Assessment of the fetal bioprofile during labor by fetal ECG analysis

References

• Rosén KG, Amer-Wahlin I, Luzietti R, Noren H. Fetal ECG waveform analysis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.18, 485–514 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosén KG, Kjellmer I. Changes in the fetal heart rate and ECG during hypoxia. Acta Physiol. Scand.93, 59–66 (1975)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawes GS, Mott JC, Shelley HJ. The importance of cardiac glycogen for the maintenance of life in fetal lambs and newborn animals during anoxia. J. Physiol.146, 516–538 (1959).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amer-Wahlin I, Hellsten C, Noren H et al. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Lancet358, 534–538 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westgate J, Harris M, Curnow JSH, Greene KR. Plymouth randomised trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring: 2,400 cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.169, 1151–1160 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neilson JP. Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, Oxford, UK (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Amer-Wahlin I, Källen K, Herbst A, Rydhstroem H, Sundström A-K, Marsal K. Implementation of new medical techniques: experience from the Swedish randomized controlled trial on fetal ECG during labor. J. Mat. Fetal Neon. Med.18, 93–100 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westgate JA, Garibaldi JM, Greene KR. Umbilical cord blood gas analysis at delivery: a time for quality data. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.101, 1054–1063 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siggaard-Andersen O. An acid–base chart for arterial blood with normal and pathophysiological reference areas. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest.27, 239–245 (1971).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosén KG, Murphy K. How to assess fetal metabolic acidosis from cord samples. J. Perinat. Med.19, 221–226 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noren H, Amer-Wahlin I, Hagberg H et al. Fetal electrocardiography in labor and neonatal outcome: data from the Swedish randomized controlled trial on intrapartum fetal monitoring. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.188, 183–192 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala K, Vaarasmaki M, Makikallio K, Valkama M, Tekay A. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography – a randomised controlled study. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.113, 419–423 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Amer-Wåhlin I, Rosén KG. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography – assessment of outcome. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.113, 1339–1340 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Neilson JP. Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.3, CD000116 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norén H, Blad S, Carlsson A et al. STAN in clinical practice – the outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Gothenburg. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.195, 7–15 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross MG, Devoe LD, Rosen KG. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med.15, 181–185 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwee A, van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW, Veerman J, Dekkers AH, Visser GH. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med.15, 400–407 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Westgate J, Greene KR. How well is fetal blood sampling used in clinical practice? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.101, 250–251 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luttkus AK, Norén H, Stupin JH et al. Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to CTG – a multi-centre, observational study. J. Perinat. Med.32, 486–494 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norén H, Luttkus AK, Stupin J et al. Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to CTG to predict fetal acidosis in labour. J. Perinat. Med.35(5), 408–14 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilja H, Norén H, Devoe L. STAN monitoring: a five years experience in clinical practice. SMFM abstracts. Am. J. Obst. Gynecol.195, S218 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Welin A-K, Norén H, Odeback A, Andersson M, Andersson G, Rosén KG. STAN, a clinical audit – the outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Varberg, Sweden. Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.86, 827–832 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.177, 1385–1390 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devoe LD, Ross M, Wilde C et al. United States multicenter clinical usage study of the STAN 21 electronic fetal monitoring system. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.195, 729–734 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parer JT, King T. Fetal heart rate monitoring: is it salvageable? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.182, 982–987 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donker DK, van Geijn HP, Hasman A. Interobserver variation in the assessment of fetal heart rate recordings. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.52, 21–28 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes G, Lobb M, Moulden M, Redman C, Wheeler T. Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.99, 791–797 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawes G, Meir Y, Mandruzzato G. Computerized evaluation of fetal heart-rate patterns. J. Perinat. Med.22, 491–499 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibony O, Fouillot J, Benaoudia M et al. Quantification of the fetal heart rate variability by spectral analysis of fetal well-being and fetal distress. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.54, 103–108 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siimes AS, Välimäki IA, Antila KJ et al. Regulation of heart rate variation by the autonomic nervous system in neonatal lambs. Pediatr. Res.27, 383–391 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siira SM, Ojala TH, Vahlberg TJ et al. Marked fetal acidosis and specific changes in power spectrum analysis of fetal heart rate variability recorded during the last hour of labor. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.112, 418–423 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Yum M-K, Kim J-H. A very-short-term intermittency of fetal heart rates and developmental milestone. Pediatr. Res.53, 915–919 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blad S, Outram N, Larsson D, Rosén KG. Assessment of fetal heart rate variability and reactivity during labour – a novel approach. Abstract European Congress Perinatal Medicine, Prague (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Skupski DW, Rosenberg CR, Eglinton GS. Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol.99, 129–134 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton KJ, Dawes GS, Patrick JE. Diurnal, respiratory, and other rhythms of fetal heart rate in lambs. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.127, 414–424 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stånge L, Rosén KG, Hökegård K-H et al. Quantification of fetal heart rate variability in relation to oxygenation in the sheep fetus. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.56, 205–209 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhuis JG, Prechtl HF, Martin CBJ, Bots RS. Are there behavioural states in the human fetus? Early Hum. Dev.6, 177–195 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhuis I, ten Hof J. Development of fetal heart rate and behavior: indirect measures to assess the fetal nervous system. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Biol.87, 1–2 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vindla S, James D. Fetal behaviour as a test of fetal wellbeing. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.102, 597–600 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The use of electronic fetal monitoring: the use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal monitoring. London, Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, No. 8 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• King T, Parer J. The physiology of fetal heart rate patterns and perinatal asphyxia. J. Perinat. Neonatal Nurs.14, 19–39 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardes J, Moura C, de Sá JPM, Pereira-Leite L. The Porto® system for automated cardiotocographic signal analysis. J. Perinat. Med.19, 61–65 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Garrido A, de Sá JM, Pereira-Leite L. SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms. J. Matern. Fetal Med.9, 311–318 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D, Santos C, Bernardes J. Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto® multicentre validation study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Biol.118, 52–60 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar