Nickel: a unique allergen – from molecular structure to European legislation

References

• Nielsen FH. Is nickel nutritionally important? Nutr. Today28, 14–19 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Brown PH, Welch RM, Cary EE. Nickel: a micronutrient essential for higher plants. Plant Physiol.85, 801–803 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wackett LP, Honek JF, Begley TP et al. Methyl-S-coenzyme-M reductase: a nickel-dependent enzyme catalyzing the terminal redox step in methane biogenesis. In: The Bioinorganic Chemistry of Nickel.Lancaster JR Jr (Ed.).VCH Publishers, NY, USA 249–274 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Ragsdale SW, Wood HG, Morton TA et al. Nickel in CO dehydrogenase. In: The Bioinorganic Chemistry of Nickel.Lancaster JR Jr (Ed.). VCH Publishers, NY, USA 311–332 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Tallant EA, Cheung WY. Calmodulin-dependent protein phosphatase. In: Calcium and Cell Function VI.Cheung WY (Ed.). Academic Press, NY, USA 71–112 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Daraji WI, Grant KR, Ryan K et al. Localization of calcineurin/NFAT in human skin and psoriasis and inhibition of calcineurin/NFAT activation in human keratinocytes by cyclosporin A. J. Invest. Dermatol.118, 779–788 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukai H, Ito A, Kishima K et al. Calmodulin antagonists differentiate between Ni2+- and Mn2+-stimulated phosphatase activity of calcineurin. J. Biochem. (Tokyo)110, 402–406 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui H, Pallen CJ, Adachi AM et al. Demonstration of different metal ion-induced calcineurin conformations using a monoclonal antibody. J. Biol. Chem.260, 4174–4179 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alomar A, Puig L, Gallardo CM, Valenzuela N. Topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment (protopic) reverses nickel contact dermatitis elicited by allergen challenge to a similar degree to mometasone furoate 0.1% with greater suppression of late erythema.Contact Derm.49, 185–188 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsito D, Wilson DC, Warshaw E et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in a model of chronic allergic contact dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.55, 40–46 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veien NK, Andersen MR. Nickel in Danish food. Acta Derm. Venereol.66, 502–509 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flyvholm MA, Nielsen GD, Andersen A. Nickel content of food and estimation of dietary intake. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch.179, 427–431 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proctor NH, Hughes JP, Fischman ML. Chemical Hazards at the Workplace. Lippincott, PA, USA 359–361 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Costa M. Effect of soluble nickel on cellular energy metabolism in A549 cells. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood)231, 1474–1480 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salsano F, Francia C, Roumpedaki I et al. Immune effects of nickel. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol.17(2 Suppl.), 63–69 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salsano F, Francia C, Proietti AR et al. Impaired natural killer cell activity associates with increased susceptibility to inflammation induced by herpesvirus infection in patients with nickel hypersensitivity. Eur. J. Inflam.3, 143–148 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Chen CY, Wang YF, Lin YH, Yen SF. Nickel-induced oxidative stress and effect of antioxidants in human lymphocytes. Arch. Toxicol.77, 123–130 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CY, Lin TH. Effects of nickel chloride on human platelets: enhancement of lipid peroxidation, inhibition of aggregation and interaction with ascorbic acid. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A62, 431–438 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepoittevin JP, Benezra C. The chemistry of contact allergy – why is a substance allergenic? Rev. Franc. Allergol. Immunol. Clin.31, 235–241 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Barratt MD, Basketter DA. Chemical aspects of contact hypersensitivity. In: Toxicology of Contact Hypersensitivity. Kimber I, Maurer T (Eds). Taylor & Francis, London, UK 75–97 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts DW, Lepoittevin JP. Hapten-protein interactions. In: Allergic Contact Dermatitis. The Molecular Basis. Lepoittevin JP, Basketter DA, Goossens A et al. (Eds). Springer, Berlin, Germany 82–111 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann PS. Contact sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis: immunobiological mechanisms. Toxicol. Lett.162, 49–54 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vollmer J, Weltzien HU, Moulon C. TCR reactivity in human nickel allergy indicates contacts with complementarity-determining region 3 but excludes superantigen-like recognition. J. Immunol.163, 2723–2731 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer J, Weltzien HU, Gamerdinger K et al. Antigen contacts by Ni-reactive TCR: typical αβ chain cooperation versus α chain-dominated specificity. Int. Immunol.12, 1723–1731 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamerdinger K, Moulon C, Karp DR et al. A new type of metal recognition by human T cells: contact residues for peptide-independent bridging of T cell receptor and major histocompatibility complex by nickel. J. Exp. Med.197, 1345–1353 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toebak MJ, Pohlmann PR, Sampat-Sardjoepersad SC et al. CXCL8 secretion by dendritic cells predicts contact allergens from irritants. Toxicol. In Vitro20, 117–124 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrighi JF, Rebsamen M, Rousset F et al. A critical role for p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in the maturation of human blood-derived dendritic cells induced by lipopolysaccharide, TNF-α, and contact sensitizers. J. Immunol.166, 3837–3845 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiba S, Manome H, Nakagawa S et al. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinases play distinct roles in the activation of dendritic cells by two representative haptens, NiCl2 and 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene. J. Invest. Dermatol.120, 390–399 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisleve F, Kerdine-Romer S, Rougier-Larzat N et al. Nickel and DNCB induce CCR7 expression on human dendritic cells through different signalling pathways: role of TNF-α and MAPK. J. Invest. Dermatol.123, 494–502 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moed H, Boorsma DM, Stoof TJ et al. Nickel-responding T cells are CD4+ CLA+ CD45RO+ and express chemokine receptors CXCR3, CCR4 and CCR10. Br. J. Dermatol.151, 32–41 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong C, Flavell RA. Cell fate decision: T-helper 1 and 2 subsets in immune responses. Arthritis Res.2, 179–188 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Garra A. Cytokines induce the development of functionally heterogeneous T helper cell subsets. Immunity8, 275–283 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosmann TR, Li L, Sad S. Functions of CD8 T-cell subsets secreting different cytokine patterns. Semin. Immunol.9, 87–92 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cerwenka A, Carter LL, Reome JB et al.In vivo persistence of CD8 polarized T cell subsets producing type 1 or type 2 cytokines. J. Immunol.161, 97–105 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minang JT, Arestrom I, Zuber B et al. Nickel-induced IL-10 down-regulates Th1-but not Th2-type cytokine responses to the contact allergen nickel. Clin. Exp. Immunol.143, 494–502 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vocanson M, Hennino A, Cluzel-Tailhardat M et al. CD8+ T cells are effector cells of contact dermatitis to common skin allergens in mice. J. Invest. Dermatol.126(4), 815–820 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlkvist H, Masjedi K, Gruvberger B et al. The lipophilic hapten parthenolide induces IFN-γ and IL-13 production by peripheral blood-derived CD8+ T cells from contact allergic subjects in vitro.Br. J. Dermatol. (In Press) (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen CS, Menne T, Lisby S et al. Experimental systemic contact dermatitis from nickel: a dose-response study. Contact Derm.49, 124–132 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen CS, Menne T, Johansen JD. Systemic contact dermatitis after oral exposure to nickel: a review with a modified meta-analysis. Contact Derm.54, 79–86 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg JJ, Epstein WL. Experimental nickel contact sensitization in man. J. Invest. Dermatol.41, 413–418 (1963).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer LA, Menne T, Johansen JD. Experimental nickel elicitation thresholds – a review focusing on occluded nickel exposure. Contact Derm.52, 57–64 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Genelhu MC, Marigo M, ves-Oliveira LF et al. Characterization of nickel-induced allergic contact stomatitis associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.128, 378–381 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancuso G, Berdondini RM. Eyelid dermatitis and conjunctivitis as sole manifestations of allergy to nickel in an orthodontic appliance. Contact Derm.46, 245 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerra L, Rogkakou A, Massacane P et al. Role of contact sensitization in chronic urticaria. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.56, 88–90 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malo JL, Cartier A, Gagnon G et al. Isolated late asthmatic reaction due to nickel sulphate without antibodies to nickel. Clin. Allergy15, 95–99 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niordson AM. Nickel sensitivity as a cause of rhinitis. Contact Derm.7, 273–274 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spiewak R, Brewczynski PZ. Powiklania po stabilizacji plyta metalowa zlamania kosci udowej u chorej z alergia kontaktowa na chrom, nikiel i kobalt. Pol. Tyg. Lek. (Wars)48, 651–652 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Rahilly G, Price N. Nickel allergy and orthodontics. J. Orthod.30, 171–174 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koster R, Vieluf D, Kiehn M et al. Nickel and molybdenum contact allergies in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis. Lancet356, 1895–1897 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle JM, Maibach HI. Patch Testing and Prick Testing. A Practical Guide. Springer, Berlin, Germany 1–136 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bruze M, Isaksson M, Edman B et al. A study on expert reading of patch test reactions: inter-individual accordance. Contact Derm.32, 331–337 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Strien GA, Korstanje MJ. Site variations in patch test responses on the back. Contact Derm.31, 95–96 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hindsen M, Bruze M, Christensen OB. Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. Am. J. Contact Derm.10, 62–67 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spiewak R. Problems with interpreting the results of allergological patch tests: an analysis of test results in 196 patients with suspected contact dermatitis. Int. Rev. Allergol. Clin. Immunol.3(Suppl. 2), 36 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Aberer W. Die “falsch-positive” Epikutantest-Reaktion. Derm. Beruf Umwelt36, 13–16 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Damian DL, Barnetson RS, Halliday GM. Effects of low-dose ultraviolet radiation on in vivo human cutaneous recall responses. Australas. J. Dermatol.42, 161–167 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green C. The effect of topically applied corticosteroid on irritant and allergic patch test reactions.Contact Derm.35, 331–333 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anveden I, Lindberg M, Andersen KE et al. Oral prednisone suppresses allergic but not irritant patch test reactions in individuals hypersensitive to nickel. Contact Derm.50, 298–303 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell JC. The angry back syndrome: eczema creates eczema. Contact Derm.1, 193–194 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruynzeel DP, van Ketel WG, von Blomberg-van der Flier M et al. Angry back or the excited skin syndrome. A prospective study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.8, 392–397 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocklin RE, Meyers OL, David JR. An in vitro assay for cellular hypersensitivity in man. J. Immunol.104, 95–102 (1970).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geczy AF, Baumgarten A. Lymphocyte transformation in contact sensitivity. Immunology19, 189–203 (1970).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macleod TM, Hutchinson F, Raffle EJ. The uptake of labelled thymidine by leucocytes of nickel sensitive patients. Br. J. Dermatol.82, 487–492 (1970).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Blomberg-vander Flier M, van der Burg CK, Pos O et al. In vitro studies in nickel allergy: diagnostic value of a dual parameter analysis. J. Invest. Dermatol.88, 362–368 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallab NJ, Mikecz K, Jacobs JJ. A triple assay technique for the evaluation of metal-induced, delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in patients with or receiving total joint arthroplasty. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.53, 480–489 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustemeyer T, von Blomberg BM, van Hoogstraten IM et al. Analysis of effector and regulatory immune reactivity to nickel. Clin. Exp. Allergy34, 1458–1466 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiewak R, Moed H, von Blomberg BME et al. Allergic contact dermatitis to nickel: modified in vitro test protocols for better detection of allergen-specific response. Contact Derm.56, 63–69 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall LM. Spot tests and chemical analyses for allergen evaluation. In: Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Rycroft RJ, Menne T, Frosch PJ (Eds). Springer, Berlin, Germany 277–284 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Uter W, Hegewald J, Aberer W et al. The European standard series in 9 European countries, 2002/2003 – first results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies. Contact Derm.53, 136–145 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiewak R. Allergische Kontaktdermatitis im Kindesalter. Eine Übersicht und Meta-Analyse. Allergologie25, 374–381 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer T, Böhler E, Ruhdorfer S et al. Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy56, 1192–1196 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O et al. Risk factors for contact allergy to nickel – results of a multifactorial analysis. Contact Derm.48, 33–38 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C et al. Nickel sensitization in adolescents and association with ear piercing, use of dental braces and hand eczema. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm. Venereol.82, 359–364 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leyden JJ, Kligman AM. Allergic contact dermatitis: sex differences. Contact Derm.3(6), 333–336 (1977).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen CS, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O et al. Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation. Br. J. Dermatol.146, 636–642 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linneberg A, Nielsen NH, Menne T et al. Smoking might be a risk factor for contact allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.111, 980–984 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spiewak R. Atopy and contact hypersensitivity: a reassessment of the relationship using objective measures. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol.95, 61–65 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryld LE, Hindsberger C, Kyvik KO et al. Risk factors influencing the development of hand eczema in a population-based twin sample. Br. J. Dermatol.149, 1214–1220 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Parliament and Council Directive 94/27/EC of 30 June 1994 amending for the 12th time Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations. Official Journal L188, 1–2 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• European Council Directive of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (76/769/EEC). Official Journal L262, 201 (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Aberer W, Kränke B. The new EURO releases nickel and elicits contact eczema. Br. J. Dermatol.146, 155–156 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nestle FO, Speidel H, Speidel MO. Metallurgy: high nickel release from 1- and 2-Euro coins. Nature419, 132 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foti C, Seidenari S, Antelmi A et al. Provocative use test of 1 Euro coin in nickel-sensitized subjects. Contact Derm.52, 167–168 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Council Regulation (EC) No 975/98 of 3 May 1998 on denominations and technical specifications of Euro coins intended for circulation. Official Journal L139, 6–8 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson E, Masjedi K, Ahlborg N et al. Cytokine production in nickel-sensitized individuals analysed with enzyme-linked immunospot assay: possible implication for diagnosis. Br. J. Dermatol.147, 442–449 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindemann M, Bohmer J, Zabel M, Grosse-Wilde H. ELISpot: a new tool for the detection of nickel sensitization. Clin. Exp. Allergy33, 992–998 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minang JT, Troye-Blomberg M, Lundeberg L, Ahlborg N. Nickel elicits concomitant and correlated in vitro production of Th1-, Th2-type and regulatory cytokines in subjects with contact allergy to nickel. Scand. J. Immunol.62, 289–296 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borg L, Christensen JM, Kristiansen J, Nielsen NH et al. Nickel-induced cytokine production from mononuclear cells in nickel-sensitive individuals and controls. Cytokine profiles in nickel-sensitive individuals with nickel allergy-related hand eczema before and after nickel challenge. Arch. Dermatol. Res.292, 285–291 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minang JT, Ahlborg N, Troye-Blomberg M. A simplified ELISpot assay protocol used for detection of human interleukin-4, interleukin-13 and interferon-γ production in response to the contact allergen nickel. Exogenous Dermatol.2, 306–313 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Buchvald D, Lundeberg L. Impaired responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to nickel in patients with nickel-allergic contact dermatitis and concomitant atopic dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol.150, 484–492 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar