DNA-assisted protein detection technologies

References

• Crick FH. On protein synthesis. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.12, 138–163 (1958).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picotti P, Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Domon B, Aebersold R. Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics. Cell138(4), 795–806 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol. Cell Proteomics1(11), 845–867 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coons AH, Creech HJ, Jones RN, Berliner E. Demonstration of pneumococcal antigen in tissues by use of fluorescent antibody. J. Immunol.45, 159–170 (1942).
   Google Scholar
• Yalow RS, Berson SA. Immunoassay of endogenous plasma insulin in man. J. Clin. Invest.39, 1157–1175 (1960).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wide L, Bennich H, Johansson SG. Diagnosis of allergy by an in vitro test for allergen antibodies. Lancet2(7526), 1105–1107 (1967).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addona TA, Abbatiello SE, Schilling B et al. Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma. Nat. Biotechnol.27(7), 633–641 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullberg M, Fredriksson S, Taussig M, Jarvius J, Gustafsdottir S, Landegren U. A sense of closeness: protein detection by proximity ligation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.14(1), 82–86 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landegren U, Schallmeiner E, Nilsson M et al. Molecular tools for a molecular medicine: analyzing genes, transcripts and proteins using padlock and proximity probes. J. Mol. Recognit.17(3), 194–197 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsdottir SM, Schallmeiner E, Fredriksson S et al. Proximity ligation assays for sensitive and specific protein analyses. Anal. Biochem.345(1), 2–9 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer CM, Adler M, Wacker R. Immuno-PCR: high sensitivity detection of proteins by nucleic acid amplification. Trends Biotechnol.23(4), 208–216 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanke HJ, Dirks RW, Raap T. FISH and immunocytochemistry: towards visualising single target molecules in living cells. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.16(1), 49–54 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Barletta J. Applications of real-time immuno-polymerase chain reaction (rt-IPCR) for the rapid diagnoses of viral antigens and pathologic proteins. Mol. Aspects Med.27(2–3), 224–253 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhao Q, Li XF, Le XC. Ultrasensitive assays for proteins. Analyst132(8), 724–737 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler M, Wacker R, Niemeyer CM. Sensitivity by combination: immuno-PCR and related technologies. Analyst133(6), 702–718 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blokzijl A, Friedman M, Ponten F, Landegren U. Profiling protein expression and interactions: proximity ligation as a tool for personalized medicine. J. Intern. Med.268(3), 232–245 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Weibrecht I, Leuchowius KJ, Clausson CM et al. Proximity ligation assays: a recent addition to the proteomics toolbox. Expert Rev. Proteomics7(3), 401–409 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartzman E, Shannon M, Lieu P et al. Expanding applications of protein analysis using proximity ligation and qPCR. Methods50(4), S23–26 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz HK, Amstutz P, Pluckthun A. Engineering novel binding proteins from nonimmunoglobulin domains. Nat. Biotechnol.23(10), 1257–1268 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren PA, Skerra A. Binding proteins from alternative scaffolds. J. Immunol. Methods290(1–2), 3–28 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellington AD, Szostak JW. In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature346(6287), 818–822 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuerk C, Gold L. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science249(4968), 505–510 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas M. Protein-priming of DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem.60, 39–71 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solomon MJ, Varshavsky A. Formaldehyde-mediated DNA–protein crosslinking: a probe for in vivo chromatin structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA82(19), 6470–6474 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sano T, Smith CL, Cantor CR. Immuno-PCR: very sensitive antigen detection by means of specific antibody–DNA conjugates. Science258(5079), 120–122 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullberg M, Gustafsdottir SM, Schallmeiner E et al. Cytokine detection by antibody-based proximity ligation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(22), 8420–8424 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlov IA, Melnyk PC, Stromsborg KE, Chee MS, Barker DL, Zhao C. Efficient strategies for the conjugation of oligonucleotides to antibodies enabling highly sensitive protein detection. Biopolymers73(5), 621–630 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderberg O, Gullberg M, Jarvius M et al. Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation. Nat. Methods3(12), 995–1000 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam JM, Thaxton CS, Mirkin CA. Nanoparticle-based bio-bar codes for the ultrasensitive detection of proteins. Science301(5641), 1884–1886 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Icoz K, Roberts A, Ellington AD, Savran CA. Diffractometric detection of proteins using microbead-based rolling circle amplification. Anal. Chem.82(1), 197–202 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold L, Ayers D, Bertino J et al. Aptamer-based multiplexed proteomic technology for biomarker discovery. PLoS ONE5(12), e15004 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer CM, Wacker R, Adler M. Combination of DNA-directed immobilization and immuno-PCR: very sensitive antigen detection by means of self-assembled DNA–protein conjugates. Nucleic Acids Res.31(16), e90 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan R, Vermesh O, Srivastava A et al. Integrated barcode chips for rapid, multiplexed analysis of proteins in microliter quantities of blood. Nat. Biotechnol.26(12), 1373–1378 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey RC, Kwong GA, Radu CG, Witte ON, Heath JR. DNA-encoded antibody libraries: a unified platform for multiplexed cell sorting and detection of genes and proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc.129(7), 1959–1967 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaxton CS, Elghanian R, Thomas AD et al. Nanoparticle-based bio-barcode assay redefines ‘undetectable’ PSA and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106(44), 18437–18442 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim EY, Stanton J, Korber BT et al. Detection of HIV-1 p24 Gag in plasma by a nanoparticle-based bio-barcode-amplification method. Nanomedicine3(3), 293–303 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Chu BC, Kramer FR, Orgel LE. Synthesis of an amplifiable reporter RNA for bioassays. Nucleic Acids Res.14(14), 5591–5603 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattah MG, Coller J, Cheung RK, Oshidary N, Utz PJ. HIT: a versatile proteomics platform for multianalyte phenotyping of cytokines, intracellular proteins and surface molecules. Nat. Med.14(11), 1284–1289 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F et al. Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science230(4732), 1350–1354 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engvall E, Jonsson K, Perlmann P. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. II. Quantitative assay of protein antigen, immunoglobulin G, by means of enzyme-labelled antigen and antibody-coated tubes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta251(3), 427–434 (1971).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engvall E, Perlmann P. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry8(9), 871–874 (1971).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engvall E, Perlmann P. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA. 3. Quantitation of specific antibodies by enzyme-labeled anti-immunoglobulin in antigen-coated tubes. J. Immunol.109(1), 129–135 (1972).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims PW, Vasser M, Wong WL, Williams PM, Meng YG. Immunopolymerase chain reaction using real-time polymerase chain reaction for detection. Anal. Biochem.281(2), 230–232 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye Q, Zhuang H, Zhou C. Detection of naphthalene by real-time immuno-PCR using molecular beacon. Mol. Cell Probes23(1), 29–34 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ruzicka V, Marz W, Russ A, Gross W. Immuno-PCR with a commercially available avidin system. Science260(5108), 698–699 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Fisher RJ, Papas TS. Universal immuno-PCR for ultra-sensitive target protein detection. Nucleic Acids Res.21(25), 6038–6039 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperl J, Paliwal V, Ramabhadran R, Nowak B, Askenase PW. Soluble T cell receptors: detection and quantitative assay in fluid phase via ELISA or immuno-PCR. J. Immunol. Methods186(2), 181–194 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson ER, Truby TM, Joerger RD, Majarian WR, Ebersole RC. High sensitivity multianalyte immunoassay using covalent DNA-labeled antibodies and polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res.23(3), 522–529 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer A, Von Eiff C, Kuczius T, Omoe K, Peters G, Becker K. A quantitative real-time immuno-PCR approach for detection of staphylococcal enterotoxins. J. Mol. Med.85(5), 461–469 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbulis I, Yamaguchi K, Gordon A, Carlson R, Brent R. Using protein–DNA chimeras to detect and count small numbers of molecules. Nat. Methods2(1), 31–37 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo YC, Zhou YF, Zhang XE et al. Phage display mediated immuno-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res.34(8), e62 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Burgoon MP, Shearer AJ, Gilden DH. Characterization of phage peptide interaction with antibody using phage mediated immuno-PCR. J. Immunol. Methods326(1–2), 33–40 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Ellington AD. Real-time PCR detection of protein analytes with conformation-switching aptamers. Anal. Biochem.380(2), 164–173 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida Y, Horii K, Sakai N, Masuda H, Furuichi M, Waga I. Antibody-specific aptamer-based PCR analysis for sensitive protein detection. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.395(4), 1089–1096 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacker R, Ceyhan B, Alhorn P, Schueler D, Lang C, Niemeyer CM. Magneto immuno-PCR: a novel immunoassay based on biogenic magnetosome nanoparticles. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.357(2), 391–396 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang TW, Lu HY, Lou PJ, Lin FH. Application of highly sensitive, modified glass substrate-based immuno-PCR on the early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Biomaterials29(33), 4447–4454 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian P, Mandrell R. Detection of norovirus capsid proteins in faecal and food samples by a real time immuno-PCR method. J. Appl. Microbiol.100(3), 564–574 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez JW, Vargis EA, Russ PK, Haselton FR, Wright DW. Detection of respiratory syncytial virus using nanoparticle amplified immuno-polymerase chain reaction. Anal. Biochem.410(1), 141–148 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deng MJ, Xiao XZ, Zhang YM et al. A highly sensitive immuno-PCR assay for detection of H5N1 avian influenza virus. Mol. Biol. Rep.38(3), 1941–1948 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Wei H, Guo Y, Cui Z, Zhang Z, Zhang XE. Gold nanoparticle enhanced immuno-PCR for ultrasensitive detection of Hantaan virus nucleocapsid protein. J. Immunol. Methods346(1–2), 64–70 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barletta JM, Edelman DC, Highsmith WE, Constantine NT. Detection of ultra-low levels of pathologic prion protein in scrapie infected hamster brain homogenates using real-time immuno-PCR. J. Virol. Methods127(2), 154–164 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barletta J, Bartolome A, Constantine NT. Immunomagnetic quantitative immuno-PCR for detection of less than one HIV-1 virion. J. Virol. Methods157(2), 122–132 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kuczius T, Becker K, Karch H, Zhang W. High sensitivity detection of the glial fibrillary acidic protein as indicator for TSE risk material in meat products using an immuno-PCR. Mol. Nutr. Food Res.53(10), 1329–1335 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Ren J, Pan K et al. Detection of gastric carcinoma-associated MG7-Ag by serum immuno-PCR assay in a high-risk Chinese population, with implication for screening. Int. J. Cancer126(2), 469–473 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Bielaszewska M, Pulz M et al. New immuno-PCR assay for detection of low concentrations of shiga toxin 2 and its variants. J. Clin. Microbiol.46(4), 1292–1297 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Zhuang H. Determination of fluoranthene by antigen-coated indirect competitive real-time immuno-PCR assay. J. Environ. Monit.11(2), 400–405 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang HS, Zhou C. Determination of anthracene by real-time immuno-polymerase chain reaction assay. Anal. Chim. Acta633(2), 278–282 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Chen HY, Zhuang HS. Real-time immuno-PCR assay for detecting PCBs in soil samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.394(4), 1205–1211 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer D, Soininen H, Alafuzoff I, Hoffmann R. Immuno-PCR-based quantification of multiple phosphorylated tau-epitopes linked to Alzheimer’s disease. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.395(7), 2263–2267 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibasaki F, Morizane Y, Ishikawa Y et al. [Clinical application of supersensitive and multiplex assay, MUSTag technology]. Rinsho Byori56(9), 802–810 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Shibasaki F, Morizane Y, Makisaka N. [Protein biomarker measurement and simple/rapid diagnostics with supersensitive and multiplex assay, MUSTag technology]. Rinsho Byori57(11), 1104–1112 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Xie MJ, Fukui K, Horie M et al. A novel sensitive immunoassay method based on the Invader technique. Anal. Biochem.374(2), 278–284 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer B, Wiltshire S, Lambert J et al. Inaugural article: immunoassays with rolling circle DNA amplification: a versatile platform for ultrasensitive antigen detection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA97(18), 10113–10119 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baner J, Nilsson M, Mendel-Hartvig M, Landegren U. Signal amplification of padlock probes by rolling circle replication. Nucleic Acids Res.26(22), 5073–5078 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson O, Jarvius J, Schallmeiner E et al. A dual-tag microarray platform for high-performance nucleic acid and protein analyses. Nucleic Acids Res.36(8), e45 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer B, Roberts S, Grimwade B et al. Multiplexed protein profiling on microarrays by rolling-circle amplification. Nat. Biotechnol.20(4), 359–365 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacarese-Hamilton T, Mezzasoma L, Ingham C et al. Detection of allergen-specific IgE on microarrays by use of signal amplification techniques. Clin. Chem.48(8), 1367–1370 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Bouwman K, Schotanus M et al. Two-color, rolling-circle amplification on antibody microarrays for sensitive, multiplexed serum-protein measurements. Genome Biol.5(4), R28 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel W, Vandenbussche F, Staes M, Goris N, De Clercq K. Assessment of the diagnostic potential of immuno-RCA in 96-well ELISA plates for foot-and-mouth disease virus. J. Virol. Methods147(1), 151–156 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobori T, Matsumoto A, Takahashi H, Sugiyama S. Rolling circle amplification for signal enhancement in ovalbumin detection. Anal. Sci.25(12), 1381–1383 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Ou LJ, Chu X, Shen GL, Yu RQ. Aptamer-based rolling circle amplification: a platform for electrochemical detection of protein. Anal. Chem.79(19), 7492–7500 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan J, Song S, Li B et al. An on-nanoparticle rolling-circle amplification platform for ultrasensitive protein detection in biological fluids. Small6(22), 2520–2525 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Kopplow K, Liu GY. In situ immuno-PCR to detect antigens. Lancet356(9234), 1002–1003 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusev Y, Sparkowski J, Raghunathan A et al. Rolling circle amplification: a new approach to increase sensitivity for immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Am. J. Pathol.159(1), 63–69 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson S, Gullberg M, Jarvius J et al. Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays. Nat. Biotechnol.20(5), 473–477 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebeski DE, Winger EM, Shin YK et al. Identification of unacceptable background caused by non-specific protein adsorption to the plastic surface of 96-well immunoassay plates using a standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay procedure. J. Immunol. Methods226(1–2), 85–92 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson S, Dixon W, Ji H, Koong AC, Mindrinos M, Davis RW. Multiplexed protein detection by proximity ligation for cancer biomarker validation. Nat. Methods4(4), 327–329 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Hu J, Sollie RS, Easley CJ. Improvement of sensitivity and dynamic range in proximity ligation assays by asymmetric connector hybridization. Anal. Chem.82(16), 6976–6982 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schallmeiner E, Oksanen E, Ericsson O et al. Sensitive protein detection via triple-binder proximity ligation assays. Nat. Methods4(2), 135–137 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsdottir SM, Schlingemann J, Rada-Iglesias A et al.In vitro analysis of DNA–protein interactions by proximity ligation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(9), 3067–3072 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsdottir SM, Nordengrahn A, Fredriksson S et al. Detection of individual microbial pathogens by proximity ligation. Clin. Chem.52(6), 1152–1160 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmanis S, Nong RY, Hammond M et al. Sensitive plasma protein analysis by microparticle-based proximity ligation assays. Mol. Cell Proteomics9(2), 327–335 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamali-Moghaddam M, Pettersson FE, Wu D et al. Sensitive detection of Abeta protofibrils by proximity ligation – relevance for Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Neurosci.11, 124 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlingemann J, Leijon M, Yacoub A et al. Novel means of viral antigen identification: improved detection of avian influenza viruses by proximity ligation. J. Virol. Methods163(1), 116–122 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pai SS, Ellington AD. Using RNA aptamers and the proximity ligation assay for the detection of cell surface antigens. Methods Mol. Biol.504, 385–398 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tavoosidana G, Ronquist G, Darmanis S et al. Multiple recognition assay reveals prostasomes as promising plasma biomarkers for prostate cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA108(21), 8809–8814 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu C, Deng X, Shi F. Rapid detection of Brucella abortus by a novel proximity ligation-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification method. J. Rapid Methods Automation Microbiol.17(2), 154–163 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson S, Horecka J, Brustugun OT et al. Multiplexed proximity ligation assays to profile putative plasma biomarkers relevant to pancreatic and ovarian cancer. Clin. Chem.54(3), 582–589 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg M, Thorsen SB, Assarsson E et al. Multiplexed homogeneous proximity ligation assays for high throughput protein biomarker research in serological material. Mol. Cell Proteomics10(4), M110.004978 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmanis S, Nong RY, Vänelid J et al. ProteinSeq: high-performance proteomic analyses by proximity ligation and next generation sequencing. PLoS ONE6(9), e25583 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conze T, Carvalho AS, Landegren U et al. MUC2 mucin is a major carrier of the cancer-associated sialyl-Tn antigen in intestinal metaplasia and gastric carcinomas. Glycobiology20(2), 199–206 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvius M, Paulsson J, Weibrecht I et al.In situ detection of phosphorylated platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta using a generalized proximity ligation method. Mol. Cell Proteomics6(9), 1500–1509 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinidiyaarachchi A, Zieba A, Allalou A, Pardali K, Wahlby C. A detailed analysis of 3D subcellular signal localization. Cytometry A75(4), 319–328 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Allalou A, Wahlby C. BlobFinder, a tool for fluorescence microscopy image cytometry. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.94(1), 58–65 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuchowius KJ, Weibrecht I, Landegren U, Gedda L, Soderberg O. Flow cytometric in situ proximity ligation analyses of protein interactions and post-translational modification of the epidermal growth factor receptor family. Cytometry A75(10), 833–839 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuchowius KJ, Jarvius M, Wickstrom M et al. High content screening for inhibitors of protein interactions and post-translational modifications in primary cells by proximity ligation. Mol. Cell Proteomics9(1), 178–183 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu Y, Gu J, Hagner-Mcwhirter A et al. Western blotting via proximity ligation for high performance protein analysis. Mol. Cell Proteomics10(11), O111.011031 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Zieba A, Wahlby C, Hjelm F et al. Bright-field microscopy visualization of proteins and protein complexes by in situ proximity ligation with peroxidase detection. Clin. Chem.56(1), 99–110 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausson CM, Allalou A, Weibrecht I et al. Increasing the dynamic range of in situ PLA. Nat. Methods8(11), 892–893 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Aubele M, Spears M, Ludyga N et al.In situ quantification of HER2-protein tyrosine kinase 6 (PTK6) protein–protein complexes in paraffin sections from breast cancer tissues. Br. J. Cancer103(5), 663–667 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Giusto DA, Wlassoff WA, Gooding JJ, Messerle BA, King GC. Proximity extension of circular DNA aptamers with real-time protein detection. Nucleic Acids Res.33(6), e64 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgregor LM, Gorin DJ, Dumelin CE, Liu DR. Interaction-dependent PCR: identification of ligand–target pairs from libraries of ligands and libraries of targets in a single solution-phase experiment. J. Am. Chem. Soc.132(44), 15522–15524 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg M, Eriksson A, Tran B, Assarsson E, Fredriksson S. Homogeneous antibody-based proximity extension assays provide sensitive and specific detection of low-abundant proteins in human blood. Nucleic Acids Res.39(15), e102 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissin DM, Kan CW, Campbell TG et al. Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations. Nat. Biotechnol.28(6), 595–599 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd J, Freese B, Lu A et al. Ultrasensitive flow-based immunoassays using single-molecule counting. Clin. Chem.53(11), 1990–1995 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessler LA, Reifenberger JG, Mitra RD. Protein quantification in complex mixtures by solid phase single-molecule counting. Anal. Chem.81(17), 7141–7148 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlen M, Svahn HA. Affinity reagents for lab on chips. Lab. Chip11(8), 1417–1419 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Dubel S, Stoevesandt O, Taussig MJ, Hust M. Generating recombinant antibodies to the complete human proteome. Trends Biotechnol.28(7), 333–339 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar