Novel wound sealants: biomaterials and applications

References

• Neuffer MC, McDivitt J, Rose D, King K, Cioonan CC, Vayer JS. Hemostatic dressings for the first responder: a review. Mil. Med.169, 716–720 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reece TB, Maxey TS, Kron IL. A prospectus on tissue adhesives. Am. J. Surg.182(2 Suppl. 1), 40S–44S (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Deanda A Jr, Elefteriades JA, Hasaniya NW, Lattouf OM, Lazzara RR. Improving outcomes through the use of surgical sealants for anastomotic sealing during cardiovascular surgery: review articles. J. Card. Surg.24(3), 325–333 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Passage J, Tam R, Windsor M, O’Brien M. Bioglue: a review of the use of this new surgical adhesive in thoracic surgery. Aust. N. Z. J. Surg.75(5), 315–318 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson T, Ng C-F, Tolley D. Renal parenchymal hemostatic aids: glues and things. Curr. Opin. Urol.13(3), 209–214 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra EA, Molenaar IQ, Porte RJ, de Boer MT. Topical haemostatic agents in liver surgery: do we need them? HPB11(4), 306–310 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Hong YM, Loughlin KR. The use of hemostatic agents and sealants in urology. J. Urol.176(6), 2367–2374 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Ryou M, Thompson CC. Tissue adhesives: a review. Tech. Gastrointest. Endosc.8(1), 33–37 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Cuschieri A. Tissue adhesives in endosurgery. Semin. Laparosc. Surg.8(1), 63–68 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oelker AM, Grinstaff MW. Ophthalmic adhesives: a materials chemistry perspective. J. Mater. Chem.18(22), 2521–2536 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Kharod BV. Tissue adhesives in corneal cataract incisions. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.18(1), 39–43 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Currie LJ, Sharpe JR, Martin R. The use of fibrin glue in skin grafts and tissue-engineered skin replacements: a review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.108(6), 1713–1726 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs JE, McDaniel CO, Owen JR, Wayne JS. Comparative analysis of biomechanical performance of available “Nerve glues”. J. Hand Surg.33(6), 893–899 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Mooney E, Loh C, Pu LLQ. The use of fibrin glue in plastic surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.124(3), 989–992 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss C, Kraus R, Schluckebier D, Stiller A-C, Wenisch S, Schnettler R. Bone adhesives in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Eur. J. Trauma32(2), 141–148 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Donkerwolcke M, Burny F, Muster D. Tissues and bone adhesives – historical aspects. Biomaterials19(16), 1461–1466 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondeen J, Pusateri A, Coppes V, Gaddy C, Holcomb J. Comparison of 10 different hemostatic dressings in an aortic injury. J. Trauma54, 280–285 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson M, Taher M, Burge J, Krishnamurti C, Reid T, Alving B. Hemostatic efficacy of a fibrin sealant dressing in an animal model of kidney injury. J. Trauma45, 662–665 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Murat F, Ereth M, Dong Y, Piedra M, Gettman M. Evaluation of microporous polysaccharide hemispheres as a novel hemostatic agent in open partial nephrectomy: favorable experimental results in the porcine model. J. Urol.172, 1119–1122 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam HB, Chen Z, Jaskille A et al. Application of a zeolite hemostatic agent achieves 100% survival in a lethal model of complex groin injury in swine. J. Trauma56, 974–983 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horák D, Svec F, Kalal J. Hydrogels in endovascular embolization. I. Spherical particles of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and their medico-biological properties. Biomaterials7(3), 188–192 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugamori T, Iwase H, Maeda M, Inoue Y, Kurosawa H. Local hemostatic effects of microcrystalline partially deacetylated chitin hydrochloride. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.49, 225–232 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Masayuki I. Photocrosslinkable chitosan hydrogel as a wound dressing and a biological adhesive. Trends Glycosci. Glyc.14, 331–341 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra A, Struszczyk H, Kivekäs O. Percutaneous microcrystalline chitosan application for sealing arterial puncture sites. Biomaterials19, 1467–1471 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen D, Machicado G, Hirabayashi K. Randomized double-blind studies of polysaccharide gel compared with glue and other agents for hemostasis of large veins and bleeding canine esophageal or gastric varices. J. Trauma57, S33–S37 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Albala D. Fibrin sealants in clinical practice. Cardiovasc. Surg.11, S5–S11 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallace DG, Cruise GM, Rhee WM et al. A tissue sealant based on reactive multifunctional polyethylene glycol. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.58(5), 545–555 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otani Y, Tabata Y, Ikada Y. Hemostatic capability of rapidly curable glues from gelatin, poly(L-glutamic acid), and carbodiimide. Biomaterials19(22), 2091–2098 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hick E, Morey A, Harris R, Morris M. Gelatin matrix treatment of complex renal injuries in porcine model. J. Urol.173, 1801–1804 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bingley JA, Gardner MAH, Stafford EG et al. Late complications of tissue glues in aortic surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg.69(6), 1764–1768 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazui T, Washiyama N, Bashar AHM et al. Role of biologic glue repair of proximal aortic dissection in the development of early and midterm redissection of the aortic root. Ann. Thorac. Surg.72(2), 509–514 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosain AK. The current status of tissue glues: I. For bone fixation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.109(7), 2581–2583 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Pusateri AE, Delgado AV, Dick EJ Jr, Martinez RS, Holcomb JB, Ryan KL. Application of a granular mineral-based hemostatic agent (quikclot) to reduce blood loss after grade V liver injury in swine. J. Trauma57, 555–562 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sierra DH. Fibrin sealant adhesive systems: a review of their chemistry, material properties and clinical applications. J. Biomater. Appl.7(4), 309–352 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anema JG, Morey AF, Harris R, MacPhee M, Cornum RL. Potential uses of absorbable fibrin adhesive bandage for genitourinary trauma. World J. Surg.25(12), 1573–1577 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb JB, McClain JM, Pusateri AE et al. Fibrin sealant foam sprayed directly on liver injuries decreases blood loss in resuscitated rats. J. Trauma49, 246–250 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kheirabadi BS, Sieber J, Bukhari T, Rudnicka K, Murcin LA, Tuthill D. High-pressure fibrin sealant foam: an effective hemostatic agent for treating severe parenchymal hemorrhage. J. Surg. Res.144(1), 145–150 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheyer M, Zimmermann G. Tachocomb used in endoscopic surgery. Surg. Endosc.10(5), 501–503 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan D, Van Gulik TM. Evolution of fibrinogen-coated collagen patch for use as a topical hemostatic agent. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.85(1), 272–278 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiele U, Kuntz G, Riegler A. Haemostyptic preparations on the basis of collagen alone and as fixed combination with fibrin glue. Clin. Mater.9(3–4), 169–177 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larson MJ, Bowersox JC, Lim RC Jr, Hess JR. Efficacy of a fibrin hemostatic bandage in controlling hemorrhage from experimental arterial injuries. Arch. Surg.130(4), 420–422 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holcomb J, MacPhee M, Hetz S, Harris R, Pusateri A, Hess J. Efficacy of a dry fibrin sealant dressing for hemorrhage control after ballistic injury. Arch. Surg.133(1), 32–35 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pusateri AE, Kheirabadi BS, Delgado AV et al. Structural design of the dry fibrin sealant dressing and its impact on the hemostatic efficacy of the product. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.70(1), 114–121 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Pusateri AE, Holcomb JB, Harris RA et al. Effect of fibrin bandage fibrinogen concentration on blood loss after grade V liver injury in swine. Mil. Med.166(3), 217–222 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Cornum R, Bell J, Gresham V, Brinkley W, Beall D, Macphee M. Intraoperative use of the absorbable fibrin adhesive bandage: long term effects. J. Urol.162(5), 1817–1820 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson MR, Friedman SA, Carter AJ et al. Hemostatic efficacy of a fibrin sealant-based topical agent in a femoral artery injury model: a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study. J. Vasc. Surg.26(2), 274–280 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb JB, Pusateri AE, Harris RA et al. Dry fibrin sealant dressings reduce blood loss, resuscitation volume, and improve survival in hypothermic coagulopathic swine with grade V liver injuries. J. Trauma47(2), 233–240 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cornum R, Morey A, Harris R et al. Does the absorbable fibrin adhesive bandage facilitate partial nephrectomy? J. Urol.164, 864–867 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell SW, Reid TJ, Dorsey J et al. A salmon thrombin-fibrin bandage controls arterial bleeding in a swine aortotomy model. J. Trauma59(1), 143–149 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb J, Pusateri A, Harris R. Effect of dry fibrin sealant dressings versus gauze packing on blood loss in grade V liver injuries in resuscitated swine. J. Trauma46, 49–57 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kheirabadi BS, Acheson EM, Deguzman R et al. The potential utility of fibrin sealant dressing in repair of vascular injury in swine. J. Trauma62(1), 94–103 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Delgado AV, Kheirabadi BS, Fruchterman TM et al. A novel biologic hemostatic dressing (fibrin patch) reduces blood loss and resuscitation volume and improves survival in hypothermic, coagulopathic swine with grade V liver injury. J. Trauma64, 75–80 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• McManus J, Wedmore I. Modern hemostatic agents for hemorrhage control – a review and discussion of use in current combat operations. Bussiness Briefing: Emergency Medicine Rev.76–79 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Michaud SE, Wang LZ, Korde N et al. Purification of salmon thrombin and its potential as an alternative to mammalian thrombins in fibrin sealants. Thromb. Res.107(5), 245–254 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Wang LZ, Gorlin J, Michaud SE et al. Purification of salmon clotting factors and their use as tissue sealants. Thromb. Res.100(6), 537–548 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Finley DS, Lee DI, Eichel L, Uribe CA, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Fibrin glue-oxidized cellulose sandwich for laparoscopic wedge resection of small renal lesions. J. Urol.173(5), 1477–1481 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L’Esperance JO, Sung JC, Marguet CG et al. Controlled survival study of the effects of Tisseel or a combination of FloSeal and Tisseel on major vascular injury and major collecting-system injury during partial nephrectomy in a porcine model. J. Endourol.19(9), 1114–1121 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Mathiasen RA, Cruz RM. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a novel matrix hemostatic sealant in children undergoing adenoidectomy. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.131(5), 601–605 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkens KL, Payner TD Jr, Leipzig TJ et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating a new hemostatic agent for spinal surgery. Spine26(15), 1645–1650 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oz MC, Rondinone JF, Shargill NS. Floseal matrix: new generation topical hemostatic sealant. J. Card. Surg.18(6), 486–493 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DI, Uribe C, Eichel L et al. Sealing percutaneous nephrolithotomy tracts with gelatin matrix hemostatic sealant: initial clinical use. J. Urol.171(2 I), 575–578 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvin CM, Brownlee AG, Huson MG et al. The development of photochemically crosslinked native fibrinogen as a rapidly formed and mechanically strong surgical tissue sealant. Biomaterials30(11), 2059–2065 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman WC, Sherman R, Boyce S et al. A novel collagen-based composite offers effective hemostasis for multiple surgical indications: results of a randomized controlled trial. Surgery129(4), 445–450 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson PA, Nol Powers J, Estridge TD et al. Serological analysis of patients treated with a new surgical hemostat containing bovine proteins and autologous plasma. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.58(6), 710–719 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochicchio G, Dunne J, Bochicchio K, Scalea T. The combination of platelet-enriched autologous plasma with bovine collagen and thrombin decreases the need for multiple blood transfusions in trauma patients with retroperitoneal bleeding. J. Trauma56(1), 76–79 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farndale RW, Sixma JJ, Barnes MJ, De Groot PG. The role of collagen in thrombosis and hemostasis. J. Thromb. Haemost.2, 561–573 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi T, Saito H, Uchida Y et al. Bonding of soft tissues using a novel tissue adhesive consisting of a citric acid derivative and collagen. Mater. Sci. Eng. C.24(6–8), 775–780 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi T, Saito H, Aoki H et al. Biocompatible high-strength glue consisting of citric acid derivative and collagen. Mater. Sci. Eng. C.26(1), 9–13 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastoe JE, Leach AA. Chemical constitution of gelatin. In: The Science and technology of gelatin. Ward AG, Courts A (Eds.). Academic Press, London, UK, 73–105 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama Y, Kameo T, Ohtaka A, Hirano Y. Enhancement of visible light-induced gelation of photocurable gelatin by addition of polymeric amine. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. Chem.177(2–3), 205–211 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Kopelman D, Wu L-Q et al. Biomimetic sealant based on gelatin and microbial transglutaminase: an initial in vivo investigation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.91(1), 5–16 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwasashi M, Sakane M, Saito H, Taguchi T, Tateishi T, Ochiai N. In vivo evaluation of bonding ability and biocompatibility of a novel biodegradable glue consisting of tartaric acid derivative and human serum albumin. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A.90, 543–548 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi T, Saito H, Iwasashi M, Sakane M, Ochiai N. Biodegradable adhesives composed of human serum albumin and organic acid-based crosslinkers with active ester groups. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym.24(6), 546–559 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Aboushwareb T, Eberli D, Ward C et al. A keratin biomaterial gel hemostat derived from human hair: evaluation in a rabbit model of lethal liver injury. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: appl. Biomater.90, 45–54 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninan L, Stroshine RL, Wilker JJ, Shi R. Adhesive strength and curing rate of marine mussel protein extracts on porcine small intestinal submucosa. Acta Biomater.3(5), 687–694 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang DS, Gim Y, Yoo HJ, Cha HJ. Practical recombinant hybrid mussel bioadhesive fp-151. Biomaterials28(24), 3560–3568 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar NL, Bradley TA, Walsh NA, Appleyard RC, Tyler MJ, Murrell GAC. Frog glue enhances rotator cuff repair in a laboratory cadaveric model. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.18(4), 639–645 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham LD, Glattauer V, Huson MG et al. Characterization of a protein-based adhesive elastomer secreted by the Australian frog Notaden bennetti. Biomacromolecules6(6), 3300–3312 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szomor ZL, Murrell GAC, Appleyard RC, Tyler MJ. Meniscal repair with a new biological glue: an ex vivo study. Tech. Knee Surg.7(4), 261–265 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Huson MG, Graham LD. Proteinaceous adhesive secretions from insects, and in particular the egg attachment glue of Opodiphthera sp. moths. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol.69(2), 85–105 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennebert E, Viville P, Lazzaroni R, Flammang P. Micro- and nanostructure of the adhesive material secreted by the tube feet of the sea star asterias rubens. J. Struct. Biol.164(1), 108–118 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whang HS, Kirsch W, Zhu YH, Yang CZ, Hudson SM. Hemostatic agents derived from chitin and chitosan. J. Macromol. Sci. Polym. Rev.45, 309–323 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loke WK, Lau SK, Yong LL, Khor E, Sum CK. Wound dressing with sustained owingmicrobial capability. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.53(1), 8–17 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peh K, Khan T, Ch’ng H. Mechanical, bioadhesive strength and biological evaluations of chitosan films for wound dressing. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.3(3), 303–311 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul W, Sharma C. Chitosan and alginate wound dressings: a short review. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs.18, 18–23 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Pusateri AE, McCarthy SJ, Gregory KW et al. Effect of a chitosan-based hemostatic dressing on blood loss and survival in a model of severe venous hemorrhage and hepatic injury in swine. J. Trauma54(1), 177–182 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kheirabadi BS, Acheson EM, Deguzman R et al. Hemostatic efficacy of two advanced dressings in an aortic hemorrhage model in swine. J. Trauma59(1), 25–35 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wedmore I, McManus JG, Pusateri AE, Holcomb JB. A special report on the chitosan-based hemostatic dressing: experience in current combat operations. J. Trauma60, 655–658 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Daya MR, Worley JA. Experience with chitosan dressings in a civilian EMS system. J. Emerg. Med.37, 1–7 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn VY, Eckert MJ, Martin MJ et al. Efficacy of three topical hemostatic agents applied by medics in a lethal groin injury model. J. Surg. Res.154, 258–261 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kozen BG, Kircher SJ, Henao J, Godinez FS, Johnson AS. An alternative hemostatic dressing: comparison of Celox, HemCon, and QuikClot. Acad. Emerg. Med.15, 74–81 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirabadi BS, Edens JW, Terrazas IB et al. Comparison of new hemostatic granules/powders with currently deployed hemostatic products in a lethal model of extremity arterial hemorrhage in swine. J. Trauma66, 316–328 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okamoto Y, Yano R, Miyatake K, Tomohiro I, Shigemasa Y, Minami S. Effects of chitin and chitosan on blood coagulation. Carbohydr. Polym.53(3), 337–342 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou TC, Fu E, Wu CJ, Yeh JH. Chitosan enhances platelet adhesion and aggregation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.302(3), 480–483 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitton R, Josef E, Shimshelashvili I, Shapira K, Seliktar D, Bianco-Peled H. Phloroglucinol-based biomimetic adhesives for medical applications. Acta Biomaterialia5(5), 1582–1587 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitton R, Bianco-Peled H. Novel biomimetic adhesives based on algae glue. Macromol. Biosci.8(5), 393–400 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D-A, Varghese S, Sharma B et al. Multifunctional chondroitin sulphate for cartilage tissue-biomaterial integration. Nat. Mater.6(5), 385–392 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirouzmanesh A, Herretes S, Reyes JMG et al. Modified microkeratome-assisted posterior lamellar keratoplasty using a tissue adhesive. Arch. Ophthalmol.124(2), 210–214 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fan Y, Sun H, Pei G, Ruan C. Haemostatic efficacy of an ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate-based aerosol in combination with tourniquet application in a large wound model with an arterial injury. Injury39(1), 61–66 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Mulet ME, Alió JL, Mahiques MM, Martin JM. Adal-1 bioadhesive for sutureless recession muscle surgery: a clinical trial. Br. J. Ophthalmol.90(2), 208–212 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zdrahala R, Zdrahala I. Biomedical applications of polyurethanes: a review of past, promises, present realities, and a vibrant future. J. Biomater. Appl.14, 67–90 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eto M, Morita S, Sugiura M, Yoshimura T, Tominaga R, Matsuda T. Elastomeric surgical sealant for hemostasis of cardiovascular anastomosis under full heparinization. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.32(5), 730–734 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Duncan R, Izzo L. Dendrimer biocompatibility and toxicity. Adv. Drug Del. Rev.57(15), 2215–2237 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinstaff MW. Designing hydrogel adhesives for corneal wound repair. Biomaterials28(35), 5205–5214 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CS, Wathier M, Grinstaff M, Kim T. In vitro sealing of clear corneal cataract incisions with a novel biodendrimer adhesive. Arch. Ophthalmol.127(4), 430–434 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Degoricija L, Johnson CS, Wathier M, Kim T, Grinstaff MW. Photo cross-linkable biodendrimers as ophthalmic adhesives for central lacerations and penetrating keratoplasties. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.48(5), 2037–2042 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Berdahl JP, Johnson CS, Proia AD, Grinstaff MW, Kim T. Comparison of sutures and dendritic polymer adhesives for corneal laceration repair in an in vivo chicken model. Arch. Ophthalmol.127(4), 442–447 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Lee BP, Chao CY, Nelson Nunalee F, Motan E, Shull KR, Messersmith PB. Rapid gel formation and adhesion in photocurable and biodegradable block copolymers with high dopa content. Macromolecules39(5), 1740–1748 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke SA, Ritter-Jones M, Lee BP, Messersmith PB. Thermal gelation and tissue adhesion of biomimetic hydrogels. Biomed. Mater.2(4), 203–210 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker CE, Kissler H, Wang LJ, Kaufman DB, Messersmith PB. Biological performance of mussel-inspired adhesive in extrahepatic islet transplantation. Biomaterials31(3), 420–427 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Liu C, Lu X, Yin M. Co-polypeptides of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine and l-lysine to mimic marine adhesive protein. Biomaterials28(23), 3456–3468 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong HE, Suh KY. Nanohairs and nanotubes: efficient structural elements for gecko-inspired artificial dry adhesives. Nano. Today4(4), 335–346 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavi A, Ferreira L, Sundback C et al. A biodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(7), 2307–2312 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Lee BP, Messersmith PB. A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos. Nature448(7151), 338–341 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamaraj J, Swaminathan E, Dharmalingam S. Development and characterization of polymer ceramic composites for orthopedic applications. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs22, 165–174 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Gutowska A, Jeong B, Jasionowski M. Injectable gels for tissue engineering. Anat. Rec.263(4), 342–349 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kretlow JD, Klouda L, Mikos AG. Injectable matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.59, 263–273 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver F, Wang M-C PG. Preparation and use of fibrin glue in surgery. Biomaterials16, 891–903 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett S, Melanson D, Torchiana D, Wiseman D, Sawhney A. Next-generation hydrogel films as tissue sealants and adhesion barriers. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino).18, 494–499 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Peng HT, Shek PN. Development of in situ-forming hydrogels for hemorrhage control. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.20(8), 1753–1762 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peng HT, Blostein MD, Shek PN. Experimental optimization of an in situ forming hydrogel for hemorrhage control. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.89(1), 199–209 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Jun JW, Shek PN. Synthesis and characterization of a novel in situ forming gel based on hydrogel dispersions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.90(2), 738–744 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Charbonneau S, Ganopolsky JG, Peng HT, Shek PN, Blostein MD. The use of ideal amphipathic helical peptides to reduce hemorrhage control in vivo. Presented at: American Society of Hemotology. December 8–11, Atlanta, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Heiss C, Kraus R, Peters F et al. Development of a bioresorbable self-hardening bone adhesive based on a composite consisting of polylactide methacrylates and β-tricalcium phosphate. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.90(1), 55–66 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Bauer NB, Brinke N, Heiss C et al. Biodegradable β-tri-calciumphosphate/hydroxyethyl methacrylate enhanced three component bone adhesive demonstrates biocompatibility without evidence of systemic toxicity in a rabbit model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B appl. Biomater.90, 767–777 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Schexneider KI. Fibrin sealants in surgical or traumatic hemorrhage. Curr. Opin. Hematol.11(5), 323–326 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson K. Controlling bleeding in the field: hemostatic powders and dressings debut in the prehospital setting. J. Emerg. Nurs.30, 160–161 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Yang LF. Literature review: hemostatic materials for hemorrhage control. DRDC Toronto Technical Report CR 2005–133 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Seyednejad H, Imani M, Jamieson T, Seifalian AM. Topical haemostatic agents. Br. J. Surg.95, 1197–1225 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira J, Phan T. Management of bleeding in patients with advanced cancer. Oncologist9(5), 561–570 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson MR, Alving BM. Fibrin sealant in preclinical and clinical studies. Curr. Opin. Hematol.6(6), 415–419 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz O, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Haemostatic sealants in nephron-sparing surgery: what surgeons need to know. BJU Int.102(11), 1502–1508 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart R, Myers J, Dent D et al. Seven hundred fifty-three consecutive deaths in a level I trauma center: the argument for injury prevention. J. Trauma54, 66–71 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion H, Bellamy R, Roberts C, Leppaniemi A. A profile of combat injury. J. Trauma54, S13–S19 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waner M. Novel hemostatic alternatives in reconstructive surgery. Semin. Hematol.41(Suppl. 1), 163–167 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Carless PA, Anthony DM, Henry DA. Systematic review of the use of fibrin sealant to minimize perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Br. J. Surg.89(6), 695–703 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankad PS, Codispoti M. The role of fibrin sealants in hemostasis. Am. J. Surg.182(2 Suppl), 21S–28S (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morikawa T. Tissue sealing. Am. J. Surg.182(2 Suppl. 1), 29S–35S (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shekarriz B, Stoller ML. The use of fibrin sealant in urology. J. Urol.167(3), 1218–1225 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Kjaergard HK, Fairbrother JE. Controlled clinical studies of fibrin sealant in cardiothoracic surgery – a review. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.10(9), 727–733 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavakli K. Fibrin glue and clinical impact on haemophilia care. Haemophilia5(6), 392–396 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tock B, Drohan W, Hess J, Pusateri A, Holcomb J, MacPhee M. Haemophilia and advanced fibrin sealant technologies. Haemophilia4(4), 449–455 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Martinowitz U, Schulman S, Horoszowski H, Heim M. Role of fibrin sealants in surgical procedures on patients with hemostatic disorders. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (328), 65–75 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Hanks JB, Kjaergard HK, Hollingsbee DA. A comparison of the haemostatic effect of Vivostat® patient-derived fibrin sealant with oxidised cellulose (Surgicel®) in multiple surgical procedures. Eur. Surg. Res.35(5), 439–444 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen MR, Solgaard S, Kjersgaard AG et al. A pilot study of the effects of vivostat patient-derived fibrin sealant in reducing blood loss in primary hip arthroplasty. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost.12(3), 352–357 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Malmquist JP, Clemens SC, Oien HJ, Wilson SL. Hemostasis of oral surgery wounds with the hemcon dental dressing. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.66, 1177–1183 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dailey RA, Chavez MR, Choi D. Use of a chitosan-based hemostatic dressing in dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.25(5), 350–353 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Millner RWJ, Lockhart AS, Bird H, Alexiou C. A new hemostatic agent: initial life-saving experience with Celox (chitosan) in cardiothoracic surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg.87, e13–e14 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garasic JM, Marin L, Anderson RD. Acute evaluation of the mynx® vascular closure device during arterial re-puncture in an ovine model. J. Invas. Cardiol.21(6), 283–285 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Scheinert D, Sievert H, Turco MA et al. The safety and efficacy of an extravascular, water-soluble sealant for vascular closure: initial clinical results for mynx. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv.70(5), 627–633 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Butler FK Jr, Holcomb JB, Giebner SD, McSwain NE, Bagian J. Tactical combat casualty care 2007: evolving concepts and battlefield experience. Mil. Med.172(11 Suppl.), 1–19 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabry RL, Holcomb JB, Baker AM et al. United States army rangers in somalia: an analysis of combat casualties on an urban battlefield. J. Trauma49(3), 515–529 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb JB, Stansbury LG, Champion HR, Wade C, Bellamy RF. Understanding combat casualty care statistics. J. Trauma60(2), 397–401 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blood CG, Puyana JC, Pitlyk PJ et al. An assessment of the potential for reducing future combat deaths through medical technologies and training. J. Trauma53(6), 1160–1165 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Connolly RJ. Application of the poly-N-acetyl glucosamine-derived rapid deployment hemostat trauma dressing in severe/lethal swine hemorrhage trauma models. J. Trauma57(1 Suppl.), S26–S28 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acheson EM, Kheirabadi BS, Deguzman R, Dick EJ Jr, Holcomb JB. Comparison of hemorrhage control agents applied to lethal extremity arterial hemorrhages in swine. J. Trauma59(4), 865–874 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Englehart MS, Cho SD, Tieu BH et al. A novel highly porous silica and chitosan-based hemostatic dressing is superior to HemCon and gauze sponges. J. Trauma65, 884–892 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Sambasivan CN, Cho SD, Zink KA, Differding JA, Schreiber MA. A highly porous silica and chitosan-based hemostatic dressing is superior in controlling hemorrhage in a severe groin injury model in swine. Am. J. Surg.197, 576–580 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pursifull NF, Morris MS, Harris RA, Morey AF. Damage control management of experimental grade 5 renal injuries: further evaluation of FloSeal gelatin matrix. J. Trauma60, 346–350 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leixnering M, Reichetseder Jr, Schultz A et al. Gelatin thrombin granules for hemostasis in a severe traumatic liver and spleen rupture model in swine. J. Trauma64, 456–461 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Klemcke HG. Evaluation of FloSeal as a potential intracavitary hemostatic agent. J. Trauma60, 385–389 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar HL, McCann J, Fitzgerald CA, Thompson J, Bao Y, Cabral HJ. Novel adhesive skin closures improve wound healing following saphenous vein harvesting. J. Card. Surg.23(2), 152–155 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preul MC, Bichard WD, Muench TR et al. Toward optimal tissue sealants for neurosurgery: use of a novel hydrogel sealant in a canine durotomy repair model. Neurosurgery53(5), 1189–1199 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Than KD, Baird CJ, Olivi A. Polyethylene glycol hydrogel dural sealant may reduce incisional cerebrospinal fluid leak after posterior fossa surgery. Neurosurgery63(1 Suppl.), ONS182–ONS186 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes JMG, Herretes S, Pirouzmanesh A et al. A modified chondroitin sulfate aldehyde adhesive for sealing corneal incisions. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.46(4), 1247–1250 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer M, Cintron J, Nelson R et al. Treatment of fistulas-in-ano with fibrin sealant in combination with intra-adhesive antibiotics and/or surgical closure of the internal fistula opening. Dis. Colon Rectum48(4), 799–808 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Baar S, Schörner C, Röllinghoff M, Radespiel-Tröger M, Hümmer HP, Carbon RT. Collagen patches impregnated with antimicrobial agents have high local antimicrobial efficacy and achieve effective tissue gluing. Infection29(1), 27–31 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Parker SJ, Brown D, Hill PF, Watkins PE. Fibrinogen-impregnated collagen as a combined haemostatic agent and antibiotic delivery system in a porcine model of splenic trauma. Eur. J. Surg.165(6), 609–614 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Stumpf M, Junge K, Rosch R, Krones C, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Suture-free small bowel anastomoses using collagen fleece covered with fibrin glue in pigs. J. Invest. Surg.22(2), 138–147 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss C, Hahn N, Wenisch S et al. The tissue response to an alkylene bis(dilactoyl)-methacrylate bone adhesive. Biomaterials26(12), 1389–1396 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossterlinden L, Janssen A, Schmitz N et al. Deleterious tissue reaction to an alkylene bis(dilactoyl)-methacrylate bone adhesive in long-term follow up after screw augmentation in an ovine model. Biomaterials27(18), 3379–3386 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver FH, Wang MC, Pins GD. Preparation and use of fibrin glue in surgery. Biomaterials16(12), 891–903 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishoff JT, Cornum RL, Perahia B et al. Laparoscopic heminephrectomy using a new fibrin sealant powder. Urology62(6), 1139–1143 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torchiana DF. Polyethylene glycol based synthetic sealants: potential uses in cardiac surgery. J. Card. Surg.18(6), 504–506 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Kilbourne M, Keledjian K, Hess JR, Scalea T, Bochicchio GV. Hemostatic efficacy of modified amylopectin powder in a lethal porcine model of extremity arterial injury. Ann. Emerg. Med.53(6), 804–810 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Arnaud F, Teranishi K, Tomori T, Carr W, McCarron R. Comparison of 10 hemostatic dressings in a groin puncture model in swine. J. Vasc. Surg.50(3), 632–639 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusateri AE, Holcomb JB, Kheirabadi BS, Alam HB, Wade CE, Ryan KL. Making sense of the preclinical literature on advanced hemostatic products. J. Trauma60, 674–682 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basu S, Marini CP, Bauman FG et al. Comparative study of biological glues: cryoprecipitate glue, two-component fibrin sealant, and ‘french’ glue. Ann. Thorac. Surg.60(5), 1255–1262 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey AF, Anema JG, Harris R et al. Treatment of grade 4 renal stab wounds with absorbable fibrin adhesive bandage in a porcine model. J. Urol.165(3), 955–958 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JF, Ritenour AE, McLaughlin DF et al. Injury severity and causes of death from operation Iraqi freedom and operation enduring freedom: 2003–2004 versus 2006. J. Trauma64(Suppl.), S21–27 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomizawa Y. Clinical benefits and risk analysis of topical hemostats: a review. J. Artif. Organs8(3), 137–142 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiffman JD, Schauer CL. A review: electrospinning of biopolymer nanofibers and their applications. Polymer Reviews48(2), 317–352 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim KP, Tan LP. Interaction force measurements for the design of tissue adhesives. Acta Biomater.5(1), 84–92 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perrin BRM, Dupeux M, Tozzi P, Delay D, Gersbach P, von Segesser LK. Surgical glues: are they really adhesive? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.36(6), 967–972 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• LeMaire SA. Invited commentary. Ann. Thorac. Surg.87(4), 1160 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Weaver FA, Hood DB, Zatina M, Messina L, Badduke B. Gelatin-thrombin-based hemostatic sealant for intraoperative bleeding in vascular surgery. Ann. Vasc. Surg.16(3), 286–293 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata M, Shiono M, Sezai A, Iida M, Negishi N, Sezai Y. Type A acute aortic dissection: immediate and mid-term results of emergency aortic replacement with the aid of gelatin resorcin formalin glue. Ann. Thorac. Surg.78(3), 853–857 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Fukunaga S, Karck M, Harringer W, Cremer J, Rhein C, Haverich A. The use of gelatin-resorcin-formalin glue in acute aortic dissection type A. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.15(5), 564–570 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama K, Doi O, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H. Pneumostatic effect of gelatin-resorcinol formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde glue on thermal injury of the lung: an experimental study on rats. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.11(2), 333–337 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung HW, Huang DM, Chang WH, Huang RN, Hsu JC. Evaluation of gelatin hydrogel crosslinked with various crosslinking agents as bioadhesives: in vitro study. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.46(4), 520–530 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung HW, Huang DM, Chang WH, Huang LLH, Tsai CC, Liang IL. Gelatin-derived bioadhesives for closing skin wounds: an in vivo study. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.10(7), 751–771 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raanani E, Latter DA, Errett LE, Bonneau DB, Leclerc Y, Salasidis GC. Use of “Bioglue” in aortic surgical repair. Ann. Thorac. Surg.72(2), 638–640 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurgen P, Robert T, Morgan W, Mark OB. Bioglue: a review of the use of this new surgical adhesive in thoracic surgery. Aust. N. Z. J. Surg.75(5), 315–318 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• LeMaire SA, Carter SA, Won T, Wang X, Conklin LD, Coselli JS. The threat of adhesive embolization: bioglue leaks through needle holes in aortic tissue and prosthetic grafts. Ann. Thorac. Surg.80(1), 106–111 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidle DM, Loos BM, Ramirez AL, Kabaker SS, Maas CS. Use of bioglue surgical adhesive for brow fixation in endoscopic browplasty. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg.7(6), 393–397 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Xie H, Wolf RF, Burke AP, Gustafson SB, Gregory KW, Prahl SA. Concentrated albumin as a biological glue for hemorrhage control on hepatic resection with argon beam coagulation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.71(1), 84–89 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Wadia Y, Xie H, Kajitani M. Liver repair and hemorrhage control by using laser soldering of liquid albumin in a porcine model. Lasers Surg. Med.27(4), 319–328 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt TP, Baker DA, Kirkpatrick SJ, Prahl SA. Mechanical properties of coagulated albumin and failure mechanisms of liver repaired with the use of an argon-beam coagulator with albumin. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.63(6), 722–728 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Lauto A, Foster LJR, Ferris L, Avolio A, Zwaneveld N, Poole-Warren LA. Albumin-genipin solder for laser tissue repair. Lasers Surg. Med.35(2), 140–145 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klokkevold PR, Fukayama H, Sung EC, Bertolami CN. The effect of chitosan (poly-N-acetyl glucosamine) on lingual hemostasis in heparinized rabbits. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.57(1), 49–52 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauto A, Foster LJ, Avolio A et al. Sutureless nerve repair with laser-activated chitosan adhesive: a pilot in vivo study. Photomed. Laser Surg.26(3), 227–234 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauto A, Stoodley M, Marcel H et al.In vitro and in vivo tissue repair with laser-activated chitosan adhesive. Lasers Surg. Med.39(1), 19–27 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihara M, Nakanishi K, Ono K et al. Photocrosslinkable chitosan as a dressing for wound occlusion and accelerator in healing process. Biomaterials23(3), 833–840 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia P, Mines MJ, Bower KS et al. Robotic laser tissue welding of sclera using chitosan films. Lasers Surg. Med.41(1), 60–67 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Singer AJ, Thode HC. A review of the literature on octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Am. J. Surg.187(2), 238–248 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson DJ, Chenery DH, Bowring HK et al. Physical and biological properties of a novel siloxane adhesive for soft tissue applications. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.16(4), 449–472 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill A, Estridge TD, Maroney M et al. Treatment of suture line bleeding with a novel synthetic surgical sealant in a canine iliac PTFE graft model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.58(3), 308–312 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg RC, Safi HJ, Sabik J, Conte J, Block JE. Improved intraoperative management of anastomotic bleeding during aortic reconstruction: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am. Surg.70(4), 307–311 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Glickman M, Gheissari A, Money S, Martin J, Ballard JL. A polymeric sealant inhibits anastomotic suture hole bleeding more rapidly than gelfoam/thrombin: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Surg.137(3), 326–332 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Buskens E, Meijboom MJ, Kooijman H, Van Hout BA. The use of a surgical sealant (CoSeal) in cardiac and vascular reconstructive surgery: an economic analysis. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino).47(2), 161–170 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY. A sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier facilitates closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy: a randomized trial. Dis. Colon Rectum51(6), 956–960 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Sueda J, Fukuchi T, Usumoto N, Okuno T, Arai M, Hirose T. Intraocular use of hydrogel tissue adhesive in rabbit eyes. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol.51(2), 89–95 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Lin KL, Yang DY, Chu IM et al. DuraSeal as a ligature in the anastomosis of rat sciatic nerve gap injury. J. Surg. Res.161(1), 101–110 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Bennett SL, Melanson DA, Torchiana DF, Wiseman DM, Sawhney AS. Next-generation hydrogel films as tissue sealants and adhesion barriers. J. Card. Surg.18(6), 494–499 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nivasu VM, Reddy TT, Tammishetti S. In situ polymerizable polyethyleneglycol containing polyesterpolyol acrylates for tissue sealant applications. Biomaterials25(16), 3283–3291 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alleyne CH Jr, Cawley CM, Barrow DL et al. Efficacy and biocompatibility of a photopolymerized, synthetic, absorbable hydrogel as a dural sealant in a canine craniotomy model. J. Neurosurg.88(2), 308–313 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawhney AS, Pathak CP, Hubbell JA. Bioerodible hydrogels based on photopolymerized poly(ethylene glycol)-co-poly(α-hydroxy acid) diacrylate macromers. Macromolecules26(4), 581–587 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Takamoto S, Ohtsuka T, Kotsuka Y, Kawauchi M. Application of Advaseal for acute aortic dissection: experimental study. Ann. Thorac. Surg.68(4), 1308–1312 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phaneuf MD, Dempsey DJ, Bide MJ, Quist WC, LoGerfo FW. Coating of Dacron vascular grafts with an ionic polyurethane: a novel sealant with protein binding properties. Biomaterials22(5), 463–469 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh N, Mirzadeh H, Katbab AA, Salehian P, Daliri M, Amanpour S. Isocyanate-terminated urethane prepolymer as bioadhesive material: evaluation of bioadhesion and biocompatibility, in vitro and in vivo assays. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.12(7), 707–719 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petratos PB, Ito K, Felsen D, Poppas D. Cross-linked matrix tissue sealant protects against mortality and hemorrhage in an acute renal injury model in heparinized rats. J. Urol.167(5), 2222–2224 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Pingsmann A, Blatt R, Breusch S et al. Efficacy and safety of a novel moldable, resorbable, and degradable sealant of bone surfaces for hemostasis after bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest. Spine30(17), 1911–1917 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Cohn D, Lando G. Tailoring lactide/caprolactone co-oligomers as tissue adhesives. Biomaterials25(27), 5875–5884 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ghavamzadeh R, Haddadi-Asl V, Mirzadeh H. Bioadhesion and biocompatibility evaluations of gelatin and polyacrylic acid as a crosslinked hydrogel in vitro. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.15(8), 1019–1031 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama Y, Matsuda T. Photocurable surgical tissue adhesive glues composed of photoreactive gelatin and poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.48(4), 511–521 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally KM, Sorg BS, Hammer DX, Heintzelman DL, Hodges DE, Welch AJ. Improved vascular tissue fusion using new light-activated surgical adhesive on a canine model. JBO6(1), 68–73 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Baumann A, Caversaccio M. Hemostasis in endoscopic sinus surgery using a specific gelatin-thrombin based agent (FloSeal™). Rhinology41(4), 244–249 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Mathiasen RA, Cruz RM. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a novel matrix hemostatic sealant in patients with acute anterior epistaxis. Laryngoscope115(5), 899–902 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann B, Volkmer E, Kokott A et al. Characterisation of a new bioadhesive system based on polysaccharides with the potential to be used as bone glue. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.20(10), 2001–2009 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strehin I, Ambrose WM, Schein O, Salahuddin A, Elisseeff J. Synthesis and characterization of a chondroitin sulfate-polyethylene glycol corneal adhesive. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.35(3), 567–576 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araki M, Tao H, Nakajima N et al. Development of new biodegradable hydrogel glue for preventing alveolar air leakage. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.134(5), 1241–1248 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takaoka M, Nakamura T, Sugai H et al. Sutureless amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction with a chemically defined bioadhesive. Biomaterials29(19), 2923–2931 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takaoka M, Nakamura T, Sugai H et al. Novel sutureless keratoplasty with a chemically defined bioadhesive. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.50(6), 2679–2685 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artzi N, Shazly T, Crespo C, Ramos AB, Chenault HK, Edelman ER. Characterization of star adhesive sealants based on PEG/dextran hydrogels. Macromol. Biosci.9(8), 754–765 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wathier M, Johnson MS, Carnahan MA et al.In situ polymerized hydrogels for repairing scleral incisions used in pars plana vitrectomy procedures. ChemMedChem1, 821–825 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Wathier M, Johnson CS, Kim T, Grinstaff MW. Hydrogels formed by multiple peptide ligation reactions to fasten corneal transplants. Bioconjug. Chem.17(4), 873–876 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami Y, Yokoyama M, Okano T et al. A novel synthetic tissue-adhesive hydrogel using a crosslinkable polymeric micelle. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A.80, 421–427 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Murakami Y, Yokoyama M, Nishida H, Tomizawa Y, Kurosawa H. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of gelation and hemostatic properties of a novel tissue-adhesive hydrogel containing a cross-linkable polymeric micelle. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.91, 102–108 (2009).
   Google Scholar