Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: past, present and future

References

• Shortt A, Secker G, Notara M. Transplantation of ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial stem cells: a review of techniques and clinical results. Surv. Ophthalmol.52, 483–502 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrini G, Traverso CE, Franzi AT. Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet349, 990–993 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Endo K, Cooper LJ et al. The successful culture and autologous transplantation of rabbit oral mucosal epithelial cells on amniotic membrane. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44, 106–116 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higa K, Shimazaki J. Recent advances in cultivated epithelial transplantation. Cornea27, S41–S47 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Wijdh RH, Nieuwendaal CP. A technique to excise the Descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea23, 286–288 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price FW Jr, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.32, 411–418 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology113, 1936–1942 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea25, 886–889 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mau K. What DSAEK is going on? An alternative to penetrating keratoplasty for endothelial dysfunction. Optometry80, 513–523 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price FW, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J. Refract. Surg.21, 339–345 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin XY, Safran AB. Corneal hypoesthesia. Surv. Ophthalmol.33, 28–40 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel A. Über transplantationen der kornea. Ber. Ophthalmol. Ges. Heidelberg18–54 (1886).
   Google Scholar
• Zirm E. Eine erfolgreiche totale keratoplastik. Arch. Ophthalmol.64, 580–593 (1906).
   Google Scholar
• Castroviejo R. Keratoplasy for the treatment of keratoconus. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc.46, 127–153 (1948).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malbran ES, Malbran E, Buonsanti J, Adrogué E. Closed-system phacoemulsification and posterior chamber implant combined with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg.24, 403–406 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tillet CW. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol.41, 530–533 (1956).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polack FM. Queratoplastia lamellar posterior. Revista Peruana Oftalmologia2, 62–64 (1965).
   Google Scholar
• Polack FM, Smelser GK, Rose J. Long-term survival of isotopically labeled stromal and endothelial cells in corneal homografts. Am. J. Ophthalmol.57, 67–78 (1964).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones DT, Culbertson WW. Endothelial lamellar keratoplasty (ELK). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.39, S76 (1998) (Abstract 342).
   Google Scholar
• Azar DT, Jain S, Sambursky R. A new surgical technique of microkeratome-assisted deep lamellar keratoplasty with a hinged flap. Arch. Ophthalmol.118, 1112–1115 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Busin M, Arffa RC, Sebastiani A. Endokeratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty for the surgical treatment of diseased endothelium: initial results. Ophthalmology107, 2077–2082 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ko W, Freuh B, Shield C, Costello M, Feldman S. Experimental posterior lamellar transplantation of the rabbit cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.34, 1102 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea17, 618–626 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Lander F, van Dooren BT, Pels E, Beekhuis WH. Preliminary clinical results of posterior lamellar keratoplasty through a sclerocorneal pocket incision. Ophthalmology107, 1850–1856 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry M, Ousley P. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty causes minimal surface topography changes. Presented at: 25th Annual Session of the Castroviejo Corneal Society. Orlando, FL, USA, 23 October 1999.
   Google Scholar
• van Dooren B, Melles G, Lander F, Beekhuis W, Binder P. Preliminary clinical results of posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.40, S632 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in the first United States patients: early clinical results. Cornea20, 239–243 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Replacing the endothelium without corneal surface incisions or sutures: the first United States clinical series using the deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty procedure. Ophthalmology110, 755–764 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Lander F, Nieuwendaal C. Sutureless, posterior lamellar keratoplasty: a case report of a modified technique. Cornea21, 325–327 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Small-incision deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK): six-month results in the first prospective clinical study. Cornea24, 59–65 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Ousley PJ. In pursuit of emmetropia: spherical equivalent refraction results with deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK). Cornea27, 619–626 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Rapid visual rehabilitation after endothelial transplants with deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK). Cornea23, 143–153 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melles GR, Wijdh RH, Nieuwendaal CP. A technique to excise the Descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorrhexis). Cornea23, 286–288 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price FW Jr, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J. Refract. Surg.21, 339–345 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Chen ES, Shamie N, Hoar KL, Friend DJ. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology115, 488–496 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash G, Jhanji V, Titiyal JS. Will Descemet’s stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) lower the rates of allograft rejection in corneal transplants for endothelial failure? Med. Hypotheses69, 1117–1119 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehta JS, Shilbayeh R, Por YM, Cajucom-Uy H, Beuerman RW, Tan DT. Femtosecond laser creation of donor cornea buttons for Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.34, 1970–1975 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YY, Hendrikse F, Pels E et al. Preliminary results of femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Arch. Ophthalmol.126, 1351–1356 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng YY, Pels E, Nuijts RM. Femtosecond-laser-assisted Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.33, 152–155 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwan-Apichon O, Reyes JM, Griffin NB, Barker J, Gore P, Chuck RS. Microkeratome versus femtosecond laser predissection of corneal grafts for anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea25, 966–968 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose L, Briceño CA, Stark WJ, Gloria DG, Jun AS. Assessment of eye bank-prepared posterior lamellar corneal tissue for endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology115, 279–286 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Saad HA, Shamie N et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: the influence of insertion techniques and incision size on donor endothelial survival. Cornea28, 24–31 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahar I, Kaiserman I, McAllum P et al. Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology115, 1525–1533 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busin M, Bhatt PR, Scorcia V. A modified technique for Descemet membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to minimize endothelial cell loss. Arch. Ophthalmol.126, 1133–1137 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Covert DJ, Koenig SB. Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with failed penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea26, 692–696 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koenig SB, Covert DJ, Dupps WJ Jr, Meisler DM. Visual acuity, refractive error, and endothelial cell density six months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea26, 670–674 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea25, 886–889 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MO, Price FW. Endothelial cell density after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty: influencing factors and two-year trend. Ophthalmology115, 857–865 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: the influence of preoperative donor endothelial cell densities on dislocation, primary graft failure, and 1-year cell counts. Cornea27, 1131–1137 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terry MA, Wall JM, Hoar KL, Ousley PJ. A prospective study of endothelial cell loss during the 2 years after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology114, 631–639 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ide T, Yoo SH, Goldman JM, Perez V, O’Brien TP. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: effect of inserting forceps on DSAEK donor tissue viability by using an in vitro delivery model and vital dye assay. Cornea26, 1079–1081 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey TM. Small incision insertion of posterior lamellar button. J. Refract. Surg.22, 429 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhanji V, Greenrod E, Sharma N, Vajpayee RB. Modifications in the surgical technique of DSAEK. Br. J. Ophthalmol.92, 1311 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macsai MS, Kara-Jose AC. Suture technique for Descemet stripping and endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea26, 1123–1126 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaiserman I, Bahar I, McAllum P, Slomovic AR, Rootman DS. Suture-assisted vs forceps-assisted insertion of the donor lenticula during Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol.145, 986–990 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta JS, Por YM, Beuerman RW, Tan DT. Glide insertion technique for donor cornea lenticule during Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.33, 1846–1850 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Sansanayudh W, Levinger E, Rootman DS. Busin guide vs forceps for the insertion of the donor lenticule in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol.147, 220–226 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balachandran C, Ham L, Birbal RS, Wong TH, van der Wees J, Melles GR. Simple technique for graft insertion in Descemet-stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty using a 30-gauge needle. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.35, 625–628 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dapena I, Ham L, Melles GR. Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK: the thinner the better? Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.20, 299–307 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea25, 879–881 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea25, 987–990 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dapena I, Ham L, Lie J, Van-Der-Wees J, Melles GR. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): two-year results. Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol.84, 237–243 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM, Price FW. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology116, 2361–2368 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham L, van Luijk C, Dapena I et al. Endothelial cell density after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1- to 2-year follow-up. Am. J. Ophthalmol.148, 521–527 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studeny P, Farkas A, Vokrojova M, Liskova P, Jirsova K. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty with a stromal rim (DMEK-S). Br. J. Ophthalmol. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.165134 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shih CY, Ritterband DC, Palmiero PM et al. The use of postoperative slit-lamp optical coherence tomography to predict primary failure in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol.147, 796–800 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman HE, Capella JA, Robbins JE. The human corneal endothelium. Am. J. Ophthalmol.61, 835–841 (1966).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senoo T, Joyce NC. Cell cycle kinetics in corneal endothelium from old and young donors. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.41, 660–667 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce NC, Zhu CC, Harris DL. Relationship among oxidative stress, DNA damage, and proliferative capacity in human corneal endothelium. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.50, 2116–2122 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu C, Rawe I, Joyce NC. Differential protein expression in human corneal endothelial cells cultured from young and older donors. Mol. Vis.14, 1805–1814 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engelmann K, Bednarz J, Valtink M. Prospects for endothelial transplantation. Exp. Eye Res.78, 573–578 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimura T, Yokoo S, Araie M, Amano S, Yamagami S. Treatment of rabbit bullous keratopathy with precursors derived from cultured human corneal endothelium. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.46, 3637–3644 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitani K, Yokoo S, Honda N, Usui T, Yamagami S, Amano S. Transplantation of a sheet of human corneal endothelial cell in a rabbit model. Mol. Vis.14, 1–9 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koizumi N, Sakamoto Y, Okumura N et al. Cultivated corneal endothelial transplantation in a primate: possible future clinical application in corneal endothelial regenerative medicine. Cornea27, S48–S55 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Mimura T, Yamagami S, Usui T, Seiichi, Honda N, Amano S. Necessary prone position time for human corneal endothelial precursor transplantation in a rabbit endothelial deficiency model. Curr. Eye Res.32, 617–623 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen KH, Azar D, Joyce NC. Transplantation of adult human corneal endothelium ex vivo: a morphological study. Cornea20, 731–737 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Liu W, Han B, Wei X, Yang C. Preparation and properties of a chitosan-based carrier of corneal endothelial cells. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.19, 3611–3619 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natu MV, Sardinha JP, Correia IJ, Gil MH. Controlled release gelatin hydrogels and lyophilisates with potential application as ocular inserts. Biomed. Mater.2, 241–249 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Saad HA, Shamie N et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: the influence of insertion techniques and incision size on donor endothelial survival. Cornea28, 24–31 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakano Y, Oyamada M, Dai P, Nakagami T, Kinoshita S, Takamatsu T. Connexin43 knockdown accelerates wound healing but inhibits mesenchymal transition after corneal endothelial injury in vivo. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.49, 93–104 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker DG, Brereton HM, Coster DJ, Williams KA. The potential of viral vector-mediated gene transfer to prolong corneal allograft survival. Curr. Gene Ther.9, 33–44 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh SW, Chandrasekara K, Abbondandolo CJ, Coll TJ, Rutzen AR. VIP and VIP gene silencing modulation of differentiation marker N-cadherin and cell shape of corneal endothelium in human corneas ex vivo. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.49, 3491–3498 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar