3-T ultrahigh-field intraoperative MRI for low-grade glioma resection

References

• Piepmeier JM. Current concepts in the evaluation and management of WHO grade II gliomas. J. Neurooncol.92, 253–259 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keles GE, Lamborn KR, Berger MS. Low-grade hemispheric gliomas in adults: a critical review of extent of resection as a factor influencing outcome. J. Neurosurg.95, 735–745 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanai N, Berger MS. Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery62, 753–764 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekinci G, Akpinar IN, Baltacioglu F et al. Early-postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in glial tumors: prediction of tumor regrowth and recurrence. Eur. J. Radiol.45, 99–107 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claus EB, Horlacher A, Hsu L et al. Survival rates in patients with low-grade glioma after intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance. Cancer103, 1227–1233 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz RB, Hsu L, Wong TZ et al. Intraoperative MR imaging guidance for intracranial neurosurgery: experience with the first 200 cases. Radiology211, 477–488 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmeier R, Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O et al. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging with the magnetom open scanner: concepts, neurosurgical indications, and procedures: a preliminary report. Neurosurgery43, 739–747 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohinski RJ, Kokkino AK, Warnick RE et al. Glioma resection in a shared-resource magnetic resonance operating room after optimal image-guided frameless stereotactic resection. Neurosurgery48, 731–742 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senft C, Seifert V, Hermann E, Franz K, Gasser T. Usefulness of intraoperative ultra low-field magnetic resonance imaging in glioma surgery. Neurosurgery63, 257–266 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall WA, Liu H, Martin AJ, Pozza CH, Maxwell RE, Truwit CL. Safety, efficacy, and functionality of high-field strength interventional magnetic resonance imaging for neurosurgery. Neurosurgery46, 632–641 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R. Comparing 0.2 tesla with 1.5 tesla intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of setup, workflow, and efficiency. Acad. Radiol.12, 1065–1079 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaibara T, Saunders JK, Sutherland GR. Utility of a moveable 1.5 Tesla intraoperative MR imaging system. Can. J. Neurol. Sci.26, 313–316 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatiboglu MA, Weinberg JS, Suki D et al. Impact of intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging guidance on glioma surgery: a prospective volumetric analysis. Neurosurgery64, 1073–1081 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimsky C, Fujita A, Ganslandt O, Von Keller B, Fahlbusch R. Volumetric assessment of glioma removal by intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery55, 358–370 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadani M, Spiegelman R, Feldman Z, Berkenstadt H, Ram Z. Novel, compact, intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided system for conventional neurosurgical operating rooms. Neurosurgery48, 799–807 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall WA, Galicich W, Bergman T, Truwit CL. 3-Tesla intraoperative MR imaging for neurosurgery. J. Neurooncol.77, 297–303 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamir MN, Ozduman K, Dincer A, Yildiz E, Peker S, Ozek MM. First intraoperative, shared-resource, ultrahigh-field 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging system and its application in low-grade glioma resection. J. Neurosurg. DOI: 10.3171/2009.3.JNS081139 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Pamir MN, Peker S, Ozek MM, Dincer A. Intraoperative MR imaging: preliminary results with 3 tesla MR system. Acta Neurochir. Suppl.98, 97–100 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jankovski A, Francotte F, Vaz G et al. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging at 3-T using a dual independent operating room-magnetic resonance imaging suite: development, feasibility, safety, and preliminary experience. Neurosurgery63, 412–424 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClain CD, Soriano SG, Goumnerova LC, Black PM, Rockoff MA. Detection of unanticipated intracranial hemorrhage during intraoperative magnetic resonance image-guided neurosurgery: report of two cases. J. Neurosurg.106, 398–400 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Hastreiter P et al. Preoperative and intraoperative diffusion tensor imaging-based fiber tracking in glioma surgery. Neurosurgery61, 178–185 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Merhof D, Sorensen AG, Fahlbusch R. Intraoperative visualization of the pyramidal tract by diffusion-tensor-imaging-based fiber tracking. Neuroimage30, 1219–1229 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramina R, Coelho Neto M, Giacomelli A et al. Optimizing costs of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: a series of 29 glioma cases. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) DOI: 10.1007/s00701-009-0430-2 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Maesawa S, Fujii M, Nakahara N et al. Clinical indications for high-field 1.5 T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and neuro-navigation for neurosurgical procedures: review of initial 100 cases. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo)49, 340–349 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R. Intraoperative visualization for resection of gliomas: the role of functional neuronavigation and intraoperative 1.5 T MRI. Neurol. Res.28, 482–487 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntoukas V, Krishnan R, Seifert V. The new generation polestar n20 for conventional neurosurgical operating rooms: a preliminary report. Neurosurgery62, 82–89 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar