LUMA™ Cervical Imaging System

References

• The challenge of colposcopy today: historical perspective. In: Modern Colposcopy Textbook and Atlas (2nd Edition). Ferris DG, Cox JT, O’Connor DM, Wright VC, Foerster J (Eds). Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, IA, USA 1–12 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ramanujam N. Fluorescence spectroscopy of neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues. Neoplasia2, 89–117 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh WK, Cestero RM, Garcia FA. Optical detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in vivo: results of a 604-patient study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.190, 1249–1257 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.188(6), 1383–1392 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group. A randomized trial on the management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology interpretations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.188(6), 1393–1400 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney WK, Manos MM, Hurley LB, Ransley JE. Where’s the high-grade cervical neoplasia? The importance of minimally abnormal Papanicolaou diagnoses. Obstet. Gynecol.91(6), 973–976 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL et al. Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.191(2), 430–434 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage JC, Hanson VW, Abbey K et al. Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet. Gynecol.108(2), 264–272 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright TC, Denny L, Kuhn L et al. Use of visual screening methods for cervical cancer screening. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am.29(4), 701–734 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertlake PT, Frankus K, Newkirk GR et al. Effectiveness of the Papanicolaou smear and speculoscopy as compared with the Papanicolaou smear alone: a community-based clinical trial. Obstet. Gynecol.90(3), 421–427 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards G, Rutkowski C. Cervical cancer screening with Papanicolaou smear plus speculoscopy by nurse practitioners in a health maintenance organization. J. Lower Gen. Tract Dis.1, 141–147 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loiudice L, Abbiati R, Boselli F et al. Improvement of Pap smear sensitivity using a visual adjunctive procedure: a co-operative Italian study on speculoscopy (GISPE). Eur. J. Cancer Prev.7(4), 295–304 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppleson M, Reid BL, Skladnev VN et al. An electronic approach to the detection of pre-cancer and cancer of the uterine cervix: a preliminary evaluation of Polarprobe. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer4(2), 79–83 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quek SC, Mould T, Canfell K et al. The Polarprobe – emerging technology for cervical cancer screening. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore27(5), 717–721 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schomaker KT, Frisoli JK, Compton CC et al. Ultraviolet laser-induced fluorescence of colonic tissue: basic biology and diagnostic potential. Lasers Surg. Med.12(1), 63–78 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo-Dinh T, Panjehpour M, Overholt BF et al. In vivo cancer diagnosis of the esophagus using differential normalized fluorescence (DNF) indices. Lasers Surg. Med.16(1), 41–47 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung J, Lam S, LeRiche JC et al. Autofluorescence of normal and malignant bronchial tissue. Lasers Surg. Med.11(2), 99–105 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anidjar M, Cussenot O, Avrillier S et al. The role of laser-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy in bladder tumor detection: dependence on the excitation wavelength. Ann. NY Acad. Sci.838, 130–142 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anidjar M, Cussenot O, Blais J et al. Argon laser induced autofluorescence may distinguish between normal and tumor human urothelial cells: a microspectrofluorimetric study. J. Urol.155, 1771–1774 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anidjar M, Ettori D, Cussenot O et al. Laser induced autofluorescence diagnosis of bladder tumors: dependence on the excitation wavelength. J. Urol.156, 1590–1596 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Hallewin MA, Baert L, Vanherzeele H. Fluorescence imaging of bladder cancer. Acta Urol. Belg.62, 49–52 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koenig F, McGovern FJ, Althausen AF et al. Laser induced autofluorescence diagnosis of bladder cancer. J. Urol.156, 1597–1601 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig F, McGovern FJ, Enquist H et al. Autofluorescence guided biopsy for the early diagnosis of bladder carcinoma. J. Urol.159, 1871–1875 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanujam N, Mitchell MF, Mahadevan A et al. Spectroscopic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in vivo using laser-induced fluorescence spectra at multiple excitation wavelengths. Lasers Surg. Med.19(1), 63–74 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanujam N, Mitchell MF, Mahadevan A et al. Fluorescence spectroscopy: a diagnostic tool for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Gynecol. Oncol.52(1), 31–38 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utzinger U, Trujillo EV, Atkinson EN et al. Performance estimation of diagnostic tests for cervical precancer based on fluorescence spectroscopy: effects of tissue type, sample size, population, and signal-to-noise ratio. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.46, 1293–1303 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchesini R, Cascinelli N, Brambilla M et al. In vivo spectrophotometric evaluation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic skin pigmented lesions. II: discriminant analysis between nevus and melanoma. Photochem. Photobiol.55(4), 515–522 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourant JR, Bigio IJ, Boyer J et al. Spectroscopic diagnosis of bladder cancer with elastic light scattering. Lasers Surg. Med.17(4), 350–357 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utzinger U, Brewer M, Silva E et al. Reflectance spectroscopy for in vivo characterization of ovarian tissue. Lasers Surg. Med.28(1), 56–66 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonios GI, Cothren RM, Arendt JT et al. Morphological model of human colon tissue fluorescence. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.43, 113–122 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakoudi I, Jacobson BC, van Dam J et al. Fluorescence, reflectance, and light-scattering spectroscopy for evaluating dysplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology120(7), 1620–1629 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang SK, Follen M, Malpica A et al. Optimal excitation wavelengths for discrimination of cervical neoplasia. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.49, 1102–1111 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakoudi I, Sheets EE, Muller MG et al. Trimodal spectroscopy for the detection and characterization of cervical precancers in vivo. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.186, 374–382 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordstrom RJ, Burke L, Niloff JM et al. Identification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) using UV-excited fluorescence and diffuse-reflectance tissue spectroscopy. Lasers Surg. Med.29, 118–127 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris DG, Lawhead RA, Dickman ED et al. Multimodal hyperspectral imaging for the noninvasive diagnosis of cervical neoplasia. J. Lower Genital Tract Dis.5(2), 65–72 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benavides JM, Chang S, Park SY et al. Multispectral digital colposcopy for in vivo detection of cervical cancer. Opt. Express11, 1223–1236 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman L, Backman V, Wallace M et al. Observation of periodic fine structure in reflectance from biological tissue: a new technique for measuring nuclear size distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 627–630 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards-Kortum R, Sevick-Muraca E. Quantitative optical spectroscopy for tissue diagnosis. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.47, 555–606 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayevsky A, Chance B. Intracellular oxidation-reduction state measured in situ by a multichannel fiber-optic surface fluorometer. Science217, 537–540 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez RD, Wright TC, Optical Detection Group. Effective cervical neoplasia detection with a novel optical detection system: a randomized trial. Gynecol. Oncol.104(2), 281–289 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh WK, Cestero R, Garcia FA et al. Optical detection of cervical neoplasia: results from an internally controlled multi-center study. Presented at the 53rd American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Annual Meeting, CA, USA, May 7–11 2005 (Abstract).
   Google Scholar