Diurnal and position-induced variability of impedance cardiography measurements in healthy subjects. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging. 31(2), 145–150 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malfatto G, Branzi G, Giglio A et al. Transthoracic bioimpedance and brain natriuretic peptide levels accurately indicate additional diastolic dysfunction in patients with chronic advanced systolic heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 12(9), 928–935 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verhoeve P, Cadwell C, Tsadok S. Reproducibility of noninvasive bioimpedance measurements of cardiac funtion. Presented at: Second Annual meeting of the heart failure society of America. Boca Raton, FL, 13–16 September 1998.
   Google Scholar
• van Oppen AC, van der Tweel I, Bruinse HW. Reproducibility of estimated cardiovascular function by transthoracic bioimpedance cardiography in healthy volunteers. Int. J. Biomed. Comput. 37(1), 15–18 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz M, Climie R, Nikolic S, Ahuja K, Sharman J. Reproducibility of cardia output derived by impedance cardiography during postural changes and exercise. Artery Res. 6(2), 78–84 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Silver MA, Cianci P, Brennan S, Longeran-Thomas H, Ahmad F. Evaluation of impedance cardiography as an alternative to pulmonary artery catheterization in critically ill patients. Congest. Heart Fail. 10( 2 Suppl. 2), 17–21 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherhag A, Kaden JJ, Kentschke E, Sueselbeck T, Borggrefe M. Comparison of impedance cardiography and thermodilution-derived measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output at rest and during exercise testing. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 19(2), 141–147 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakimets J, Jensen L. Evaluation of impedance cardiography: comparison of NCCOM3-R7 with Fick and thermodilution methods. Heart Lung 24(3), 194–206 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jakovljevic DG, Moore S, Hallsworth K, Fattakhova G, Thoma C, Trenell MI. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance and bioreactance methods at rest and during exercise. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 26(2), 63–68 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maurer MM, Burkhoff D, Maybaum S et al. A multicenter study of noninvasive cardiac output by bioreactance during symptom-limited exercise. J. Card. Fail. 15(8), 689–699 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers J, Gujja P, Neelagaru S, Burkhoff D. Cardiac output and cardiopulmonary responses to exercise in heart failure: application of a new bio-reactance device. J. Card. Fail. 13(8), 629–636 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belardinelli R, Ciampani N, Costantini C, Blandini A, Purcaro A. Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Cardiol. 77(15), 1293–1301 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drazner MH, Thompson B, Rosenberg PB et al. Comparison of impedance cardiography with invasive hemodynamic measurements in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Cardiol. 89(8), 993–995 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Scholten RJ, Goovaerts HG, Heethaar RM. A meta-analysis of three decades of validating thoracic impedance cardiography. Crit. Care Med. 27(6), 1203–1213 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung GL, Fedullo PF, Kinninger K, Johnson W, Channick RN. Comparison of impedance cardiography to direct Fick and thermodilution cardiac output determination in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Congest. Heart Fail. 10( 2 Suppl. 2), 7–10 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang DJ, Gottlieb SS. Impedance cardiography: more questions than answers. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 8(3), 180–186 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Waal EE, Konings MK, Kalkman CJ, Buhre WF. Assessment of stroke volume index with three different bioimpedance algorithms: lack of agreement compared to thermodilution. Intensive Care Med. 34(4), 735–739 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cotter G, Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E et al. Accurate, noninvasive continuous monitoring of cardiac output by whole-body electrical bioimpedance. Chest 125(4), 1431–1440 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvekot JJ, Peeters LL. Maternal cardiovascular hemodynamic adaptation to pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 49( Suppl. 12), S1–S14 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Dennis AT, Castro J, Carr C, Simmons S, Permezel M, Royse C. Haemodynamics in women with untreated pre-eclampsia. Anaesthesia 67(10), 1105–1118 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayad S, Tetzlaff JE. Massive pulmonary embolism in a patient undergoing Cesarean delivery. J. Clin. Anesth. 24(7), 582–585(2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manivannan S, Dadlani G, Parsons M et al. Surgical repair of atrial septal defect with severe pulmonary hypertension during pregnancy: a case report with literature review. Cardiol. Young. 22(5), 493–498 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh SI, Brooks C, Dobkowski W. General anesthesia using remifentanil for Cesarean delivery in a parturient with Marfan's syndrome. Can. J. Anaesth. 55(8), 526–531 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith IJ, Gillham MJ. Fulminant peripartum cardiomyopathy rescue with extracorporeal membranous oxygenation. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 18(2), 186–188 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajj-Chahine J, Jayle C, Tomasi J, Corbi P. Successful surgical management of massive pulmonary embolism during the second trimester in a parturient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 11(5), 679–681 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Easterling TR, Watts DH, Schmucker BC, Benedetti TJ. Measurement of cardiac output during pregnancy: validation of Doppler technique and clinical observations in preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. 69(6), 845–850 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W, Rokey R, Cotton DB. Noninvasive maternal stroke volume and cardiac output determinations by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 158(3 Pt 1), 505–510 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Easterling TR, Carlson KL, Schmucker BC, Brateng DA, Benedetti TJ. Measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy by Doppler technique. Am. J. Perinatol. 7(3), 220–222 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Oppen AC, van der Tweel I, Duvekot JJ, Bruinse HW. Use of cardiac index in pregnancy: is it justified? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 173(3 Pt 1), 923–928 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contreras G, Gutierrez M, Beroiza T et al. Ventilatory drive and respiratory muscle function in pregnancy. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 144(4), 837–841 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heethaar RM, van Oppen AC, Ottenhoff FA, Brouwer FA, Bruinse HW. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance: suitable for monitoring stroke volume during pregnancy? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 58(2), 183–190 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• San Frutos L, Engels V, Zapardiel I et al. Hemodynamic changes during pregnancy and postpartum: a prospective study using thoracic electrical bioimpedance. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 24(11), 1333–1340 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milsom I, Forssman L, Biber B, Dottori O, Sivertsson R. Measurement of cardiac stroke volume during cesarean section: a comparison between impedance cardiography and the dye dilution technique. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 27(5), 421–426 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milsom I, Forssman L, Sivertsson R, Dottori O. Measurement of cardiac stroke volume by impedance cardiography in the last trimester of pregnancy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 62(5), 473–479 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterling TR, Benedetti TJ. Measurement of cardiac output by impedance technique. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 163(3), 1104–1106 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark SL, Southwick J, Pivarnik JM, Cotton DB, Hankins GD, Phelan JP. A comparison of cardiac index in normal term pregnancy using thoracic electrical bio-impedance and oxygen extraction (Fick) techniques. Obstet. Gynecol. 83(5 Pt 1), 669–672 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robson SC, Hunter S, Boys RJ, Dunlop W. Serial study of factors influencing changes in cardiac output during human pregnancy. Am. J. Physiol. 256(4 Pt 2), H1060–H1065(1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flo K, Wilsgaard T, Vartun A, Acharya G. A longitudinal study of the relationship between maternal cardiac output measured by impedance cardiography and uterine artery blood flow in the second half of pregnancy. BJOG 117(7), 837–844 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Volman MN, Rep A, Kadzinska I et al. Haemodynamic changes in the second half of pregnancy: a longitudinal, noninvasive study with thoracic electrical bioimpedance. BJOG 114(5), 576–581 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Oppen AC, van der Tweel I, Alsbach GP, Heethaar RM, Bruinse HW. A longitudinal study of maternal hemodynamics during normal pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 88(1), 40–46 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mabie WC, DiSessa TG, Crocker LG, Sibai BM, Arheart KL. A longitudinal study of cardiac output in normal human pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 170(3), 849–856 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyselaers W, Molenberghs G, Mesens T, Peeters L. Maternal hepatic vein Doppler velocimetry during uncomplicated pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 35(8), 1278–1283(2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng SW, Chou HC, Tsou KI, Fang LJ, Tsao PN. Delivery before 32 weeks of gestation for maternal pre-eclampsia: neonatal outcome and 2-year developmental outcome. Early Hum. Dev. 76(1), 39–46 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Dadelszen P, Menzies JM, Payne B, Magee LA. Predicting adverse outcomes in women with severe pre-eclampsia. Semin. Perinatol. 33(3), 152–157 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Easterling TR, Benedetti TJ, Carlson KL, Watts DH. Measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy by thermodilution and impedance techniques. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 96(1), 67–69 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• da Silva EG, Carvalhaes MA, Hirakawa HS, Peracoli JC. Bioimpedance in pregnant women with preeclampsia. Hypertens. Pregnancy 29(4), 357–365 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish MR, Laye MR, Wood T et al. Impedance cardiography facilitates differentiation of severe and superimposed preeclampsia from other hypertensive disorders. Hypertens. Pregnancy 31(3), 327–340 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman RB, Pierre H, Scardo J. Thoracic-fluid conductivity in peripartum women with pulmonary edema. Obstet. Gynecol. 94(1), 48–51 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendrickson K. Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring. AACN Clin. Issues. 10(3), 419–424 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sodolski T, Kutarski A. Impedance cardiography: a valuable method of evaluating haemodynamic parameters. Cardiol. J. 14(2), 115–126 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hett DA, Jonas MM. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring. Intensive Crit. Care Nurs. 20(2), 103–108 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Meer BJ, de Vries JP, Schreuder WO, Bulder ER, Eysman L, de Vries PM. Impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery patients: abnormal body weight gives unreliable cardiac output measurements. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 41(6), 708–712 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirschl MM, Kittler H, Woisetschlager C et al. Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement. Crit. Care Med. 28(6), 1798–1802 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballestero Y, Lopez-Herce J, Urbano J et al. Measurement of cardiac output in children by bioreactance. Pediatr. Cardiol. 32(4), 469–472 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor K, La Rotta G, McCrindle BW, Manlhiot C, Redington A, Holtby H. A comparison of cardiac output by thoracic impedance and direct Fick in children with congenital heart disease undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 25(5), 776–779 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Wilde RB, Schreuder JJ, van den Berg PC, Jansen JR. An evaluation of cardiac output by five arterial pulse contour techniques during cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 62(8), 760–768 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa MG, Della Rocca G, Chiarandini P et al. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement in hyperdynamic conditions: pulmonary artery catheter vs lithium dilution technique. Intensive Care Med. 34(2), 257–263 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irlbeck M, Forst H, Briegel J, Haller M, Peter K. Continuous measurement of cardiac output with pulse contour analysis. Anaesthesist. 44(7), 493–500 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Pompei L, Coccia C, Pietropaoli P. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br. J. Anaesth. 88(3), 350–356 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Coccia C et al. Cardiac output monitoring: aortic transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis agree with standard thermodilution methods in patients undergoing lung transplantation. Can. J. Anaesth. 50(7), 707–711 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamashita K, Nishiyama T, Yokoyama T, Abe H, Manabe M. The effects of vasodilation on cardiac output measured by PiCCO. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 22(5), 688–692(2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br. J. Anaesth. 82(4), 525–530 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bendjelid K, Marx G, Kiefer N et al. Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: validation in critically ill patients. Br. J. Anaesth. 111(4), 573–579 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godje O, Hoke K, Goetz AE et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit. Care Med. 30(1), 52–58 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubenek-Turconi SI, Craciun M, Miclea I, Perel A. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. Anesth. Analg. 117(2), 366–372 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Spoel AG, Voogel AJ, Folkers A, Boer C, Bouwman RA. Comparison of noninvasive continuous arterial waveform analysis (Nexfin) with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for monitoring of cardiac output. J. Clin. Anesth. 24(4), 304–309 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Dib JC, Dubois C. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med. 33(7), 1191–1194 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spiess BD, Patel MA, Soltow LO, Wright IH. Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 15(5), 567–573 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woltjer HH, Bogaard HJ, Scheffer GJ, van der Spoel HI, Huybregts MA, de Vries PM. Standardization of non-invasive impedance cardiography for assessment of stroke volume: comparison with thermodilution. Br. J. Anaesth. 77(6), 748–752 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ziegler D, Grotti L. Comparison of cardiac output measurements by TEB vs Intermettent bolus thermodilution in mechanical ventilated patients. American college of chest physicians. Chest 116(4) ( Suppl. 2), 281S (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Sageman WS, Riffenburgh RH, Spiess BD. Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 16(1), 8–14 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albert NM, Hail MD, Li J, Young JB. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure. Am. J. Crit. Care. 13(6), 469–479 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamath SA, Drazner MH, Tasissa G, Rogers JG, Stevenson LW, Yancy CW. Correlation of impedance cardiography with invasive hemodynamic measurements in patients with advanced heart failure: the BioImpedance CardioGraphy (BIG) substudy of the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) Trial. Am. Heart J. 158(2), 217–223 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonelli AR, Alnuaimat H, Li N, Carrie R, Mubarak KK. Value of impedance cardiography in patients studied for pulmonary hypertension. Lung 189(5), 369–375 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kieback AG, Borges AC, Schink T, Baumann G, Laule M. Impedance cardiography versus invasive measurements of stroke volume index in patients with chronic heart failure. Int. J. Cardiol. 143(2), 211–213 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt C, Theilmeier G, Van Aken H et al. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output. Br. J. Anaesth. 95(5), 603–610 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer NJ, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Kamp O, de Vries PM. Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output: two methods compared in patients with mitral regurgitation. Angiology 50(2), 95–101 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fellahi JL, Caille V, Charron C, Deschamps-Berger PH, Vieillard-Baron A. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac index in healthy volunteers: a comparison between thoracic impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography. Anesth. Analg. 108(5), 1553–1559 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame J, Ohana P, Aaronoff M, Seto T. Noninvasive cardiac monitoring in pregnancy: impedance cardiography versus echocardiography. J. Perinatol. 33(9), 675–680 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar