Invasive and non-invasive ventilation for prematurely born infants – current practice in neonatal ventilation

References

• Papers of special note have been highlighted as:
   Google Scholar
• • of interest
   Google Scholar
• •• of considerable interest
   Google Scholar
• Greenough A, Cox S, Alexander J, et al. Health care utilisation of infants with chronic lung disease, related to hospitalisation for RSV infection. Arch Dis Child. 2001;85:463–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parad RB, Davis JM, Lo J, et al. Prediction of respiratory outcome in extremely low gestational age infants. Neonatology. 2015;107:241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

• Demonstrates that bronchopulmonary dysplasia is a poor predictor of chronic respiratory morbidity.

• Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, et al. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med. 1971;284:1333–1340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieran EA, Walsh H, O’Donnell CP. Survey of nasal continuous positive airways pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) use in Irish newborn nurseries. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96:F156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Faber B, et al. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD002977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong SC, Chen SJ, Boo NY. Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised control study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F480–F483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevisanuto D, Grazzina N, Doglioni N, et al. A new device for administration of continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: comparison with a standard nasal CPAP continuous positive airway pressure system. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:859–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaramella P, Freato F, Grazzina N, et al. Does helmet CPAP reduce cerebral blood flow and volume by comparison with Infant Flow driver CPAP in preterm neonates? Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1613–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevisanuto D, Camiletti L, Doglioni N, et al. Noise exposure is increased with neonatal helmet CPAP in comparison with conventional nasal CPAP. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:35–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beker F, Rogerson SR, Hooper SB, et al. The effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on cardiac function in premature infants with minimal lung disease: a crossover randomized trial. J Pediatr. 2014;164:726–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beker F, Rogerson SR, Hooper ST, et al. Hemodynamic effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with evolving chronic lung disease, a crossover randomized trial. J Pediatr. 2015;166:477–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery ME, Tooley WH, Keller JB, et al. Is chronic lung disease in low birth weight infants preventable? A survey of eight centers. Pediatrics. 1987;79:26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aly H, Milner JD, Patel K, et al. Does the experience with the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure improve over time in extremely low birth weight infants? Pediatrics. 2004;114:697–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miksch R-M, Armbrust S, Pahnke J, et al. Outcome of very low birthweight infants after introducing a new standard regime with the early use of nasal CPAP. Eur J Pediatr. 2008;167:909–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narendran V, Morley CJ, Lau R, et al. Early bubble CPAP and outcomes in ELBW preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2003;23:195–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ammari A, Suri M, Milisavljevic V, et al. Variables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2005;147:341–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birenbaum HJ, Dentry A, Cirelli J, et al. Reduction in the incidence of chronic lung disease in very low birth weight infants: results of a quality improvement process in a tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 2009;123:44–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:700–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Support Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1970–1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens TP, Finer NN, Carlo WA, et al. Respiratory outcomes of the surfactant positive pressure and oximetry randomized trial (SUPPORT). J Pediatr. 2014;165:240–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

• Demonstrates nasal continuous positive airways pressure is associated with better respiratory outcomes at follow-up.

• Dunn MS, Kaempf J, De Klerk A, et al. Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e1069–e1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmolzer GM, Kumar M, Pichler G, et al. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f5980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ. Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2:CD000143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buzzella B, Claure N, D’Ugard C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels after extubation in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2014;164:46–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury O, Wedderburn CJ, Duffy D, et al. CPAP review. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171:1441–1448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardine LA, Inglis GD, Davies MW. Strategies for the withdrawal of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;2:CD006979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broom M, Ying L, Wright A, et al. CeasIng Cpap At standarD criteria (CICADA): impact on weight gain, time to full feeds and caffeine use. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F423–F425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell SM, Curry SJ, Buggy NA, et al. The NOFLO Trial: low flow nasal prongs therapy in weaning nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2013;163:79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: a survey of practice in England. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F148–F150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi Y, Tang S, Zhao J, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled study of NIPPV versus nCPAP in preterm and term infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;49:673–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahramaner Z, Erdemir A, Turkoglu E, et al. Unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants after extubation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:926–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG. Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:372–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirpalani H, Millar D, Lemyre B, et al. A trial comparing non invasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:611–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang HY, Claure N, D’Ugard C, et al. Effects of synchronization during nasal ventilation in clinically stable preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2011;69:84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD003212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gizzi C, Montecchia F, Panetta V, et al. Is synchronised NIPPV more effective than NIPPV and nCPAP in treating apnoea of prematurity (APO)? A randomised cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100:F17–F23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampland AL, Pluss B, Worwa C, et al. Bi-level CPAP does not improve gas exchange when compared with conventional CPAP for the treatment of neonates recovering from respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100:F31–F34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien K, Campbell C, Brown L, et al. Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP-NCPAP) vs infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants ≤1250 grams: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough JL, Shearman AD, Jardine LA, et al. Humidified high flow nasal cannulae: current practice in Australian nurseries, a survey. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48:106–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha S, Gridley E, Dorling J. Use of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen in neonates: a UK wide survey. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:249–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty S, Hickey A, Rafferty GF, et al. Work of breathing during CPAP and heated humidified high flow nasal cannula. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 [in press].
   Google Scholar
• Klingenberg C, Pettersen M, Hansen EA, et al. Patient comfort during treatment with heated humidified high flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomised cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F134–F137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley BJ, Owen LS, Doyle LW, et al. High-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1425–1433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder B, Stoddard R, Li M, et al. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e1482–1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulzke SM, Pillow J, Ewald B, et al. Flow-cycled versus time-cycled synchronized ventilation for neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;7:CD008246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenough A, Milner AD, Dimitriou G. Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Rev. 2008;1:CD000456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes ZC, Claure N, Tauscher MK, et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus pressure support in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1409–1417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

• Demonstrates respiratory support provided to all of the infant’s respiratory efforts is more efficacious.

• Patel DS, Rafferty GF, Lee S, et al. Work of breathing during SIMV with and without pressure support. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94:434–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DS, Murthy V, Hannam S, et al. Randomised weaning trial comparing assist control to pressure support ventilation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97:F429–F433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze A, Rieger-Fackeldey E, Gerhardt T, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of proportional assist ventilation and patient-triggered ventilation in extremely low birth weight infants with evolving chronic lung disease. Neonatology. 2007;92:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat P, Patel DS, Hannam S, et al. Crossover study of proportional assist versus assist control ventilation. Arch Dis Child Fetal. 2015;100:F35–F38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty S, Bhat P, Hickey A, et al. Proportional assist versus assist control ventilation in premature infants. Eur J Pediatr. 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Verbrugghe W, Jorens PG. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist: a ventilation tool or a ventilation toy? Respir Care. 2011;56:327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein H, Alosh H, Ethington P, et al. Prospective crossover comparison between NAVA and pressure control ventilation in premature neonates less than 1500 grams. J Perinatol. 2013;33:452–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Kim HS, Sohn JA, et al. Randomized crossover study of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2012;161:808–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhini F, Ferrero F, De Luca D, et al. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm neonates with acute respiratory failure. Neonatology. 2015;107:60–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck J, Reilly M, Grasselli G, et al. Patient-ventilator interaction during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Res. 2009;65:663–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng W, Zhu H, Shi H, et al. Volume targeted ventilation is more suitable than pressure limited ventilation for preterm infants: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F158–F165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury O, Patel DS, Hannam S, et al. Randomised trial of volume-targeted ventilation versus pressure limited ventilation in acute respiratory failure in prematurely born infants. Neonatology. 2013;104:290–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Milner AD, Greenough A. Performance of neonatal ventilators in volume targeted ventilation mode. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:176–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DS, Rafferty GF, Lee S, et al. Work of breathing and volume targeted ventilation in respiratory distress. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95:F443–F446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DS, Sharma A, Prendergast M, et al. Work of breathing and different levels of volume-targeted ventilation. Pediatrics. 2009;123:e679–e684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh J, Sinha SK, Alsop E, et al. Long term follow- up of very low birthweight infants from a neonatal volume versus pressure mechanical ventilation trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94:F360–F362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

• This study demonstrates improved respiratory outcomes at follow-up related to use of volume-targeted ventilation.

• Laubscher B, Greenough A, Costeloe K. Performance of high frequency oscillators. Brit J Intern Care. 1996;6:148–162.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson-Smart DJ, Cools F, Bhuta T, et al. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD000104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cools F, Askie L, Offringa M, et al. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation in preterm infants: a meta-analysis of individual patient’s data. Lancet. 2010;375:2082–2089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

• Patient level meta-analysis demonstrated that high frequency oscillatory ventilation did not significantly reduce bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

• Johnson AH, Peacock JL, Greenough A, et al. High frequency oscillatory ventilation for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:633–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas M, Rafferty G, Limb E, et al. Pulmonary function at follow up of very preterm infants from the UK oscillation study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:868–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofhuis W, Huysman MWA, van der Wiel EC, et al. Worsening of V′ max FRC in infants with chronic lung disease in the first year of life. A more favorable outcome after high-frequency oscillation ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:1539–1543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zivanovic S, Peacock JL, Alcazare-Paris M, et al. United Kingdom Oscillation Study Group. Late outcomes of a randomized trial of high-frequency oscillation in neonates. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1121–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

•• First study to demonstrate a respiratory technique influences respiratory outcomes at school age.