Acute coronary syndromes: considerations for improved acceptance and implementation of management guidelines

References

• Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J.28(13), 1598–1660 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm CW, Bassand J-P, Agewall S et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J.32(23), 2999–3054 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. Heart J.29(23), 2909–2945 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur. Heart J.31(20), 2501–2555 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angiolillo DJ, Suryadevara S, Capranzano P, Bass TA. Prasugrel: a novel platelet ADP P2Y12 receptor antagonist. A review on its mechanism of action and clinical development. Expert Opin. Pharmacother.9(16), 2893–2900 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Giezen JJ, Nilsson L, Berntsson P et al. Ticagrelor binds to human P2Y12 independently from ADP but antagonizes ADP-induced receptor signaling and platelet aggregation. J. Thromb. Haemost.7(9), 1556–1565 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes DR Jr, Dehmer GJ, Kaul S, Leifer D, O’Gara PT, Stein CM. ACCF/AHA clopidogrel clinical alert: approaches to the FDA ‘boxed warning’: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents and the American Heart Association endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.56(4), 321–341 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MJ, Berger PB, Teirstein PS et al. Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial. JAMA305(11), 1097–1105 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiviott SD, Trenk D, Frelinger AL et al. Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation – Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 trial. Circulation116(25), 2923–2932 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YG, Ni L, Brandt JT et al. Inhibition of platelet aggregation with prasugrel and clopidogrel: an integrated analysis in 846 subjects. Platelets20(5), 316–327 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey RF, Angiolillo DJ, Patil SB et al. Inhibitory effects of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) PLATELET substudy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.56(18), 1456–1462 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K et al. Randomized double-blind assessment of the onset and offset of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation120(25), 2577–2585 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med.357(20), 2001–2015 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CURRENT-OASIS 7 Investigators. Dose comparisons of clopidogrel and aspirin in acute coronary syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med.363(10), 930–942 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med.361(11), 1045–1057 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grines CL, Bonow RO, Casey DE Jr et al. Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians. Circulation115(6), 813–818 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon CP, Harrington RA, James S et al. Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with a planned invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO): a randomised double-blind study. Lancet375(9711), 283–293 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg G. Results of the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial subset analysis in patients with STEMI and planned PCI. Presented at: American Heart Association Scientific Sessions. Orlando, FL, USA, 14–18 November 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bellemain-Appaix A, Brieger D, Beygui F et al. New P2Y12 inhibitors versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.56(19), 1542–1551 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biondi-Zoccai G, Lotrionte M, Agostoni P et al. Adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis of prasugrel versus ticagrelor for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Int. J. Cardiol.150(3), 324–331 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Hulot JS, Collet JP, Silvain J et al. Cardiovascular risk in clopidogrel-treated patients according to cytochrome P450 2C19*2 loss-of-function allele or proton pump inhibitor coadministration: a systematic meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.56(2), 134–143 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré G, Mehta SR, Yusuf S et al. Effects of CYP2C19 genotype on outcomes of clopidogrel treatment. N. Engl. J. Med.363, 1704–1714 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott SA, Martis S, Peter I, Kasai Y, Kornreich R, Desnick RJ. Identification of CYP2C19*4B: pharmacogenetic implications for drug metabolism including clopidogrel responsiveness. Pharmacogenomics J. doi:10.1038/tpj.2011.5 (2011) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Sibbing D, Koch W, Gebhard D et al. Cytochrome 2C19*17 allelic variant, platelet aggregation, bleeding events, and stent thrombosis in clopidogrel-treated patients with coronary stent placement. Circulation121(4), 512–518 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD et al. Cytochrome P450 genetic polymorphisms and the response to prasugrel: relationship to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical outcomes. Circulation119(19), 2553–2560 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallentin L, James S, Storey RF et al. Effect of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on outcomes of treatment with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes: a genetic substudy of the PLATO trial. Lancet376(9749), 1320–1328 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James S, Angiolillo DJ, Cornel JH et al. Ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and diabetes: a substudy from the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Eur. Heart. J.31(24), 3006–3016 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James S, Budaj A, Aylward P et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes in relation to renal function: results from the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circulation122(11), 1056–1067 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidjane MA, Voisin S, Lhermusier T, Bongard V, Sie P, Carrie D. More on: adenosine diphosphate-inducible platelet reactivity shows a pronounced age dependency in the initial phase of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel. J. Thromb. Haemost.9(3), 614–616 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurbel PA, Mahla E, Antonino MJ, Tantry US. Response variability and the role of platelet function testing. J. Invasive Cardiol.21(4), 172–178 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuisset T, Frere C, Quilici J et al. Relationship between aspirin and clopidogrel responses in acute coronary syndrome and clinical predictors of nonresponse. Thromb. Res.123(4), 597–603 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SJ, Park DW, Kim YH et al. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents. N. Engl. J. Med.362(15), 1374–1382 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang MK, Jeong YH, Yoon SE et al. Preprocedural platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading in Korean patients undergoing scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention. J. Atheroscler.Thromb.17(11), 1122–1131 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne RA, Schulz S, Mehilli J et al. Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 versus 12 months clopidogrel therapy after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Safety and Efficacy of 6 Months Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stenting (ISAR-SAFE) study. Am. Heart J.157(4), 620–624 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri L, Kereiakes DJ, Normand SL et al. Rationale and design of the dual antiplatelet therapy study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial to assess the effectiveness and safety of 12 versus 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with either drug-eluting stent or bare-metal stent placement for the treatment of coronary artery lesions. Am. Heart J.160(6), 1035–1041 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheught FW, Focks JJ, Brouwer MA. Long-term clopidogrel therapy and the impact on CV mortality: lessons from the large randomized controlled trials. Circulation122, A19240 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Chin CT, Roe MT, Fox KA et al. Study design and rationale of a comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel in medically managed patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Targeted Platelet Inhibition to Clarify the Optimal Strategy to Medically Manage Acute Coronary Syndromes (TRILOGY ACS) trial. Am. Heart J.160(1), 16–22 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen JL, Mahaffey KW, Hasselblad V et al. Efficacy and bleeding complications among patients randomized to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for anti-thrombin therapy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. A systematic overview. JAMA292(1), 89–96 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhuja R, Yeh RW, Bhatt DL. Anticoagulant agents in acute coronary syndromes. Curr. Probl. Cardiol.36(4), 127–168 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antman EM, Morrow DA, McCabe CH et al. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med.354(14), 1477–1488 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalescot G, Zeymer U, Silvain J et al. Intravenous enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the international randomised open-label ATOLL trial. Lancet378(9792), 693–703 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Gensini GF, Maritz F et al. The safety and efficacy of subcutaneous enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin and tirofiban versus placebo in the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients ineligible for reperfusion (TETAMI): a randomized trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.42(8), 1348–1356 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antman EM, Cohen M, Radley D et al. Assessment of the treatment effect of enoxaparin for unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction TIMI 11B–ESSENCE meta-analysis. Circulation100(15), 1602–1608 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White HD, Kleiman NS, Mahaffey KW et al. Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (SYNERGY) trial. Am. Heart J.152(6), 1042–1050 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S et al. Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med.354(14), 1464–1476 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta RH, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50(18), 1742–1751 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S et al. Effects of fondaparinux on mortality and reinfarction in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the OASIS-6 randomized trial. JAMA295(13), 1519–1530 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito V, Ciapponi A, Kwong J. Factor Xa inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1, CD007038 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Stone GW, McLaurin BT, Cox DA et al. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med.355(21), 2203–2216 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone GW, Ware JH, Bertrand ME et al. Anti-thrombotic strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early invasive management: one-year results from the ACUITY trial. JAMA298(21), 2497–2506 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoff AM, Steinhubl SR, Manoukian SV et al. Influence of timing of clopidogrel treatment on the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.1(6), 639–646 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopes RD, Alexander KP, Manoukian SV et al. Advanced age, anti-thrombotic strategy, and bleeding in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.53(12), 1021–1030 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Schulz S et al. Abciximab and heparin versus bivalirudin for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med.365(21), 1980–1989 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Witzenbichler B et al. Bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarctions (HORIZONS-AMI): 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet374(9696), 1149–1159 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangas G, Mehran R, Guagliumi G et al. Role of clopidogrel loading dose in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: results from the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.54(15), 1436–1446 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G et al. Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet377(9784), 2193–2204 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg PG, Mehta SR, Jukema W et al. RUBY-1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety and tolerability of the novel oral Factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) following acute coronary syndrome. Eur. Heart J.32(20), 2541–2554 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander JH, Lopes RD, James S et al. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med.365(8), 699–708 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldgren J, Budaj A, Granger CB et al. Dabigatran vs placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized, double-blind, Phase I trial. Eur. Heart J.32(22), 2781–2789 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med.366(1), 9–12 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno H, Fernández-Avilés F. Use of risk scores in acute coronary syndromes. Heart98(2), 162–168 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehran R, Pocock SJ, Nikolsky E et al. A risk score to predict bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.55(23), 2556–2566 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone GW, Ware JH, Bertrand ME et al. Anti-thrombotic strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early invasive management: one-year results from the ACUITY trial. JAMA298(21), 2497–2506 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subherwal S, Bach RG, Chen AY et al. Baseline risk of major bleeding in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) bleeding score. Circulation119(14), 1873–1882 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the bleeding academic research consortium. Circulation123(23), 2736–2747 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betteridge DJ. Lipid control in patients with diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.8(5), 278–290 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jernberg T, Johanson P, Held C, Svennblad B, Lindback J, Wallentin L. Association between adoption of evidence-based treatment and survival for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA305(16), 1677–1684 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber S. A new and rapid scoring system to assess the scientific evidence from clinical trials. J. Interv. Cardiol.19(6), 485–492 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox KAA, Goodman SG, Klein W et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome; findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Eur. Heart J.23(15), 1177–1189 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heras M, Bueno H, Bardaji A, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Marti H, Marrugat J. Magnitude and consequences of undertreatment of high-risk patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the DESCARTES registry. Heart92(11), 1571–1576 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno H, Bardaji A, Fernandez-Ortiz A et al. Management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in Spain. The DESCARTES (Descriptión del Estado de los Sindromes Coronarios Agudos en un Registro Temporal Español) study. Rev. Esp. Cardiol.58(2), 244–252 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Permanyer-Miralda G, Heras M et al. Patterns of use and effectiveness of early invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: an assessment by propensity score. Am. Heart J.156(5), 946–953 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoekstra JW, Pollack CV Jr, Roe MT et al. Improving the care of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department: the CRUSADE initiative. Acad. Emerg. Med.9(11), 1146–1155 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasdai D, Behar S, Wallentin L et al. A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin; the Euro Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes (Euro Heart Survey ACS). Eur. Heart J.23(15), 1190–1201 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrieres J, Bakhai A, Iñiquez A et al. Treatment patterns in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Curr. Med. Res. Opin.26(9), 2193–2202 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman SG, Huang W, Yan AT et al. The expanded Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events: baseline characteristics, management practices, and hospital outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am. Heart J.158(2), 193–201 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehta RH, Montoye CK, Gallogly M et al. Improving quality of care for acute myocardial infaction: the Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Initiative. JAMA287(10), 1269–1276 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birtcher KK, Pan W, Labresh KA, Cannon CP, Fonarow GC, Ellrodt G. Performance achievement award program for Get With The Guidelines – coronary artery disease is associated with global and sustained improvement in cardiac care for patients hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction. Crit. Pathw. Cardiol.9(3), 103–112 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medina HM, Cannon CP, Zhao X et al. Quality of acute myocardial infarction care and outcomes in 33,997 patients aged 80 years or older: findings from Get With The Guidelines – Coronary Artery Disease. Am Heart J.162(2), 283–290 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flather MD, Booth J, Babalis D et al. Improving the management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: systematic evaluation of a quality improvement program European Quality Improvement Programme for Acute Coronary Syndrome: the EQUIP-ACS project protocol and design. Trials11(5), (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flather MD, Babalis D, Booth J et al. Cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the effects of a quality improvement program on management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the European Quality Improvement Programme for Acute Coronary Syndromes (EQUIP-ACS). Am. Heart J.162(4), 700–707.e1 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson-Jaffe, Goodman SG, Yan RT et al. Comparison of baseline characteristics, management and outcome of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in versus not in clinical trials. Am. J. Cardiol.106(10), 1389–1396 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox KA, Steg PG, Eagle KA et al. Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999–2006. JAMA297(17), 1892–1900 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiele F, Hochadel M, Tubaro M et al. Reperfusion strategy in Europe: temporal trends in performance measures for reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J.31(21), 2614–2624 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Widimsky P, Wijns W, Fajadet J et al. Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries. Eur. Heart J.31(8), 943–957 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer FA, Montalescot G, Fox KA et al. Delay to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to acute care hospitals: an international perspective. Eur. Heart J.31(11), 1328–1336 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van de Werf F, Gore JM, Avezum A et al. Access to catheterisation facilities in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome: multinational registry study. BMJ330(7489), 441 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul P, Newby LK, Fu Y et al. Relation between baseline risk and treatment decisions in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: an examination of international practice patterns. Heart91(7), 876–881 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M et al. Management patterns in relation to risk stratification among patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Arch. Intern. Med.167(10), 1009–1016 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox KA, Anderson FA Jr, Dabbous OH et al. Intervention in acute coronary syndromes: do patients undergo intervention on the basis of their risk characteristics? The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Heart93(2), 177–182 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson ED, Roe MT, Mulgund J et al. Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA295(16), 1912–1920 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer T, Koeth O, Junger C et al. Effect of an invasive strategy on in-hospital outcome in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J.28(23), 2873–2878 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan BC, Stearns SC, Rossi JS, D’Arcy LP, Federspiel JJ, Carey TS. Three-year outcomes of multivessel revascularization in very elderly acute coronary syndrome patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg.89(6), 1889–1894 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montalescot G, Brieger D, Eagle KA et al. Unprotected left main revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J.30(19), 2308–2317 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention1(2), 219–227 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Garg S et al. Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study. EuroIntervention5(1), 50–56 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox KA, Mehta SR, Peters R et al. Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Ischemic Events (CURE) trial. Circulation110(10), 1202–1208 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew DP, Mahaffey KW, White HD et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with acute coronary syndromes is difficult to predict. Am. Heart J.155(5), 841–847 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar