Levonorgestrel for emergency contraception

References

• Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health38(2), 90–96 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J. Choosing a contraceptive: efficacy, safety, and personal considerations. In: Contraceptive Technology. (19th Edition) Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson A, Cates W, Stewart FH, Kowal D (Eds.) Ardent Media, NY, USA, 19–47 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Stewart F, Guest F et al. Emergency contraceptive pills: a simple proposal to reduce unintended pregnancies. Fam. Plann. Perspect.24(6), 269–273 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart F, Trussell J, Van Look PF. Emergency contraception. In: Contraceptive Technology, (19th Edition) Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson A, Cates W, Stewart FH, Kowal D. (Eds.) Ardent Media, NY, USA, 87–116 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Glasier A. Emergency postcoital contraception. N. Engl. J. Med.337(15), 1058–1064 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart FH, Howells S, Russell CR, Kowal D. Emergency Contraception: The Nation’s Best Kept Secret. Bridging the Gap Communications, GA, USA (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Gulmezoglu AM, Oel CJet al. Interventions for emergency contraception (Review). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.3, CD001324 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ellertson C, Webb A, Blanchard K et al. Modifying the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol.101(6), 1160–1167 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamoda H, Ashok PW, Stalder C et al. A randomized trial of mifepristone (10 mg) and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception. Obstet. Gynecol.104(6), 1307–1313 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Wang C, Wang Y et al. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study on comparing levonorgestrel and mifepristone for emergency contraception. J. Reprod. Med.8(Suppl. 1), 43–46 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• von Hertzen H, Piaggio G, Ding J et al. Low dose mifepristone and two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a WHO multicentre randomised trial. Lancet360(9348), 1803–1810 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creinin MD, Schlaff W, Archer DF et al. Progesterone receptor modulator for emergency contraception: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol.108(5), 1089–1097 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes DA. Intrauterine devices (IUDs). In: Contraceptive Technology. (19th Edition) Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson A, Cates W, Stewart FH, Kowal D. (Eds) Ardent Media, NY, USA, 117–143 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kook K, Gabelnick H, Duncan G. Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel 0.75 mg tablets. Contraception66(1), 73–76 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond E. Contraceptive implants. In: Contraceptive Technology. (19th Edition). Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson A, Cates W, Stewart FH, Kowal D. (Eds.) Ardent Media, NY, USA, 145–156 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Humpel M, Wendt H, Pommerenke G et al. Investigations of pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel to specific consideration of a possible first-pass effect in women. Contraception17(3), 207–220 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambol NC, Harper C, Kim L et al. Pharmacokinetics of single-dose levonorgestrel in adolescents. Contraception74(2), 104–109 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotherby K. Variability of pharmacokinetic parameters for contraceptive steroids. J. Steroid Biochem.19(1C), 817–820 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fotherby K. Levonorgestrel: clinical pharmacokinetics. Clin. Pharmacokinet.28(3), 203–215 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond GL, Lahteenmaki PL, Lahteenmaki P et al. Distribution and percentages of non-protein bound contraceptive steroids in human serum. J. Steroid Biochem.17(4), 375–380 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fotherby K. Pharmacokinetics of gestagens: some problems. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.163(1 Pt 2), 323–328 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotherby K. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of progestins in humans. In: Pharmacology of the Contraceptive Steroids. Goldzieher J, Fotherby K, Lautenschlager M (Eds). Raven Press, NY, USA, 99–126 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Hapangama D, Glasier A, Baird DT. The effects of peri-ovulatory administration of levonorgestrel on the menstrual cycle. Contraception63(3), 123–129 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand M, Cravioto MD, Raymond E et al. On the mechanisms of action of short-term levonorgestrel administration in emergency contraception. Contraception64(4), 227–234 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marions L, Hultenby K, Lindell I et al. Emergency contraception with mifepristone and levonorgestrel: mechanism of action. Obstet. Gynecol.100(1), 65–71 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marions L, Cekan SZ, Bygdeman M et al. Effect of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel or mifepristone on ovarian function. Contraception69(5), 373–377 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croxatto HB, Brache V, Pavez M et al. Pituitary-ovarian function following the standard levonorgestrel emergency contraceptive dose or a single 0.75-mg dose given on the days preceding ovulation. Contraception70(6), 442–450 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okewole IA, Arowojolu AO, Odusoga OL et al. Effect of single administration of levonorgestrel on the menstrual cycle. Contraception75(5), 372–377 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand M, Seppala M, Cravioto MDC et al. Late follicular phase administration of levonorgestrel as an emergency contraceptive changes the secretory pattern of glycodelin in serum and endometrium during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Contraception71(6), 451–457 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesseru E, Garmendi F, Westphal N et al. Hormonal and peripheral effects of D-norgestrel in postcoital contraception. Contraception10(4), 411–424 (1974).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croxatto HB, Devoto L, Durand M et al. Mechanism of action of hormonal preparations used for emergency contraception: a review of the literature. Contraception63(3), 111–121 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller AL, Llados CM, Croxatto HB. Postcoital treatment with levonorgestrel does not disrupt postfertilization events in the rat. Contraception67(5), 415–419 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz ME, Ortiz RE, Fuentes MA et al. Post-coital administration of levonorgestrel does not interfere with post-fertilization events in the new-world monkey cebus apella. Hum. Reprod.19(6), 1352–1356 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novikova N, Weisberg E, Stanczyk FZ et al. Effectiveness of levonorgestrel emergency contraception given before or after ovulation – a pilot study. Contraception75(2), 112–118 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaggio G, von Hertzen H, Grimes DA et al. Timing of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel or the Yuzpe regimen. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Lancet353(9154), 721 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidoff F, Trussell J. Plan B and the politics of doubt. JAMA296(14), 1775–1778 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OPRR reports: protection of human subjects. Code of Federal Regulations 45CFR 46 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Hughes EC. Committee on Terminology, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. In: Obstetric–Gynecologic Terminology. FA Davis Company, PA, USA (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Dixon GW, Schlesselman JJ, Ory HW et al. Ethinyl estradiol and conjugated estrogens as postcoital contraceptives. JAMA244(12), 1336–1339 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation – effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N. Engl. J. Med.333(23), 1517–1521 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling A, Glasier A. Estimating the efficacy of emergency contraception – how reliable are the data? Contraception66(1), 19–22 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinos JJ, Rodriguez-Espinosa J, Senosiain R et al. The role of matching menstrual data with hormonal measurements in evaluating effectiveness of postcoital contraception. Contraception60(4), 243–247 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinos-Gomez JJ, Senosiain R, Mata A et al. What is the seminal exposition among women requiring emergency contraception? A prospective, observational comparative study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.131(1), 57–60 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond E, Taylor D, Trussell J et al. Minimum effectiveness of the levonorgestrel regimen of emergency contraception. Contraception69(1), 79–81 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arowojolu AO, Okewole IA, Adekunle AO. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception in Nigerians. Contraception66(4), 269–273 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngai SW, Fan S, Li SQ et al. A randomized trial to compare 24h versus 12h double dose regimen of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception. Hum. Reprod.20(1), 307–311 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho PC, Kwan MSW. A prospective randomized comparison of levonorgestrel with the Yuzpe regimen in post-coital contraception. Hum. Reprod.8(3), 389–392 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Task Force on Post-Ovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet352(9126), 428–433 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Ellertson C, von Hertzen H et al. Estimating the effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills. Contraception67(4), 259–265 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellertson C, Evans M, Ferden S et al. Extending the time limit for starting the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception to 120 hours. Obstet. Gynecol.101(6), 1168–1171 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues I, Grou F, Joly J. Effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills between 72 and 120 hours after unprotected sexual intercourse. Obstet. Gynecol.184(4), 531–537 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care Clinical Effectiveness Unit. FFPRHC guidance (April 2006). Emergency contraception. J. Fam. Plann. Reprod. Health Care32(2), 121–128 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellertson C, Trussell J, Stewart FH et al. Should emergency contraceptive pills be available without prescription? J. Am. Med. Womans Assoc.53(Suppl. 2), 226–232 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimes DA, Raymond E, Scott Jones B. Emergency contraception over-the-counter: the medical and legal imperatives. Obstet. Gynecol.98(1), 151–155 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold MA, Wolford JE, Smith KA et al. The effects of advance provision of emergency contraception on adolescent women’s sexual and contraceptive behaviors. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol.17(2), 87–96 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harper CC, Cheong M, Rocca CH et al. The effect of increased access to emergency contraception among young adolescents. Obstet. Gynecol.106(3), 483–491 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Marston C, Meltzer H, Majeed A. Impact on contraceptive practice of making emergency hormonal contraception available over the counter in Great Britain: repeated cross sectional surveys. Br. Med. J.331(7511), 271–273 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Moreau C, Bajos N, Trussell J. The impact of pharmacy access to emergency contraceptive pills in France. Contraception73(6), 602–608 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasier A, Baird D. The effects of self-administering emergency contraception. N. Engl. J. Med.339(1), 1–4 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine TR, Harper C, Leon K et al. Emergency contraception: advance provision in a young, high-risk clinic population. Obstet. Gynecol.96(1), 1–7 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RA, Schwarz EB, Freedman L et al. Advance supply of emergency contraception. Effect on use and usual contraception – a randomized trial. Obstet. Gynecol.102(1), 8–16 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo SS, Fan SY, Ho PC et al. Effect of advanced provision of emergency contraception on women’s contraceptive behaviour: a randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod.19(10), 2404–2410 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine TR, Harper C, Rocca CH et al. Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA293(1), 54–62 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Cheng L, Hua X et al. Advanced provision of emergency contraception to postnatal women in china makes no difference in abortion rates: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception72(2), 111–116 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belzer M, Sanchez K, Olson J et al. Advance supply of emergency contraception: a randomized trial in adolescent mothers. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol.18(5), 347–354 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trussell J, Raymond E, Stewart FH. Re: advance supply of emergency contraception. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol.19(3), 251 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh TL, Frezieres RG. Patterns of emergency contraception use by age and ethnicity from a randomized trial comparing advance provision and information only. Contraception74(2), 110–117 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond E, Stewart F, Weaver M et al. Impact of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol.108(5), 1098–1106 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polis CB, Schaffer K, Blanchard K et al. Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention (full review). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.2 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond E, Goldberg A, Trussell J et al. Bleeding patterns after use of levonorgestrel emergency contraceptive pills. Contraception73(4), 376–381 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainer E, Kenfack B, Mboudou E et al. Menstrual bleeding patterns following levonorgestrel emergency contraception. Contraception74(2), 118–124 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care Clinical Effectiveness Unit. FFPRHC guidance (April 2005). Drug interactions with hormonal contraception. J. Fam. Plann. Reprod. Health Care31(2), 139–151 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerts TBP, Goorissen EM, Sitsen JMA. Summary of Drug Interactions with Oral Contraceptives. Parthenon Publishing Group, Carnforth, UK (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Wells ES, Hutchings J, Gardner JS et al. Using pharmacies in Washington State to expand access to emergency contraception. Fam. Plann. Perspect.30(6), 288–290 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardner JS, Hutchings J, Fuller TS et al. Increasing access to emergency contraception through community pharmacies: lessons from Washington State. Fam. Plann. Perspect.33(4), 172–175 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marciante KD, Gardner JS, Veenstra DL et al. Modeling the cost and outcomes of pharmacist-prescribed emergency contraception. Am. J. Public Health91(9), 1443–1445 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam. Plann. Perspect.30(1), 24–29 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trussell J, Raymond E. Preventing unintended pregnancy: let us count the ways. Lancet368(9549), 1747–1748 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Raymond E, Trussell J, Polis CB. Population effect of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review. Obstet. Gynecol.109(1), 181–188 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasier A, Fairhurst K, Wyke S et al. Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates. Contraception69(5), 361–366 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis KR, Weller SC. The effectiveness of condoms in reducing heterosexual transmission of HIV. Fam. Plann. Perspect.31(6), 272–279 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cantor J, Baum K. The limits of conscientious objection – may pharmacists refuse to fill prescriptions for emergency contraception? N. Engl. J. Med.351(19), 2008–2012 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baergen R, Owens C. Revisiting pharmacists’ refusals to dispense emergency contraception. Obstet. Gynecol.108(5), 1277–1282 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shacter HE, Gee RE, Long JA. Variation in availability of emergency contraception in pharmacies. Contraception75(3), 214–217 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Guthrie KA. Talking straight about emergency contraception. J. Fam. Plan. Reprod. H.33(3), 139–142 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez B. Easier access to contraceptive may boost costs. WSJ. A (Eastern Edition)8 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Stewart FH, Trussell J. Prevention of pregnancy resulting from rape: a neglected preventive health measure. Am. J. Prev. Med.19(4), 228–229 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice. A national protocol for sexual assault medical forensic examinations. NCJ 206554, 1–130 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Maze R. Emergency contraception still available. Marine Corps Times (2007).
   Google Scholar