Military applications of novel hemostatic devices

References

• Perkins JG, Cap AP, Weiss BM et al. Massive transfusion and nonsurgical hemostatic agents. Crit. Care Med.36, S325–S339 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy RF. The cause of death in conventional land warfare: implications for combat casualty research. Mil. Med.149, 59–62 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Dorlac WC, DeBakey ME, Holcomb JB et al. Mortality from isolated civilian penetrating extremity injury. J. Trauma59, 217–222 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoyt DB, Bulger E, Knudson MM et al. Death in the operating room: an analysis of a multi-center experience. J. Trauma37, 426–432 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Champion HR, Bellamy RF, Roberts CP et al. A profile of combat injury. J. Trauma54(Suppl. 5), S13–S19 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Committee on Fluid Resuscitation for Combat Casualties. Fluid Resuscitation: State of the Science for Treating Combat Casualties and Civilian Injuries. Report of the Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 9–18 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Trunkey DD, Slater M. Management of battle casualties. In: Trauma (Fourth Edition). Mattox DV, Feliciano EE, Moore KL (Eds). McGraw-Hill, NY, USA, 1211–1228 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly JF, Ritenour AE, McLaughlin DF et al. Injury severity and causes of death from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom: 2003–4 versus 2006. J. Trauma64, S21–S26 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb J, Caruso J, Wade CE et al. Causes of death in US Special Operations Forces in the global war on terrorism: 2001–2004. US Army Med. Dep. J.24–37 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Wedmore I, McManus JG, Pusateri AE, Holcomb JB. A special report on the chitosan-based hemostatic dressing: experience in current combat operations. J. Trauma60, 655–658 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox ED, Schreiber MA, McManus J et al. New hemostatic agents in the combat setting. Transfusion49, 244–255 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja N, Ostomel TA, Rhee P et al. Testing of modified zeolite hemostatic dressing in a large animal model of lethal groin injury. J. Trauma61, 1312–1320 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Pusateri AE, Holcomb JB, Kheirabadi BS et al. Making sense of the preclinical literature on advanced hemostatic products. J. Trauma60, 674–682 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trunkey D, Holcomb J. Lessons relearned. Arch. Surg.143, 112–114 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rhee P, Brown C, Martin M et al. QuikClot use in trauma for hemorrhage control: case series of 103 documented uses. J. Trauma64, 1093–1099 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee P, Holcomb J, Jenkins J. Modern combat casualty care. In: Trauma (Fourth Edition). Mattox DV, Feliciano EE, Moore KL (Eds). McGraw-Hill, NY, USA, 1105–1137 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Cordts PR, Brosch LA, Holcomb JB. Now and then: combat casualty care policies for operation Iraqi freedom and operation enduring freedom compared with those of Vietnam. J. Trauma64, S14–S20 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Pusateri AE, McCarthey SJ, Gregory KW et al. Effect of a chitosan-based hemostatic dressing on blood loss and survival in a model of severe venous hemorrhage and hepatic injury in swine. J. Trauma54, 177–182 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klokkevold PR, Lew DS, Ellis DG et al. Effect of chitosan on lingual hemostasis in rabbits. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.49, 858–863 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rao SB, Sharma CP. Use of chitosan as a biomaterial: studies on its safety and hemostatic potential. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.34, 21–28 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatte HS, Zagarins SE, Amiji M, Khuri SF. Poly-N-acetylglucosamine-mediated red blood cell interactions. J. Trauma57, S7–S12 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Chou TC, Fu E, Wu CJ et al. Chitosan enhances platelet adhesion and aggregation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.302, 480–483 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan MW, Schwaitzberg SD, Demcheva M et al. Comparison of poly-N-acetyl glucosamine with absorbable collagen and fibrin sealant for achieving hemostasis in a swine model of splenic hemorrhage. J. Trauma48, 454–458 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Cole, DJ Connolly RJ, Chan MW et al. A pilot study evaluating the efficacy of a fully acetylated poly-N-acetyl glucosamine membrane formulation of a topical hemostatic agent. Surgery48, 510–517 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Kheirabadi BS, Acheson EM, Deguzman R et al. Hemostatic efficacy of two advanced dressings in aortic hemorrhage model in swine. J. Trauma59, 25–34 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Acheson EM, Kheirabadi BS, Deguzman R et al. Comparison of hemorrhage control agents applied to lethal extremity arterial hemorrhages in swine. J. Trauma59, 865–875 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gustafson SB, Fulkerson P, Bildfell R et al. Chitosan dressing in swine arterial hemorrhage mode. Prehosp. Emerg. Care11, 172–178 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Daya MR, Worley JA. Experience with chitosan dressing in a civilian EMS system. J. Emerg. Med.37, 1–7 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmquist JP, Clemens SC, Oien HJ et al. Hemostasis of oral surgery wounds with HemCon Dental dressing. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.66(6), 1177–1183 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam HB, Chen Z, Jaskille A et al. Application of a zeolite hemostatic agent achieves 100% survival in a lethal model of complex groin injury in swine. J. Trauma56, 974–983 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kozen BG, Kircher SJ, Henao J et al. An alternative hemostatic dressing: comparisson of Celox, HemCon, and QuikClot. Acad. Emerg. Med.15, 74–81 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaud F, Parreno-Sadalan D, Tomori T et al. Comparison of 10 hemostatic dressings in a groin transection model in swine. J. Trauma67, 848–855 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devlin JJ, Kircher S, Kozen BG et al. Comparison of ChitoFlex, Celox and QuikClot in control of hemorrhage. J. Emer. Med.1 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kheirabadi BS, Edens JW, Terrazas IB et al. Comparison of new hemostatic granules/powders with currently deployed hemostatic products in a lethal model of extremity arterial hemorrhage in swine. J. Trauma66, 316–328 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kheirabadi BS, Sherer MA, Estep JS et al. Determination of efficacy of new hemostatic dressings in a model of extremity arterial hemorrhage in swine. J. Trauma67, 450–460 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alam HB, Burris D, Dacorta JA et al. Hemorrhage control in the battlefield: role of new hemostatic agents. Military Med.70, 63–69 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Araunad F, Tomori T, Saito R et al. Comparative efficacy of granular and bagged formulations of the hemostatic agent QuikClot. J. Trauma63, 775–782 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Arnaud F, Tomori T, Carr W et al. Exothermic reaction in zeolite hemostatic dressings: QuikClot ACS and ACS+. Ann. Biomed. Eng.36(10), 1708–1713 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carraway JW, Kenta D, Young, K et al. Comparison of a new mineral based hemostatic agent to a commercially available granular zeolite agent for hemostasis in a swine model of lethal extremity arterial hemorrhage. Resuscitation78(2), 230–235 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Yan W, Jing L et al. Addition of an alginate to a modified zeolite improves hemostatic performance in a swine model of lethal groin injury. J. Trauma66, 612–620 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Wright FL, Hua HT, Velmahos G et al. Intracorporeal use of the hemostatic agent QC in a coagulopathic patient with combined thoracoabdominal trauma. J. Trauma56, 205–208 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shanmugam V, Robinson MH. Case report of uncontrollable pelvic bleeding – managed by previously unreported method (QuikClot). Colorectal Dis.11(2), 221–222 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Margulis V, Matsumoto ED, Svatek R, Kabbani W, Cadeddu JA, Lotan Y. Application of novel hemostatic agent during laparoscopic partialnephrectomy. J. Urol.174(2), 761–764 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Plurad D, Chandrasoma S, Best C et al. A complication of intracorporeal use of QuikClot for pelvic hemorrhage. J. Trauma66, 1482–1484 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Sondeen JL, Pusateri AE, Coppes VG et al. Comparison of 10 different hemostatic dressings in an aortic injury. J. Trauma54, 280–285 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delgado AV, Kheirabadi BS, Fruchterman TM et al. A novel biologic hemostatic dressing (fibrin patch) reduces blood loss and resuscitation volume and improves survival in hypothermic coagulopathic swine with grade v liver injury. J. Trauma64, 75–80 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb JB, Pusateri AE, Harris RA et al. Dry fibrin sealant dressings reduce blood loss, resuscitation volume and improve survival in hypothermic, coagulopathic swine with grade V liver injuries. J. Trauma47, 233–242 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kheirabadi BS, Acheson EM, Deguzman R et al. The potential utility of fibrin sealant dressing in repair of vascular injury in swine. J. Trauma62, 94–103 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ward KR, Tiba MH, Holbert WH et al. Comparison of a new hemostatic agent to current combat hemostatic agents in a swine model of lethal extremity arterial hemorrhage. J. Trauma63, 276–284 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kheirabadi BS, Mace JE, Terazzas IB et al. Safety evaluation of new hemostatic agents, smectite granules, and kaolin-coated gauze in a vascular injury wound model in swine. J. Trauma68(2), 269–278 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar