Ceramics as biomaterials for dental restoration

References

• Gehre G. Keramische Werkstoffe. In: Zahnärztliche Werkstoffe und ihre Verarbeitung. Bd 1: Grundlagen und Verarbeitung (6th Auflage). Kappert H (Ed.). Hüthig Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann-Axthelm W. Geschichte der Zahnheilkunde. Quintessenz Verlag, Berlin, Germany (1974).
   Google Scholar
• Kirsten H Die Jacketkrone. Hermann Meusser Verlag, Berlin, Germany (1929).
   Google Scholar
• Southan DE. Die Porzellan-Jacketkrone. In: Dental-Keramik Vorträge und Diskussionen anlässlich des 1. Internationalen Keramik-Symposiums. Mc Lean JW (Ed.). Quintessenz Verlag, Berlin, Germany (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Kerschbaum T. Überlebenszeiten von Kronen und Brückenzahnersatz heute. Zahnärztl. Mitt.76, 2315–2320 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerschbaum T, Erpenstein H. Galvano-keramische Einzelkronen haben sich klinisch bewährt. Zahnärztl. Mitt.87, 28–33 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Schwickerath H. Werkstoffkundliche Bewertung keramischer Kronen. Zahnärztl. Mitt.77, 2422 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwickerath H, Coca I. Zur Festigkeit von Kronen im Frontzahnbereich. Dtsch Zahnarztl. Z.41, 1002 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLean JW. Dental porcelains. In: Dental Materials Research, NBS Publications 354. Dickens G, Cassels JM (Eds). National Bureau of Standards, DC, USA (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Hench LL, Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.74, 1487–1510 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubo T. Bioactive glass–ceramics properties and application. Biomaterials12, 155–163 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strub JR, Türp JC, Witkowski S, Hürzeler MB, Kern M. Curriculum Prothetik Bd. 2, Quintessenz Verlag, Berlin, Germany (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Tinschert J, Natt T, Jorewitz A, Fischer H, Spiekermann H, Marx R. Belastbarkeit vollkeramischer Seitenzahnbrücken aus neuen Hartkernkeramiken. Dtsch Zahnarztl. Z.55, 610–616 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Tinschert J, Natt T, Latzke P, Schulze K, Heussen N, Spiekermann H. Vollkeramische Brücken aus DC-Zirkon – ein klinisches Konzept mit Erfolg? Dtsch Zahnarztl. Z.60, 435–445 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kappert HF, Krah M. Keramiken – eine Übersicht. Quintessenz Zahntech.27, 668–704 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Kappert HF. Verblendung von Oxidkeramiken. In: Neue Oxidkeramiken und CAD/CAM-Techniken im Dentalbereich. Klinik, Labortechnik und Werkstoffkunde. Deutscher Ärzte Verlag DÄV, Köln, Germany (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kingery WD, Bowen RK, Uhlmann DR. Introduction to Ceramics. Wiley, NY, USA (1975).
   Google Scholar
• O’Brian WJ. Dental porcelains. In: An Outline of Dental Materials and their Chemistry. O’Brian WJ, Ryge G (Eds). WB Sauders, PA, USA (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann W. Kristalline Phasen in keramischen Verblendungen. Dent. Lab.33, 993–994 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Schmid M, Fischer J, Salk M, Strub J. Mikrogefüge leucit-verstärkter Glaskeramiken. Schweizer Monatsschr. Zahnmed.102, 1046–1053 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Della-Bona A, Salazar Marocho SM. Characterization and properties of a dental ceramic material. Presented at: 85th General Session of the IADR. New Orleans, LA, USA, 21–24 March 2007 (Abstract 022).
   Google Scholar
• Abuzenada BM, Pober R, Girodano RII. Flexural strength and toothbrushing abrasion of veneering restorative dental materials. Presented at: ADEA/AADR/CADR Meeting. Orlando, FL, USA, 8–11 March 2006 (Abstract 1365).
   Google Scholar
• Cesar PF, Yoshiruma HN, Miranda WG, Goldenstein H, Okada CY, Gonzaga CC. Fracture toughness of dental porcelains. Presented at: 81st General Session of the IADR, Goteborg, Sweden, 30 June–1 July 2003 (Abstract 0869).
   Google Scholar
• Höland W, Beall GH. Glass–Ceramic Technology. The American Ceramic Society-Wiley, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• McMillan PW. Glass–Ceramics (2nd Edition). Academic Press, NY, USA (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Höland W. Glaskeramik. vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, UTB Stuttgart (2006)
   Google Scholar
• Bühler-Zemp P, Völkl T. Scientific documentation IPS InLine, IVoclar Vivadent AG (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Höland W, Frank M, Rheinberger VM. Surface crystallization of leucite in glass. J. Non-Cryst. Sol.180, 292–307 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor D, Henderson CMB. Thermal expansion of the leucite group of minerals. Am. Min.53, 1476 (1968).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappert HF, Schwickerath H, Veiel S, Bregazzi J. Zur Korrosionsfestigkeit aufbrennfähiger Edelmetalllegierungen. Dtsch. Zahnärztl. Z.49, 716–721 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• ISO 6872 Dental Ceramics (1998).
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9693 Metal–ceramic dental restorative systems (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Vogel W. Chemistry of Glass. The American Ceramic Society–Wiley, OH, USA (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Vogel W, Höland W. The development of bioglass–ceramics for medical application. Angew. Chem. Int. (Engl. Transl.)26, 527–544 (1987).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höland W, Vogel W, Naumann K, Gummel J. Interface reactions between machinable bioactive glass–ceramics and bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.9, 303–312 (1985).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höland W, Götz W, Carl G, Vogel W. Microstructure of mica glass–ceramics and interface reactions between mica glass–ceramics and bone. Cells Mater.2, 105–112 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Höland W, Frank M, Schweiger M, Rheinberger VM. Development of translicent glass–ceramics for dental application. Glastech. Ber. Glass Sci. Technol.67C, 117–122 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Höland W. Biocompatible and bioactive glass–ceramics – state of the art and new directions. J. Non-Cryst. Sol.219, 192–197 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höland W, Rheinberger VM, Wegner S, Frank M. Needle like apatite–leucite glass–ceramic as a base material for the veneering of metal restorations in dentistry. J. Mat. Sci.: Mater. Med.11, 1–7 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller R, Abu-Hilal LA, Reinsch S, Höland W. Coarsening of needle-shaped apatite crystals in SiO2–Al2O3–Na2O–K2O–CaO–P2O5–F glass. J. Mater. Sci.34, 65–69 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Völksch G, Höche T, Szabo I, Höland W. Phase content in a glass–ceramic from the SiO2–Al2O3–Na2O–K2O–CaO–P2O5–F system. Glastech. Ber. Glass Sci. Technol.71C, 500–502 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Szabo I, Barnab S, Völksch G, Höland W. Crystallization and color of apatite–leucite glass–ceramic. Glastech. Ber. Glass Sci. Technol.73C1, 354–357 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Kreidl NJ. Inorganic glass forming systems. In: Glass Science and Technology. Kreidl NJ, Uhlmann DR (Eds). Pergamin Press, FL, USA (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Grossmann DG. Machinable glass–ceramic based on tetrasilicic mica. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.55, 446–449 (1972).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köber K. Zahnärztliche Prothetik, 4. vollständig überarbeitet Auflage. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Marxkors PDR. Lehrbuch der zahnärztlichen Prothetik. Hanser, München, Germany (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Jiang YL, Sun J, Weng WM, Zhang FQ. Long-term observation of 920 porcelain fused to metal prostheses. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue15(5), 490–492 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Backer H, Van Maele G, De Moor N, Van den Berghe L, De Boever J. A 20-year retrospective survival study of fixed partial dentures. Int. J. Prosthodont.19(2), 143–153 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Backer H, Van Maele G, De Moor N, Van den Berghe L, De Boever J. An 18-year retrospective survival study of full crowns with or without posts. Int. J. Prosthodont.19(2), 136–142 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubalkova H, Charvat J, Dostalova T, Linetskiy I. Long-term clinical evaluation of fixed dentures – two to fifteen years after insertion. Prague Med. Rep.106(1), 50–60 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erpenstein H, Borchard R, Kerschbaum T. Long-term clinical results of galvano–ceramic and glass–ceramic individual crowns. J. Prosthet. Dent.83(5), 530–534 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival of extensive amalgams and posterior crowns. J. Dent.25(3–4), 225–227 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmqvist S, Swartz B. Artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures 18 to 23 years after placement. Int. J. Prosthodont.6(3), 279–285 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coornaert J, Adriaens P, De Boever J. Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent.51(3), 338–342 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal–ceramic FPDs: part 1. Outcome. Int. J. Prosthodont.15(5), 439–445 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton TR. A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics: clinical characteristics and outcome of single-unit metal-ceramic crowns. Int. J. Prosthodont.12(6), 519–526 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson S. A clinical evaluation of fixed bridges, 10 years following insertion. J. Oral Rehabil.13(5), 423–432 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby G, Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Hebl L. Longevity of fixed partial dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent.78(2), 127–131 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan K, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP, Chan ES. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years III. Conventional FPDs. Clin. Oral Implants Res.15(6), 654–666 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitemeier B, Hansel K, Kastner C, Walter MH. Metal–ceramic failure in noble metal crowns: 7-year results of a prospective clinical trial in private practices. Int. J. Prosthodont.19(4), 397–399 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etemadi S, Smales RJ. Survival of resin-bonded porcelain veneer crowns placed with and without metal reinforcement. J. Dent.34(2), 139–145 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappert HF. Dentalkeramik. In: Fortschritte der Zahnärztlichen Prothetik und Werkstoffkunde. Hanser, München, Germany, 343–389 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Schwickerath H. Prüfung der Verbundfestigkeit Metall–Keramik. Dtsch. Zahnärztl. Z.38, 21 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyenberg KH. Modified porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations and porcelain laminates for anterior aesthetics. Pract. Periodontics Aesthet. Dent.7(7), 33–44 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Derand P, Vereby P. Wear of low-fusing dental porcelains. J. Prosthet. Dent.81, 460–463 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelain. J. Prosthodont.12(3), 168–175 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuh C, Kinast EJ, Mezzomo E, Kapczinski MP. Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics. J. Prosthet. Dent.93(3), 245–252 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Wear of enamel opposing low-fusing and conventional ceramic restorative materials. J. Prosthodont.10(1), 8–15 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yilmaz Y, Yilmaz A. Repairing a preveneered stainless steel crown with two different materials. J. Dent. Child. (Chic.)71(2), 135–138 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burke FJ. Repair of metal–ceramic restorations using an abrasive silica-impregnating technique: two case reports. Dent. Update29(8), 398–402 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmes JR, Sulik WD, Holland GA, Bayne SC. Marginal fit of castable ceramic crowns. J. Prosthet. Dent.67(5), 594–599 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaerer P, Sato T, Wohlwend A. A comparison of the marginal fit of three cast ceramic crown systems. J. Prosthet. Dent.59(5), 534–542 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claus H. Das Hi-Ceram Verfahren. Metallfreie Kronen auf einem Keramikgerüst. Dent. Lab.35, 479–482 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Claus H. Vita In-Ceram, eine neues Verfahren zur Herstellung von oxid–keramischen Kronen–und Brückengerüsten. Quintessenz Zahntech.16, 35 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kappert HF, Knode H. In-Ceram auf dem Prüfstand. Quintessenz Zahntech.16, 42 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Reichel K. Anwendungstechnische Aspekte des Vita In-Ceram-Systems. Dental Labor41, 1205–1215 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Kappert HF. Vollkeramik. Werkstoffkunde –Zahntechnik - klinische Erfahrung. Quintessenz Verlag, Berlin, Gemany (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Kappert HF. Dental materials: new ceramic systems. Acad. Dental Mater. Trans.9, 180–199 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Wassermann A, Kaiser M, Strub JR. Clinical long-term results of VITA In-Ceram classic crowns and fixed partial dentures: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Prosthodont.19(4), 355–363 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappert HF, Knipp U, Wehrstein A, Kmitta M, Knipp J. Festigkeit von Zirkonoxid-verstärkten Vollkeramikbrücken aus In-Ceram. Dtsch. Zahnärztl. Z.50, 683–685 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Stookey SD. Catalyzed crystallization of glass in theory and practice. Ind. Eng. Chem.51, 805–808 (1959).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beall GH. Structure, properties, and nucleation of glass–ceramics. In: Advances in Nucleation and Crystallization in Glass. Hench LL, Freiman SW (Eds). The American Ceramic Society-Wiley, OH, USA (1971).
   Google Scholar
• Grossman DG. Structure and physical properties of Dicor/MGC glass–ceramic. In: International Symposium on Computer Restorations. Mörmann WH (Ed.). Quintessence, IL, USA (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Malament KA, Grossman DG. Bonded vs. non bonded Dicor crowns: four years report. J. Dent. Res.71, 321 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Malament KA, Socransky SS. Survival of Dicor glass–ceramic dental restorations over 14 years: part I. Survival of Dicor complete coverage restorations and effect of internal surface acid etching, tooth position, gender, and age. J. Prosthet. Dent.81, 23–32 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adair PJ, Grossmann DG. Die gegossene keramische Krone. Int. J. Par. Rest. Zahnheilk.4, 33 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Erpenstein H, Kerschbaum T. Frakturanfälligkeit von glas- und galvano-keramischen Kronen. Rostocker Medizinische Beiträge Universität Rostock4, 71 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Geller W, Kwiatowski SJ. Willi’s Glas: glaskeramische Synthese zur Vermeidung der Dunkel- und Schattenzonen im Gingivabereich. Quintessenz Zahntech.13, 39–57 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beham G. IPS Empress – Eine neue Keramik-Technologie. Ivoclar Vivadent-Report6, 1–13 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Wohlwend A., Schärer P. Die Empress-Technik – ein neues Verfahren zur Herstellung von vollkeramischen Kronen, Inlays und Facetten. Quintessenz Zahntech.16, 966–978 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Höland W, Frank M. IPS Empress Glaskeramik. In: Metallfreie Restaurationenen aus Presskeramik. Haller B, Bischoff H (Eds). Quintessenz Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Dong JK, Lüthy H, Wohlwend A, Schärer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: technology and strength. Int.J. Prosthodont.5, 9 (1992)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Höland W, Rheinberger VM, Frank M, Schweiger M. Glass–ceramic for dental restoration. Bioceramics8, 299–301 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Heinzmann JL, Krejci I, Lutz F. Wear and marginal adaptation of glass–ceramic inlays, amalgam and enamel. J. Dent. Res.69, 161 (1990) (Abstract 423).
   Google Scholar
• Fradeani M, Redemagni M. An 11-year clinical evaluation of leucite-reinforced glass–ceramic crown: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int.33, 503–510 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Petschelt A. Leucite-reinforced glass–ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Operative Dentistry25, 459–465 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodbeck U. Six years of clinical experience with an all-ceramic system. Signature4(3 Suppl.), 6–13 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malamant KA. Presentation on clinical results of IPS Empress. Internal report (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am. J. Dent.13(Spec. No), D60–D76 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelhoff D, Horstkemper T, Richter EJ, Spiekermann H, Yildirim M. Adhäsiv und konventionell befestigte Empress 1-Kronen: klinische Befunde nach vierjähriger Tragedauer. Dtsch Zahnarztl. Z.55, 326–330 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Strub JR, Türp JC, Witkowski S, Hürzeler MB, Kern M. Curriculum Prothetik Bd. 2: Artikulatoren, Ästhetik, Werkstoffkunde, Festsitzende Prothetik- Metall- und Vollkeramiksysteme in der Kronen-Brücken-Prothetik. Quintessenz, Berlin, Germany (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Krämer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dent. Mater.22(1), 13–21 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felden A, Schmalz G, Hiller KA. Retrospective clinical study and survival analysis on partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin. Oral Investig.4(4), 199–205 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fradeani M. Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.18(3), 216–225 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper. Dent.25(6), 459–465 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess PC, Stappert CF. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Dent. Mater.24(6), 804–813 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheinberger VM. Perspectives in dental ceramics. Glastech. Ber. Glass Sci. Technol.70C, 393–400 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Hölsch W, Kappert HF. Festigkeitsprüfung von vollkeramischem Einzelzahnersatz für den Front- und Seitenzahnbereich. Dtsch. Zahnärztl. Z.47, 621–623 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Witkowski S. Presskeramiken – Aktueller Überblick über die Systeme 2000. Quintessenz Zahntech.26(5), 452–486 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Höland W, Rheinberger V, Apel E et al. Clinical application of glass–ceramics in dentistry. J. Mat. Sci.: Mat. Med.17, 1037–1042 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beall GH. Design of glass ceramics. Solid State Sci.129, 333–354 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Höland W, Wange P, Naumann K et al. Control of phase formation in glass–ceramics for medicine and technology. J. Non-Cryst. Sol.129, 152–162 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datzmann G. Cerec Vitablocs Mark II machinable ceramic. In: CAD/CIM in Aesthetic Dentistry. Mörmann WH (Ed). Quintessence Pub. Co., IL, USA (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Schweiger M. Materials properties of IPS Empress. Presented at: Scientific Meeting, Hohenems, Austria (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Bühler P, Völkel T. Scientific documentation of IPS Empress CAD. Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Mörmann WH, Brandestini M. Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int.20, 329–339 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehl A, Gloger W, Hickel R. Fully automatic CAD/CAM-fabrication of tooth restorations with a new precise 3D-scanning system. J. Dent. Res.79, 530 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Mörmann WH. 20 Jahre keramische CEREC CAD/CAM Restaurationen. Technischer Stand und klinische Bewährung. Zahnärztl. Mitt.96, 58–65 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Reich S, Wichmann M. Unterschiede zwischen den CEREC-3D-Software-Versionen 1000 und 15000. Int. J. Comp. Dentistry7, 47–60 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luthard R, Rudolph H, Sandkuhl O, Walter M. Aktuelle CAD/CAM- Systeme zur Herstellung von keramischen Zahnersatz Teil I. Zahnärzt. Rundsch.110, 747 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Tinschert J, Natt G, Spiekermann H. Aktuelle Standortbestimmung von Dentalkeramiken. Dental Praxis18, 293–309 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Rekow ED. Prosthese by computer. NY State Dent. J.54, 21–22 (1988)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durret F. CAD/CAM in dentistry. J. Am. Dent. Assoc.117, 715–720 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker J. CAD/CAM in der Zahnmedizin – Teil II. Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt105, 188 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Roulet J-F, Herder S. Seitenzahnversorgung mit adhäsiv befestigten Keramikinlays. Grundlagen, Herstellung und klinisches Vorgehen. Quintessenz Verlag-GmbH, Berlin, Germany (1989)
   Google Scholar
• Reiss B. Eighteen-year clinical study in a dental practice. In: State of the Art of CAD/CAM Restorations 20 Years of CEREC. Mörmann WH (Ed.). Quintessence Publishing Company, Berlin, Germany, 57–64 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly R. Machinable ceramics. In: State of the Art of CAD/CAM Restorations 20 Years of CEREC. Mörmann WH (Ed.). Quintessence Publishing Company, Berlin, Germany, 29–38 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen RP, Galàn AD, Mosher TA. Clinical status of eleven CAD/CAD materials after one to twelve years of service. In: State of the Art of CAD/CAM Restorations 20 Years of CEREC. Mörmann WH (Ed.). Quintessence Publishing Company, Berlin, Germany, 9–18 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen GJ. The future significance of CAD/CAM for dentistry. In: State of the Art of CAD/CAM Restorations 20 Years of Cerec. Mörmann WH (Ed). Quintessence Pub. Co., Berlin, Germany, 19–28 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent. Mater.15(1), 54–61 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss B. Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. Int. J. Comput. Dent.9(1), 11–22 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Posselt A, Kerschbaum T. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays. Int. J. Comput. Dent.6(3), 231–248 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F, Gotsch T. CAD–CAM ceramic inlays and onlays: a case report after 3 years in place. J. Am. Dent. Assoc.120(5), 517–520 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto T, Schneider D. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series. Int. J. Prosthodont.21(1), 53–59 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J. Am. Dent. Assoc.137(Suppl.), S22–S31 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. A prospective clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays: ten-year results. Quintessence Int.37(2), 139–144 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedhahn K, Kerschbaum T, Fasbinder DF. Clinical long-term results with 617 Cerec veneers: a nine-year report. Int. J. Comput. Dent.8(3), 233–246 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reich SM, Wichmann M, Rinne H, Shortall A. Clinical performance of large, all-ceramic CAD/CAM-generated restorations after three years: a pilot study. J. Am. Dent. Assoc.135(5), 605–612 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjogren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Int. J. Prosthodont.17(2), 241–246 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindl A, Mormann WH. Survival rate of mono-ceramic and ceramic-core CAD/CAM-generated anterior crowns over 2–5 years. Eur. J. Oral Sci.112(2), 197–204 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int. J. Prosthodont.15(2), 122–128 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin. Oral Investig.2(4), 161–167 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjogren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol. Scand.56(5), 263–267 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg NG, Derand T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (CEREC). Swed. Dent. J.21(4), 121–127 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J. Dent.21(1), 39–46 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mörmann W, Krejci I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int.23(2), 109–115 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper. Dent.29(5), 481–508 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federlin M, Wagner J, Manner T, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Three-year clinical performance of cast gold vs ceramic partial crowns. Clin. Oral Investig.11(4), 345–352 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger M, Frank M, Rheinberger V, Höland W. New sintered glass–ceramic based on apatite and zirconia. Proceedings Int. Symp. Glass Problems2, 229–235 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen JA, Mito WT. Rational and clinical technique for esthetic restorations of endodontically treated teeth with the CosmoOst and IPS Empress Post system. Qunit. Dent. Technol.21, 81–90 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen JA, Cruz M, Mito WT, Merrideth H, Raffeiner O. Empress 2 all-ceramic bridge clinical trials: status 1998. J. Dent. Res.218 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Pospiech P, Rountree P, Unsöld F, Rammelsberg P. In-vitro-investigations on the fracture strength of all-ceramic posterior bridges of Empress II. J. Dent. Res.78, 307 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Schweiger M, Höland W, Frank M, Drescher H, Rheinberger VM. IPS Empress 2, a new pressable high strength glass–ceramic for esthetic all ceramic restoration. Quint. Dent. Technol.22, 143–152 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Höland W, Schweiger M, Frank M, Rheinberger V. A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress®2 and the IPS Empress® glass–ceramic. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. (Appl. Biomater.)53, 297–203 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kistler S, Pospiech P, Frasch C, Gernet W. Clinical performance of Empress 2 lithium disilicate glass–ceramic posterior crown: results up to two years. J. Dent. Res.79, (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelhoff D, Brauner J, Spiekermann H, Yilderim M. Two-year clinical evaluation of crowns and bridges made of IPS Empress 2. J. Dent. Res.81, 2584 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen JA, Berge HX, Edelhoff D. Effect of storage media and fatigue loading on ceramic strength. J. Dent. Res.79, 217 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt P, Strub JR. Survival rates of IPS empress 2 all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures: results of a 5-year prospective clinical study. Quintessence Int.37, 253–259 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinschert J, Natt G, Spiekermann H: Aktuelle Standortbestimmung von Dentalkeramiken. Dental Praxis18, 293–309 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger V. Vom Experiment zur Erfolgsgeschichte- Materialforschung eröffnet heute breites Indikationsspektrum. Die Zahnarzt Woche37, 14–15 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kappert HF, Schweiger M, Rheinberger V. Das IPSe.max-System, Werkstoffkundliche Vielfalt. Dental Labor54, 613–624 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Bürke H Zwei Glaskeramiken auf dem neuesten Stand. Quintessenz Zahntech.32, 1316–1325 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Apel E, van’t Hoen C, Rheinberger V, Höland W. Influence of ZrO2 on the crystallization and properties of lithium disilicate glass–ceramics derived from a multi-component system. J. Europ. Ceram. Soc.27, 1571–1577 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höland W, Rheinberger V, Apel E, van’t Hoen C. Principles and phenomena of bioengineering with glass–ceramics for dental restoration. J. Europ. Ceram. Soc.27, 1521–1526 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel E, Deubener J, Bernard A et al. Phenomena and mechanisms of crack propagation in glass–ceramics. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mat.1, 313–325 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass-infiltrated ceramics. Dent. Mat.20, 441–448 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger M. IPS e.max Ceram. Internal report; Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein, 25–36 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Edelhoff D. Presentation at: Dental Congress Ivoclar Vivadent AG. Hohenems, Austria (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Anusavice KJ. Internal report; Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Nathanson D, Al-Harbi FA. Clinical performance and fit of a milled ceramic crown system. Presented at: IADR 86th General Session & Exhibition. ON, Canada, 2–5 July 2008 (Abstract 0303).
   Google Scholar
• Bühler-Zemp P, Völkel T. Scientific Documentation IPS e.max CAD. Internal report; Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Haag P, Andersson M, Vult von Steyern P, Odén A. 15 years of clinical experience with Procera® Alumina. A Review. Appl. Osseointegrat. Res.4, 7–12 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Rodiger O, Kappert HF, Marinello CP. In-vitro-Bruchlasttests von 3-gliedrigen Seitenzahnbrücken hergestellt im Procera®-Verfahren. Schweiz. Monatsschr. Zahnmed.114, 207–213 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lang B, Maló P, Guedes C et al. Procera® AllCeram Bridge. Appl. Osseointegrat. Res.4, 13–21 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Rühle M, Evens AG. High toughness ceramics and ceramic composites. Prog. Mat. Sci.33, 85–167 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deville S, Guénin G, Chevalier J. Martensitic transformation in zirconia, part II. Martensite growth. Acta Mater.52, 5709–5721 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger M. Zirkoniumoxid – hochfeste und bruchzähe Strukturkeramik. Ästhetische Zahnmedizin5, 248–257 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Weber W, Rieger W. Key Engineering Materials192–195, 929–932 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Kosmac T, Swain MV, Claussen N. The role of tetragonal and monoclinic ZrO2 particles in the fracture toughness of Al2O3–ZrO2 Composites. Mater. Sci. Eng.71, 57–64 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Hahn R, Löst C. Sonoerosive Fertigung keramischer Zahnrestaurationen. Dtsch. Zahnärztl. Z.47, 734–739 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Hauptmann H, Suttor D, Frank S, Hoescheler H. Materials properties of all ceramic zirconia prostheses. Proceedings 78th IADR. DC, USA 2910 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Behrens A, Reusch B, Hauptmann H. Fracture strength of colored versus uncolored zirconia specimens. Proceedings 82nd IADR. HI, USA 10–13 March 2004 (Abstract 0243).
   Google Scholar
• Pospiech P, Nothdurft F. Long-term behaviour of zirconia-based bridges Lava: results after three years in service. Proceedings 82nd IADR. HI, USA, 10–13 March 2004 (Abstract 0230).
   Google Scholar
• Behrens A, Nesslauer H, Hauptmann H. Fracture strength of sandblasted and silicated colored and non-colored zirconia. Proceedings 83rd IADR. MD, USA, 9–12 March 2004 (Abstract 0558).
   Google Scholar
• Filser F, Kocher P, Weibel F, Luthy H, Scharer P, Gauckler LJ. Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining (DCM). Int. J. Comput. Dent.4, 89–106 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Studart AR, Filser F, Kocher P, Gauckler LJ. Fatigue of zirconia under cyclic loading in water and its implications for the design of dental bridges. Dental Mat.23, 106–114 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothbrust F. IPS e.max ZirCAD. Internal report; Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein, 17–25 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Höland W, Ritzberger C, Apel E et al. Formation and crystal growth of needle-like fluoroapatite in functional glass–ceramics. J. Mater. Chem.18, 1318–1332 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deville S, Chevalier J, Al Attaoui H. Atomic force microscopy study and qualitative analysis of martensite relief in zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.88, 1261–1267 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JR, Denry I. Stabilized zirconia as structural ceramic: an overview. Dental Mat.24(3), 289–298 (2008)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirata R, Viotti R, Reis AF, de Andrade OS. All-ceramic inlay-retained fixed partial bridge using a CAD-CAM produced Y-TZP framework and fluoroapatite veneering ceramic: a clinical report. Gen. Dent.55(7), 657–662 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Uphaus A, Kern M. Fracture strength of all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. Dent. Mater.23(12), 1513–1520 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfart S, Kern M. A new design for all-ceramic inlay-retained fixed partial dentures: a report of 2 cases. Quintessence Int.37(1), 27–33 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlmann B, Gabbert O, Schmitter M, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P. Fracture resistance of the veneering on inlay-retained zirconia ceramic fixed partial dentures. Acta Odontol. Scand.63(6), 335–342 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilicarslan MA, Kedici PS, Kucukesmen HC, Uludag BC. In vitro fracture resistance of posterior metal-ceramic and all-ceramic inlay-retained resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent.92(4), 365–370 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelhoff D, Spiekermann H, Yildirim M. Metallfreie Inlaybrücken. Quintessenz51, 613–625 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Edelhoff D, Weber V. Inlaybrücke mit CAD/CAM-gefertigtem Gerüst aus Zirkoniumdioxid-Keramik. Quintessenz Zahntechnik29(9), 1022–1032 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: fixed dental prostheses. Clin. Oral Implants Res.18(Suppl. 3), 86–96 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Att W, Grigoriadou M, Strub JR. ZrO2 three-unit fixed partial dentures: comparison of failure load before and after exposure to a mastication simulator. J. Oral Rehabil.34(4), 282–290 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vult von Steyern P, Ebbesson S, Holmgren J, Haag P, Nilner K. Fracture strength of two oxide ceramic crown systems after cyclic pre-loading and thermocycling. J. Oral Rehabil.33(9), 682–689 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int. J. Prosthodont.14(3), 231–238 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int.33, 415–426 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int. J. Prosthodont.20(4), 383–388 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Potiket N et al. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. J. Prosthet. Dent.96(4), 237–244 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F et al. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int.37(9), 685–693 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vult von Steyern P. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems. Swed. Dent. J. (Suppl. 173), 1–69 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höland W, Rheinberger VM, Apel E et al. Future perspectives of biomaterials for dental restoration. J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. doi:10.1016/j.jerceramsoc.2008.08.023 (2008) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Uo M, Sjogren G, Sundh A, Watari F, Bergman M, Lerner U. Cytotoxicity and bonding property of dental ceramics. Dent. Mater.19(6), 487–492 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist – a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent. Mater.24(4), 433–449 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke FJ, Grey NJ. Repair of fractured porcelain units: alternative approaches. Br. Dent. J.176(7), 251–256 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper. Dent.26(4), 367–374 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer J, Stawarczyk B, Tomic M, Strub JR, Hammerle CH. Effect of thermal misfit between different veneering ceramics and zirconia frameworks on in vitro fracture load of single crowns. Dent. Mater. J.26(6), 766–772 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taskonak B, Yan J, Mecholsky JJ Jr, Sertgoz A, Kocak A. Fractographic analyses of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures. Dent. Mater. (2008).
   Google Scholar