Can comparative genomic hybridization improve in vitro fertilization outcomes?

References

• Edmonds DK, Lidsay KS, Miller JF et al. Early embryonic mortality in women. Fertil. Steril.38, 447–453 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells D, Delhanty JD. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol. Hum. Reprod.6, 1055–1062 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: studies of the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet.2, 280–291 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Benet J, Wells D et al. Aneuploidy study of human oocytes first polar body comparative genomic hybridisation and metaphase II fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis. Hum. Reprod.19, 2859–2868 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeMarie-Adkins R, Radke K, Hunt PA. Lack of checkpoint control at the mataphase/anaphase transition: a mechanism of meiotic non disjunction in mammalian females. J. Cell Biol.139, 1611–1619 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coonen E, Derhaag JG, Dunmoulin JC et al. Anaphase lagging mainly explains chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos. Hum. Reprod.19, 316–324 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin DK, Wilton LJ, Handyside AH, Winston RMK, Delhanty JDA. Dual fluorescent in situ hybridisation for simultaneous detection of X and Y chromosome-specific probes for the sexing of human preimplantation embryonic nuclei. Hum. Genet.89, 18–22 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R, Wilton L. Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridisation. Prenat. Diagn.19, 846–851 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellestor F, Anahory T, Hamamah S. The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures. Hum. Reprod. Update.11(1), 15–32 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilton L, Voullaire L, Sargeant P, WilliamsonR, McBain J. Preimplantation embryo screening using comparative genomic hybridisation. Fertil. Steril.80, 875–876 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsthemke B, Ludwig M. Assisted Reproduction: the epigenetic perspective. Hum. Reprod. Update11(5), 473–482 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli E, Wells D, Whalley KM, Mills JA, Faed MJW, Delhanty JDA. Increased susceptibility to maternal aneuploidy demonstrated by comparative genomic hybridisation of human MII oocytes and 1st polar bodies. Cytogenet. Genome Res.114, 30–38 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson MD, Awartani KA, Robinson WP. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case control study. Hum. Reprod.17, 446–451 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voullaire L, Wilton L, McBain J, Callaghan T, Williamson R. Chromosome abnormalities identified by comparative genomic hybridisation in embryos from women with repeated implantation failure. Mol. Hum. Reprod.8(11), 1035–1041 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Code of Practice (6th Edition). (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bazrt EB, Martini E, van den Berg I et al. Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF. Hum. Reprod.21(1), 223–233 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoso P, Staessen C, Fauser BCJM, Devroey P. Current value of preimplantation aneuploidy screening in IVF. Hum. Reprod. Update13(1), 15–25 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayesth L, Lu Y, Kuo WL et al. PIK3CA is implicated as an oncogene in ovarian cancer. Nat. Genet.21, 99–102 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins C, Rommens JM, Kowbel D et al. Positional cloning of ZNF217 and NABC1: genes amplified at 20q13.2 and overexpressed in breast carcinoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA95, 8703–8708 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, Delhanty JD. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation. Nucleic Acids Res.27, 1214–1218 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sher G, Keskintepe L, Keskintepe M et al. Oocyte karyotyping by comparative genomic hybridisation provides a highly reliable method for selecting ‘competent’ embryos, markedly improving in vitro fertilisation outcome: a multiphase study. Fertil. Steril.87(5), 1033–1040 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean FB, Hosono S, Fang L et al. Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99, 5261 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Caignec C, Spits C, Sermon K et al. Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH. Nucleic Acids Res.34(9), e68 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handyside AH, Robinson M, Simpson RJ et al. Isothermal whole genome amplification from single and small numbers of cells: a new era for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of inherited disease. Mol. Hum. Reprod.10, 767–772 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellani A, Coskun S, Benkhalifa M et al. Multiple displacement amplification on single cell and possible PGD applications. Mol. Hum. Reprod.10, 847–852 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick PJ, Lewis CM, Abbs S, Ogilvie Mackie CM. Determination of the genetic status of cleavage-stage human embryos by microsatellite marker analysis following multiple displacement amplification. Prenat. Diagn.27(3), 206–215 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzvetkov MV, Becker C, Kulle B, Nurnberg P, Brockmoller J, Wojnowski L. Genome wide single nucleotide polymorphism arrays demonstrate high fidelity of multiple displacement based whole genome amplification. Electrophoresis12, 710–715 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Wilton L, Williamson R, McBain J, Edgar D, Voullaire L. Birth of a healthy infant after preimplantation confirmation of euploid by comparative genomic hybridization. N. Engl. J. Med.345, 1537–1541 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilton L, Voullaire L, Sargent P, Williamson R, McBain J. Preimplantation aneuploidy screening using comparative genomic hybridization or fluorescence in situ hybridization of embryos from patients with recurrent implantation failure. Fertil. Steril.80(4), 860–868 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalal SM, Adeyinka A, Thornhill AR. Chromsome analysis in prenatal diagnosis. In: Handbook of Clinical Testing During Pregnancy. Current Clinical Pathology. Grownoski AM (Ed.). Humana Press Inc. NJ, USA139–158 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Wilton L, Williamson B, McBain J and Voullaire L. Determination of aneuploidy in human embryos using comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil. Steril.75, S6 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Mateo C, Benet J, Wells D et al. Reliability of comparative genomic hybridisation to detect chromosome abnormalities in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes. Hum. Reprod.19, 2118 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli E, Delhanty JDA, Wells D. Single cell diagnosis using comparative genomic hybridization after preliminary DNA amplification still needs more tweaking: to many miscalls. Fertil. Steril.88, 247–248 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli E, Wells D, Thornhill A et al. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies. Hum. Reprod.21(9), 2319–2328 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli E, Wells D, Doshi A, Gotts S, Harper JC, Delhanty JDA. Complete cytogenetic investigation of oocytes from a young woman with the use of comparative genomic hybridisation reveals meiotic errors. Prenat. Diagn.26, 71–76 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussler J, Pickering S, Mackie Ogilvie C. Investigation of chromsomal imbalance in human embryos using comparative genomic hybridisation. Reprod. Biomed. Online.8, 701–711 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skakkabaek N, Jorgensen N, Rajpart-De Meyts E et al. Environment, lifestyle and male fertility: a review. Advances in fertility studies and reproductive medicine. IFFS (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Baart EB, van den Berg I, Martini E, Eussen HJ, Fauser BCJM, van Opstal D. FISH analysis of 15 chromosomes in human day 4 and 5 preimplantation embryos: the value of extended aneuploidy detection. Prenat. Diagn.27(1), 55–63 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek S, Truisk M, van Echten-Arden J et al.in vitro fertilisation with preimplantation screening. N. Engl. J. Med.357(1), 9–17 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion. Fertil. Steril.88, 1497–1504 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar