Strategies for the development of the urinary catheter

References

• Beiko DT, Knudsen BE, Watterson JD, Cadieux PA, Reid G, Denstedt JD. Urinary tract. Biomaterials J. Urol.171(6 Pt 1), 2438–2444 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Carr HA. A short history of the Foley catheter: from handmade instrument to infection-prevention device. J. Endourol.14(1), 5–8 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint S, Lipsky BA, Goold SD. Indwelling urinary catheters: a one-point restraint? Ann. Inter. Med.137(2), 125–127 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki DG, Tambyah PA. Engineering out the risk of infection with urinary catheters. Emerg. Infect. Dis.7(2), 1–6 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint S, Wiese J, Amory JK et al. Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters? Am. J. Med.109(6), 476–480 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein JW, Mazon D, Pantelick E, Reagan-Cirincione P, Dembry LM, Hierholzer WJ Jr. A decade of prevalence surveys in a tertiary-care center: trends in nosocomial infection rates, device utilization and patient acuity. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.20(8), 543–548 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saint S, Lipsky BA, Goold SD. Indwelling urinary catheters: a one-point restraint? Ann. Inter. Med.137(2), 125–127 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toughill E. Indwelling urinary catheters: common mechanical and pathogenic problems. Am. J. Nurs.105(5), 35–37 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray M. What nursing interventions reduce the risk of symptomatic urinary tract infection in the patient with an indwelling catheter? J. Wound Ostomy. Continence Nurs.31(1), 3–13 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maki DG, Tambyah PA. Engineering out the risk of infection with urinary catheters. Emerg. Infect. Dis.7(2), 1–6 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomfret I. Urinary catheters: selection, management and prevention of infection. Br. J. Community Nurs.5(1), 6–8 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drinka PJ. Complications of chronic indwelling urinary catheters. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc.7(6), 388–392 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leone M, Garnier F, Avidan M, Martin C. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in intensive care units. Microbes Infect.6(11), 1026–1032 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choong S, Wood S, Fry C, Whitfield H. Catheter associated urinary tract infection and encrustation. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents17(4), 305–310 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JR, Kuskowski MA, Wilt TJ. Systematic review: antimicrobial urinary catheters to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients. Ann. Intern. Med.144(2), 116–126 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosnahan J, Jull A, Tracy C. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalised adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1, CD004013 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Keane PF, Bonner MC, Johnston SR, Zafia A, Gorman SP. Caracterization of biofilms and encrustation on ureteric stents in vitro. Br. J. Urol.73(6), 687–691 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stickler DJ, Evans A, Morris, Hughes G. Strategies for the control of catheter encrustation. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents19(6), 499–506 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner M, Keane PF, Gorman SP. Characterization and antibiotic sensitivities of isolates from urethral stent biofilm. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.45, 1445 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents17(4), 299–303 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickler DJ, McLean RJC. Biomaterial associated infections: the scale of the problem.Cell. Mater.5, 167–182 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Kunin CM, Douthitt S, Dancing J, Anderson J, Moeschberger M. The association between the use of urinary catheters and morbidity and mortality among elderly patients in nursing homes. Am. J. Epidemiol.135(3), 291–301 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickler DJ, Zimakoff J. Complications of urinary tract infections associated with devices used for long-term bladder management. J. Hosp. Infect.28(3), 177–194 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Locke JR, Hill DE, Walzer Y. Incidence of squamous cell carcinoma in patients with long term catheter drainage. J. Urol.133(6), 1034–1035 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria. Am. J. Infect. Control28(1), 68–75 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coello R, Glenister H, Fereres Jet al. The cost of infection in surgical patients: a case control study.J. Hosp. Infect.25(4), 239–250 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouprêt M, Daudon M, Hupertan V, Gattegno B, Thibault P, Traxer O. Can urinary stent encrustation analysis predict urinary stone composition? Urology66(2), 246–251 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabbura NA, Stickler DJ, Mahenthiralingam E et al. Genotyping demonstrates that the strains of Proteus mirabilis from bladder stones and catheter encrustations of patients undergoing long-term bladder catheterization are identical. J. Urol.171(5), 1925–1928 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris NS, Stickler DJ. Encrustation of indwelling urethral catheters by Proteus mirabilis biofilms growing in human urine. J. Hosp. Infect.39(3), 227–234 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones BD, Mobley HL. Genetic and biochemical diversity of ureases of Proteus, Providencia and Morganella species isolated from urinary tract infection. Infect. Immun.55(9), 2198–2203 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedl B. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Curr. Opin. Urol.11(1), 75–79 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belas R, Suvanasuthi R. The ability of Proteus mirabilis to sense surfaces and regulate virulence gene expression involves FliL, a flagellar basal body protein. J. Bacteriol.187(19), 6789–6803 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumanski AJ, Hedelin H, Edin-Liljegren A, Beauchemin D, McLean RJ. Unique ability of the Proteus mirabilis capsule to enhance mineral growth in infectious urinary calculi. Infect. Immun.62(7), 2998–3003 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rozalski A, Sidorczyk Z, Kotelko K. Potential virulence factors of Proteus bacilli. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.61(1), 65–89 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santin M, Motta A, Denyer SP, Cannas M. Effect of the urine conditioning film on ureteral stent encrustation and characterization of its protein composition. Biomaterials20(13), 1245–1251 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman SP, McGovern JG, Woolfson AD, Adair CG, Jones DS. The concomitant development of poly(vinyl chloride)-related biofilm and antimicrobial resistance in relation to ventilator-associated pneumonia. Biomaterials22(20), 2741–2747 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorman SP, Tunney MM. Assessment of encrustation behaviour of urinary tract biomaterials. J. Biomater. Appl.12(2), 136–166 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedelin H, Edin-Liljegren A, Grenabo L. E. coli and urease-induced crystallisation in urine. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol.24(1), 57–61 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedelin H. Uropathogens and urinary tract concretion formation and catheter encrustations. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents19(6), 484–487 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suller MT, Anthony VJ, Mathur S, Feneley RC, Greenman J, Stickler DJ. Factors modulating the pH at which calcium and magnesium phosphates precipitate from human urine. Urol. Res.33(4), 254–260 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathur S, Suller MT, Stickler DJ, Feneley CL. Prospective study of individuals with long-term urinary catheters colonized with Proteus species. Br. J. Urol.97(1), 121–128 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Torzewska A, Staczek P, Rozalski A. Crystallization of urine mineral components may depend on the chemical nature of Proteus endotoxin polysaccharides. J. Med. Microbiol.52(6), 471–477 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedelin H, Bratt CG, Eckerdal G, Lincoln K. Relationship between urease-producing bacteria, urinary pH and encrustation on indwelling urinary catheters. Br. J. Urol.67(5), 527–531 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tunney MM, Keane PF, Gorman SP. Assessment of urinary tract biomaterial encrustation using a modified Robbins device continuous flow model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater.38, 87–93 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Tuney MM, Bonner MC, Keane PF, Gorman SP. Development of a model for assessment of biomaterial encrustation in the upper urinary tract. Biomaterials17(10), 1025–1029 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence EL, Turner IG. Materials for urinary catheters: a review of their history and development in the UK. Med. Eng. Phys.27(6), 443–453 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrie BG, Groome J, Sethia B, Kirk D. Comparison of silicone and latex catheters in the development of urethral stricture after cardiac surgery. Br. J. Urol.58(5), 549–550 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Denstedt JD, Wollin TA, Reid G. Biomaterials used in urology: current issues of biocompatibility, infection and encrustation. J. Endourol.12(6), 493–500 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris NS, Stickler DJ, Winters C. Which indwelling urethral catheters resist encrustation by Proteus mirabilis biofilms? Br. J. Urol.80(1), 58–63 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones DS, Garvin CP, Gorman SP. Design of a simulated urethra model for the quantitative assessment of urinary catheter lubricity. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.12(1), 15–21 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piechota HJ, Pannek J. Catheter drainage of the urinary tract. Status of the technique and prospects. Urologe A.42(8), 1060–1069 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabbuba N, Hughes G, Stickler DJ. The migration of Proteus mirabilis and other urinary tract pathogens over Foley catheters. BJU Int.89(1), 55–60 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts JA, Fussell EN, Kaack MB. Bacterial adherence to urethral catheters. J. Urol.144(2 Pt 1), 264–269 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormio L, La Forgia P, LaForgia D, Siitonen A, Ruutu M. Bacterial adhesion to urethral catheters: role of coating materials and immersion in antibiotic solution. Eur. Urol.40(3), 354–358 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull E, Chilton CP, Gould CA, Sutton TM. Single-blind, randomised, parallel group study of the Bard Biocath catheter and a silicone elastomer coated catheter. Br. J. Urol.68(4), 394–399 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorman SP, Woolfson AD, McCafferty DE. Microbial adherence and biofilm formation on latex and polymer-coated urinary catheters; role of hydrophobicity. Proc. 10th Pharmaceutical Conference, Bologna, Italy, 661–663 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Denyer SP, Hanlon GW, Davies MC, Gorman SP. Antimicrobial and other methods for controlling microbial adhesion in infection. In: Microbial Biofilms: Formation and Control. Denyer SP, Gorman SP, Sussman M (Eds). Oxford Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, UK, 147–165 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Tunney MM, Gorman SP. Evaluation of a poly(vinyl pyrollidone)-coated biomaterial for urological use. Biomaterials23(23), 4601–4608 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Cho YW, Kwon IC, Jeong SY, Bae YH. Assessment of PEO/PTMO multiblock copolymer/segmented polyurethane blends as coating materials for urinary catheters: in vitro bacterial adhesion and encrustation behavior. Biomaterials23(19), 3991–4000 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehmer B, Marsden PO. Route and prophylaxis of ascending bladder infection in male patients with indwelling catheters. J. Urol.108(5), 719–721 (1972).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickler DJ, Morris NS, Williams TJ. An assessment of the ability of a silver-releasing device to prevent bacterial contamination of urethral catheter drainage systems. Br. J. Urol.78(4), 579–588 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saint S, Elmore JG, Sullivan SD, Emerson SS, Koepsell TD. The efficacy of silver coated urinary catheters in preventing urinary infection: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Med.105(3), 236–241 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautner BW, Hull RA, Darouiche RO. Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.18(1), 37–41 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan A, Karchmer T, Richards A, Song X, Perl TM. A prospective trial of a novel, silicone-based, silver-coated foley catheter for the prevention of nosocomial urinary tract infections. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.27(1), 38–43 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niel-Weise BS, Arend SM, van den Broeck PJ. Is there evidence for recommending silver-coated urinary catheters in guidelines? J. Hosp. Infect.52(2), 81–87 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart MJ, Parikh S, Xiao G, Tonge PJ, Kisker C. Structural basis and mechanism of enoyl reductase inhibition by triclosan. J. Mol. Biol.290(4), 859–865 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickler DJ, Jones GL, Russell AD. Control of blockage and encrustation of Foley catheters. Lancet361(9367), 1435–1437 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bibby JM, Cox AJ, Hukins DW. Feasibility of preventing encrustation of urinary catheters. Cell Mater.2, 183–95 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Jones GL, Russell AD, Caliskan Z, Stickler DJ. A strategy for the control of blockage of catheter blockage by crystalline Proteus mirabilis biofilm using the antimicrobial agent triclosan. Eur. Urol.48(5), 838–845 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GL, Muller CT, O’Reilly M, Stickler DJ. Effect of triclosan on the development of bacterial biofilms by urinary tract pathogens on urinary catheters. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.57(2), 266–272 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Cadieux PA, Chew BH, Knudsen BE et al. Triclosan loaded ureteral stents decrease Proteus mirabilis 296 infection in a rabbit urinary tract infection model. J. Urol.175(6), 2331–2335 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JR, Berggren T, Conway AJ. Activity of a nitrofurazone matrix urinary catheter against catheter-associated uropathogens. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother.37(9), 2033–2036 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SJ, Kim SW, Cho YH et al. A comparative multicentre study on the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection between nitrofurazone-coated and silicone catheters. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents24(Suppl. 1), S65–S69 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Habdan I, Sadat-Ali M, Corea JR, Al-Othman A, Kamal BA, Shrivan DS. Assessment of nosocomial urinary tract infections in orthopaedic patients: a prospective and comparative study using two different catheters. Int. Surg.88(3), 152–154 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maki DG, Knasinski V, Halvorson KT, Tambyah PA, Holcomb RG. A prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial of a novel nitrofurazone-impregnated urinary catheter. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.18(Suppl.), 50 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Park JH, Cho YW, Cho YH et al. Norfloxacin-releasing urethral catheter for long-term catheterization. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.14(9), 951–962 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho YH, Lee SJ, Lee JY et al. Prophylactic efficacy of a new gentamicin-releasing urethral catheter in short-term catheterized rabbits. BJU Int.87(4), 104–109 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaonkar TA, Sampath LA, Modak SM. Evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of urinary catheters impregnated with antiseptics in an in vitro urinary tract model. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.24(7), 506–513 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Andrews GP, Gorman SP. Characterization of crosslinking effects on the physicochemical and drug diffusional properties of cationic hydrogels designed as bioactive urological biomaterials. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.57(10), 1251–1259 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiban G, Hanna H, Dvorak T, Raad I. A rapid method of impregnating endotracheal tubes and urinary catheters with gendine: a novel antiseptic agent. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.55(1), 51–56 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darouiche RO, Smith JA, Hanna H et al. Efficacy of antimicrobial-impregnated ladder catheters in reducing catheter-associated bacteruria: a prospective randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Urology54(6), 976–981 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki DG, Tambyah PA. Engineering out the risk of infection with urinary catheters. Emerg. Infect. Dis.7(2), 1–6 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith DP, Musher DM. Acetohydroxamic acid. Potential use in urinary infection caused by urea-splitting bacteria. Urology5(3), 299–302 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Griffith DP, Gibson JR, Clinton CW, Musher DM. Acetohydroxamic acid: clinical studies of a urease inhibitor in patients with staghorn renal calculi. J. Urol.119(1), 9–15 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millner OE Jr, Andersen JA, Appler ME et al. Flurofamide: a potent inhibitor of bacterial urease with potential clinical utility in the treatment of infection induced urinary stones. J. Urol.127(2), 346–350 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris NS, Stickler DJ. The effect of urease inhibitors on the encrustation of urethral catheters. Urol. Res.26(4), 275–279 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton E, Gawande PV, Yakandawala N et al. Antibiofilm activity of GlmU enzyme inhibitors against catheter-associated uropathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.50(5), 1835–1840 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis CP, Anderson MD, Hoskins S, Warren MM. Electrode and bacterial survival with iontophoresis in synthetic urine. J. Urol.147(5), 1310–1313 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costerton JW, Ellis B, Lam K, Johnson F, Khoury AE. Mechanism of electrical enhancement of efficacy of antibiotics in killing biofilm bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.38(12), 2803–2809 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarti A, Gangodawila S, Long MJ, Morris NS, Blacklock AR, Stickler DJ. An electrified catheter to resist encrustation by Proteus mirabilis biofilm. J. Urol.174(3), 1129–1132 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stickler D, Young R, Jones G, Sabbuba N, Morris N. Why are Foley catheters so vulnerable to encrustation and blockage by crystalline bacterial biofilm? Urol. Res.31(5), 306–311(2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbuba NA, Stickler DJ, Long MJ, Dong Z, Short TD, Feneley RJC. Does the valve regulated release of urine from the bladder decrease encrustation and blockage of indwelling catheters by crystalline Proteus mirabilis biofilms? J. Urol.173(1), 262–266 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence EL, Turner IG. Kink, flow and retention properties of urinary catheters part 1: conventional foley catheters. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.17(2), 147–152 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar