Instrumented hip joint replacements, femoral replacements and femoral fracture stabilizers

References

• Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes. in the Swedish hip arthroplasty register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93-B(7):867-87
   Google Scholar
• Bergen H. Report June 2010. The Norwegian arthroplasty register. 2010
   Google Scholar
• Garellick G, Karrholm J, Rogmark C, et al. Annual report 2011. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. 2011
   Google Scholar
• Porter M, Borroff M, Gregg P, et al. 10th annual report 2013. National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. 2013
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg 2007;89(4):780-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton EW, Namba RS, Maletis GB, et al. A prospective study of 80,000 total joint and 5000 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in a community-based registry in the united states. J Bone Joint Surg 2010;92(2):117-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, et al. Revision rates after total joint replacement – cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Joint Surg 2011;93-B(3):293-7
   Google Scholar
• Ong KL, Lau E, Suggs J, et al. Risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat R 2010;468(11):3070-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpott A, Weston-Simons JS, Grammatopoulos G, et al. Predictive outcomes of revision total hip replacement – a consecutive series of 1176 patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Maturitas 2014;77(2):185-90
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, et al. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement – national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat R 2009;467(10):2606-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozic KJ, Lau E, Ong K, et al. Risk factors for early revision after primary total hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients. Clin Orthop Relat R 2014;472(2):449-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrama J, Espehaug B, Hallan G, et al. Risk of revision for infection in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis: A prospective, population-based study on 108,786 hip and knee joint arthroplasties from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. Arthritis Care Res 2010;62(4):473-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozic KJ, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Estimating risk in medicare patients with THA – an electronic risk calculator for periprosthetic joint infection and mortality. Clin Orthop Relat R 2013;471(2):574-83
   Google Scholar
• Rydell NW. Forces acting in the femoral head-prosthesis. A study on strain gauge supplied prostheses in living persons. Acta Orthop Scand 1966;37(Suppl 88):1-132
   Google Scholar
• Heller MO, Bergmann G, Kassi JP, et al. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech 2005;38(5):1155-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller MO, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, et al. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech 2001;34(7):883-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burny F, Donkerwolcke M, Moulart F, et al. Concept, design and fabrication of smart orthopedic implants. Med Eng Phys 2000;22(7):469-79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledet EH, D’Lima D, Westerhoff P, et al. Implantable sensor technology: from research to clinical practice. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 2012;20(6):383-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida H, Faust A, Wilckens J, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic hip contact area and pressure distribution during activities of daily living. J Biomech 2006;39(11):1996-2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah AD, Taylor SJ, Hua J. Correlation of radiographic and telemetric data from massive implant fixations. J Biomech 2006;39(7):1304-14
   Google Scholar
• Rubash HE, Sinha RK, Shanbhag AS, Kim S. Pathogenesis of bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1998;29(2):173-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvizi J, Mortazavi SJ. Massive femoral bone loss: solutions of last resort. Semin Arthroplasty 2010;21(1):51-6
   Google Scholar
• Carlson CE. A proposed method for measuring pressures on the human hip joint. Exp Mech 1971;11(11):499-506
   Google Scholar
• Carlson CE, Mann RW, Harris WH. A look at the prosthesis-cartilage interface: design of a hip prosthesis containing pressure transducers. J Biomed Mater Res 1974;8(4):261-9
   Google Scholar
• Carlson CE, Mann RW, Harris WH. A radio telemetry device for monitoring cartilage surface pressures in the human hip. IEEE Trans Bio-med Eng 1974;21(4):257-64
   Google Scholar
• Rushfeldt PD, Mann RW, Harris WH. Influence of cartilage geometry on the pressure distribution in the human hip joint. Science 1979;204(4391):413-15
   Google Scholar
• Rushfeldt PD, Mann RW, Harris WH. Improved techniques for measuring in vitro the geometry and pressure distribution in the human acetabulum – II. Instrumented endoprosthesis measurement of articular surface pressure distribution. J Biomech 1981;14(5):315-23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodge WA, Fijan RS, Carlson KL, et al. Contact pressures in the human hip joint measured in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986;83(9):2879-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge WA, Carlson KL, Fijan RS, et al. Contact pressures from an instrumented hip endoprosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1989;71(9):1378-86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mann RW, Burgess RG. A instrumented prosthesis for measuring pressure on acetabular cartilage in vivo. In: Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, editors. Implantable telemetry in orthopaedics. Freie Universität; Berlin, Germany: 1990. p. 65-75
   Google Scholar
• Mann RW, Hodge WA. In vivo pressures on acetabular cartilage following endoprosthesis surgery, during recovery and rehabilitation, and in the activities of daily living. In: Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, editors. Implantable telemetry in orthopaedics. Freie Universität; Berlin, Germany: 1990. p. 181-204
   Google Scholar
• Carlson KL. Human hip joint mechanics – an investigation into the effects of femoral head endoprosthetic replacements using in vivo and in vitro pressure data. Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; London, UK: 1993
   Google Scholar
• Tackson SJ, Krebs DE, Harris BA. Acetabular pressures during hip arthritis exercises. Arthritis Care Res 1997;10(5):308-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGibbon CA, Krebs DE, Mann RW. In vivo hip pressures during cane and load-carrying gait. Arthritis Care Res 1997;10(5):300-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGibbon CA, Krebs DE, Trahan CA, et al. Cartilage degeneration in relation to repetitive pressure – case study of a unilateral hip hemiarthroplasty patient. J Arthroplasty 1999;14(1):52-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs DE, Elbaum L, Riley PO, et al. Exercise and gait effects on in vivo hip contact pressures. Phys Ther 1991;71(4):301-9
   Google Scholar
• Strickland EM, Fares M, Krebs DE, et al. In vivo acetabular contact pressures during rehabilitation, part I: acute phase. Phys Ther 1992;72(10):691-9
   Google Scholar
• Givens-Heiss DL, Krebs DE, Riley PO, et al. In vivo acetabular contact pressures during rehabilitation, part II: postacute phase. Phys Ther 1992;72(10):700-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman RM, English TA, Kilvington M. An implantable FM telemetry system for measuring forces on prosthetic hip joints. In: Amlaner CJ Jr, Macdonald DW, editors. A handbook on biotelemetry and radio tracking. Pergamon Press; Oxford, UK: 1979. p. 297-306
   Google Scholar
• English TA, Kilvington M. In vivo records of hip loads using a femoral implant with telemetric output (a preliminary report). J Biomed Eng 1979;1(2):111-15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilvington M, Goodman RM. In vivo hip joint forces recorded on a strain gauged ‘English’ prosthesis using an implanted transmitter. Eng Med 1981;10(4):175-87
   Google Scholar
• Puers R, Catrysse M, Vandevoorde G, et al. A telemetry system for the detection of hip prosthesis loosening by vibration analysis. Sensor. Actuat A Phys 2000;85(1-3):42-7
   Google Scholar
• Davy DT, Kotzar GM, Brown RH, et al. Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1988;70(1):45-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy DT, Kotzar GM, Berilla J, Brown RH. Telemeterized orthopaedic implant work at case Western Reserve University. In: Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, editors. Implantable telemetry in orthopaedics. Freie Universität; Berlin, Germany: 1990. p. 205-19
   Google Scholar
• Kotzar GM, Davy DT, Goldberg VM, et al. Telemeterized in vivo hip joint force data: a report on two patients after total hip surgery. J Orthop Res 1991;9(5):621-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Davy DT, et al. Comparison of hip force calculations and measurements in the same patient. J Arthroplasty 1994;9(1):45-51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotzar GM, Davy DT, Berilla J, Goldberg VM. Torsional loads in the early postoperative period following total hip replacement. J Orthop Res 1995;13(6):945-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Siraky J, et al. Multichannel strain gauge telemetry for orthopaedic implants. J Biomech 1988;21(2):169-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graichen F, Bergmann G. Four-channel telemetry system for in vivo measurement of hip joint forces. J Biomed Eng 1991;13(5):370-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Instrumentation of a hip joint prosthesis. In: Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, editors. Implantable telemetry in orthopaedics. Freie Universität; Berlin: 1990. p. 35-63
   Google Scholar
• Graichen F, Bergmann G, Rohlmann A. Dual 8 channel telemetry system for in vivo load measurements with two instrumented implants. In: Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, editors. Implantable telemetry in orthopaedics. Freie Universität; Berlin, Germany: 1990. p. 153-62
   Google Scholar
• Graichen F, Bergmann G, Rohlmann A. Hip endoprosthesis for in vivo measurement of joint force and temperature. J Biomech 1999;32(10):1113-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graichen F, Arnold R, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G. Implantable 9-channel telemetry system for in vivo load measurements with orthopedic implants. IEEE Trans Bio-med Eng 2007;54(2):253-61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damm P, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, et al. Total hip joint prosthesis for in vivo measurement of forces and moments. Med Eng Phys 2010;32(1):95-100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 1993;26(8):969-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Correa da Silva M, Neff G, et al. Evaluation of ischial weight-bearing orthoses, based on in-vivo joint force measurements. Clin Biomech 1994;9(4):225-34
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Kniggendorf H, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Influence of shoes and heel strike on the loading of the hip joint. J Biomech 1995;28(7):817-27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Is staircase walking a risk for the fixation of hip implants. J Biomech 1995;28(5):535-53
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Linke H. Hip joint forces during load carrying. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;335:190-201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint forces in sheep. J Biomech 1999;32(8):769-77
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001;34(7):859-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller MO, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, et al. Influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients. J Biomech 2001;16(8):644-9
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, et al. Frictional heating of total hip implants. Part 1. measurements in patients. J Biomech 2001;34(4):421-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stansfield BW, Nicol AC, Paul JP, et al. Direct comparison of calculated hip joint contact forces with those measured using instrumented implants. An evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the lower limb. J Biomech 2003;36(7):929-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint contact forces during stumbling. Langenbeck Arch Surg 2004;389(1):53-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damm P, Ackermann R, Bender A, et al. In vivo measurements of the friction moment in total hip joint prostheses during walking. J Biomech 2012;45(Suppl 1):S268
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Siraky J, Kölbel R, Rohlmann A. Measurement of joint forces with implants – a new method of instrumentation and its application in sheep. Biomechanics Symposium, ASCE Mechanics Conference; 1981. 43:225-8
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Siraky J, Rohlmann A, Koelbel R. A comparison of hip joint forces in sheep, dog and man. J Biomech 1984;17(12):907-21
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann G. editor. Charit Universitaetsmedizin Berlin “OrthoLoad”. Available from: www.orthoload.com [Last accessed December 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Qi G, Mouchon WP, Tan TE. How much can a vibrational diagnostic tool reveal in total hip arthroplasty loosening? Clin Biomech 2003;18(5):444-58
   Google Scholar
• IEEE-SA Standard Board. C95.1-2005 – IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; NJ, USA: 2005
   Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ, Donaldson NN. Instrumenting STANMORE-prostheses for long-term strain measurement in vivo. In: Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, editors. Implantable telemetry in orthopaedics. Freie Universität; Berlin, Germany: 1990. p. 93-102
   Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ. A telemetry system for measurement of forces in massive orthopaedic implants in vivo. Conf Proc 18th IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1996;1:290-2
   Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ, Perry JS, Meswania JM, et al. Telemetry of forces from proximal femoral replacements and relevance to fixation. J Biomech 1997;30(3):225-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassey EJ, Littlewood JJ, Taylor SJ. Relations between compressive axial forces in an instrumented massive femoral implant, ground reaction forces, and integrated electromyographs from vastus lateralis during various ‘osteogenic’ exercises. J Biomech 1997;30(3):213-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ, Walker PS, Perry JS, et al. The forces in the distal femur and the knee during walking and other activities measured by telemetry. J Arthroplasty 1998;13(4):428-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ, Walker PS. Forces and moments telemetered from two distal femoral replacements during various activities. J Biomech 2001;34(7):839-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RH, Burstein AH, Frankel VH. Telemetering in vivo loads from nail plate implants. J Biomech 1982;15(11):815-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider E, Michel MC, Genge M, Perren SM. Loads acting on an intramedullary femoral nail. In: Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, editors. Implantable telemetry in orthopaedics. Freie Universität; Berlin: Germany: 1990. p. 221-7
   Google Scholar
• Genge M, Schneider E, Michel MC, Genge H Perren SM. Multi-channel telemetry system for load measurements in intramedullary nails. In: Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, editors. Implantable telemetry in orthopaedics. Freie Universität; Berlin: Germany: 1990. p.133-6
   Google Scholar
• Schneider E, Michel MC, Genge M, et al. Loads acting in an intramedullary nail during fracture healing in the human femur. J Biomech 2001;34(7):849-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehner T, Claes L, Simon U. Internal loads in the human tibia during gait. Clin Biomech 2009;24(3):299-302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Dymke J, et al. High-tech hip implant for wireless temperature measurements in vivo. PLoS One 2012;7(8):e43489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, et al. Hip implant for temperature measurements. J Biomech 2012;45(1):S1
   Google Scholar
• Faroug R, McCarthy I, Meswania J, et al. Strain response of an instrumented intramedullary nail to three-point bending. J Med Eng Technol 2011;35(5):275-82
   Google Scholar
• Marschner U, Grätz H, Jettkant B, et al. Integration of a wireless lock-in measurement of hip prosthesis vibrations for loosening detection. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 2009;156(1):145-54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdastri P, Rossi S, Menciassi A, et al. An implantable ZigBee ready telemetric platform for in vivo monitoring of physiological parameters. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 2008;142(1):369-78
   Google Scholar
• Cristofolini L, Marchetti A, Cappello A, Viceconti M. A novel transducer for the measurement of cement-prosthesis interface forces in cemented orthopaedic devices. Med Eng Phys 2000;22(7):493-501
   Google Scholar
• Gattiker F, Umbrecht F, Neuenschwander J, et al. Novel ultrasound read-out for a wireless implantable passive strain sensor (WIPSS). Sensor Actuat A-Phys 145-2008;146:291-8
   Google Scholar
• Alpuim P, Filonovich SA, Costa CM, et al. Fabrication of a strain sensor for bone implant failure detection based on piezoresistive doped nanocrystalline silicon. J Non-Cryst Solids 2008;354(19-25):2585-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao S, Taylor JT, Bowen CR, et al. Sensing methodology for in vivo stability evaluation of total hip and knee arthroplasty. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 2010;157(1):150-60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruther C, Gabler C, Ewald H, et al. In vivo monitoring of implant osseointegration in a rabbit model using acoustic sound analysis. J Orthop Res 2014;32(4):606-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais R, Silva N, Santos P, et al. Permanent magnet vibration power generator as an embedded mechanism for smart hip prosthesis. Proc Eng 2010;5:766-9
   Google Scholar
• Morais R, Silva NM, Santos PM, et al. Double permanent magnet vibration power generator for smart hip prosthesis. Sensor Actuat. A-Phys 2011;172(1):259-68
   Google Scholar
• Silva N, Santos P, Ferreira J, et al. Multi-purpose and multi-source energy management system for biomedical implants. Proc Eng 2012;47:722-5
   Google Scholar
• Silva NM, Santos PM, Ferreira JA. Power management architecture for smart hip prostheses comprising multiple energy harvesting systems. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 2013;202:183-92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgado ML, Morgado LF, Henriques E, et al. Nonlinear modeling of vibrational energy harvesters for smart prostheses. Procedia Engineering 2012;47:1089-92
   Google Scholar
• Soares dos Santos M, Ferreira JA, Ramos A, et al. Multi-source energy harvesting power generators for instrumented implants – towards the development of a smart hip prosthesis. Conf Proc 5th Biodevices; 2012. p. 71-81
   Google Scholar
• Soares dos Santos M, Ferreira JA, Ramos A, et al. Multi-source harvesting systems for electric energy generation on smart hip prostheses. In: Gabriel J, Schier J, Van Huffel S, et al. editors. Biomedical engineering systems and technologies 357. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; NY, USA: 2013. p. 80-96
   Google Scholar
• Soares dos Santos M, Ferreira JA, Ramos A, et al. Instrumented hip implants: electric supply systems. J Biomech 2013;46(15):2561-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt SR, Farritor S, Haider H. On low-frequency electric power generation with PZT ceramics. IEEE-ASME Trans Mech 2005;10(2):240-52
   Google Scholar
• Le TT, Han J, von Jouanne A, et al. Piezoelectric micro-power generation interface circuits. IEEE J Solid-St Circ 2006;41(6):1411-20
   Google Scholar
• Morais R, Frias CM, Silva NM, et al. An activation circuit for battery-powered biomedical implantable systems. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 2009;156(1):229-36
   Google Scholar
• Reis J, Frias C, Canto e Castro C, et al. A new piezoelectric actuator induces bone formation in vivo: a preliminary study. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012;2012:1-7
   Google Scholar
• Frias C, Reis J, Capela e Silva F, et al. Polymeric piezoelectric actuator substrate for osteoblast mechanical stimulation. J Biomech 2010;43(6):1061-6
   Google Scholar
• Frias C, Reis J, Capela e Silva F, et al. Piezoelectric actuator: searching inspiration in nature for osteoblast stimulation. Compos Sci Technol 2010;70(13):1920-5
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich PJ, Lanyon LE. Mechanical strain and bone cell function: a review. Osteoporosis Int 2002;13(9):688-700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatius A, Blessing H, Liedert A, et al. Tissue engineering of bone: effects of mechanical strain on osteoblastic cells in type I collagen matrices. Biomaterials 2005;26(3):311-18
   Google Scholar
• Hronik-Tupaj M, Kaplan DL. A review of the responses of two- and three-dimensional engineered tissues to electric fields. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2012;18(3):167-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balint R, Cassidy NJ, Cartmell SH. Electrical stimulation: a novel tool for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2013;19(1):48-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares dos Santos M, Ferreira JA, Simões JA, et al. Design methodology for the development of long-term hip prosthesis survival. J Biomech 2012;45(1):S106
   Google Scholar
• Prescott JH, Lipka S, Baldwin S, et al. Chronic, programmed polypeptide delivery from an implanted, multireservoir microchip device. Nat Biotechnol 2006;24(4):437-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao K, Luo H, Chen H, et al. A SoC for pressure balance measurement application in total knee arthroplasty. AASRI Proc 2012;1:267-75
   Google Scholar
• Weiss MD, Smith JL, Bach J. RF coupling in a 433-MHz biotelemetry system for an artificial hip. IEEE Antenn Wirel Pr 2009;8:916-19
   Google Scholar
• Stea S, Visentin M, Donati ME, et al. Nitric oxide synthase in tissues around failed hip prostheses. Biomaterials 2002;23(24):4833-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Wu W, Cao L, et al. Pathways of macrophage apoptosis within the interface membrane in aseptic loosening of prostheses. Biomaterials 2011;32(35):9159-67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponmozhi J, Frias C, Marques T, Frazão O. Smart sensors/actuators for biomedical applications: rev measurement. 2012;45(7):1675-88
   Google Scholar