Visual prosthetics 2006: assessment and expectations

References

• Radtke ND, Aramant RB, Seiler MJ, Petry HM, Pidwell D. Vision change after sheet transplant of fetal retina with retinal pigment epithelium to a patient with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch. Ophthalmol.122, 1159–1165 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchel C, Price C, Frackowiak RS, Friston K. Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects. Brain121(Pt 3), 409–419 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine I, Wade AR, Brewer AA et al. Long-term deprivation affects visual perception and cortex. Nature Neurosci.6, 915–916 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson MR, Hart PM, Montgomery AM, McCulloch DW, Chakravarthy U. Reduced vision in older adults with age related macular degeneration interferes with ability to care for self and impairs role as carer. Br. J. Ophthalmol.88, 1125–1130 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Dagnelie G et al. Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. Arch. Ophthalmol.114, 40–46 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humayun MS, Prince M, deJuan E et al. Morphometric analysis of the extramacular retina from postmortem eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.40, 143–148 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones BW, Marc RE. Retinal remodeling during retinal degeneration. Exp. Eye Res.81, 123–137 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marc RE, Jones BW, Watt CB, Strettoi E. Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration. Prog. Retin. Eye Res.22, 607–655 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanker D, Huie P, Vankov A et al. Migration of retinal cells through a perforated membrane: implications for a high-resolution prosthesis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.45, 3266–3270 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterman MC, Bloom DM, Lee C et al. Localized neurotransmitter release for use in a prototype retinal interface. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44, 3144–3149 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterman MC, Mehenti NZ, Bilbao KV et al. The Artificial Synapse Chip: a flexible retinal interface based on directed retinal cell growth and neurotransmitter stimulation. Artif. Organs27, 975–985 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eckmiller R, Neumann D, Baruth O. Tunable retina encoders for retina implants: why and how. J. Neural. Eng.2, S91–S104 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuritz T, Lee I, Owens ET, Humayun M, Greenbaum E. Molecular photovoltaics and the photoactivation of mammalian cells. IEEE Trans. Nanobioscience4,196–200 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hu Z, Zhou DM, Greenberg R, Thundat T. Nanopowder molding method for creating implantable high-aspect-ratio electrodes on thin flexible substrates. Biomaterials27, 2009–2017 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Warren DJ, Fernandez E, Normann RA. High-resolution two-dimensional spatial mapping of cat striate cortex using a 100-microelectrode array. Neuroscience105, 19–31 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt EM, Bak MJ, Hambrecht FT et al. Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. Brain119, 507–522 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley DC, Troyk PR, Berg JA et al. Visuotopic mapping through a multichannel stimulating implant in primate V1. J. Neurophysiol.93, 1659–1670 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre CC, Grill WM. Extracellular stimulation of central neurons: influence of stimulus waveform and frequency on neuronal output. J. Neurophysiol.88, 1592–1604 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Sivaprakasam M, Singh PR, Bashirullah R, Wang G. Electronic visual prosthesis. Artif. Organs27, 986–995 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow AY, Peachey N. The subretinal microphotodiode array retinal prosthesis II. Ophthalmic Res.31, 246 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Volker M, Shinoda K, Sachs H et al.In vivo assessment of subretinally implanted microphotodiode arrays in cats by optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.242(9), 792–799 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Margalit E, Maia M, Weiland JD et al. Retinal prosthesis for the blind. Surv. Ophthalmol.47, 335–356 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland JD, Liu W, Humayun MS. Retinal prosthesis. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.7, 361–401 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY et al. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res.43, 2573–2581 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevappa M, Weiland JD, Yanai D et al. Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.13, 201–206 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rizzo JF III, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D. Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44, 5362–5369 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo JF III, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D. Methods and perceptual thresholds for short-term electrical stimulation of human retina with microelectrode arrays. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44, 5355–5361 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein JI, Montezuma SR, Rizzo JF III. Outer retinal degeneration: an electronic retinal prosthesis as a treatment strategy. Arch. Ophthalmol.122, 587–596 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamauchi Y, Franco LM, Jackson DJ et al. Comparison of electrically evoked cortical potential thresholds generated with subretinal or suprachoroidal placement of a microelectrode array in the rabbit. J. Neural. Eng.2, S48–S56 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornig R, Laube T, Walter P et al. A method and technical equipment for an acute human trial to evaluate retinal implant technology. J. Neural. Eng.2, S129–S134 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieglitz T. Considerations on surface and structural biocompatibility as prerequisite for long-term stability of neural prostheses. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.4, 496–503 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Walter P, Kisvarday ZF, Gortz M et al. Cortical activation via an implanted wireless retinal prosthesis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.46, 1780–1785 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterman MC, Noolandi J, Blumenkranz MS, Fishman HA. Localized chemical release from an artificial synapse chip. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101, 9951–9954 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iezzi R, Walraven T, Abrams G. Toxicological profiles of the phototriggerable molecules MNI and MCNI glutamate for use in visual prostheses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.45, ARVO E-abstr. 4221 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Yagi T, Watanabe M, Ohnishi Y, Okuma S, Mukai T. Biohybrid retinal implant: research and development update in 2005. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Neural Engineering. Washington DC, USA, 248–251 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi H, Fujikado T, Fang X et al. Transretinal electrical stimulation with a suprachoroidal multichannel electrode in rabbit eyes. Jpn J. Ophthalmol.48, 256–261 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Baac H, Lee J-H, Seo J-M et al. Submicron-scale topographical control of cell growth using holographic surface relief grating. Mater. Sci. Eng. C24, 209–212 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Lee CJ, Oh SJ, Song JK, Kim SJ. Neural signal recording using microelectrode arrays fabricated on liquid crystal polymer material. Mater. Sci. Eng. C24, 265–268 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Seo J-M, Kim SJ, Chung H et al. Biocompatibility of polyimide microelectrode array for retinal stimulation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C24, 185–189 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury V, Morley JW, Coroneo MT. Feasibility of extraocular stimulation for a retinal prosthesis. Can. J. Ophthalmol.40, 563–572 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Dokos S, Suaning GJ, Lovell NH. A bidomain model of epiretinal stimulation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.13, 137–146 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallum LE, Suaning GJ, Lovell NH. Contribution to the theory of prosthetic vision. ASAIO J.50, 392–396 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Suaning GJ, Lovell NH. CMOS neurostimulation ASIC with 100 channels, scaleable output, and bidirectional radio-frequency telemetry. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.48, 248–260 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gekeler F, Zrenner E. [Status of the subretinal implant project. An overview]. (German) Ophthalmologe102, 941–949 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feili D, Schuettler M, Doerge T, Kammer S, Stieglitz T. Encapsulation of organic field effect transistors for flexible biomedical microimplants. Sens. Actuators A Phys.120, 101–109 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Brelen ME, Duret F, Gerard B, Delbeke J, Veraart C. Creating a meaningful visual perception in blind volunteers by optic nerve stimulation. J. Neural. Eng.2, S22–S28 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbeke J, Oozeer M, Veraart C. Position, size and luminosity of phosphenes generated by direct optic nerve stimulation. Vision Res.43, 1091–1102 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Veraart C, Duret F, Brelen M, Oozeer M, Delbeke J. Vision rehabilitation in the case of blindness. Expert Rev. Med. Devices1, 139–153 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang X, Sakaguchi H, Fujikado T et al. Electrophysiological and histological studies of chronically implanted intrapapillary microelectrodes in rabbit eyes. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.244(3), 364–375 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horton JC, Hoyt WF. The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. Arch. Ophthalmol.109, 816–824 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandez E, Alfaro A, Tormos JM et al. Mapping of the human visual cortex using image-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc.10, 115–124 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shelepin YE, Bondarko VM. Resolving ability and image discretization in the visual system. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol.34, 147–157 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Troyk P, Bak M, Berg J et al. A model for intracortical visual prosthesis research. Artif. Organs27, 1005–1015 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez E, Pelayo F, Romero S et al. Development of a cortical visual neuroprosthesis for the blind: the relevance of neuroplasticity. J. Neural. Eng.2, R1–R12 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coulombe J, Carniguian S, Sawan M. A power efficient electronic implant for a visual cortical neuroprosthesis. Artif. Organs29, 233–238 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG, Girvin JP. Artificial vision for the blind: electrical stimulation of the cortex offers hope for a functional prosthesis. Science183, 1–39 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Dobelle WH. Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex. ASAIO J.46, 3–9 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow AY, Chow VY, Packo KH et al. The artificial silicon retina microchip for the treatment of vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa. Arch. Ophthalmol.122, 460–469 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardue MT, Phillips MJ, Yin H et al. Possible sources of neuroprotection following subretinal silicon chip implantation in RCS rats. J. Neural. Eng.2, S39–S47 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Priore LV. Effect of sham surgery on retinal function after subretinal transplantation of the artificial silicone retina. Arch. Ophthalmol.123, 1156; author reply 1156–1157 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Zaraska W, Thor P, Lipinski M et al. Design and fabrication of neurostimulator implants – selected problems. Microelectronics Reliability45, 1930–1934 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Polikov VS, Tresco PA, Reichert WM. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J. Neurosci. Methods148, 1–18 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffoni LX, Coulombe J, Sawan M. Image processing strategies dedicated to visual cortical stimulators: a survey. Artif. Organs29, 658–664 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Marc RE, Jones BW. Retinal remodeling in inherited photoreceptor degenerations. Mol. Neurobiol.28, 139–147 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagon RA. Retinitis pigmentosa. Surv. Ophthalmol.33, 137–177 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckenlively JR, Yoser SL, Friedman LH, Oversier JJ. Clinical findings and common symptoms in retinitis pigmentosa. Am. J. Ophthalmol.105, 504–511 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha K, Horch K, Normann RA. Simulation of a phosphene-based visual field: visual acuity in a pixelized system. Ann. Biomed. Eng.20, 439–449 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha K, Horch KW, Normann RA. Mobility performance with a pixelized vision system. Vision Res.32, 1367–1372 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha K, Horch KW, Normann RA, Boman DK. Reading speed with a pixelized vision system. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A9, 673–677 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornos AP, Sommerhalder J, Rappaz B, Safran AB, Pelizzone M. Simulation of artificial vision, III: do the spatial or temporal characteristics of stimulus pixelization really matter? Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.46, 3906–3912 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Sommerhalder J, Oueghlani E, Bagnoud M et al. Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning. Vision Res.43, 269–283 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerhalder J, Rappaz B, de Haller R et al. Simulation of artificial vision: II. Eccentric reading of full-page text and the learning of this task. Vision Res.44, 1693–1706 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallum LE, Suaning GJ, Taubman DS, Lovell NH. Simulated prosthetic visual fixation, saccade, and smooth pursuit. Vision Res.45, 775–788 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Dagnelie G, Barnett GD, Humayun M, Thompson RW Jr. Paragraph text reading using a pixelized prosthetic vision simulator: parameter dependence and task learning in free-viewing conditions. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.47, 1241–1250 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dagnelie G, Walter M, Yang L. Playing checkers: detection and eye-hand coordination in simulated prosthetic vision. J. Modern Optics (2006) (In press).
   Google Scholar
• Hayes JS, Yin VT, Piyathaisere D et al. Visually guided performance of simple tasks using simulated prosthetic vision. Artif. Organs27, 1016–1028 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelle C, Trullemans C, Arno P, Veraart C. A real-time experimental prototype for enhancement of vision rehabilitation using auditory substitution. IEEE Trans Biomed. Eng.45, 1279–1293 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renier L, Collignon O, Poirier C et al. Cross-modal activation of visual cortex during depth perception using auditory substitution of vision. NeuroImage26, 573–580 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kupers R, Ptito M. ‘Seeing’ through the tongue: cross-modal plasticity in the congenitally blind. Int. Congr. Ser.1270, 79–84 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita P, Kercel SW. Sensory substitution and the human–machine interface. Trends Cogn. Sci.7, 541–546 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelek JS. Seeing by touch (haptics) for wayfinding. Int. Congr. Ser.1282, 1108–1112 (2005).
   Google Scholar