Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and potential role of 3D imaging

References

• Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet368, 1005–1011 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur. Heart J.24, 1231–1243 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K et al.; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation117(4), E25–E146 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldbarg SH, Elmariah S, Miller MA, Fuster V. Insights into degenerative aortic valve disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50, 1205–1213 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butany J, Collins MJ, Demellawy DE et al. Morphological and clinical findings in 247 surgically excised native aortic valves. Can. J. Cardiol.21, 747–755 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Otto CM, Kuusisto J, Reichenbach DD, Gown AM, O’Brien KD. Characterization of the early lesion of ‘degenerative’ valvular aortic stenosis. Histological and immunohistochemical studies. Circulation90, 844–853 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Sata M, Fukuda D et al. Age-associated aortic stenosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46, 134–141 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsson M, Dalsgaard CJ, Haegerstrand A, Rosenqvist M, Ryden L, Nilsson J. Accumulation of T lymphocytes and expression of interleukin-2 receptors in nonrheumatic stenotic aortic valves. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.23, 1162–1170 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aikawa E, Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik D et al. Multimodality molecular imaging identifies proteolytic and osteogenic activities in early aortic valve disease. Circulation115, 377–386 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss RM, Ohashi M, Miller JD, Young SG, Heistad DD. Calcific aortic valve stenosis in old hypercholesterolemic mice. Circulation114, 2065–2069 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akat K, Borggrefe M, Kaden JJ. Aortic valve calcification – basic science to clinical practice. Heart95(8), 616–623 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg V, Muth AN, Ransom JF et al. Mutations in NOTCH1 cause aortic valve disease. Nature437, 270–274 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz DJ, Kloeckener-Gruissem B, Akhmedov A et al. Degenerative aortic valve stenosis, but not coronary disease, is associated with shorter telomere length in the elderly. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.26, E114–E117 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novaro GM, Sachar R, Pearce GL, Sprecher DL, Griffin BP. Association between apolipoprotein E alleles and calcific valvular heart disease. Circulation108, 1804–1808 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz R, Wong ND, Kronmal R et al. Features of the metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus as predictors of aortic valve calcification in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Circulation113, 2113–2119 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.29, 630–634 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon A, Cheriex E, Lodder J, Kessels F. Cardiac valve calcification: characteristics of patients with calcification of the mitral annulus or aortic valve. Heart78, 472–474 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novaro GM, Katz R, Aviles RJ et al. Clinical factors, but not C-reactive protein, predict progression of calcific aortic-valve disease: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50, 1992–1998 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novaro GM, Pearce GL, Sprecher DL, Griffin BP. Comparison of cardiovascular risk and lipid profiles in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery versus those undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Heart Valve Dis.10, 19–24 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Otto CM, O’Brien KD. Why is there discordance between calcific aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease? Heart85, 601–602 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Allison MA, Cheung P, Criqui MH, Langer RD, Wright CM. Mitral and aortic annular calcification are highly associated with systemic calcified atherosclerosis. Circulation113, 861–866 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong ND, Sciammarella M, Arad Y et al. Relation of thoracic aortic and aortic valve calcium to coronary artery calcium and risk assessment. Am. J. Cardiol92, 951–955 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajamannan NM, Otto CM. Targeted therapy to prevent progression of calcific aortic stenosis. Circulation110, 1180–1182 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajamannan NM, Subramaniam M, Caira F, Stock SR, Spelsberg TC. Atorvastatin inhibits hypercholesterolemia-induced calcification in the aortic valves via the Lrp5 receptor pathway. Circulation112, I229–I234 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhek R, Rader F, Loho N et al. Statins but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors delay progression of aortic stenosis. Circulation110, 1291–1295 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien KD, Shavelle DM, Caulfield MT et al. Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme with low-density lipoprotein in aortic valvular lesions and in human plasma. Circulation106, 2224–2230 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helske S, Lindstedt KA, Laine M et al. Induction of local angiotensin II-producing systems in stenotic aortic valves. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.44, 1859–1866 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien KD, Probstfield JL, Caulfield MT et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and change in aortic valve calcium. Arch. Intern. Med.165, 858–862 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galis ZS, Khatri JJ. Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and atherogenesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Circ. Res.90, 251–262 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basalyga DM, Simionescu DT, Xiong W, Baxter BT, Starcher BC, Vyavahare NR. Elastin degradation and calcification in an abdominal aorta injury model: role of matrix metalloproteinases. Circulation110, 3480–3487 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohle K, Maffert R, Ropers D et al. Progression of aortic valve calcification: association with coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors. Circulation104, 1927–1932 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelle DM, Takasu J, Budoff MJ, Mao S, Zhao XQ, O’Brien KD. HMG CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) and aortic valve calcium. Lancet359, 1125–1126 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novaro GM, Tiong IY, Pearce GL, Lauer MS, Sprecher DL, Griffin BP. Effect of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on the progression of calcific aortic stenosis. Circulation104, 2205–2209 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy MF, Pellikka PA, Klarich KW, Tajik AJ, Enriquez-Sarano M. Association of cholesterol levels, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase inhibitor treatment, and progression of aortic stenosis in the community. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.40, 1723–1730 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I, Goldman ME. Association of coronary risk factors and use of statins with progression of mild valvular aortic stenosis in older persons. Am. J. Cardiol.88, 693–695 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura LM, Ramos SF, Zamorano JL et al. Rosuvastatin affecting aortic valve endothelium to slow the progression of aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.49, 554–561 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell SJ, Newby DE, Prescott RJ et al. A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med.352, 2389–2397 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossebø AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K et al. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med.359, 1343–1356 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation114, E84–E231 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson LG. Aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation: an overview of management. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino)49, 297–303 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Hammermeister KE, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Oprian C, Kim T, Rahimtoola S. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease. N. Engl. J. Med.328, 1289–1296 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson LG, Deglurkar I, Ung J et al. Aortic valve repair and root preservation by remodeling, reimplantation, and tailoring: technical aspects and early outcome. J. Card. Surg.22, 473–479 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Murtuza B, Pepper JR, Stanbridge RD et al. Minimal access aortic valve replacement: is it worth it? Ann. Thorac. Surg.85, 1121–1131 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iung B, Vahanian A. Valvular heart diseases in elderly people. Lancet368, 969–971 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G et al. Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur. Heart J.26, 2714–2720 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander KP, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH et al. Outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients ≥80 years: results from the National Cardiovascular Network. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.35, 731–738 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihaljevic T, Nowicki ER, Rajeswaran J et al. Survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: implications for decision making. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.135, 1270–1278 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Varadarajan P, Kapoor N, Bansal RC, Pai RG. Clinical profile and natural history of 453 nonsurgically managed patients with severe aortic stenosis. Ann. Thorac. Surg.82, 2111–2115 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma BJ, van Den Brink RB, van Der Meulen JH et al. To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences. Heart82, 143–148 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai RG, Kapoor N, Bansal RC, Varadarajan P. Malignant natural history of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: benefit of aortic valve replacement. Ann. Thorac. Surg.82, 2116–2122 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach DS, Cimino N, Deeb GM. Unoperated patients with severe aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50, 2018–2019 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstkotte D, Loogen F. The natural history of aortic valve stenosis. Eur. Heart J.9(Suppl. E), 57–64 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iivanainen AM, Lindroos M, Tilvis R, Heikkila J, Kupari M. Natural history of aortic valve stenosis of varying severity in the elderly. Am. J. Cardiol.78, 97–101 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chizner MA, Pearle DL, deLeon AC Jr. The natural history of aortic stenosis in adults. Am. Heart J.99, 419–424 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapadia SR, Goel SS, Svensson Let al. Characterization and outcome of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.137(6), 1430–1435 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill WW. Predictors of long-term survival after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty: report of the Mansfield Scientific Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Registry. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.17, 193–198 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland J, Cribier A, Savin T, Lefebvre E, Koning R, Letac B. Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty in patients with severe aortic stenosis and low ejection fraction. Immediate results and 1-year follow-up. Circulation79, 1189–1196 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Otto CM, Mickel MC, Kennedy JW et al. Three-year outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Insights into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation89, 642–650 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman EB, Bashore TM, Hermiller JB et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in adults: failure of procedure to improve long-term survival. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.26, 1522–1528 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen HR, Knudsen LL, Hasenkam JM. Transluminal implantation of artificial heart valves. Description of a new expandable aortic valve and initial results with implantation by catheter technique in closed chest pigs. Eur. Heart J.13, 704–708 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C et al. Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with calcific aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.43, 698–703 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grube E, Laborde JC, Gerckens U et al. Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg first-in-man study. Circulation114, 1616–1624 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grube E, Schuler G, Buellesfeld L et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50, 69–76 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein SV, Cheung A, Ye J et al. Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in humans: initial clinical experience. Circulation114, 591–596 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR et al. Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation113, 842–850 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humphries K et al. Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation116, 755–763 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation106, 3006–3008 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descoutures F, Himbert D, Lepage L et al. Contemporary surgical or percutaneous management of severe aortic stenosis in the elderly. Eur. Heart J.29, 1410–1417 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Al-Attar N et al. Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European Association of Cardio–Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur. Heart J.29, 1463–1470 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen FJ. Evolving concepts of cardiac valve dynamics: the continuum of development, functional structure, pathobiology, and tissue engineering. Circulation118, 1864–1880 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelson K, Schoen FJ. Heart valve tissue engineering: concepts, approaches, progress, and challenges. Ann. Biomed. Eng.34, 1799–1819 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan AV, Baim DS, Smith JJ et al. Medical device development: from prototype to regulatory approval. Circulation109, 3068–3072 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassiliades TA Jr, Block PC, Cohn LH et al. The clinical development of percutaneous heart valve technology: a position statement of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS), and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.129, 970–976 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Zegdi R, Khabbaz Z, Borenstein N, Fabiani JN. A repositionable valved stent for endovascular treatment of deteriorated bioprostheses. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48, 1365–1368 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roselli EE, Greenberg RK, Pfaff K, Francis C, Svensson LG, Lytle BW. Endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.133, 1474–1482 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Vesely I. Heart valve tissue engineering. Circ. Res.97, 743–755 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Rieder E, Seebacher G, Kasimir MT et al. Tissue engineering of heart valves: decellularized porcine and human valve scaffolds differ importantly in residual potential to attract monocytic cells. Circulation111, 2792–2797 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks MS, Engelmayr GC, Hildebrand D. Bioreactors for heart valve tissue engineering. In: Bioreactors for Tissue Engineering. Chaduri J, Al-Rubeai M (Eds). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 235–267 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Rabkin-Aikawa E, Farber M, Aikawa M, Schoen FJ. Dynamic and reversible changes of interstitial cell phenotype during development and remodeling of cardiac valves. J. Heart Valve Dis.13, 841–847 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerstrup SP, Sodian R, Daebritz S et al. Functional living trileaflet heart valves grown in vitro. Circulation102(19 Suppl. 3), III44–III49 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutherland FWH, Perry TE, Yu Yet al. From stem cells to viable autologous semilunar heart valve. Circulation111, 2783–2791 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody S, Pandit A. Approaches to heart valve tissue engineering scaffold design. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.83, 16–43 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Dohmen PM, Lembcke A, Holinski S et al. Mid-term clinical results using a tissue-engineered pulmonary valve to reconstruct the right ventricular outflow tract during the Ross procedure. Ann. Thorac. Surg.84, 729–736 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon P, Kasimirr MT, Seebacher Get al. Early failure of the tissue engineered porcine heart valve SYNERGRAFT™ in pediatric patients. Eur. J. Cardiothorac Surg.23, 1002–1006 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fann JI, Chronos N, Rowe SJet al. Evolving strategies for the treatment of valvular heart disease: preclinical and clinical pathways for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.71, 434–440 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufnagel CA, Harvey WP, Rabil P et al. Surgical correction of aortic valve insufficiency. Surgery35, 673–680 (1954).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Non-orthotopic Model for Stentless Heart Valve Evaluation. From the Office of Science and Technology – Annual Report – Fiscal Year 1995. US FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health, MD, USA (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Petersilka M, Bruder H, Krauss B, Stierstorfer K, Flohr TG. Technical principles of dual source CT. Eur. J. Radiol.68, 362–368 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo SJ, McRae G, Olomon JP et al. Aortic root geometry: pattern of differences between leaflets and sinuses of Valsalva. J. Heart Valve Dis.8, 407–415 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Rankin JS, Dalley AF, Crooke PS, Anderson RH. A ‘hemispherical’ model of aortic valvar geometry. J. Heart Valve Dis.17, 179–186 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lansac E, Lim HS, Shomura Y et al. Aortic root dynamics are asymmetric. J. Heart Valve Dis.14, 400–407 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Lansac E, Lim HS, Shomura Y et al. A four-dimensional study of the aortic root dynamics. Eur. J. Cardiothorac Surg.22, 497–503 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazui T, Izumoto H, Yoshioka K, Kawazoe K. Dynamic morphologic changes in the normal aortic annulus during systole and diastole. J. Heart Valve Dis.15, 617–621 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kazui T, Kin H, Tsuboi J, Yoshioka K, Okabayashi H, Kawazoe K. Perioperative dynamic morphological changes of the aortic annulus during aortic root remodeling with aortic annuloplasty at systolic and diastolic phases. J. Heart Valve Dis.17, 366–370 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.1, 321–330 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado V, Bax JJ. Classical methods to measure aortic valve area in the era of new invasive therapies: still accurate enough? Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging.25(2), 183–185 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Doddamani S, Grushko MJ, Makaryus AN et al. Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by 64-slice multi-detector CT. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging.25(2), 175–181 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Pérez de Isla L, Zamorano J, Pérez de la Yglesia R et al. [Quantification of aortic valve area using three-dimensional echocardiography]. Rev. Esp. Cardiol.61, 494–500 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegdi R, Ciobotaru V, Noghin M et al. Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent? Results from a human anatomic study in adults. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.51, 579–584 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poh KK, Levine RA, Solis J et al. Assessing aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by continuity equation: a novel approach using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur. Heart J.29(20), 2526–2535 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgstahler C, Kunze M, Loffler C, Gawaz MP, Hombach V, Merkle N. Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.8, 825–829 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okura H, Yoshida K, Hozumi T et al. Planimetry and transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in noninvasive assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.30, 753–759 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR et al. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standard. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.42, 519–526 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M et al. Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcifications in aortic stenosis. Radiology225, 120–128 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herzog C, Nasreddin A, Balzer J et al. Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality. Eur. Radiol.12, 2670–2678 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Friedrich GJ et al. Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47, 1410–1417 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H, Desbiolles L, Husmann L et al. Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT. Radiology245, 111–121 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Grander W et al. Aortic valve calcification as quantified with multislice computed tomography predicts short-term clinical outcome in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. J. Heart Valve Dis.15, 494–498 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Schachner T et al. Diagnostic performance of MDCT for detecting aortic valve regurgitation. Am. J. Roentgenol.186, 1676–1681 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Morgan-Hughes GJ, Owens PE, Roobottom CA, Marshall AJ. Three dimensional volume quantification of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography. Heart89, 1191–1194 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA. Aortic valve calcification on computed tomography predicts the severity of aortic stenosis. Clin. Radiol.59, 208(2004).
   Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Takasu J, Katz R et al. Reproducibility of CT measurements of aortic valve calcification, mitral annulus calcification, and aortic wall calcification in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Acad. Radiol.13, 166–172 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar M, Tuzcu ME, Kapadia SR et al. Aortic root morphology in patients undergoing percutaneous aortic valve replacement. evidence of aortic root remodeling. J. Thoracic Cardiovasc. Surg.137(4), 950–956 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Maselli D, De Paulis R, Scaffa Ret al. Sinotubular junction size affects aortic root geometry and aortic valve function in the aortic valve reimplantation procedure: an in vitro study using the Valsalva graft. Ann. Thorac. Surg.84, 1214–1218 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodés-Cabau J, Dumont E, De Larochellière R et al. Feasibility and initial results of percutaneous aortic valve implantation including selection of the transfemoral or transapical approach in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Am. J. Cardiol.102, 1240–1246 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray D, Ghosh J, Khwaja N, Murphy MO, Baguneid MS, Walker MG. Access for endovascular aneurysm repair. J. Endovasc. Ther.13, 754–761 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurra V, Schoenhagen P, Roselli EE et al. Prevalence of significant peripheral artery disease in patients evaluated for percutaneous aortic valve insertion: preprocedural assessment with multidetector computed tomography. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.137(5), 1258–1264 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Eide KR, Odegard A, Myhre HO, Haraldseth O. Initial observations of endovascular aneurysm repair using Dyna-CT. J. Endovasc. Ther.14, 50–53 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Teutelink A, Muhs BE, Vincken KL et al. Use of dynamic computed tomography to evaluate pre- and postoperative aortic changes in AAA patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. J. Endovasc. Ther.14, 44–49 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Eggebrecht H, Heusch G, Erbel R, Ladd ME, Quick HH. Real-time vascular interventional magnetic resonance imaging: the future of aortic stent-graft placement? Basic Res. Cardiol.102, 1–8 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Peterson BG, Longo GM, Matsumura JS et al. Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic pathology with custom-made devices. Surgery138, 598–605 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg RK, Haddad F, Svensson L et al. Hybrid approaches to thoracic aortic aneurysms: the role of endovascular elephant trunk completion. Circulation112, 2619–2626 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Schachner T, Feuchtner G, Bonaros N et al. Does preoperative multislice computed tomography predict operative times in total endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting? Heart Surg. Forum.8, E314–E318 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Falk V, Mourgues F, Adhami L et al. Cardio navigation: planning, simulation, and augmented reality in robotic assisted endoscopic bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.79, 2040–2047 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu AM, Dey D, Drangova M, Boyd WD, Peters TM. 3-D image guidance for minimally invasive robotic coronary artery bypass. Heart Surg. Forum3, 224–231 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Sato Y, Kamata J, Izumoto H, Nasu M, Kawazoe K. Morphological analysis of aortic root in eccentric aortic regurgitation using anyplane two-dimensional images produced by transesophageal three-dimensional echocardiography. J. Heart Valve Dis.12, 186–196 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Laissy JP, Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM et al. Comprehensive evaluation of preoperative patients with aortic valve stenosis: usefulness of cardiac multidetector computed tomography. Heart93, 1121–1125 (2007).
   Google Scholar