Merging experimental data and in silico analysis: a systems-level approach to autoimmune disease and cancer

References

• Lin PI, Vance JM, Pericak-Vance MA, Martin ER. No gene is an island: the flip-flop phenomenon. Am. J. Hum. Genet.80(3), 531–538 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tramontano A. No protein is an island. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.19(3), 310–311 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ideker T, Galitski T, Hood L. A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.2, 343–372 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingolia NT, Weissman JS. Systems biology: reverse engineering the cell. Nature454(7208), 1059–1062 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourret RB. Signal transduction meets systems biology: deciphering specificity determinants for PPIs. Mol. Microbiol.69(6), 1336–1340 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruggeman FJ, Westerhoff HV. The nature of systems biology. Trends Microbiol.15, 45–50 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preisinger C, von Kriegsheim A, Matallanas D, Kolch W. Proteomics and phosphoproteomics for the mapping of cellular signalling networks. Proteomics8(21), 4402–4415 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy S, Ross KN, Lander ES, Golub TR. A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors. Nat. Genet.33, 49–54 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy S. Rational design of cancer-drug combinations. N. Engl. J. Med.357, 299–300 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baechler EC, Batliwalla FM, Karypis G et al. Interferon-inducible gene expression signature in peripheral blood cells of patients with severe lupus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100, 2610–2615 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigelt B, Hu Z, He X et al. Molecular portraits and 70-gene prognosis signature are preserved throughout the metastatic process of breast cancer. Cancer Res.65(20), 9155–9158 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirillo N, Prime SS. Desmosomal interactome in keratinocytes: a systems biology approach leading to an understanding of the pathogenesis of skin disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.66(21), 3517–3533 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim KP, Cirillo N, Hassona Y et al. Fibroblast gene expression profile reflects the stage of tumour progression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Pathol.223(4), 459–469 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hess EL. Origins of molecular biology. Science168, 664–669 (1970).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strange K. The end of “naive reductionism”: rise of systems biology or renaissance of physiology? Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.288(5), C968–C974 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom FE. What does it all mean to you? J. Neurosci.21, 8304–8305 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitano H. Looking beyond the details: a rise in system-oriented approaches in genetics and molecular biology. Curr. Genet.41, 1–10 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitano H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science295, 1662–1664 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader GD, Hogue CW. Analyzing yeast PPI data obtained from different sources. Nat. Biotechnol.20, 991–997 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidel-Bar R, Itzkovitz S, Ma’ayan A, Iyengar R, Geiger B. Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome. Nat. Cell Biol.9, 858–867 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer MD, Murali TM, Sobral BW. Computational prediction of host-pathogen PPIs. Bioinformatics23(13), I159–I166 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieroni E, de la Fuente van Bentem S, Mancosu G, Capobianco E, Hirt H, de la Fuente A. Protein networking: insights into global functional organization of proteomes. Proteomics8(4), 799–816 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paschoal PO, Chamberlin W. Review of the 1st Annual World Congress of Immunodiseases and Therapeutics. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol.6(5), 757–759 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schöner D, Barkow S, Bleuler S et al. Network analysis of systems elements. EXS97, 331–351 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geier F, Timmer J, Fleck C. Reconstructing gene-regulatory networks from time series, knock-out data, and prior knowledge. BMC Syst. Biol.1, 11 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar A, Snyder M. Proteomics: protein complexes take the bait. Nature415, 123–124 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Virtanen C, Woodgett J. Clinical uses of microarrays in cancer research. Methods Mol. Med.141, 87–113 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung YF, Cavalieri D. Fundamentals of cDNA microarray data analysis. Trends Genet.19, 649–659 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quackenbush J. Computational analysis of microarray data. Nat. Rev. Genet.2, 418–427 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slonim DK. From patterns to pathways: gene expression data analysis comes of age. Nat. Genet.32(Suppl.), 502–508 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaravinos A, Lambrou GI, Boulalas I, Delakas D, Spandidos DA. Identification of common differentially expressed genes in urinary bladder cancer. PLoS ONE6(4), E18135 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Mendes A, Scott RJ, Moscato P. Microarrays – identifying molecular portraits for prostate tumors with different Gleason patterns. Methods Mol. Med.141, 131–151 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sikaroodi M, Galachiantz Y, Baranova A. Tumor markers: the potential of “omics” approach. Curr. Mol. Med.10(2), 249–257 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaidel-Bar R, Geiger B. The switchable integrin adhesome. J. Cell. Sci.123(9), 1385–1388 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said MR, Begley TJ, Oppenheim AV, Lauffenburger DA, Samson LD. Global network analysis of phenotypic effects: protein networks and toxicity modulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.101, 18006–18011 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallabhajosyula RR, Raval A. Computational modeling in systems biology. Methods Mol. Biol.662, 97–120 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Efroni S, Schaefer CF, Buetow KH. Identification of key processes underlying cancer phenotypes using biologic pathway analysis. PLoS ONE2(5), E425 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wachi S, Yoneda K, Wu R. Interactome–transcriptome analysis reveals the high centrality of genes differentially expressed in lung cancer tissues. Bioinformatics21, 4205–4208 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttaris VC, Krishnan S, Tsokos GC. Systems biology in systemic lupus erythematosus: integrating genes, biology and immune function. Autoimmunity39(8), 705–709 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuller T, Atar S, Ruppin E, Gurevich M, Achiron A. Global map of physical interactions among differentially expressed genes in multiple sclerosis relapses and remissions. Hum. Mol. Genet.20(18), 3606–3619 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ideker T, Sharan R. Protein networks in disease. Genome Res.18(4), 644–652 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews LR, Vaglio P, Reboul J et al. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved PPIs or “interologs.” Genome Res.11, 2120–2126 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson PF, Bates PA. Global topological features of cancer proteins in the human interactome. Bioinformatics22, 2291–2297 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futreal PA, Coin L, Marshall M et al. A census of human cancer genes. Nat. Rev. Cancer4, 177–183 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh KI, Cusick ME, Valle D, Childs B, Vidal M, Barabasi AL. The human disease network. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104, 8685–8690 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamosh A, Scott AF, Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, McKusick VA. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledge base of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res.33, D514–D517 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A et al. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res.32, D258–D261 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvano SE, Xiao W, Richards DR et al. A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans. Nature437, 1032–1037 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amagai M, Klaus-Kovtun V, Stanley JR. Autoantibodies against a novel epithelial cadherin in pemphigus vulgaris, a disease of cell adhesion. Cell67, 869–877 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne AS, Hanakawa Y, Amagai M, Stanley JR. Desmosomes and disease: pemphigus and bullous impetigo. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.16, 536–543 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bystryn JC, Rudolph JL. Pemphigus. Lancet366, 61–73 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirillo N. Pathophysiology of the desmosome. Research Signpost, Kerala, India (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Waschke J. The desmosome and pemphigus. Histochem. Cell. Biol.130, 21–54 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amagai M, Karpati S, Prussick R, Klaus-Kovtun V, Stanley JR. Autoantibodies against the amino-terminal cadherin-like binding domain of pemphigus vulgaris antigen are pathogenic. J. Clin. Invest.90, 919–926 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen VT, Ndoye A, Grando SA. Novel human 9 acetylcholine receptor regulating keratinocyte adhesion is targeted by pemphigus vulgaris autoimmunity. Am. J. Pathol.157, 1377–1391 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen VA, Ndoye A, Grando SA. Pemphigus vulgaris antibody identifies pemphaxin, a novel keratinocyte annexin-like molecule binding acetylcholine. J. Biol. Chem.275, 29466–29476 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza A, Cirillo N, Femiano F, Gombos F. How does acantholysis occur in pemphigus vulgaris: a critical review. J. Cutan. Pathol.33, 401–412 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res.13, 2498–2504 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi AL. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature406, 378–382 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza A, Cirillo N, Rossiello R et al. Evidence of key role of Cdk2 overexpression in pemphigus vulgaris. J. Biol. Chem.283, 8736–8745 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios R, Goni J, Martinez-Forero I et al. A network analysis of the human T-cell activation gene network identifies JAGGED1 as a therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases. PLoS ONE21, E1222 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ptitsyn AA, Weil MM, Thamm DH. Systems biology approach to identification of biomarkers for metastatic progression in cancer. BMC Bioinformatics9(Suppl. 9), S8 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thurlow JK, Peña Murillo CL, Hunter KD et al. Spectral clustering of microarray data elucidates the roles of microenvironment remodeling and immune responses in survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol.28(17), 2881–2888 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung CH, Parker JS, Karaca G et al. Molecular classification of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas using patterns of gene expression. Cancer Cell5, 489–500 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przytycka TM, Kim YA. Network integration meets network dynamics. BMC Biol.8, 48 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar