Outcomes of carotid stenting among symptomatic patients: a contemporary review

References

• Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM et al.; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics – 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 121(7), 948–954 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S et al.; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task ForceAmerican Stroke AssociationAmerican Association of Neuroscience NursesAmerican Association of Neurological SurgeonsAmerican College of RadiologyAmerican Society of NeuroradiologyCongress of Neurological SurgeonsSociety of Atherosclerosis Imaging and PreventionSociety for Cardiovascular Angiography and InterventionsSociety of Interventional RadiologySociety of NeuroInterventional SurgerySociety for Vascular MedicineSociety for Vascular SurgeryAmerican Academy of NeurologySociety of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 3(2), 100–130 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naylor AR, Bolia A, Abbott RJ et al. Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trial. J. Vasc. Surg. 28(2), 326–334 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricotta JJ 2nd, Malgor RD. A review of the trials comparing carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty and stenting. Perspect. Vasc. Surg. Endovasc. Ther. 20(3), 299–308 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CAVATAS Investigators. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet 357(9270), 1729–1737 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonati LH, Ederle J, McCabe DJ et al.; CAVATAS Investigators. Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 8(10), 908–917 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al.; Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy Investigators. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 351(15), 1493–1501 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal BK, Brott TG. The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial completes randomization: lessons learned and anticipated results. J. Vasc. Surg. 50(5), 1224–1231 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coward LJ, Featherstone RL, Brown MM. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy: a Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke 36(4), 905–911 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Brückmann H et al.; SPACE Collaborative Group. 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368(9543), 1239–1247 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B et al.; EVA-3S Investigators. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 355(16), 1660–1671 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G et al.; CREST Investigators. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 363(1), 11–23 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veith FJ, Paraskevas KI. Influence and critique of CREST and ICSS trials. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 24(3), 153–156 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voeks JH, Howard G, Roubin GS et al.; CREST Investigators. Age and outcomes after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial. Stroke 42(12), 3484–3490 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silver FL, Mackey A, Clark WM et al.; CREST Investigators. Safety of stenting and endarterectomy by symptomatic status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Stroke. 42(3), 675–680 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ederle J, Dobson J, Featherstone RL et al.; International Carotid Stenting Study investigators. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375(9719), 985–997 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonati LH, Jongen LM, Haller S et al.; ICSS-MRI study group. New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Lancet Neurol. 9(4), 353–362 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppi G, Moratto R, Silingardi R et al. PRIAMUS – proximal flow blockage cerebral protection during carotid stenting: results from a multicenter Italian registry. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino) 46(3), 219–227 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safian RD, Bresnahan JF, Jaff MR et al.; CREATE Pivotal Trial Investigators. Protected carotid stenting in high-risk patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47(12), 2384–2389 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray WA, Yadav JS, Verta P et al. The CAPTURE registry: results of carotid stenting with embolic protection in the post approval setting. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 69(3), 341–348 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CJ, Iyer SS, Hopkins LN, Katzen BT, Russell ME; BEACH Trial Investigators. Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: the BEACH trial 30 day results. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 67(4), 503–512 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzen BT, Criado FJ, Ramee SR et al.; CASES-PMS Investigators. Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: thirty-day results of the CASES-PMS study. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 70(2), 316–323 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins LN, Myla S, Grube E et al. Carotid artery revascularization in high surgical risk patients with the NexStent and the Filterwire EX/EZ: 1-year results in the CABERNET trial. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 71(7), 950–960 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashida RT, Popma JJ, Apruzzese P, Zimetbaum P; MAVErIC I and II Investigators. Evaluation of the medtronic exponent self-expanding carotid stent system with the medtronic guardwire temporary occlusion and aspiration system in the treatment of carotid stenosis: combined from the MAVErIC (Medtronic AVE Self-expanding CaRotid Stent System with distal protection In the treatment of Carotid stenosis) I and MAVErIC II trials. Stroke. 41(2), e102–e109 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ansel GM, Hopkins LN, Jaff MR et al.; Investigators for the ARMOUR Pivotal Trial. Safety and effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA proximal cerebral protection device during carotid artery stenting: results from the ARMOUR pivotal trial. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 76(1), 1–8 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myla S, Bacharach JM, Ansel GM, Dippel EJ, McCormick DJ, Popma JJ. Carotid artery stenting in high surgical risk patients using the FiberNet embolic protection system: the EPIC trial results. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 75(6), 817–822 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clair DG, Hopkins LN, Mehta M et al.; EMPiRE Clinical Study Investigators. Neuroprotection during carotid artery stenting using the GORE flow reversal system: 30-day outcomes in the EMPiRE Clinical Study. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 77(3), 420–429 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S et al.; ARCHeR Trial Collaborators. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J. Vasc. Surg. 44(2), 258–268 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross CB, Yancey AE, Byrnes KR, Wayne EJ, Dwivedi AJ, Morris ME. Late outcomes of carotid artery stenting: a critical review. Am. Surg. 77(9), 1117–1130 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonati LH, Fraedrich G; Carotid Stenting Trialists’ Collaboration. Age modifies the relative risk of stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis–a pooled analysis of EVA-3S, SPACE and ICSS. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 41(2), 153–158 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economopoulos KP, Sergentanis TN, Tsivgoulis G, Mariolis AD, Stefanadis C. Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes. Stroke. 42(3), 687–692 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonati LH, Dobson J, Algra A et al.; Carotid Stenting Trialists’ Collaboration. Short-term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 376(9746), 1062–1073 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Veith FJ. Mechanisms to explain the poor results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in symptomatic patients to date and options to improve CAS outcomes. J. Vasc. Surg. 52(5), 1367–1375 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricotta JJ, Aburahma A, Ascher E, Eskandari M, Faries P, Lal BK; Society for Vascular Surgery. Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. J. Vasc. Surg. 54(3), e1–e31 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg N, Karagiorgos N, Pisimisis GT et al. Cerebral protection devices reduce periprocedural strokes during carotid angioplasty and stenting: a systematic review of the current literature. J. Endovasc. Ther. 16(4), 412–427 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar