Proteomics to study the diversity and dynamics of proteasome complexes: from fundamentals to the clinic

References

• Alberts B. The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell92, 291–294 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem.67, 425–479 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman MH, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol. Rev.82, 373–428 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciechanover A, Orian A, Schwartz AL. Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis: biological regulation via destruction. Bioessays22, 442–451 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg AL. On prions, proteasomes, and mad cows. N. Engl. J. Med.357, 1150–1152 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Mani A, Gelmann EP. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and its role in cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.23, 4776–4789 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu WK, Cho CH, Lee CW et al. Proteasome inhibition: a new therapeutic strategy to cancer treatment. Cancer Lett.293, 15–22 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlowski M, Wilk S. Catalytic activities of the 20 S proteasome, a multicatalytic proteinase complex. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.383, 1–16 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousquet-Dubouch MP, Uttenweiler-Joseph S, Ducoux-Petit M, Matondo M, Monsarrat B, Burlet-Schiltz O. Purification and proteomic analysis of 20S proteasomes from human cells. Methods Mol. Biol.432, 301–320 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Zoeger A, Blau M, Egerer K, Feist E, Dahlmann B. Circulating proteasomes are functional and have a subtype pattern distinct from 20S proteasomes in major blood cells. Clin. Chem.52, 2079–2086 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klare N, Seeger M, Janek K, Jungblut PR, Dahlmann B. Intermediate-type 20 S proteasomes in HeLa cells: “asymmetric” subunit composition, diversity and adaptation. J. Mol. Biol.373, 1–10 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Dahlmann B, Ruppert T, Kuehn L, Merforth S, Kloetzel PM. Different proteasome subtypes in a single tissue exhibit different enzymatic properties. J. Mol. Biol.303, 643–653 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drews O, Wildgruber R, Zong C et al. Mammalian proteasome subpopulations with distinct molecular compositions and proteolytic activities. Mol. Cell Proteomics6, 2021–2031 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaume B, Chapiro J, Stroobant V et al. Two abundant proteasome subtypes that uniquely process some antigens presented by HLA class I molecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107(43), 18599–18604 (2010) .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata S, Sasaki K, Kishimoto T et al. Regulation of CD8+ T cell development by thymus-specific proteasomes. Science316, 1349–1353 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert U, Bialy LP, Ebstein F et al. Immunoproteasomes preserve protein homeostasis upon interferon-induced oxidative stress. Cell142, 613–624 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes AV, Zong C, Edmondson RD et al. Mapping the murine cardiac 26S proteasome complexes. Circ. Res.99, 362–371 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Froment C, Uttenweiler-Joseph S, Bousquet-Dubouch MP et al. A quantitative proteomic approach using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and isotope-coded affinity tag labeling for studying human 20S proteasome heterogeneity. Proteomics5, 2351–2363 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boisvert FM, Lam YW, Lamont D, Lamont AI. A quantitative proteomic analysis of subcellular proteome localization and changes induced by DNA damage. Mol. Cell Proteomics9, 457–470 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldin V, Militello M, Thomas Y et al. A novel role for PA28γ-proteasome in nuclear speckle organization and SR protein trafficking. Mol. Biol. Cell19, 1706–1716 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yan W, Hwang D, Aebersold R. Quantitative proteomic analysis to profile dynamic changes in the spatial distribution of cellular proteins. Methods Mol. Biol.432, 389–401 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pelletier S, Schuurman KG, Berkers CR, Ovaa H, Heck AJ, Raijmakers R. Quantifying cross-tissue diversity in proteasome complexes by mass spectrometry. Mol. Biosyst.6, 1450–1453 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lu H, Zong C, Wang Y et al. Revealing the dynamics of the 20 S proteasome phosphoproteome: a combined CID and electron transfer dissociation approach. Mol. Cell Proteomics7, 2073–2089 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Raijmakers R, Berkers CR, de Jong A, Ovaa H, Heck AJ, Mohammed S. Automated online sequential isotope labeling for protein quantitation applied to proteasome tissue-specific diversity. Mol. Cell Proteomics7, 1755–1762 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haass C, Kloetzel PM. The Drosophila proteasome undergoes changes in its subunit pattern during development. Exp. Cell Res.180, 243–252 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Hutson MR, Rhodes MR, Kirby ML. Differential expression of a proteasomal subunit during chick development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.234, 216–223 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt F, Dahlmann B, Hustoft HK et al. Quantitative proteome analysis of the 20S proteasome of apoptotic Jurkat T cells. Amino Acids41(2), 351–361 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Visekruna A, Joeris T, Schmidt N et al. Comparative expression analysis and characterization of 20S proteasomes in human intestinal tissues: the proteasome pattern as diagnostic tool for IBD patients. Inflamm. Bowel Dis.15, 526–533 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Visekruna A, Slavova N, Dullat S et al. Expression of catalytic proteasome subunits in the gut of patients with Crohn’s disease. Int. J. Colorectal Dis.24, 1133–1139 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaught KS, Jnobaptiste R, Jackson T, Jengelley TA. The pattern of neuronal loss and survival may reflect differential expression of proteasome activators in Parkinson’s disease. Synapse64, 241–250 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemaire R, Menguellet SA, Stauber J et al. Specific MALDI imaging and profiling for biomarker hunting and validation: fragment of the 11S proteasome activator complex, Reg α fragment, is a new potential ovary cancer biomarker. J. Proteome Res.6, 4127–4134 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman MH, Raveh D. Proteasome plasticity. FEBS Lett.579, 3214–3223 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna J, Finley D. A proteasome for all occasions. FEBS Lett.581, 2854–2861 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HM, Yu Y, Cheng Y. Structure characterization of the 26S proteasome. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1809, 67–79 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Bohn S, Beck F, Sakata E et al. Structure of the 26S proteasome from Schizosaccharomyces pombe at subnanometer resolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 20992–20997 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Nickell S, Beck F, Scheres SH et al. Insights into the molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106, 11943–11947 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Gingras AC, Gstaiger M, Raught B, Aebersold R. Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.8, 645–654 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher T, Superti-Furga G. Mass spectrometry-based functional proteomics: from molecular machines to protein networks. Nat. Methods4, 807–815 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaake RM, Wang X, Huang L. Profiling of protein interaction networks of protein complexes using affinity purification and quantitative mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell Proteomics9, 1650–1665 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Guerrero C, Kaiser P, Huang L. Proteomics of proteasome complexes and ubiquitinated proteins. Expert Rev. Proteomics4, 649–665 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drews O, Zong C, Ping P. Exploring proteasome complexes by proteomic approaches. Proteomics7, 1047–1058 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verma R, Chen S, Feldman R et al. Proteasomal proteomics: identification of nucleotide-sensitive proteasome-interacting proteins by mass spectrometric analysis of affinity-purified proteasomes. Mol. Biol. Cell11, 3425–3439 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leggett DS, Hanna J, Borodovsky A et al. Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol. Cell10, 495–507 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang P, Fu H, Walker J et al. Purification of the Arabidopsis 26 S proteasome: biochemical and molecular analyses revealed the presence of multiple isoforms. J. Biol. Chem.279, 6401–6413 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano Y, Murata S, Tanaka K. Large- and small-scale purification of mammalian 26S proteasomes. Methods Enzymol.399, 227–240 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Horiguchi R, Dohra H, Tokumoto T. Comparative proteome analysis of changes in the 26S proteasome during oocyte maturation in goldfish. Proteomics6, 4195–4202 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leggett DS, Glickman MH, Finley D. Purification of proteasomes, proteasome subcomplexes, and proteasome-associated proteins from budding yeast. Methods Mol. Biol.301, 57–70 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camacho-Carvajal MM, Wollscheid B, Aebersold R, Steimle V, Schamel WW. Two-dimensional Blue native/SDS gel electrophoresis of multi-protein complexes from whole cellular lysates: a proteomics approach. Mol. Cell Proteomics3, 176–182 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shibatani T, Carlson EJ, Larabee F, McCormack AL, Fruh K, Skach WR. Global organization and function of mammalian cytosolic proteasome pools: Implications for PA28 and 19S regulatory complexes. Mol. Biol. Cell17, 4962–4971 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wittig I, Braun HP, Schagger H. Blue native PAGE. Nat. Protoc.1, 418–428 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsasser S, Chandler-Militello D, Muller B, Hanna J, Finley D. Rad23 and Rpn10 serve as alternative ubiquitin receptors for the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem.279, 26817–26822 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeljeklaus S, Meyer HE, Warscheid B. New dimensions in the study of protein complexes using quantitative mass spectrometry. FEBS Lett.583, 1674–1683 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamazaki J, Iemura S, Natsume T, Yashiroda H, Tanaka K, Murata S. A novel proteasome interacting protein recruits the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 to 26S proteasomes. EMBO J.25, 4524–4536 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu XB, Ouyang SY, Li CJ, Miao S, Wang L, Goldberg AL. hRpn13/ADRM1/GP110 is a novel proteasome subunit that binds the deubiquitinating enzyme, UCH37. EMBO J.25, 5742–5753 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanhill A, Haynes CM, Zhang Y et al. An arsenite-inducible 19S regulatory particle-associated protein adapts proteasomes to proteotoxicity. Mol. Cell23, 875–885 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rigaut G, Shevchenko A, Rutz B, Wilm M, Mann M, Seraphin B. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol.17, 1030–1032 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero C, Milenkovic T, Przulj N, Kaiser P, Huang L. Characterization of the proteasome interaction network using a QTAX-based tag-team strategy and protein interaction network analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105, 13333–13338 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sikder D, Johnston SA, Kodadek T. Widespread, but non-identical, association of proteasomal 19 and 20 S proteins with yeast chromatin. J. Biol. Chem.281, 27346–27355 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins GA, Tansey WP. The proteasome: a utility tool for transcription? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.16, 197–202 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai HC, Besche H, Goldberg AL, Schuman EM. Characterization of the brain 26S proteasome and its interacting proteins. Front Mol. Neurosci.3, pii12 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Tanahashi N, Murakami Y, Minami Y, Shimbara N, Hendil KB, Tanaka K. Hybrid proteasomes. Induction by interferon-γ and contribution to ATP-dependent proteolysis. J. Biol. Chem.275, 14336–14345 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giusti L, Iacconi P, Ciregia F et al. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: proteomic analysis to identify cancer biomarkers. J. Proteome Res.7, 4079–4088 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Feng X, Liu X et al. Involvement of potential pathways in malignant transformation from oral leukoplakia to oral squamous cell carcinoma revealed by proteomic analysis. BMC Genomics10, 383 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Moriishi K, Shoji I, Mori Y et al. Involvement of PA28γ in the propagation of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology52, 411–420 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao G, Wong J, Zhang J et al. Proteasome activator REG{γ} enhances coxsackieviral infection via facilitating p53 degradation. J. Virol.84(21), 11056–11066 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Bousquet-Dubouch MP, Nguen S, Bouyssie D et al. Chronic ethanol feeding affects proteasome-interacting proteins. Proteomics9, 3609–3622 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scanlon TC, Gottlieb B, Durcan TM, Fon EA, Beitel LK, Trifiro MA. Isolation of human proteasomes and putative proteasome-interacting proteins using a novel affinity chromatography method. Exp. Cell Res.315(2), 176–189 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Besche H, Haas W, Gygi S, Goldberg A. Isolation of mammalian 26S proteasomes and p97/VCP complexes using the ubiquitin-like domain from HHR23B reveals novel proteasome-associated proteins. Biochemistry48(11), 2538–2549 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Madura K. Evidence for distinct functions for human DNA repair factors hHR23A and hHR23B. FEBS Lett.580, 3401–3408 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann K, Falquet L. A ubiquitin-interacting motif conserved in components of the proteasomal and lysosomal protein degradation systems. Trends Biochem. Sci.26, 347–350 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rechsteiner M, Hill CP. Mobilizing the proteolytic machine: cell biological roles of proteasome activators and inhibitors. Trends Cell Biol.15, 27–33 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbitt SE, Kiss A, Deffenbaugh AE et al. ATP hydrolysis-dependent disassembly of the 26S proteasome is part of the catalytic cycle. Cell121, 553–565 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Book AJ, Gladman NP, Lee SS, Scalf M, Smith LM, Vierstra RD. Affinity purification of the Arabidopsis 26S proteasome reveals a diverse array of plant proteolytic complexes. J. Biol. Chem.285(33), 25554–25569 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bousquet-Dubouch MP, Baudelet E, Guerin F et al. Affinity purification strategy to capture human endogenous proteasome complexes diversity and to identify proteasome-interacting proteins. Mol. Cell Proteomics8, 1150–1164 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drews O, Tsukamoto O, Liem D, Streicher J, Wang Y, Ping P. Differential regulation of proteasome function in isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Circ. Res.107, 1094–1101 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman RL, Chin KT, Haynes CM et al. Thioredoxin-related protein 32 is an arsenite-regulated thiol reductase of the proteasome 19 S particle. J. Biol. Chem.284, 15233–15245 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendil KB. Development and use of antiproteasome monoclonal antibodies. Methods Enzymol.398, 439–453 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claverol S, Burlet-Schiltz O, Girbal-Neuhauser E, Gairin JE, Monsarrat B. Mapping and structural dissection of human 20 S proteasome using proteomic approaches. Mol. Cell Proteomics1, 567–578 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducoux-Petit M, Uttenweiler-Joseph S, Brichory F et al. Scaled-down purification protocol to access proteomic analysis of 20S proteasome from human tissue samples: comparison of normal and tumor colorectal cells. J. Proteome Res.7, 2852–2859 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Jariel-Encontre I, Bossis G, Piechaczyk M. Ubiquitin-independent degradation of proteins by the proteasome. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1786, 153–177 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilescu J, Guo X, Kast J. Identification of protein-protein interactions using in vivo cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Proteomics4, 3845–3854 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann-Petersen R, Tanaka K, Hendil KB. Quaternary structure of the ATPase complex of human 26S proteasomes determined by chemical cross-linking. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.386, 89–94 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Kao A, Chiu CL, Vellucci D et al. Development of a novel cross-linking strategy for fast and accurate identification of cross-linked peptides of protein complexes. Mol. Cell Proteomics10(1), M110.002212 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Orlando V. Mapping chromosomal proteins in vivo by formaldehyde-crosslinked-chromatin immunoprecipitation. Trends Biochem. Sci.25, 99–104 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak SJ, Pu S, Vlasblom J, Seraphin B. Challenges and rewards of interaction proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics8, 3–18 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang W, Steen H, Freeman MR. Proteomic approaches to the analysis of multiprotein signaling complexes. Proteomics8, 832–851 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science316, 1160–1166 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflieger D, Junger MA, Muller M et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of protein complexes: concurrent identification of interactors and their state of phosphorylation. Mol. Cell Proteomics7, 326–346 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell127, 635–648 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen M, Hubner NC, Mann M. High confidence determination of specific protein-protein interactions using quantitative mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.19, 331–337 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen P, Hochstrasser M. Autocatalytic subunit processing couples active site formation in the 20S proteasome to completion of assembly. Cell86, 961–972 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautto L, Grinyer J, Birch D et al. Rapid purification method for the 26S proteasome from the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. Protein Expr. Purif.67, 156–163 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kikuchi J, Iwafune Y, Akiyama T et al. Co- and post-translational modifications of the 26S proteasome in yeast. Proteomics10(15), 2769–2779 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen JP, Lauridsen AM, Kristensen P et al. Adrm1, a putative cell adhesion regulating protein, is a novel proteasome-associated factor. J. Mol. Biol.360, 1043–1052 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Zong C, Koag MC et al. Proteome dynamics and proteome function of cardiac 19S proteasomes. Mol. Cell Proteomics10, M110006122 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Andersen KM, Madsen L, Prag S et al. Thioredoxin Txnl1/TRP32 is a redox-active cofactor of the 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem.284, 15246–15254 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Huang L. Identifying dynamic interactors of protein complexes by quantitative mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell Proteomics7, 46–57 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Chen CF, Baker PR, Chen PL, Kaiser P, Huang L. Mass spectrometric characterization of the affinity-purified human 26S proteasome complex. Biochemistry46, 3553–3565 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt F, Dahlmann B, Janek K et al. Comprehensive quantitative proteome analysis of 20S proteasome subtypes from rat liver by isotope coded affinity tag and 2-D gel-based approaches. Proteomics6, 4622–4632 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttenweiler-Joseph S, Claverol S, Sylvius L, Bousquet-Dubouch MP, Burlet-Schiltz O, Monsarrat B. Toward a full characterization of the human 20S proteasome subunits and their isoforms by a combination of proteomic approaches. Methods Mol. Biol.484, 111–130 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Marcantonio M, Trost M, Courcelles M, Desjardins M, Thibault P. Combined enzymatic and data mining approaches for comprehensive phosphoproteome analyses: application to cell signaling events of interferon-γ-stimulated macrophages. Mol. Cell Proteomics7, 645–660 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ishihama Y, Wei FY, Aoshima K, Sato T, Kuromitsu J, Oda Y. Enhancement of the efficiency of phosphoproteomic identification by removing phosphates after phosphopeptide enrichment. J. Proteome Res.6, 1139–1144 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Wei X, Li L. Comparative glycoproteomics: approaches and applications. Brief Funct. Genomic Proteomic8, 104–113 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Dai Z, Zhou J, Qiu SJ, Liu YK, Fan J. Lectin-based glycoproteomics to explore and analyze hepatocellular carcinoma-related glycoprotein markers. Electrophoresis30, 2957–2966 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg TH, Pretty On Top K, Berggren KN et al. Rapid and simple single nanogram detection of glycoproteins in polyacrylamide gels and on electroblots. Proteomics1, 841–855 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg TH, Agnew BJ, Gee KR et al. Global quantitative phosphoprotein analysis using multiplexed proteomics technology. Proteomics3, 1128–1144 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riederer BM. Non-covalent and covalent protein labeling in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J. Proteomics71, 231–244 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riederer IM, Herrero RM, Leuba G, Riederer BM. Serial protein labeling with infrared maleimide dyes to identify cysteine modifications. J. Proteomics71, 222–230 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Lenchik NJ, Pabst MJ, Solomon SS, Shull J, Gerling IC. Functional characterization of two-dimensional gel-separated proteins using sequential staining. Electrophoresis26, 225–237 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong C, Young GW, Wang Y et al. Two-dimensional electrophoresis-based characterization of post-translational modifications of mammalian 20S proteasome complexes. Proteomics8, 5025–5037 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner J, Premsler T, Sickmann A. Application of electron transfer dissociation (ETD) for the analysis of posttranslational modifications. Proteomics8, 4466–4483 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good DM, Wirtala M, McAlister GC, Coon JJ. Performance characteristics of electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell Proteomics6, 1942–1951 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersema PJ, Mohammed S, Heck AJ. Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom.44, 861–878 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung HR, Pasini D, Helin K, Jensen ON. Quantitative mass spectrometry of histones H3.2 and H3.3 in Suz12-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells reveals distinct, dynamic post-translational modifications at Lys-27 and Lys-36. Mol. Cell Proteomics9, 838–850 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mischerikow N, Altelaar AF, Navarro JD, Mohammed S, Heck A. Comparative assessment of site assignments in CID and ETD spectra of phosphopeptides discloses limited relocation of phosphate groups. Mol. Cell Proteomics9(10), 2140–2148(2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chi A, Huttenhower C, Geer LY et al. Analysis of phosphorylation sites on proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104, 2193–2198 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumegi M, Hunyadi-Gulyas E, Medzihradszky KF, Udvardy A. 26S proteasome subunits are O-linked N-acetylglucosamine-modified in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.312, 1284–1289 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klement E, Lipinszki Z, Kupihar Z, Udvardy A, Medzihradszky KF. Enrichment of O-GlcNAc modified proteins by the periodate oxidation-hydrazide resin capture approach. J. Proteome Res.9, 2200–2206 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Peng J, Schwartz D, Elias JE et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat. Biotechnol.21, 921–926 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis NJ, Vasilescu J, Lambert JP, Smith JC, Figeys D. Tryptic digestion of ubiquitin standards reveals an improved strategy for identifying ubiquitinated proteins by mass spectrometry. Proteomics7, 868–874 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isasa M, Katz EJ, Kim W et al. Monoubiquitination of RPN10 regulates substrate recruitment to the proteasome. Mol. Cell38, 733–745 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventadour S, Jarzaguet M, Wing SS et al. A new method of purification of proteasome substrates reveals polyubiquitination of 20 S proteasome subunits. J. Biol. Chem.282, 5302–5309 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto M, Hatakeyama S, Oyamada K, Oda Y, Nishimura T, Nakayama KI. Large-scale analysis of the human ubiquitin-related proteome. Proteomics5, 4145–4151 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chondrogianni N, Tzavelas C, Pemberton AJ, Nezis IP, Rivett AJ, Gonos ES. Overexpression of proteasome β5 assembled subunit increases the amount of proteasome and confers ameliorated response to oxidative stress and higher survival rates. J. Biol. Chem.280, 11840–11850 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillardon F, Kloss A, Berg M et al. The 20S proteasome isolated from Alzheimer’s disease brain shows post-translational modifications but unchanged proteolytic activity. J. Neurochem.101, 1483–1490 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Tsimokha AS, Mittenberg AG, Kulichkova VA, Kozhukharova IV, Gause LN, Konstantinova IM. Changes in composition and activities of 26S proteasomes under the action of doxorubicin--apoptosis inductor of erythroleukemic K562 cells. Cell Biol. Int.31, 338–348 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Park Y, Yoon SK, Yoon JB. Osmotic stress inhibits proteasome by p38 MAPK-dependent phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem.285(53), 41280–41289 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domanski D, Murphy LC, Borchers CH. Assay development for the determination of phosphorylation stoichiometry using multiple reaction monitoring methods with and without phosphatase treatment: application to breast cancer signaling pathways. Anal. Chem.82, 5610–5620 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu P, Duong DM, Seyfried NT et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell137, 133–145 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DS, Hathaway NA, Hanna J et al. Quantitative analysis of in vitro ubiquitinated cyclin B1 reveals complex chain topology. Nat. Cell Biol.8, 700–710 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson AD, Zhang NY, Xu P et al. The lysine 48 and lysine 63 ubiquitin conjugates are processed differently by the 26 s proteasome. J. Biol. Chem.284, 35485–35494 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther TC, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics in cell biology. J. Cell Biol.190, 491–500 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouduri AU, Tokumoto T, Dohra H, Ushimaru T, Yamada S. Functional and biochemical characterization of the 20S proteasome in a yeast temperature-sensitive mutant, rpt6-1. BMC Biochem.9, 20 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Minden JS, Dowd SR, Meyer HE, Stuhler K. Difference gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis30(Suppl. 1), S156–S161 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timms JF, Cramer R. Difference gel electrophoresis. Proteomics8, 4886–4897 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal NK, Mueller GA, Mueller C, Streich JH, Asif AR, Dihazi H. Expression proteomics of acute promyelocytic leukaemia cells treated with methotrexate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1804, 918–928 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Visentin M, Simula MP, Sartor F, Petrucco A, De Re V, Toffoli G. Identification of proteins associated to multi-drug resistance in LoVo human colon cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol.34, 1281–1289 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Gomes AV, Young GW, Wang Y et al. Contrasting proteome biology and functional heterogeneity of the 20 S proteasome complexes in mammalian tissues. Mol. Cell Proteomics8, 302–315 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macagno A, Gilliet M, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A, Nestle FO, Groettrup M. Dendritic cells up-regulate immunoproteasomes and the proteasome regulator PA28 during maturation. Eur. J. Immunol.29, 4037–4042 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata S, Takahama Y, Tanaka K. Thymoproteasome: probable role in generating positively selecting peptides. Curr. Opin. Immunol.20, 192–196 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinkle-Mulcahy L, Boulon S, Lam YW et al. Identifying specific protein interaction partners using quantitative mass spectrometry and bead proteomes. J. Cell Biol.183, 223–239 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selbach M, Mann M. Protein interaction screening by quantitative immunoprecipitation combined with knockdown (QUICK). Nat. Methods3, 981–983 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics1, 376–386 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol.17, 994–999 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Kellermann J, Lottspeich F. A novel strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope-coded protein labels. Proteomics5, 4–15 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell Proteomics3, 1154–1169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Old WM, Meyer-Arendt K, Aveline-Wolf L et al. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics4, 1487–1502 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zybailov B, Mosley AL, Sardiu ME, Coleman MK, Florens L, Washburn MP. Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res.5, 2339–2347 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecker SH, Goldberg AL, Mitch WE. Protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in normal and disease states. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.17, 1807–1819 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Vicente M, Sovak G, Cuervo AM. Protein degradation and aging. Exp. Gerontol.40, 622–633 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinsztein DC. The roles of intracellular protein-degradation pathways in neurodegeneration. Nature443, 780–786 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Otin C, Hunter T. The regulatory crosstalk between kinases and proteases in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer10, 278–292 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken CT, Kaake RM, Wang X, Huang L. Oxidative stress-mediated regulation of proteasome complexes. Mol. Cell Proteomics10(5), R110.006924 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matondo M, Bousquet-Dubouch MP, Gallay N et al. Proteasome inhibitor-induced apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia: a correlation with the proteasome status. Leuk. Res.34(4), 498–506 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kaake RM, Milenkovic T, Przulj N, Kaiser P, Huang L. Characterization of cell cycle specific protein interaction networks of the yeast 26S proteasome complex by the QTAX strategy. J. Proteome Res.9, 2016–2029 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonda DJ, Wang X, Perry G et al. Oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease: a possibility for prevention. Neuropharmacology59, 290–294 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonoki A, Kuranaga E, Tomioka T et al. Genetic evidence linking age-dependent attenuation of the 26S proteasome with the aging process. Mol. Cell Biol.29, 1095–1106 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabel C, Nguyen HP, Hin SC, Hartl D, Mao L, Klose J. Proteasome and oxidative phoshorylation changes may explain why aging is a risk factor for neurodegenerative disorders. J. Proteomics73, 2230–2238 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg AL. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature426, 895–899 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell SR, Wang P, Divald A et al. Aggregates of oxidized proteins (lipofuscin) induce apoptosis through proteasome inhibition and dysregulation of proapoptotic proteins. Free Radic. Biol. Med.38, 1093–1101 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller JN, Huang FF, Zhu H, Yu J, Ho YS, Kindy TS. Oxidative stress-associated impairment of proteasome activity during ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.20, 1467–1473 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farout L, Friguet B. Proteasome function in aging and oxidative stress: implications in protein maintenance failure. Antioxid. Redox. Signal.8, 205–216 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fataccioli V, Andraud E, Gentil M, French SW, Rouach H. Effects of chronic ethanol administration on rat liver proteasome activities: relationship with oxidative stress. Hepatology29, 14–20 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulteau AL, Lundberg KC, Humphries KM et al. Oxidative modification and inactivation of the proteasome during coronary occlusion/reperfusion. J. Biol. Chem.276, 30057–30063 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardag-Gorce F, Li J, French BA, French SW. The effect of ethanol-induced CYP2E1 on proteasome activity: the role of 4-hydroxynonenal. Exp. Mol. Pathol.78, 109–115 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Bardag-Gorce F, Venkatesh R, Li J, French BA, French SW. Hyperphosphorylation of rat liver proteasome subunits: the effects of ethanol and okadaic acid are compared. Life Sci.75, 585–597 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demasi M, Silva GM, Netto LE. 20 S proteasome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is responsive to redox modifications and is S-glutathionylated. J. Biol. Chem.278, 679–685 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmijewski JW, Banerjee S, Abraham E. S-glutathionylation of the Rpn2 regulatory subunit inhibits 26 S proteasomal function. J. Biol. Chem.284, 22213–22221 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii T, Sakurai T, Usami H, Uchida K. Oxidative modification of proteasome: identification of an oxidation-sensitive subunit in 26 S proteasome. Biochemistry44, 13893–13901 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Yen J, Kaiser P, Huang L. Regulation of the 26S proteasome complex during oxidative stress. Sci. Signal.3, ra88 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sixt SU, Dahlmann B. Extracellular, circulating proteasomes and ubiquitin – incidence and relevance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1782, 817–823 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreyev AY, Shen Z, Guan Z et al. Application of proteomic marker ensembles to subcellular organelle identification. Mol. Cell Proteomics9, 388–402 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen JS, Wilkinson CJ, Mayor T, Mortensen P, Nigg EA, Mann M. Proteomic characterization of the human centrosome by protein correlation profiling. Nature426, 570–574 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster LJ, de Hoog CL, Zhang Y, Xie X, Mootha VK, Mann M. A mammalian organelle map by protein correlation profiling. Cell125, 187–199 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkley TP, Hester S, Shadforth IP et al. Mapping the Arabidopsis organelle proteome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 6518–6523 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustrell V, Hoffman L, Pratt G, Rechsteiner M. PA200, a nuclear proteasome activator involved in DNA repair. EMBO J.21, 3516–3525 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford L, Paine S, Sheppard PW, Mayer RJ, Roelofs J. Assembly, structure, and function of the 26S proteasome. Trends Cell Biol.20, 391–401 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallastegui N, Groll M. The 26S proteasome: assembly and function of a destructive machine. Trends Biochem. Sci.35, 634–642 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matiuhin Y, Kirkpatrick DS, Ziv I et al. Extraproteasomal Rpn10 restricts access of the polyubiquitin-binding protein Dsk2 to proteasome. Mol. Cell32, 415–425 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Chen T, Ziv I et al. Together, Rpn10 and Dsk2 can serve as a polyubiquitin chain-length sensor. Mol. Cell36, 1018–1033 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickart CM, Fushman D. Polyubiquitin chains: polymeric protein signals. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.8, 610–616 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickliffe K, Williamson A, Jin L, Rape M. The multiple layers of ubiquitin-dependent cell cycle control. Chem. Rev.109, 1537–1548 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstrasser M. Origin and function of ubiquitin-like proteins. Nature458, 422–429 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem.78, 477–513 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley D, Sadis S, Monia BP et al. Inhibition of proteolysis and cell cycle progression in a multiubiquitination-deficient yeast mutant. Mol. Cell Biol.14, 5501–5509 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deveraux Q, Ustrell V, Pickart C, Rechsteiner M. A 26 S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. J. Biol. Chem.269, 7059–7061 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZJ, Sun LJ. Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. Mol. Cell33, 275–286 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baboshina OV, Haas AL. Novel multiubiquitin chain linkages catalyzed by the conjugating enzymes E2EPF and RAD6 are recognized by 26 S proteasome subunit 5. J. Biol. Chem.271, 2823–2831 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin L, Williamson A, Banerjee S, Philipp I, Rape M. Mechanism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting complex. Cell133, 653–665 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meierhofer D, Wang X, Huang L, Kaiser P. Quantitative analysis of global ubiquitination in HeLa cells by mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res.7, 4566–4576 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeki Y, Kudo T, Sone T et al. Lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin chain may serve as a targeting signal for the 26S proteasome. EMBO J.28, 359–371 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett EJ, Shaler TA, Woodman B et al. Global changes to the ubiquitin system in Huntington’s disease. Nature448, 704–708 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HT, Kim KP, Lledias F et al. Certain pairs of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) and ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s) synthesize nondegradable forked ubiquitin chains containing all possible isopeptide linkages. J. Biol. Chem.282, 17375–17386 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann RM, Pickart CM. In vitro assembly and recognition of Lys-63 polyubiquitin chains. J. Biol. Chem.276, 27936–27943 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagwerker C, Flick K, Cui M et al. A tandem affinity tag for two-step purification under fully denaturing conditions: application in ubiquitin profiling and protein complex identification combined with in vivocross-linking. Mol. Cell Proteomics5, 737–748 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saracco SA, Hansson M, Scalf M, Walker JM, Smith LM, Vierstra RD. Tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometric analysis of ubiquitylated proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant J.59, 344–358 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DS, Weldon SF, Tsaprailis G, Liebler DC, Gandolfi AJ. Proteomic identification of ubiquitinated proteins from human cells expressing His-tagged ubiquitin. Proteomics5, 2104–2111 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjerpe R, Aillet F, Lopitz-Otsoa F, Lang V, England P, Rodriguez MS. Efficient protection and isolation of ubiquitylated proteins using tandem ubiquitin-binding entities. EMBO Rep.10, 1250–1258 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burande CF, Heuze ML, Lamsoul I, Monsarrat B, Uttenweiler-Joseph S, Lutz PG. A label-free quantitative proteomics strategy to identify E3 ubiquitin ligase substrates targeted to proteasome degradation. Mol. Cell Proteomics8, 1719–1727 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nencioni A, Grunebach F, Patrone F, Ballestrero A, Brossart P. Proteasome inhibitors: antitumor effects and beyond. Leukemia21, 30–36 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll D, Sarikas A, Krajcik R, Zolk O. Proteomic expression analysis of cardiomyocytes subjected to proteasome inhibition. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.353, 436–442 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bieler S, Meiners S, Stangl V, Pohl T, Stangl K. Comprehensive proteomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals early induction of a protective anti-oxidative stress response by low-dose proteasome inhibition. Proteomics9, 3257–3267 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeffler-Ragg J, Mueller D, Gamerith G et al. Proteomic identification of aldo-keto reductase AKR1B10 induction after treatment of colorectal cancer cells with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Mol.Cancer Ther.8, 1995–2006 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinkauf M, Zimmermann Y, Hartmann E et al. 2-D PAGE-based comparison of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in sensitive and resistant mantle cell lymphoma. Electrophoresis30, 974–986 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde IB, Brack M, Winget JM, Mayor T. Proteomic characterization of aggregating proteins after the inhibition of the ubiquitin proteasome system. J. Proteome Res.10(3), 1062–1072 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kumatori A, Tanaka K, Inamura N et al. Abnormally high expression of proteasomes in human leukemic cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA87, 7071–7075 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albright JM, Romero J, Saini V et al. Proteasomes in human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after burn and inhalation injury. J. Burn Care Res.30, 948–956 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Majetschak M, Zedler S, Romero J et al. Circulating proteasomes after burn injury. J. Burn Care Res.31, 243–250 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sixt SU, Adamzik M, Spyrka D et al. Alveolar extracellular 20S proteasome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.179, 1098–1106 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Stoebner PE, Lavabre-Bertrand T, Henry L et al. High plasma proteasome levels are detected in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol.152, 948–953 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry L, Lavabre-Bertrand T, Douche T et al. Diagnostic value and prognostic significance of plasmatic proteasome level in patients with melanoma. Exp. Dermatol.19, 1054–1059 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Henry L, Lavabre-Bertrand T, Vercambre L et al. Plasma proteasome level is a reliable early marker of malignant transformation of liver cirrhosis. Gut58, 833–838 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Yousef AA, Suliman GA, Mabrouk MM. The value of correlation of serum 20S proteasome concentration and percentage of lymphocytic apoptosis in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study. Crit. Care14, R215 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Heubner M, Wimberger P, Dahlmann B et al. The prognostic impact of circulating proteasome concentrations in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.120, 233–238 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco R, Bruna J. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: an unresolved issue. Neurologia25, 116–131 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Colson K, Doss DS, Swift R, Tariman J. Expanding role of bortezomib in multiple myeloma: nursing implications. Cancer Nurs.31, 239–249 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn DJ, Hunsucker SA, Chen Q, Voorhees PM, Orlowski M, Orlowski RZ. Targeted inhibition of the immunoproteasome is a potent strategy against models of multiple myeloma that overcomes resistance to conventional drugs and nonspecific proteasome inhibitors. Blood113, 4667–4676 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egerer T, Martinez-Gamboa L, Dankof A et al. Tissue-specific up-regulation of the proteasome subunit β5i (LMP7) in Sjogren's syndrome. Arthritis Rheum.54, 1501–1508 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Visekruna A, Joeris T, Seidel D et al. Proteasome-mediated degradation of IκBα and processing of p105 in Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis. J. Clin. Invest.116, 3195–3203 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick LR, Small JS, Poritz LS, McKenna KJ, Koltun WA. Enhanced intestinal expression of the proteasome subunit low molecular mass polypeptide 2 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dis. Colon Rectum50, 337–348; discussion 348–350 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Vasuri F, Capizzi E, Bellavista E et al. Studies on immunoproteasome in human liver. Part I: absence in fetuses, presence in normal subjects, and increased levels in chronic active hepatitis and cirrhosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.397, 301–306 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishto M, Bellavista E, Santoro A et al. Immunoproteasome and LMP2 polymorphism in aged and Alzheimer’s disease brains. Neurobiol. Aging27, 54–66 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenhain R, Malmstrom J, Picotti P, Aebersold R. Perspectives of targeted mass spectrometry for protein biomarker verification. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.13, 518–525 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin T, Salvador A, Charrier JP et al. Multiple reaction monitoring cubed for protein quantification at the low nanogram/milliliter level in nondepleted human serum. Anal. Chem.81, 9343–9352 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin T, Salvador A, Charrier JP et al. Clinical quantitation of prostate-specific antigen biomarker in the low nanogram/milliliter range by conventional bore liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (multiple reaction monitoring) coupling and correlation with ELISA tests. Mol. Cell Proteomics8, 1006–1015 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange V, Picotti P, Domon B, Aebersold R. Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial. Mol. Syst. Biol.4, 222 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picotti P, Rinner O, Stallmach R et al. High-throughput generation of selected reaction-monitoring assays for proteins and proteomes. Nat. Methods7, 43–46 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makawita S, Diamandis EP. The bottleneck in the cancer biomarker pipeline and protein quantification through mass spectrometry-based approaches: current strategies for candidate verification. Clin. Chem.56, 212–222 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang CS, Phung J, Nice EC. The discovery and validation of colorectal cancer biomarkers. Biomed. Chromatogr.25, 82–99 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister W, Walz J, Zuhl F, Seemuller E. The proteasome: paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease. Cell92, 367–380 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groll M, Ditzel L, Lowe J et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature386, 463–471 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque CP, Smolka MB, Payne SH, Bafna V, Eng J, Zhou H. A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol. Cell Proteomics7, 1389–1396 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Gerber SA, Rudner AD et al. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of α-factor-arrested Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res.6, 1190–1197 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong C, Gomes AV, Drews O et al. Regulation of murine cardiac 20S proteasomes: role of associating partners. Circ. Res.99, 372–380 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwafune Y, Kawasaki H, Hirano H. Identification of three phosphorylation sites in the α7 subunit of the yeast 20S proteasome in vivo using mass spectrometry. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.431, 9–15 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smolka MB, Albuquerque CP, Chen SH, Zhou H. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104, 10364–10369 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubiel W, Ferrell K, Rechsteiner M. Subunits of the regulatory complex of the 26S protease. Mol. Biol. Rep.21, 27–34 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coux O, Nothwang HG, Silva Pereira I, Recillas Targa F, Bey F, Scherrer K. Phylogenic relationships of the amino acid sequences of prosome (proteasome, MCP) subunits. Mol. Gen. Genet.245, 769–780 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Hu Y, Huang P, Toleman CA, Paterson AJ, Kudlow JE. Proteasome function is regulated by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase through phosphorylation of Rpt6. J. Biol. Chem.282, 22460–22471 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beausoleil SA, Jedrychowski M, Schwartz D et al. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101, 12130–12135 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar