Scientific and technical advances in continence recovery following radical prostatectomy

References

• Young HH. Four cases of radical prostatectomy. Johns Hopkins Bull.16, 315 (1905).
   Google Scholar
• Penson DF, Rossignol M, Sartor AO, Scardino PT, Abenhaim LL. Prostate cancer: epidemiology and health-related quality of life. Urology72(Suppl. 6A), 3–11 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J. Clin.57, 43–66 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn M, Babb P. Patterns and trends in prostate cancer incidence, survival, prevalence and mortality. Part 1: international comparisons. BJU Int.90(2), 162–173 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu-Yao GL, Yao S. Population based study of long-term survival in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Lancet349, 906–910 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amico DV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA280(11), 969–974 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.352(19), 1977–1984 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J. Natl Cancer Inst.100(16), 1144–1154 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein EA, Ceizki J, Kupelian PA, Mahadevan A. Outcomes for intermediate risk prostate cancer: are there advantages for surgery, external radiation or brachytherapy? Urol. Oncol.27(1), 67–71 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Marsh DM, Lepor H. Predicting continence following radical prostatectomy. Curr. Urol. Rep.2, 248–252 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• MacDiarmid SA. Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: pathophysiology and management. Curr. Urol. Rep.2, 209–213 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Kao T-C, Cruess DF, Garner D et al. Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.163, 858–864 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler FJ, Barry MJ, Lu-Yao G et al. Effect of radical prostatectomy on patient quality of life: results from a Medicare survey. Urology45, 1007–1013 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JA, Elliott DS, Barrett DM. Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: a comparison of the cost of conservative versus surgical management. Urology51(5), 715–720 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Nitti VW, Blaivas JG. Urinary incontinence: epidemiology, pathophysiology, evaluation and management overview. In: Campbell-Walsh Urology (9th Edition). Wein A (Ed.). WB Saunders, PA, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Burnett AL, Mostwin JL. In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: relevance to continence preservation following major pelvic surgery. J. Urol.160, 1301–1306 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, Neuhaus J, Constantinides C, Liatsikos EN. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol.51, 629–639 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorschner W, Stolzenburg JU. A new theory of micturition and urinary continence based on histomorphological studies. 3. The two parts of the musculus sphincter urethrae: physiological importance for continence in rest and stress. Urol. Int.52, 185–188 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Strasser H, Klima G, Poisel S, Horninger W, Bartsch G. Anatomy and innervations of the rhabdosphincter of the male urethra. Prostate28, 24–31 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Strasser H, Bartsch G. Anatomy and innervations of the rhabdosphincter of the male urethra. Semin. Urol. Oncol.18, 2–8 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Dorschner W, Biesold M, Schmidt F, Stolzenburg JU. The dispute about the external sphincter and the urogenital diaphragm. J. Urol.162, 1942–1945 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling JA, Dixon JS, Critchley HO, Thompson SA. A comparative study of the human external sphincter and periurethral levator ani muscles. Br. J. Urol.53(1), 35–41 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elbadawi A, Mathews R, Light JK, Wheeler TM. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of rhabdosphincter component of the prostatic capsule. J. Urol.158, 1819–1828 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Steiner MS. Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy: the “no-touch” technique. Curr. Urol. Rep.1, 20–27 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Myers RP. Male urethral sphincteric anatomy and radical prostatectomy. Urol. Clin. North Am.18, 211–227 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Steiner MS. The puboprostatic ligament and the male urethral suspensory mechanism: an anatomic study. Urology44, 530–534 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juenemann KP, Lue TF, Schmidt RA, Melchior H, Tanagho EA. Neuroanatomy and clinical significance of sacral and pudendal nerve anatomy. J. Urol.139, 74–80 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zvara P, Carrier S, Kour NW, Tanagho EA. The detailed neuroantomy of the human striated urethral sphincter. Br. J. Urol.74, 182–187 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Hollabaugh RS Jr, Dmochowski RR, Steiner MS. Neuroanatomy of the male rhabdosphincter. Urology49, 426–434 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Walz J, Graefen M, Huland H. Basic principles of anatomy for optimal surgical treatment of prostate cancer. World J. Urol.25, 31–38 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hollabaugh RS, Dmochowski RR, Kneib TG, Steiner MS. Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence. Urology51, 960–967 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years. J. Urol.152(5), 1831–1836 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, et al. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J. Urol.172, 2227–2231 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varkarakis J, Wirtenberger W, Pinggera GM et al. Evaluation of urinary extravasation and results after continence-preserving radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int.94, 991–995 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E et al. Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.156, 1707–1713 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lepor H, Kaci L, Xue X. Continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy using self-reporting instruments. J. Urol.171, 1212–1215 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seckiner I, Yesili C, Mungan NA, Aykanat A, Akduman B. Correlations between the ICIQ-SF score and urodynamic findings. Neurourol. Urodyn.26, 492–494 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Thüroff J, Abrams P, Andersson KE et al. Guidelines on urinary incontinence. In: European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines. Aus G (Ed.). European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands, 3–7 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Bauer RM, Bastian PJ, Gozzi C, Stief CG. Postprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur. Urol.55, 322–333 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int.97(6), 1234–1241 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horie S, Tobisu K, Fujimoto H, Doi N, Kakizoe T. Urinary incontinence after non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation. Urology53(3), 561–567 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS et al. Urinary and sexual function after prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA283, 354–360 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr LA, Zincke H. Radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer in the elderly and the young: complications and prognosis. Eur. Urol.25(4), 305–311 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Talcott JA, Rieker P, Clark JA et al. Patient-reported symptoms after primary therapy for early prostate cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. J. Clin. Oncol.16, 275–283 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner MS, Morton RA, Walsh PC. Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence. J. Urol.145, 512–515 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerer P, Huland H. Urodynamic evaluation of changes in urinary control after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol.157, 233–236 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficcazola MA, Nitti VW. The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings. J. Urol.160, 1317–1320 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Winters JC, Appell RA, Rackley RR. Urodynamic findings in postprostatectomy incotinenence. Neurourol. Urodyn.17, 493–498 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielb SJ, Clemens JQ. Comprehensive urodynamics evaluation of 146 men with incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urology66, 392–396 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW et al. Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J. Urol.168, 1032–1035 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyugen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A. Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J. Urol.179, 1907–1911 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Paperal P, Akin O, Sandhu JS et al. Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. Urol. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.057 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Majoros A, Bach D, Keszthelyi A et al. Analysis of risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urol. Int.78, 202–207 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R, Martin S, Goldberg JD, Lepor H. Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: insights into incidence, effectiveness of intervention, effect on continence, and factors predisposing to occurrence. Urology57, 742–746 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil N, Krane L, Javed K, Williams T, Bhandari M, Menon M. Evaluating and grading cystographic leakage: correlation with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy. BJU Int.103, 1108–1110 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanapragasam VJ, Baker P, Naisby GP, Chadwick D. Identification and validation of risk factors for vesciourethral leaks following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int. J. Urol.12, 948–952 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden AR, Chodak GW. Can leakage at the vescio-urethral anastomosis be predicted after radical retropubic prostatectomy? BJU Int.93, 504–506 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Leibovitch I, Rowland RG, Little JS Jr et al. Cystography after radical retropubic prostatectomy, clinical implications of abnormal findings. Urology46, 78–80 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin JW, Ramchandani P, Banner MP et al. Voiding cystography after radical prostatectomy, normal findings and correlation between contrast extravasation and anastomotic strictures. Am. J. Roentgenol.162, 87–91 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Guru KA, Seereiter PJ, Sfakianos JP, Hutson AD, Mohler JL. Is a cystogram necessary after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy? Urol. Oncol.25, 465–467 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N. Engl. J. Med.346(15), 1138–1144 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco FJ Jr, Reidel ER, Begg CB, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters. J. Urol.173, 2099–2013 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu JC, Gold KF, Pashos CL, Mehta SS, Litwin MS. Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes. J. Clin. Oncol.21(3), 401–405 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, MacDonald R, Kane RL. Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J. Urol.180, 820–829 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Eden CG, Neill MG, Louie-Johnsun MW. The first 1000 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the UK: evidence of multiple “learning curves”. BJU Int.103, 1224–1230 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman A, Wasson J, Wennberg JE. Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. The National Medicare Experience 1988–1990 (updated June 1993). Urology42, 622–629 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine E, Izadifar V, Barthelemy Y, Desgrippes A, Beurton D. Urinary continence following radical prostatectomy assessed by a self administered questionnaire. Eur. Urol.37, 223–227 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy GP, Mettlin C, Menck H, Winchester DP, Davidson AM. National patterns of prostate cancer treatment by radical prostatectomy: results of a survey by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Cancer. J. Urol.152, 1817–1819 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei JT, Dunn RL, Marcovich R, Montie JE, Sanda MG. Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.164, 744–748 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell PD, Finan BF. Continence following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.142, 1227–1229 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Fleischmann A, Thalmann GN, Schumacher M, Studer UE. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy – does it have an impact on urinary continence? J. Urol.176(1), 189–195 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marien TP, Lepor H. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy? BJU Int.102, 1581–1584 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan SM, Duncan HJ, Macgregor RJ, Russell JM. Prospective assessment of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: objective and subjective analysis. Urology49, 225–230 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu EI, Hong EK, Lepor H. Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology61, 601–606 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JA, Rodin DM, Lee B, Dahl DM. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and body mass index: an assessment of 151 sequential cases. J. Urol.173(2), 442–445 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liatsikos E, Muhlstadt S, Kallidonis P et al. Performance and functional outcome of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in relation to obesity: an assessment of 500 patients. BJU Int.102(6), 718–722 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy. Urology65(4), 740–744 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology73(2), 316–322 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boczko J, Madeb R, Golijanin D et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in obese patients. Can. J. Urol.13(4), 3169–3173 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Tan GY, Jhaveri JK, Tewari AK. Anatomic restoration technique (ART): a biomechanics-based approach for early continence recovery after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Urology (2009) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Foley CL, Bott SR, Thomas K, Parkinson MC, Kirby RS. A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates. BJU Int.92, 370–374 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frota R, Turna B, Santos BM, Lin YC, Gill IS, Aron M. The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int.101(5), 589–593 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA et al. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology69(2), 300–305 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konety BR, Sadetsky N, Carroll PR; CaPSURE Investigators. Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of prostate volume – analysis of data from the CaPSURE database. J. Urol.177(4), 1423–1425 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boczko J, Erturk E, Golijanin D et al. Impact of prostate size in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol.21(2), 184–188 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Oefelein MG. Prospective predictors of urinary continence after anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: a multivariate analysis. World J. Urol.22, 267–271 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Meeks JJ, Zhao L, Greco KA, Macejko A, Nadler RB. Impact of prostate median lobe anatomy on robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology73(2), 323–327 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Eden CG, Richards AJ, Ooi J, Moon DA, Laczko I. Previous bladder outlet surgery does not affect medium-term outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int.99(2), 399–402 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Colombo R, Naspro R, Salonia A et al. Radical prostatectomy after previous prostate surgery: clinical and functional outcomes. J. Urol.176(6 Pt 1), 2459–2463 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Song C, Doo CK, Hong J-H et al. Relationship between the integrity of the pelvic floor muscles and early recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.178, 208–211 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kampen M, de Weert W, van Poppel H, De Ridder D, Feys H, Baert L. Effect of pelvic floor re-education on duration and degree of incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet355, 98–102 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parekh AR, Feng MI, Kirages D, Bremner H, Kaswick J, Aboseif S. The role of pelvic floor exercises on post-prostatectomy incontinence. J. Urol.170(1), 130–133 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgio KL, Goode PS, Urban DA et al. Preoperative biofeedback assisted behavioural training to decrease post-prostatectomy incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial. J. Urol.175, 196–201 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald R, Fink HA, Huckabay C, Monga M, Wilt TJ. Pelvic floor muscle training to improve urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of effectiveness. BJU Int.100(1), 76–81 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter KF, Glazener CM, Moore KN. Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.18(2), CD001843 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bales GT, Gerber GS, Minor TX et al. Effect of preoperative biofeedback/pelvic floor training on continence in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urology56(4), 627–630 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Randenborgh H, Paul R, Kubler H, Breul J, Hartung R. Improved urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy with preparation of a long, partially intraprostatic portion of the membranous urethra: an analysis of 1013 consecutive cases. Prostate Cancer Prostat. Dis.7, 253–257 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Steiner MS. Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology55, 427–435 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Montorsi F, Salonia A, Suardi N et al. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur. Urol.48, 938–945 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco F, Carmignani L, Aquati P et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol.175, 2201–2206 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P et al. Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur. Urol.52, 376–383 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol.51, 996–1003 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen MM, Kamoi K, Stein RJ et al. Early continence outcomes of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction during robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int.101, 1135–1139 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licht MR, Klein EA, Tuason L, Levin H. Impact of bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy on continence and cancer control. Urology44, 883–887 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepor H, Chan S, Melamed J. The role of bladder neck biopsy in men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy with preservation of the bladder neck. J. Urol.160(6), 2435–2439 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Shelfo SW, Obek C, Soloway MS. Update on bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact on pathological outcome, anastomotic strictures and continence. Urology51(1), 73–78 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon M, Ruckle H, Bamshad BR, Tsai C, Webster R, Lui P. Radical retropubic prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation versus reconstruction. J. Urol.163(1), 194–198 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Markovich R, Wojno KJ, Wei JT, Rubin MA, Montie JE, Sanda MG. Bladder neck sparing modification of radical prostatectomy adversely affects surgical margins in pathologic T3a prostate cancer. Urology55(6), 904–908 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Srougi M, Nesrallah LJ, Kauffman JR, Nesrallah A, Leite KR. Urinary continence and pathological outcome after bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial. J. Urol.165(3), 815–818 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deliveliotis C, Protogerou V, Alargorf E, Varkarakis J. Radical prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing – effect on continence and positive margins. Urology60(5), 855–858 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco FJ, Grignon DJ, Sakr WA et al. Radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: impact of a positive margin. Eur. Urol.43(5), 461–466 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Selli C, De Antoni P, Moro U, Macchiarella A, Giannarini G, Crisci A. Role of bladder neck preservation in urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol.38(1), 32–37 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaker DL, Steel BL. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of urinary continence: pathology and long-term results. J. Urol.172(6), 2549–2552 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Abou-Elela A, Reyad I, Morsy A, Elgammal M, Bedair AS, Abdelkader M. Continence after radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.33(1), 96–101 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Cambio AJ, Evans CP. Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur. Urol.50, 903–913 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Walsh PC, Marschke PL. Intussusception of the bladder neck leads to earlier continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology59(6), 934–938 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Wille S, Varga Z, von Knobloch R, Hofmann R. Intussusception of bladder neck improves early continence after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective trial. Urology65(3), 524–527 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Sakai I, Harada K, Hara I, Eto H, Miyake H. Intussusception of the bladder neck does not promote early restoration to urinary continence after non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int. J. Urol.12(3), 275–279 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Srougi M, Paranhos M, Leite KM, Dall’Oglio M, Nesrallah L. The influence of bladder neck mucosal eversion and early urinary extravasation on patient outcome after radical retropubic prosatatectomy: a prospective controlled trial. BJU Int.95(6), 757–760 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Igel TC, Wehle MJ. Vesico–urethral reconstruction in radical retropubic prostatectomy: an alternative technique. J. Urol.161, 844–846 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Thiel DD, Igel TC, Brisson TE, Heckman MG. Outcomes with an alternative anastomotic technique after radical retropubic prostatectomy: 10-year experience. Urology68, 132–136 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poore RE, McCullough DL, Jarow JP. Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology51, 67–72 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi M, Shimada A, Nakashima O, Kojiro M, Matsuoka K. Urodynamic evaluation of a suspension technique for rapid recovery of continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int. J. Urol.13, 373–378 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Rabenalt R et al. Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy – effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur. Urol.49(1), 103–111 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari AK, Bigelow K, Rao S et al. Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology69, 726–731 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takenaka A. Tewari AK, Leung RA et al. Preservation of the puboperineoplasty for early recovery of urinary incontinence after robotic prostatectomy: anatomic basis and preliminary outcomes. Eur. Urol.51, 433–440 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S et al. Total reconstruction of the vesico-urethral junction. BJU Int.101, 871–877 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh C, Kshirsagar A, Mohler JL. Outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology61, 412–416 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• John H, Hauri D, Leuener M, Reinecke M, Maake C. Evidence of trigonal denervation and reinnervation after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol.165, 111–113 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catarin MV, Manzano GM, Nobrega JA, Almeida FG, Srougi M, Bruschini H. The role of membranous urethral afferent autonomic innervation in the continence mechanism after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy, a clinical and prospective study. J. Urol.180, 2527–2531 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Boy S, Reitz A, Wirth B et al. Facilitatory neuromodulatory effect of duloxetine on pudendal motor neurons controlling the urethral pressure: a functional urodynamic study in healthy women. Eur. Urol.50, 119–125 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahariou A, Papaioannou P, Kalogirou G. Is HCL duloxetine effective in the management of urinary stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy? Urol. Int.77, 9–12 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenker B, Gratzke C, Reich O, Schorsch I, Seitz M, Stief CG. Preliminary results on the off-label use of duloxetine for the treatment of stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy or cystectomy. Eur. Urol.49, 1075–1078 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G et al. Pharmacologic treatment in postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Eur. Urol.51, 1559–1564 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner WA, Schlarp OM. Treatment of incontinence after prostatectomy using a new minimally invasive device: adjustable continence therapy. BJU Int.96, 587–594 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner WA, Schlarp OM. Adjustable continence therapy (ProACT™): evolution of the surgical technique and comparison of the original 50 patients with the most recent 50 patients at a single center. Eur. Urol.52, 680–686 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasiadis AG, Salomon L, Katz R et al. Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcomes. Urology62(2), 292–297 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artibani W, Grosso G, Navarro G et al. Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of perioperative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy. Eur. Urol.44(4), 401–406 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepor H, Kaci L. The impact of open radical retropubic prostatectomy on continence and lower urinary tract symptoms: a prospective assessment using validated self-administered outcome instruments. J. Urol.171(3), 1216–1219 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touijer K, Eastham JA, Secin FP et al. Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005. J. Urol.179(5), 1811–1817 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J. Urol.166(6), 2101–2108 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link RE, Su LM, Sullivan W, Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP. Health related quality of life before and after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.173(1), 175–179 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martina GR, Giumelli P, Scuzzarella S, Remotti M, Caruso G, Lovisolo J. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy – learning curve of a laparscopic naïve urologist in a community hospital. Urology65(5), 959–963 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rozet F, Galiano M, Cathelineau X et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases. J. Urol.174(3), 908–911 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lein M, Stibane I, Mansour R et al. Complications, urinary continence and oncologic outcomes of 1000 laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomies – experience at the Charite Hospital Berlin, Campus Mitte. Eur. Urol.50(6), 1278–1282 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the university of Leipzig experience of 2000 cases. J. Endourol.22(10), 2319–2325 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan SW, Lam KM, Kwok SC et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single center experience after 5 years. Hong Kong Med. J.14, 192–197 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Milhoua PM, Koi PT, Lowe D, Ghavamian R. Issue of prostate gland size, laproscopic radical prostatectomy, and continence revisited. Urology71(3), 417–420.
   Google Scholar
• Nisen H, Pertilla I, Rana-Knuuttila T et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol.42, 29–34 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.170(5), 1738–1741 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Menon M; The VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int.92(3), 205–210 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello AJ, Haxhimolla H, Crowe H, Peters JS. Installation of telerobotic surgery and experience with telerobotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int.96, 34–38 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? BJU Int.96(1), 39–42 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int.99(5), 1109–1112 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borin JF, Skarecky DW, Narula N, Ahlering TE. Impact of urethral stump length on continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology70(1), 173–177 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur. Urol.51(3), 648–657 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur. Urol.51(3), 755–762 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JO. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2-group parallel randomized controlled trial. J. Urol.180(3), 1018–1023 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su L. Role of robotics in modern urologic practice. Curr. Opin. Urol.19, 63–64 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Box GN, Lee HJ, Santos RJ et al. Rapid communication: robot-assisted NOTES nephrectomy: initial report. J. Endourol.22, 503–508 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Haber GP, Crouzet S, Kamoi K et al. Robotic NOTES (Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery) in reconstructive urology: initial laboratory experience. Urology71, 996–1000 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rané A, Rao P, Rao P. Single-port access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-port). Urology72, 260–263 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, Stern JM, Caddedu JA. Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology70, 1039–1042 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman RV, Box GN, Abraham JB et al. Rapid communication: transvaginal single-port NOTES nephrectomy: initial laboratory experience. J. Endourol.21, 640–644 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aron M, Canes D, Desai MM et al. Transumbilical single port laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int.103(4), 516–521 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill IS, Canes D, Aron M et al. Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. J. Urol.180, 637–641 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ponsky LE, Cherullo EE, Sawyer M, Hartke D. Single access laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. J. Endourol.22, 663–666 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Castelluci SA, Curcillo PG, Ginsberg PC, Saba SC, Jaffe JS, Harmon JD. Single port access adrenalectomy. J. Endourol.22, 1573–1576 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Raman JD, Caddedu JA, Rao P, Rané A. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: initial urological experience and comparison with natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. BJU Int.101, 1493–1496 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK et al. Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology71, 3–6 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M et al. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int.83, 101–188 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur. Urol.54, 1020–1029 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Desai MM, Gill IS. Single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology72, 1190–1193 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Stein RJ. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report. BJU Int.103(3), 366–369 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai MM, Aron M, Berger A et al. Transvesical robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int.102, 1666–1669 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Kommu SS, Rané A. Devices for laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery in urology. Expert Rev. Med. Dev.6(1), 95–103 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldoorn M, Marani E. Overview of mathematical computer models of striated sphincter muscles. Arch. Physiol. Biochem.109(4), 293–303 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function. Urology66(5 Suppl.), 83–94 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar