Gaps in glaucoma care: a systematic review of monoscopic disc photos to screen for glaucoma

References

• Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:614-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration.The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:429-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:701-13; discussion 829-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, et al. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:48-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malihi M, Moura Filho ER, Hodge DO, et al. Long-term trends in glaucoma-related blindness in Olmsted County. Minnesota. Ophthalmology 2014;121:134-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters D, Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Lifetime risk of blindness in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156:724-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA, West SK, Rodriguez J, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hispanic subjects: proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1819-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore eye survey. JAMA 1991;266:369-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa SS, Paudyal I, Khanal S, et al. A population-based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in Nepal: the Bhaktapur Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology 2012;119:759-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Oskarsdottir SE. Prevalence and severity of undetected manifest glaucoma: results from the early manifest glaucoma trial screening. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1541-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer VA. Screening for glaucoma: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:484-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee PP, Walt JG, Doyle JJ, et al. A multicenter, retrospective pilot study of resource use and costs associated with severity of disease in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:12-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen PB, Buchholz P, Walt JG, et al. Cost analysis of glaucoma-related-blindness in Europe. Int Congr Ser 2005;1282:262-6
   Google Scholar
• Burr JM, Campbell MK, Campbell SE, et al. Developing the clinical components of a complex intervention for a glaucoma screening trial: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moga C, Guo B, Schopflocher D, et al. Development of a quality appraisal tool for case studies using a modified Delphi technique. Alberta, Canada: Institute of Health Economics, 2012. Available from: http://www.ihe.ca/publications/library/2012-publications/development-of-a-quality-appraisal-tool-for-case-series-studies-using-a-modified-delphi-technique/ [Last accessed 19 August 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Maa AY, Evans C, DeLaune WR, et al. A novel tele-eye protocol for ocular disease detection and access to eye care services. Telemed J E Health 2014;20:318-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus DM, Brooks SE, Ulrich LD, et al. Telemedicine diagnosis of eye disorders by direct ophthalmoscopy. A pilot study. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1907-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Giubilato A, Morgan W, et al. Glaucoma screening: analysis of conventional and telemedicine-friendly devices. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2007;35:237-43
   Google Scholar
• Yogesan K, Constable IJ, Barry CJ, et al. Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1999;8:297-301
   Google Scholar
• Lichter PR. Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1976;74:532-72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan HH, Ong DN, Kong YX, et al. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation (GONE) project: the effect of monoscopic versus stereoscopic viewing conditions on optic nerve evaluation. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:936-44
   Google Scholar
• Vaahtoranta-Lehtonen H, Tuulonen A, Aronen P, et al. Cost effectiveness and cost utility of an organized screening programme for glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:508-18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Momont AC, Mills RP. Glaucoma screening: current perspectives and future directions. Semin Ophthalmol 2013;28:185-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2010 U.S. age-specific prevalence rates for glaucoma by age and race/ethnicity. Bethesda, MD: national Eye Institute, 2010. Available from: www.nei.nih.gov/eyedata/glaucoma.asp#1 [Last accessed 27 June 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA. How should diagnostic tests be evaluated in glaucoma? Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:273-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleming C, Whitlock EP, Beil T, et al. Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma in the primary care setting: an update for the US preventive services task force. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:167-70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mowatt G, Burr JM, Cook JA, et al. Screening tests for detecting open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:5373-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YX, Xu L, Zhang RX, et al. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: the Beijing Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1402-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, et al. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology 2007;114:27-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diabetic Eye Screening Pathway Overviews. Glaucester, UK: NHS, October 29, 2012. Available from: http://diabeticeye.screening.nhs.uk/operational-guidance [Last accessed 19 August 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Yogesan K, Barry CJ, Jitskaia L, et al. Software for 3-D visualization/analysis of optic-disc images. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1999;18:43-9
   Google Scholar
• Abramoff MD, Reinhardt JM, Russell SR, et al. Automated early detection of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1147-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natchiar G, Robin AL, Thulasiraj RD, et al. Attacking the backlog of India’s curable blind. The Aravind Eye Hospital model. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:987-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, et al. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:238-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumberg DM, Vaswani R, Nong E, et al. A comparative effectiveness analysis of visual field outcomes after projected glaucoma screening using SD-OCT in African American communities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:3491-500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar