The Covidien LigaSure Maryland Jaw Device

References

• Reynolds WJr. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2001;5:89-94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bordeleon BM, Hobday KA, Hunter JG. Laser vs electrosurgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 1993;128(2):233-6
   Google Scholar
• Butskiy O, Wiseman SM. Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigasureTM) for hemostasis during thyroid surgery: a comprehensive review. Expert Rev Med Devices 2013;10(3):389-410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG. High-burst-strength, feedback controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc 1998;12(6):876-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hruby GW, Marruffo FC, Durak E, et al. Evaluation of surgical energy devices for vessel sealing and peripheral energy spread in a porcine model. J Urol 2007;178:2689-93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergdahl B, Vallfors B. Studies on coagulation and the development of an automatic computerized bipolar coagulator. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1991;75(1):148-51
   Google Scholar
• Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Fukunaga M. Comparison of two different energy-based vascular sealing systems for the hemostasis of various types of arteries: a porcine model-evaluation of LigaSureForceTriad™. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010;20(9):747-51
   Google Scholar
• Hubner M, Demartines N, Muller S, et al. Prospective randomized study of monopolar scissors, bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic shears in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2008;95:1098-104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taragona EM, Balague C, Marin J, et al. Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and cost analysis. Surg Innov 2005;12(4):339-44
   Google Scholar
• Shabahang H, Maddah G, Tavassoli A, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: ligasure or clip ligation? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22(2):136-8
   Google Scholar
• Janssen P, Brolmann HAM, Huirne JAF. Effectiveness of electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices versus other electrothermal and ultrasonic devices for abdominal surgical hemostasis: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2012;26:2892-901
   Google Scholar
• Macario A, Dexter F, Sypal J, et al. Operative time and other outcomes of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigaSureTM) versus other methods for surgical hemostasis: a meta-analysis. Surg Innov 2008;15(4):284-91
   Google Scholar
• Rimoda R, Arezzo A, Garrone C, et al. Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system vs harmonic scalpel in colorectal laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52(4):657-61
   Google Scholar
• Guerrieri M, Crosta F, De Sanctis A, et al. Use of electrothermal bipolar vessel system (EBVS) in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 2008;22:141-5
   Google Scholar
• Campagnacci R, De Sanctis A, Baldarelli M, et al. Hepatic resections by means of electrothermal bipolar vessel device (EBVS) LigaSure V: early experience. Surg Endosc 2007;21:2280-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lorenzo N, Franceschlli L, Allaix ME, et al. Radiofrequenccy versus ultrasonic energy in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a metaanalysis of operative time and blood loss. Surg Endosc 2012;26:2917-24
   Google Scholar
• Smith TC, Zarebczan B, Alhefdhi A, Chen H. Infrared thermographic profiles of vessel sealing devices on thyroid parenchyma. J Surg Res 2011;170:64-8
   Google Scholar
• Druzijanic N, Pogorelic Z, Perko Z, et al. Comparison of lateral thermal damage of the human peritoneum using monopolar diathermy, Harmonic scalpel, and LigaSure. Canadian J Surg 2012;55(5):317-21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contin P, Gooben K, Grummich K, et al. ENERgized vessel sealing systems versus CONventionalhemostais techniques in thyroid surgery – the ENERCON systematic review and network meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013;398:1039-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Hong TO. Comparison of various methods of meso-appendix dissection in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2014;24(1):28-31
   Google Scholar
• Chang LY, O’Neill C, Suliburk J, et al. Sutureless total thyroidectomy: a safe and cost-effective alternative. ANZ J Surg 2011;81:510-14
   Google Scholar
• Glover A, Gundara J, Lee JC, et al. Thermal sealing systems with and without tissue divider for total thyroidectomy. ANZ J Surg 2014;84(5):383-5
   Google Scholar
• Uzunoglu FG, Bockhorn M, Fink JA, et al. LigaSureTM versus conventional dissection techniques in pancreatic surgery – a prospective randomized single-centre trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2013;17:494-500
   Google Scholar
• Milsom J, Trencheva K, Monette S, et al. Evaluation of the safety, efficacy, and versatility of a new surgical energy device (Thunderbeat) in comparison with Harmonic ACE, LigaSure V, and EnSeal devices in a porcine model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Technol A 2012;22(4):378-86
   Google Scholar
• Aytan H, Nazik H, Narin R, et al. Comparison of the use of LigaSure, HALO PKS cutting forceps, and EnSeal tissue sealer in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014;21(4):650-5
   Google Scholar
• Toishi M, Yoshida K, Agatsuma H, et al. Usefulness of vessel-sealing devices for ≤7mm diameter vessels: a randomized controlled trial for human thorascopic lobectomy in primary lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014;19(3):448-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar