90
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Functional genomics and networks: new approaches in the extraction of complex gene modules

&
Pages 55-63 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature431(7011), 931–945 (2004).
  • Stumpf MP, Thorne T, de Silva E et al. Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(19), 6959–6964 (2008).
  • Copley RR. The animal in the genome: comparative genomics and evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.363(1496), 1453–1461 (2008).
  • Yeger-Lotem E, Sattath S, Kashtan N et al. Network motifs in integrated cellular networks of transcription-regulation and protein–protein interaction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(16), 5934–5939 (2004).
  • Barabasi AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science286(5439), 509–512 (1999).
  • He X, Zhang J. Why do hubs tend to be essential in protein networks? PLoS Genet.2(6), E88 (2006).
  • Sporns O, Honey CJ, Kotter R. Identification and classification of hubs in brain networks. PLoS ONE2(10), E1049 (2007).
  • Said MR et al. Global network analysis of phenotypic effects: protein networks and toxicity modulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(52), 18006–18011 (2004).
  • Lim J, Hao T, Shaw C et al. A protein–protein interaction network for human inherited ataxias and disorders of Purkinje cell degeneration. Cell125(4), 801–814 (2006).
  • Tyson JJ, Chen K, Novak B. Network dynamics and cell physiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.2(12), 908–916 (2001).
  • Tegner J, Bjorkegren J. Perturbations to uncover gene networks. Trends Genet.23(1), 34–41 (2007).
  • Kitano H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science295(5560), 1662–1664 (2002).
  • Bruggeman FJ, Westerhoff HV. The nature of systems biology. Trends Microbiol.15(1), 45–50 (2007).
  • Kelley R, Ideker T. Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks. Nat. Biotechnol.23(5), 561–566 (2005).
  • Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Robert F et al. Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science298(5594), 799–804 (2002).
  • Stuart JM, Segal E, Koller D, Kim SK. A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science302(5643), 249–255 (2003).
  • Ma H, Sorokin A, Mazein A et al. The Edinburgh human metabolic network reconstruction and its functional analysis. Mol. Syst. Biol.3, 135 (2007).
  • Papin JA, Hunter T, Palsson BO, Subramaniam S. Reconstruction of cellular signalling networks and analysis of their properties. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.6(2), 99–111 (2005).
  • Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA95(25), 14863–14868 (1998).
  • Allison DB, Cui X, Page GP, Sabripour M. Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus. Nat. Rev. Genet.7(1), 55–65 (2006).
  • Dopazo J. Functional interpretation of microarray experiments. Omics10(3), 398–410 (2006).
  • Khatri P, Draghici S. Ontological analysis of gene expression data: current tools, limitations, and open problems. Bioinformatics21(18), 3587–3595 (2005).
  • Al-Shahrour F, Diaz-Uriarte R, Dopazo J. FatiGO: a web tool for finding significant associations of gene ontology terms with groups of genes. Bioinformatics20(4), 578–580 (2004).
  • Draghici S, Khatri P, Bhavsar P, Shah A, Krawetz SA, Tainsky MA. Onto-tools, the toolkit of the modern biologist: onto-express, onto-compare, onto-design and onto-translate. Nucleic Acids Res.31(13), 3775–3781 (2003).
  • Zeeberg BR, Feng W, Wang G. GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data. Genome Biol.4(4), R28 (2003).
  • Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet.25(1), 25–29 (2000).
  • Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res.32(Database issue), D277–D280 (2004).
  • Pan KH, Lih CJ, Cohen SN. Effects of threshold choice on biological conclusions reached during analysis of gene expression by DNA microarrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102(25), 8961–8965 (2005).
  • Mateos A, Dopazo J, Jansen R, Tu Y, Gerstein M, Stolovitzky G. Systematic learning of gene functional classes from DNA array expression data by using multilayer perceptrons. Genome Res.12(11), 1703–1715 (2002).
  • Lee HK, Hsu AK, Sajdak J, Qin J, Pavlidis P. Coexpression analysis of human genes across many microarray data sets. Genome Res.14(6), 1085–1094 (2004).
  • Dopazo J. Formulating and testing hypotheses in functional genomics. Artif. Intell. Med.45(2–3), 97–107 (2009).
  • Lee JM, Sonnhammer EL. Genomic gene clustering analysis of pathways in eukaryotes. Genome Res.13(5), 875–882 (2003).
  • Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF et al. PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet.34(3), 267–273 (2003).
  • Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102(43), 15545–15550 (2005).
  • Barry WT, Nobel AB, Wright FA. Significance analysis of functional categories in gene expression studies: a structured permutation approach. Bioinformatics21(9), 1943–1949 (2005).
  • Smid M, Dorssers LC. GO-Mapper: functional analysis of gene expression data using the expression level as a score to evaluate gene ontology terms. Bioinformatics20(16), 2618–2625 (2004).
  • Goeman JJ, van de Geer SA, de Kort F, van Houwelingen HC. A global test for groups of genes: testing association with a clinical outcome. Bioinformatics20(1), 93–99 (2004).
  • Kim SY, Volsky DJ. PAGE: parametric analysis of gene set enrichment. BMC Bioinformatics6, 144 (2005).
  • Al-Shahrour F, Arbiza L, Dopazo H et al. From genes to functional classes in the study of biological systems. BMC Bioinformatics8, 114 (2007).
  • Al-Shahrour F, Diaz-Uriarte R, Dopazo J. Discovering molecular functions significantly related to phenotypes by combining gene expression data and biological information. Bioinformatics21(13), 2988–2993 (2005).
  • Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res.37(1), 1–13 (2008).
  • Goeman JJ, Buhlmann P. Analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets: methodological issues. Bioinformatics23(8), 980–987 (2007).
  • Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet.5(2), 101–113 (2004).
  • Hartwell LH, Hopfield JJ, Leibler S, Murray AW. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature402(6761 Suppl.), C47–C52 (1999).
  • Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res.36(Database issue), D480–D484 (2008).
  • Vastrik I, D’Eustachio P, Schmidt E et al. Reactome: a knowledge base of biologic pathways and processes. Genome Biol.8(3), R39 (2007).
  • Schaefer CF, Anthony K, Krupa S et al. PID: the Pathway Interaction Database. Nucleic Acids Res.37(Database issue), D674–D679 (2009).
  • Falk R, Ramström M, Ståhl S, Hober S. Approaches for systematic proteome exploration. Biomol. Eng.24(2), 155–168 (2007).
  • Berggard T, Linse S, James P. Methods for the detection and analysis of protein–protein interactions. Proteomics7(16), 2833–2842 (2007).
  • Badano JL, Katsanis N. Beyond Mendel: an evolving view of human genetic disease transmission. Nat. Rev. Genet.3(10), 779–789 (2002).
  • Duarte NC, Becker SA, Jamshidi N et al. Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(6), 1777–1782 (2007).
  • Montaner D, Minguez P, Al-Shahrour F, Dopazo J. Gene set internal coherence in the context of functional profiling. BMC Genomics10(1), 197 (2009).
  • Tomfohr J, Lu J, Kepler TB. Pathway level analysis of gene expression using singular value decomposition. BMC Bioinformatics6, 225 (2005).
  • Lee E, Chuang HY, Kim JW, Ideker T, Lee D. Inferring pathway activity toward precise disease classification. PLoS Comput. Biol.4(11), E1000217 (2008).
  • Rapaport F, Zinovyev A, Dutreix M, Barillot E, Vert JP. Classification of microarray data using gene networks. BMC Bioinformatics8, 35 (2007).
  • Hanisch D, Zien A, Zimmer R, Lengauer T. Co-clustering of biological networks and gene expression data. Bioinformatics18(Suppl. 1), S145–S154 (2002).
  • Rahnenführer J, Domingues FS, Maydt J, Lengauer T. Calculating the statistical significance of changes in pathway activity from gene expression data. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol.3, Article 16 (2004).
  • Wei Z, Li H. Markov random field model for network-based analysis of genomic data. Bioinformatics23(12), 1537–1544 (2007).
  • Wei P, Pan W. Incorporating gene networks into statistical tests for genomic data via a spatially correlated mixture model. Bioinformatics24(3), 404–411 (2008).
  • Thomas R, Gohlke JM, Stopper GF, Parham FM, Portier CJ. Choosing the right path: enhancement of biologically relevant sets of genes or proteins using pathway structure. Genome Biol.10(4), R44 (2009).
  • Efroni S, Schaefer CF, Buetow KH. Identification of key processes underlying cancer phenotypes using biologic pathway analysis. PLoS ONE2(5), E425 (2007).
  • Draghici S, Khatri P, Tarca AL et al. A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis. Genome Res.17(10), 1537–1545 (2007).
  • Tarca AL, Draghici S, Khatri P et al. A novel signaling pathway impact analysis. Bioinformatics25(1), 75–82 (2009).
  • Pereira-Leal JB, Enright AJ, Ouzounis CA. Detection of functional modules from protein interaction networks. Proteins54(1), 49–57 (2004).
  • Rives AW, Galitski T. Modular organization of cellular networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100(3), 1128–1133 (2003).
  • Girvan M, Newman ME. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99(12), 7821–7826 (2002).
  • Wilkinson DM, Huberman BA. A method for finding communities of related genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(Suppl. 1), 5241–5248 (2004).
  • Sharan R, Suthram S, Kelley RM et al. Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102(6), 1974–1979 (2005).
  • Luo F, Yang Y, Chen CF, Chang R, Zhou J, Scheuermann RH. Modular organization of protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics23(2), 207–214 (2007).
  • Brunner HG, van Driel MA. From syndrome families to functional genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet.5(7), 545–551 (2004).
  • Gandhi TK, Zhong J, Mathivanan S et al. Analysis of the human protein interactome and comparison with yeast, worm and fly interaction datasets. Nat. Genet.38(3), 285–293 (2006).
  • Dezso Z, Nikolsky Y, Nikolskaya T et al. Identifying disease-specific genes based on their topological significance in protein networks. BMC Syst. Biol.3, 36 (2009).
  • Hernández P, Huerta-Cepas J, Montaner D et al. Evidence for systems-level molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis. BMC Genomics8, 185 (2007).
  • Rambaldi D, Giorgi FM, Capuani F, Ciliberto A, Ciccarelli FD. Low duplicability and network fragility of cancer genes. Trends Genet.24(9), 427–430 (2008).
  • Ideker T, Ozier O, Schwikowski B et al. Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics18(Suppl. 1), S233–S240 (2002).
  • Calvano SE, Xiao W, Richards DR et al. A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans. Nature437(7061), 1032–1037 (2005).
  • Huang SS, Fraenkel E. Integrating proteomic, transcriptional, and interactome data reveals hidden components of signaling and regulatory networks. Sci. Signal.2(81), 40 (2009).
  • Liu M, Liberzon A, Kong SW et al. Network-based analysis of affected biological processes in Type 2 diabetes models. PLoS Genet.3(6), E96 (2007).
  • Guo Z, Wang L, Li Y et al. Edge-based scoring and searching method for identifying condition-responsive protein protein interaction sub-network. Bioinformatics23(16), 2121–2128 (2007).
  • Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M. BiNGO: a cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics21(16), 3448–3449 (2005).
  • Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res.13(11), 2498–2504 (2003).
  • Liu J, Hughes-Oliver JM, Menius JA Jr. Domain-enhanced analysis of microarray data using GO annotations. Bioinformatics23(10), 1225–1234 (2007).
  • Minguez P, Dopazo J. Protein Interactions for Functional Genomics, in Biological Data Mining in Protein Interaction Networks. Li X-L, Ng S-K (Eds). IGI Global, PA, USA, 223–238 (2009).
  • Hwang T, Park T. Identification of differentially expressed subnetworks based on multivariate ANOVA. BMC Bioinformatics10, 128 (2009).
  • Minguez P, Götz S, Montaner D, Al-Shahrour F, Dopazo J. SNOW, a web-based tool for the statistical analysis of protein-protein interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res.37(Web Server issue), W109–W114 (2009).
  • Dijkstra E. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik1, 269–271 (1959).
  • Xu J, Li Y. Discovering disease-genes by topological features in human protein–protein interaction network. Bioinformatics22(22), 2800–2805 (2006).
  • Chuang HY, Lee E, Liu YT, Lee D, Ideker T. Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol. Syst. Biol.3, 140 (2007).
  • Francesconi M, Remondini D, Neretti N et al. Reconstructing networks of pathways via significance analysis of their intersections. BMC Bioinformatics9(Suppl. 4), S9 (2008).
  • Campillos M, Kuhn M, Gavin AC, Jensen LJ, Bork P. Drug target identification using side-effect similarity. Science321(5886), 263–266 (2008).
  • Goh KI, Cusick ME, Valle D, Childs B, Vidal M, Barabási AL. The human disease network. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA.104(21), 8685–8690 (2007).
  • Mak HC, Daly M, Gruebel B, Ideker T. CellCircuits: a database of protein network models. Nucleic Acids Res.35(Database issue), D538–D545 (2007).
  • Schwartz AS, Yu J, Gardenour KR, Finley RL Jr, Ideker T. Cost-effective strategies for completing the interactome. Nat. Methods6(1), 55–61 (2009).

Website

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.