Tsetse flies, trypanosomes, humans and animals: what is proteomics revealing about their crosstalks?

References

• WHO. Human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness): epidemiological update. Wkly Epidemiol. Rec.81, 71–80 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Simmaro PP, Jannin J, Cattand P. Eliminating human African trypanosomiasis: where do we stand and what comes next? PLoS Med.5(2), E55 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desquesnes M, Dia ML. Mechanical transmission of Trypanosoma congolense in cattle by the African tabanid Atylotus agrestis. Exp. Parasitol.105(3–4), 226–231 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desquesnes M, Dia ML. Mechanical transmission of Trypanosoma vivax in cattle by the African tabanid Atylotus fuscipes. Vet. Parasitol.119(1), 9–19 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desquesnes M, Bossard G, Patrel D et al. First outbreak of Trypanosoma evansi in camels in metropolitan France. Vet. Rec162(23), 750–752 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joshi PP, Shegokar VR, Powar RM et al. Human trypanosomiasis caused by Trypanosoma evansi in India: the first case report. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.73(3), 491–495 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dantas-Torres F, Marcondes CB. Fighting neglected tropical diseases in the postgenomic era. Trends Parasitol.24(4), 156–157 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holzmuller P, Grébaut P, Brizard JP et al. ‘Pathogeno-Proteomics’: toward a new approach of host–vector–pathogen interactions. Ann. NY Acad. Sci.1149, 337–342 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roditi I, Lehane M. Interactions between trypanosomes and tsetse flies. Curr. Opin. Microb.11, 345–351 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biron DG, Moura H, Marché L, Hughes AL, Thomas F. Towards a new conceptual approach to ‘parasitoproteomics’. Trends Parasitol.21, 162–168 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bridges DJ, Pitt AR, Hanrahan O et al. Characterisation of the plasma membrane subproteome of bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei. Proteomics8(1), 83–99 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NL, Parish NM, Richardson JP, Pearson TW. Comparison of African trypanosomes of different antigenic phenotypes, subspecies and life cycle stages by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.16(3), 299–314 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearson TW, Moloo SK, Jenni L. Culture form and tsetse fly midgut form procyclic Trypanosoma brucei express common proteins. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.25(3), 273–278 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Deursen FJ, Thornton DJ, Matthews KR. A reproducible protocol for analysis of the proteome of Trypanosoma brucei by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.128(1), 107–110 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colasante C, Ellis M, Ruppert T, Voncken F. Comparative proteomics of glycosomes from bloodstream form and procyclic culture form Trypanosoma brucei brucei. Proteomics6(11), 3275–3293 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holzmuller P, Biron DG, Courtois P et al. Virulence and pathogenicity patterns of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense field isolates in experimentally infected mouse: differences in host immune response modulation by secretome and proteomics. Microbes Infect.10(1), 79–86 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grébaut P, Chuchana P, Brizard JP et al. Identification of total and differentially expressed excreted-secreted proteins from Trypanosoma congolense strains exhibiting different virulence and pathogenicity. Int. J. Parasitol.39, 1137–1150 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart SR, Lau KW, Hao Z et al. Analysis of the trypanosome flagellar proteome using a combined electron transfer/collisionally activated dissociation strategy. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom.20(2), 167–175 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Degrasse JA, Chait BT, Field MC, Rout MP. High-yield isolation and subcellular proteomic characterization of nuclear and subnuclear structures from trypanosomes. Methods Mol. Biol.463, 77–92 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panigrahi AK, Ogata Y, Zíková A et al. A comprehensive analysis of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial proteome. Proteomics9(2), 434–450 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons M, Nielsen B. Trypanosoma brucei : two-dimensional gel analysis of the major glycosomal proteins during the life cycle. Exp. Parasitol.70(3), 276–285 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foucher AL, McIntosh A, Douce G, Wastling J, Tait A, Turner CM. A proteomic analysis of arsenical drug resistance in Trypanosoma brucei. Proteomics6(9), 2726–2732 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vertommen D, Van Roy J, Szikora JP, Rider MH, Michels PA, Opperdoes FR. Differential expression of glycosomal and mitochondrial proteins in the two major life-cycle stages of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.158(2), 189–201 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Sayed NM, Hegde P, Quackenbush J, Melville SE, Donelson JE. The African trypanosome genome. Int. J. Parasitol.30(4), 329–345 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saas J, Ziegelbauer K, von Haeseler A, Fast B, Boshart M. A developmentally regulated aconitase related to iron-regulatory protein-1 is localized in the cytoplasm and in the mitochondrion of Trypanosoma brucei. J. Biol. Chem.275(4), 2745–2755 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nett IR, Martin DM, Miranda-Saavedra D et al. The phosphoproteome of bloodstream form Trypanonosoma brucei, causative agent of African sleeping sickness. Mol. Cell. Proteomics.8, 1527–1538 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre T, Thomas F, Ravel S et al.Trypanosoma brucei brucei induces alteration in the head proteome of the tsetse fly vector Glossina palpalis gambiensis. Insect Mol. Biol.16, 651–660 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papadopoulos MC, Abel PM, Agranoff D et al. A novel and accurate diagnostic test for human African trypanosomiasis. Lancet363(9418), 1358–1363 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff D, Stich A, Abel P, Krishna S. Proteomic fingerprinting for the diagnosis of human African trypanosomiasis. Trends Parasitol.21(4), 154–157 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biron DG, Loxdale HD, Ponton F et al. Population proteomics: an emerging discipline to study metapopulation ecology. Proteomics6, 1712–1715 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matthews KR. The developmental cell biology of Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Sci.118(2), 283–290 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aksoy S, Gibson WC, Lehane MJ et al. Perspectives on the interactions between tsetse and trypanosomes with implications for the control of trypanosomiasis. Adv. Parasitol.62, 1–83 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Lehane MJ, Msangi AR. Lectin and peritrophic membrane development in the gut of Glossina m. morsitans and a discussion of their role in protecting the fly against trypanosome infection. Med. Vet. Entomol.5, 495–501 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Z, Kasumba I, Lehane MJ, Gibson WC, Kwon J, Aksoy S. Tsetse immune responses and trypanosome transmission: implications for the development of tsetse-based strategies to reduce trypanosomiasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98, 12648–12653 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munks RJL, Sant’Anna MRV, Grail W et al. Antioxidant gene expression in the blood-feeding fly Glossina morsitans morsitans. Insect. Mol. Biol.14, 483–491 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu CY, Aksoy S. Innate immune responses regulate trypanosome parasite infection of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans. Mol. Microbiol.60, 1194–1204 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chandra M, Liniger M, Tetley L, Roditi I, Barry JD. TsetseEP, a gut protein from the tsetse Glossina morsitans, is related to a major surface glycoprotein of trypanosomes transmitted by the fly and to the products of a Drosophila gene family. Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol.3, 1163–1173 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Haines LR, Jackson AM, Lehane MJ et al. Increased expression of unusual EP repeat-containing proteins in the midgut of the tsetse fly (Glossina) after bacterial challenge. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.35, 413–423 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearson TW. Procyclins, proteases and proteomics: dissecting trypanosomes in the tsetse fly. Trends Microbiol.9, 299–301 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Acosta-Serrano A, Vassella E, Liniger M et al. The surface coat of procyclic Trypanosoma brucei : programmed expression and proteolytic cleavage of procyclin in the tsetse fly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98, 1513–1518 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Güther ML, Lee S, L Tetley A et al. GPI-anchored proteins and free GPI glycolipids of procyclic form Trypanosoma brucei are nonessential for growth, are required for colonization of the tsetse fly, and are not the only components of the surface coat. Mol. Biol. Cell.17, 5265–5274 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Güther ML, Beattie K, Lamont DJ et al. Fate of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-less procyclin and characterization of sialylated non-GPI-anchored surface coat molecules of procyclic-form Trypanosoma brucei. Eukaryot. Cell8, 1407–1417 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spoerri I, Chadwick R, Renggli CK et al. Role of the stage-regulated nucleoside transporter TbNT10 in differentiation and adenosine uptake in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.154, 110–114 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dean S, Marchetti R, Kirk K et al. A surface transporter family conveys the trypanosome differentiation signal. Nature459, 213–217 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mina JG, Pan SY, Wansadhipathi NK et al. The Trypanosoma brucei sphingolipid synthase, an essential enzyme and drug target. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.168, 16–23 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddow JD, Poulis B, Haines LR et al. Identification of major soluble salivary gland proteins in teneral Glossina morsitans morsitans. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.32, 1045–1053 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poulin R. The evolution of parasite manipulation of host behaviour: a theoretical analysis. Parasitology109, S109–S118 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd H. Manipulation of medically important insect vectors by their parasites. Annu. Rev. Entomol.48, 141–161 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas F, Adamo S, Moore J. Parasitic manipulation: where are we and where should we go? Behav. Proc.68, 185–199 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre T, Thomas F. Behind the scene, something else is pulling the strings: emphasizing parasitic manipulation in vector-borne diseases. Inf. Gen. Evol.8, 504–519 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagrue C, Poulin R. Manipulative parasites in the world of veterinary science: implications for epidemiology and pathology. Vet. J. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.01.015 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Lefèvre T, Adamo S, Biron DG, Missé D, Hughes D, Thomas F. How to make someone do something: the diversity and evolution of manipulative strategies in host–parasite interactions. Adv. Parasitol.68, 45–83 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adamo S. Modulating the modulators: parasites, neuromodulators and host behavioral change. Brain Behav. Evol.60, 370–377 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beckage NE. Parasite- and pathogen-mediated manipulation of host hormones and behaviour. In:Hormones, Brain and Behaviour (Volumes 2–3). Pfaff DW, Arnold AP, Etgen AM, Fahrbach SE, Rubin RT (Eds). Academic Press, CA, USA, 281–318 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Schaub GA. Parasitogenic alterations of vector behaviour. Int. J. Med. Microbiol.296, 37–40 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster JP. Rats, cats, people and parasites: the impact of latent toxoplasmosis on behaviour. Microbes Infect.3, 1037–1045 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre T, Roche B, Poulin R, Hurd H, Renaud F, Thomas F. Exploiting host compensatory responses: the ‘must’ of manipulation? Trends Parasitol.24(10), 435–439 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore J. Parasites and the behaviour of biting flies. J. Parasitol.79, 1–16 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre T, Koella JC, Renaud F, Hurd H, Biron DG, Thomas F. New prospects for research on manipulation of insect vectors by pathogens. PLoS Path.2(7), E75 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers ME, Bates PA. Leishmania manipulation of sand fly feeding behaviour results in enhanced transmission. PLoS Path.3, E91 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenni L, Molyneux DH, Livesey JL, Galun R. Feeding behavior of tsetse flies infected with salivarian trypanosomes. Nature283, 383–385 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts W. Probing by Glossina morsitans morsitans and transmission of Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.30, 948–951 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molyneux DH, Jefferies D. Feeding behaviour of pathogen-infected vectors. Parasitology92, 721–736 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helluy S, Holmes JC. Serotonin, octopamine and the clinging behaviour induced by the parasite Polymorphus paradoxus (Acanthocephala) in Gammarus lacustris (Crustacea). Can. J. Zool.68, 1214–1220 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson SN, Kavaliers M. Physiological bases for parasite-induced alterations of host behaviour. Parasitology109, S119–S138 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein SL. Parasite manipulation of the proximate mechanisms that mediate social behaviour in vertebrates. Physiol. Behav.79, 441–449 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biron DG, Joly C, Galeotti N, Ponton F, Marché L. The proteomics: a new prospect for studying parasitic manipulation. Behav. Processes68, 249–253 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Libersat F, Delago A, Gal R. Manipulation of host behavior by parasitic insects and insect parasites. Annu. Rev. Entomol.54, 189–207 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre T, Thomas F, Schwartz A et al. Malaria Plasmodium agent induces alteration in the head proteome of their Anopheles mosquito host. Proteomics7, 1908–1915 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barry JD, McCulloch R. Antigenic variation in trypanosomes: enhanced phenotypic variation in a eukaryotic parasite. Adv. Parasitol.49, 1–70 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson MA, Brimacombe JS, Brown JR et al. The GPI biosynthetic pathway as a therapeutic target for African sleeping sickness. Biochim. Biophys. Acta.1455(2–3), 327–340(1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Koning HP, Bridges DJ, Burchmore RJ. Purine and pyrimidine transport in pathogenic protozoa: from biology to therapy. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.29(5), 987–1020 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seebeck T, Schaub R, Johner A. cAMP signalling in the kinetoplastid protozoa. Curr. Mol. Med.4(6), 585–599 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rout MP, Field MC. Isolation and characterization of subnuclear compartments from Trypanosoma brucei. Identification of a major repetitive nuclear lamina component. J. Biol. Chem.276(41), 38261–38271 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons M. Glycosomes: parasites and the divergence of peroxisomal purpose. Mol. Microbiol.53(3), 717–724 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Hellemond JJ, Opperdoes FR, Tielens AG. The extraordinary mitochondrion and unusual citric acid cycle in Trypanosoma brucei. Biochem. Soc. Trans.33(5), 967–971 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerra-Giraldez C, Quijada L, Clayton CE. Compartmentation of enzymes in a microbody, the glycosome, is essential in Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Sci.115(13), 2651–2658 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acestor N, Panigrahi AK, Ogata Y et al. Protein composition of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial membranes. Proteomics9(24), 5497–5508 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panigrahi AK, Zíková A, Dalley RA et al. Mitochondrial complexes in Trypanosoma brucei : a novel complex and a unique oxidoreductase complex. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(3), 534–545 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broadhead R, Dawe HR, Farr H et al. Flagellar motility is required for the viability of the bloodstream trypanosome. Nature440(7081), 224–227 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzmuller P, Grébaut P, Peltier JB et al. Secretome of animal trypanosomes. Ann. NY Acad. Sci.1149, 337–342 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverman JM, Chan SK, Robinson DP et al. Proteomic analysis of the secretome of Leishmania donovani. Genome Biol.9(2), R35 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandan D, Yi T, Lopez M, Lai C, Reiner NE. Leishmania EF-1a activates the Src homology 2 domain containing tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 leading to macrophage deactivation. J. Biol. Chem.277(51), 50190–50197 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira V, Molina MC, Valck C et al. Role of calreticulin from parasites in its interaction with vertebrate hosts. Mol. Immunol.40(17), 1279–1291 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst P, Stromberg E, Ghalib HW et al. Identification and characterization of T cell-stimulating antigens from Leishmania by CD4 T cell expression cloning. J. Immunol.166(1), 498–505 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lubega GW, Ochola DO, Prichard RK. Trypanosoma brucei : anti-tubulin antibodies specifically inhibit trypanosome growth in culture. Exp. Parasitol.102(3–4), 134–142 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajid M, McKerrow JH. Cysteine proteases of parasitic organisms. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.120(1), 1–21 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalmanach G, Boulangé A, Serveau C et al. Congopain from Trypanosoma congolense : drug target and vaccine candidate. Biol. Chem.383(5), 739–749 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinsignon A, Cornelie S, Remoue F et al. Human/vector relationships during human African trypanosomiasis: initial screening of immunogenic salivary proteins of Glossina species. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.76, 327–333 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caljon G, Broos K, De Goeyse I et al. Identification of a functional antigen 5-related allergen in the saliva of a blood feeding insect, the tsetse fly. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.39, 332–341 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang CG, Chromy BA, McCutchen-Maloney SL. Host–pathogen interactions: a proteomic view. Expert Rev. Proteomics2(2), 187–202 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vierstraete E, Verleyen P, Baggerman G et al. A proteomic approach for the analysis of instantly released wound and immune proteins in Drosophila melanogaster hemolymph. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101, 470–475 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabilloud T. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: old, old fashioned, but it still climbs up the mountains. Proteomics.2, 3–10 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen H, Mann M. The ABC’s (and XYZ’s) of peptide sequencing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.5, 699–711 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett J, Brophy PM, Hamilton JV. Analysing proteomic data. Int. J. Parasitol.35, 543–553 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nedelkov D. Population proteomics: addressing protein diversity in humans. Expert Rev. Proteomics2(3), 315–324 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiehntopf M, Siegmund R, Deufel T. Use of SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry for identification of new biomarkers: potential and limitations. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.45(11), 1435–1449 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischoff R, Luider TM. Methodological advances in the discovery of protein and peptide disease markers. J. Chromatogr. B.803, 27–40 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issaq HJ, Veenstra TD, Conrads TP, Felschow D. The SELDI-TOF MS approach to proteomics: protein profiling and biomarker identification. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.292(3), 587–592 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert V, Wiesner A, Buschmann T, Meuer J. Surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI TOF-MS) and protein chip© technology in proteomics research. Pathol. Res. Pract.200, 83–94 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand S, Hahner S, Ketterlinus R. Protein profiling and identification in complex biological samples using LC-MALDI. Drug Plus Int.1, 6–8 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Greibrokk T, Pepaj M, Lundenes E, Andersen T, Novotna K. Separating proteins by pI-values – can 2D LC replace 2D GEL? LC-GC Europe18, 355–360 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature403, 623–631 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giot L, Bader JS, Brouwer C et al. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science302, 1727–1736 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Armstrong CM, Bertin N et al. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science303, 540–543 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juan D, Pazos F, Valencia A. High confidence prediction of global interactomes based on genome-wide coevolutionary networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(3), 934–939 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uetz P, Dong YA, Zeretzke C et al. Herpesviral protein networks and their interaction with the human proteome. Science311, 239–242 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Dragan Y, Epstein J et al. Quality control and quality assessment of data from surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) time-of flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS). BMC Bioinformatics6(Suppl. 2), S5 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biron DG, Hughes AL, Loxdale HD et al. The need for megatechnologies: massive sequencing, proteomics and bioinformatics. In: Encyclopedia of Infectious Diseases: Modern Technologies. Tibayrenc M (Ed.). Wiley, NJ, USA, 357–377 (2007)
   Google Scholar
• Brand S, Hahner S, Ketterlinus R. Protein profiling and identification in complex biological samples using LC-MALDI. DrugPlus International CA, USA, 6 September 2005.
   Google Scholar