Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the EndoGlide Ultrathin graft insertion device

References

• Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, et al. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes. Ophthalmol 2009;116(9):1818-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Levinger E, et al. Retrospective contralateral study comparing descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2009;28(5):485-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed-Noriega K, Angunawela RI, Tan DT, Mehta JS. Corneal transplantation: changing techniques. Transplantation 2011;92(7):e31-2
   Google Scholar
• Price MO, Fairchild KM, Price DA, Price FW Jr. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmol 2011;118(4):725-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta JS, Por YM, Poh R, et al. Comparison of donor insertion techniques for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126(10):1383-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Sansanayudh W, et al. Busin guide vs forceps for the insertion of the donor lenticule in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147(2):220-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khor WB, Mehta JS, Tan DT. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with a graft insertion device: surgical technique and early clinical results. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151(2):223-32
   Google Scholar
• Foster JB, Swan KR, Vasan RA, et al. Small-incision Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison of small-incision tissue injector and forceps techniques. Cornea 2012;31(1):42-7
   Google Scholar
• Gangwani V, Obi A, Hollick EJ. A prospective study comparing EndoGlide and Busin glide insertion techniques in descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153(1):38-43
   Google Scholar
• Khor WB, Han SB, Mehta JS, Tan DT. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with a donor insertion device: clinical results and complications in 100 eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156(4):773-9
   Google Scholar
• Neff KD, Biber JM, Holland EJ. Comparison of central corneal graft thickness to visual acuity outcomes in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2011;30(4):388-91
   Google Scholar
• Pogorelov P, Cursiefen C, Bachmann BO, Kruse FE. Changes in donor corneal lenticule thickness after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with organ-cultured corneas. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93(6):825-9
   Google Scholar
• Liu YC, Alvarez Paraz CM, Cajucom-Uy HY, et al. Risk factors for donor endothelial loss in eye bank-prepared posterior lamellar corneal tissue for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2014;33(7):677-82
   Google Scholar
• Hollick EJ, Gangwani V. Reply to: a prospective study comparing EndoGlide and Busin glide insertion techniques in descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;154(2):417
   Google Scholar
• Borderie VM, Baudrimont M, Lopez M, et al. Evaluation of the deswelling period in dextran-containing medium after corneal organ culture. Cornea 1997;16(2):215-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busin M, Bhatt PR, Scorcia V. A modified technique for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to minimize endothelial cell loss. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126(8):1133-7
   Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Straiko MD, Goshe JM, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: prospective, randomized, masked clinical trial comparing an injector with forceps for tissue insertion. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156(1):61-68.e3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbaz U, Yeung SN, Lichtinger A, et al. EndoGlide vs. EndoSerter for the insertion of donor graft in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; In press
   Google Scholar
• Ang M, Saroj L, Htoon HM, et al. Comparison of a donor insertion device to sheets glide in descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: 3-year outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157(6):1163-1169.e3
   Google Scholar
• Balidis M, Konidaris VE, Ioannidis G, Boboridis K. Descemet’s stripping endothelial automated keratoplasty using Tan EndoGlide endothelium insertion system. Trnasplant Proc 2012;44(9):2759-64
   Google Scholar
• Letko E, Price DA, Lindoso EM, et al. Secondary graft failure and repeat endothelial keratoplasty after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmol 2011;118(2):310-14
   Google Scholar
• Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW. Endothelial keratoplasty: fellow eyes comparison of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2011;30(12):1382-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busin M, Madi S, Santorum P, et al. Ultrathin descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique. Ophthalmol 2013;120(6):1186-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokogawa H, Kobayashi A, Sugiyama K. Clinical evaluation of a new donor graft inserter for Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2012;43(1):50-6
   Google Scholar