Meshology: a fast-growing field involving mesh and/or tape removal procedures and their outcomes

References

• van Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 2007;94:506-10
   Google Scholar
• Amid P. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1997;1:15-21
   Google Scholar
• Yamada BS, Govier FE, Stefanovic KB, et al. High rate of vaginal erosions associated with the Mentor ObTape. J Urol 2006;176:651-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Debodinance P, Cosson M, Burlet G. Tolerance of synthetic tissues in touch with vaginal scar: review to the point of 287 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;87:23-30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FDA. 1998 Jan 28. 510(K) Number K974098. FDA; USA: 1998
   Google Scholar
• Oliphant SS, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Trends in stress urinary incontinence inpatient procedures in the United States, 1979-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200(521):e1-6
   Google Scholar
• Washington JL. Commercial products for pelvic repair. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2011;17(5):218-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111(4):891-8
   Google Scholar
• Carey M, Higgs P, Goh J, et al. Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2009;116(10):1380-6
   Google Scholar
• Deng D, Rutman M, Raz S, Rodriguez LV. Presentation and management of midurethral slings: are complications under-reported? Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:46-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA Public Health Notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. FDA; USA: Issued 2008
   Google Scholar
• FDA Public Health Notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. FDA; USA: Issued 2011
   Google Scholar
• Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/ International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22(1):3-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JM, Gandhi MP, Shah AD, et al. Trends in inpatient urinary incontinence surgery in the USA, 1998-2007. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22(11):1437-43
   Google Scholar
• Desseauve D, Pierre F, Fritel X. Urinary incontinence in women: study of surgical practice in France. Prog Urol 2013;23(4):249-55
   Google Scholar
• Serati M, Ghezzi F, Cattoni E, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: efficacy and adverse effects at 10-year follow up. Eur Urol 2012;61(5):939-46
   Google Scholar
• Ward K, Hilton P; Group UaITT. A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:324-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogah J, Cody J, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;4:CD006375
   Google Scholar
• Barber M, Weidner A, Solkol A, et al. Single-incision mini-sling compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119(2 Pt 1):328-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornu J-N, Lizee D, Sebe P, et al. TVT SECUR single-incision sling after 5 years of follow-up: the promises made and the promises broken. Eur Urol 2012;62(4):737-8
   Google Scholar
• Ritcher H, Albo M, Zycznski H, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. NEJM 2010;362(22):2066-76
   Google Scholar
• Sung VW, Schleinitiz MD, Rardin C, et al. Comparison of retropubic vs transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:3-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Dwyer P, Rosamilia A, et al. Which women develop urgency or urgency urinary incontinence following midurethral slings? Int Urogynecol J 2012. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson C, Falconer C, Rezapour M. Seven-year follow up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104(6):1259-62
   Google Scholar
• Tse V, Chan L. Outlet obstruction after sling surgery. BJU Int 2011;108(Suppl 2):24-8
   Google Scholar
• Daneshgari F, Kong W, Swartz M. Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials. J Urol 2008;180(5):1890-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petri E, Ashok K. Partner Dyspareunia- a report of six cases. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:127-9
   Google Scholar
• Hazewinkel MH, Hinoul P, Roovers J-P. Persistent groin pain following a trans-obturator sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Int Urogynecol J 2009;20:365-7
   Google Scholar
• Duckett JRA, Jain S. Groin pain after a tension-free vaginal tape or similar suburethral sling: management strategies. BJU Int 2005;9(5):95-7
   Google Scholar
• Meschia M, Bertozzi R, Pifarotti P, et al. Peri-operative morbidity and early results of a randomised trial comparing TVT and TVT-O. Int Urogynecol J 2007;18(7):1257-61
   Google Scholar
• Neuman M, Sosnovski V, Goralnik S, et al. Comparison of two inside-out transobturator suburethral sling techniques for stress incontinence: early postoperative thigh pain and 3-year outcomes. Int J Urol 2012. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Rigaud J, Pothin P, Labat J-J, et al. Functional Results after Tape Removal for Chronic Pelvic Pain Following Tension-free Vaginal Tape or Transobturator Tape. J Urol 2010;184:610-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholhan H, Hutchings TB, Rooney KE. Dyspareunia associated with paraurethral banding in the transobturator sling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202(5):481.e1-5
   Google Scholar
• SUFU. Society for Female Urology and Urodynamics (SUFU) Response: FDA Safety Communication: UPDATE of surgical mesh for pelvic organ Prolapse. SUFU; USA: 2011
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer PL, Riss P. The mesh debate. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:1-2
   Google Scholar
• Khanuengkitkong S, Lo T-S, Dass A. Delayed vaginal and urethral mesh exposure: 10 years after TVT surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2012. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Mucowski S, Jurnalov C, Phelps J. Use of vaginal mesh in the face of recent FDA warnings and litigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:103.e1-4
   Google Scholar
• Murray S, Haverkorn RM, Koch YK, et al. Urethral distortion after placement of synthetic mid urethral sling. J Urol 2011;185(4):1321-6
   Google Scholar
• Meschia M, Bertozzi R, Pifarotti P, et al. Peri-operative morbidity and early results of a randomised trial comparing TVT and TVT-O. Int Urogynecol J 2007;18(7):1257-61
   Google Scholar
• Neuman M, Sosnovski V, Goralnik S, et al. Comparison of two inside-out transobturator suburethral sling techniques for stress incontinence: early postoperative thigh pain and 3-year outcomes. Int J Urol 2012;19(12):1103-7
   Google Scholar
• Hammett J, Peters A, Trowbridge E, Hullfish K. Short-term surgical outcomes and characteristics of patients with mesh complications from pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2014;25(4):465-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew G, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Functional outcomes following surgical management of pain, exposure or extrusion following a suburethral tape insertion for urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2014;25(2):235-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou JC, Alhalabi F, Lemack GE, Zimmern PE. Outcome of Transvaginal Mesh and Tape Removed for Pain Only. J Urol 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Tijdink MM, Vierhout ME, Heesakkers JP, Withagen MI. Surgical management of mesh-related complications after prior pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22(11):1395-404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misrai V, Roupret M, Xylinas E, et al. Surgical resection for suburethral sling complications after treatment for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2009;181(5):2198-202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klutke C, Siegel S, Carlin B, et al. Urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure: incidence and treatment. Urology 2001;58:697-701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South MM, Wu JM, Webster GD, et al. Early vs late midline sling lysis results in greater improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200(5):564.e1-5
   Google Scholar
• Ordorica R, Rodriguez AR, Coste-Delvecchio F, et al. Disabling complications with slings for managing female stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2008;102(3):333-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen JN. Tape mobilization for urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedures. Urology 2005;66:523-6
   Google Scholar
• Price N, Slack A, Khong SY, et al. The benefit of early mobilisation of tension-free vaginal tape in the treatment of post-operative voiding dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20(7):855-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurikainen E, Kiilholma P. A nationwide analysis of transvaginal tape release for urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006;17(2):111-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamé X, Soulié M, Malavaud B, et al. [Treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to suburethral tape by section of the tape]. Prog Urol 2006;16(1):67-71; Article in French
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasturi S, Hale DS. “J” cut of sling for postoperative voiding dysfunction following synthetic midurethral slings. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22(8):933-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew G, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Functional outcomes for surgical revision of synthetic slings performed for voiding dysfunction: a retrospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;163(1):113-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isom-Batz G, Zimmern PE. Vaginal mesh for incontinence and/or prolapse: caution required!. Expert Rev Med Devices 2007;4(5):675-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon B, Gurbuz C, Zimmern P. Long term results after complication of “prophylactic” suburethral tape placement. Can J Urol 2012;19:6424-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford EJ, Paraiso MF. A comprehensive review of suburethral sling procedure complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15(2):132-45
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson-Funk M, Siddiqui NY, Pate V, et al. Sling revision/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(1):73.e1-7
   Google Scholar
• Leng WW, Davies BJ, Tarin T, et al. Delayed treatment of bladder outlet obstruction after sling surgery: association with irreversible bladder dysfunction. J Urol 2004;172(4 Pt 1):1379-81
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren C, Nilsson S, Lanner L, Hellberg D. Frequency of de novo urgency in 463 women who had undergone the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for genuine stress urinary incontinence- A long-term follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;132:121-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Segal J, Vassallo B, Kleeman S, et al. Prevalence of persistent and de novo overactive bladder symptoms after the tension-free vaginal tape. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;104(6):1263-9
   Google Scholar
• Duckett J, Baranowski A. Pain after suburethral sling insertion for urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24(2):195-201
   Google Scholar
• Petri E, Ashok K. Comparison of late complications of retropubic and transobturator slings in stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23(3):321-5
   Google Scholar
• Latthe PM, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P. Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. BJOG 2007;114(5):522-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds WS, Kit LC, Kaufman MR, et al. Obturator foramen dissection for excision of symptomatic transobturator mesh. J Urol 2012;187(5):1680-4
   Google Scholar
• Haase P, Skibsted L. Influence of operations for stress incontinence and/or genital descensus on sexual life. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988;67:659-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR. Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1610-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund AL, Fugl-Meyer KS. Some sexological characteristics of stress incontinent women. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1996;30:207-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn A, Eggeman C, Burkhard F, Mueller MD. Correction of erosion after suburethral sling insertion for stress incontinence: results and related sexual function. Eur Urol 2009;56(2):371-6
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn A, Burkhard F, Eggemann C, Mueller MD. Sexual function after suburethral sling removal for dyspareunia. Surg Endosc 2009;23(4):765-8
   Google Scholar
• Zoorob D, Karram M. Management of mesh complications and vaginal constriction: a Urogynecology Perspective. Urol Clin N Am 2012;39:413-18
   Google Scholar
• Kobashi K, Govier F. Management of vaginal erosion of polypropylene mesh slings. J Urol 2003;169:2242-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks B, Goldman HB. Controversies in the management of mesh-based complications: a urology perspective. Urol Clin N Am 2012;39:419-28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquetin B, Cosson M. Complications of vaginal mesh: our experience. Int Urogynecol J 2009;20:893-6
   Google Scholar
• Doumouchtsis SK, Lee F, Bramwell D, Fynes M. Evaluation of holmium laser for managing mesh/suture complications of continence surgery. BJU Int 2011;108:1472-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh T-H, Ryu D-S. Transurethral resection of intravesical mesh after midurethral sling procedures. J Endourol 2009;23(8):1333-7
   Google Scholar
• Misrai V, Roupret M, Xylinas E, et al. Surgical resection for suburethral sling complications after treatment for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2009;181(5):2198-202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosti PA, Iglesia CB. Medicolegal issues surrounding devices and mesh for surgical treatment of prolapse and incontinence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013;56(2):221-8
   Google Scholar
• SOGC Technical Update No. 254. Society of obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Transvaginal mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011;33:168-74
   Google Scholar
• Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Systematic Review Group of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22(7):789-98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewski L, Walters MD, Weber AM, Barber MD. Re-analysis of a randomized trial of 3 techniques of anterior colporrhaphy using clinically relevant definitions of success. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205(1):69.e1-8
   Google Scholar
• Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114(3):600-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjelic-Radisic V, Aigmueller T, Preyer O, et al. Austrian Urogynecology Working Group. Vaginal prolapse surgery with transvaginal mesh: results of the Austrian registry. Int Urogynecol J 2014;25(8):1047-52
   Google Scholar
• Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010(4):CD004014
   Google Scholar
• Danford JM, Osborn DJ, Reynolds WS, et al. Postoperative pain outcomes after transvaginal mesh revision. Int Urogynecol J 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Crosby EC, Abernethy M, Berger MB, et al. Symptom resolution after operative management of complications from transvaginal mesh. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123(1):134-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Dillon B, Lemack G, et al. Transvaginal mesh kits-how “serious” are the complications and are they reversible? Urology 2013;81(1):43-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijdink MM, Vierhout ME, Heesakkers JP, Withagen MI. Surgical management of mesh-related complications after prior pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22(11):1395-404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiner B, Maher C. Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115(2 Pt 1):325-30
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway B, Walters MD, Paraiso MF, et al. Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(6):703.e1-7
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado EA, Appell RA. Management of complications arising from transvaginal mesh kit procedures: a tertiary referral center’s experience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20:11-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skala CE, Renezeder K, Albrich S, et al. Mesh-complications following prolapse surgery: management and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;159:453-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokol AI, Iglesia CB, Kudish BI, et al. One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206(1):86.e1-9
   Google Scholar
• Bako A, Dhar R. Review of synthetic mesh-related complications in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20(1):103-11
   Google Scholar
• Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Hendriks JC, et al. Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(3):629-36
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson J. J & J’s Ethicon abandon four vaginal mesh implants. Medical device and diagnostic industry online. Internet 2012 10/3/2012 Available from: www.mddionline.com/article/jj%E2%80%99s-ethicon-abandons-four-vaginal-mesh-implants
   Google Scholar
• Keys T, Campeau L, Badlani G. Synthetic mesh in the surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse: current status and future directions. Urology 2012;80:237-43
   Google Scholar
• Slack M, Ostergard D, Cervigni M, Deprest J. A standardized description of graft-containing meshes and recommended steps before the introduction of medical devices for prolapse surgery. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA grafts roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2010;23(Suppl 1):S15-26
   Google Scholar
• Urogynaecological Society of Australia. UGSA pelvic floor surgery database. Melbourne, Australia [ 10/3/2012 Available from: www.ugsa.org.au/UGSAdb.html
   Google Scholar
• Ostergard D. Lessons from the past: directions for the future. Do new marketed surgical procedures and grafts produce ethical, personal liability and legal concerns for physicians? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18(6):591-8
   Google Scholar