Myoelectric training systems

References

• Ziegler-Graham K, Mackenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.89(3), 422–429 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker P, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.16(6), 541–548 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudgins B, Parker P, Scott RN. A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.40(1), 82–94 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englehart K, Hudgins B. A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.50(7), 848–854 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oskoei MA, Hu H. Support vector machine-based classification scheme for myoelectric control applied to upper limb. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.55(8), 1956–1965 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childress DS. Powered limb prostheses: their clinical significance. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.20(3), 200–207 (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Hermansson LM. Structured training of children fitted with myoelectric prostheses. Prosthet. Orthot. Int.15(2), 88–92 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakpa R, Heger H. Prosthetic management and training of adult upper limb amputees. Curr. Orthop.11(3), 193–202 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Sorbye R. Myoelectric prosthetic fitting in young children. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.148, 34–40 (1980).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hubbard S, Galway HR, Milner M. Myoelectric training methods for the preschool child with congenital below-elbow amputation. A comparison of two training programmes. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.67(2), 273–277 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egermann M, Kasten P, Thomsen M. Myoelectric hand prostheses in very young children. Int. Orthop.33(4), 1101–1105 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeschlein RA, Domholdt E. Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use. Prosthet. Orthot. Int.13(1), 14–18 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silcox DH III, Rooks MD, Vogel RR, Fleming LL. Myoelectric prostheses. A long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.75(12), 1781–1789 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont A-C, Morin EL. Myoelectric control evaluation and trainer system. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng.2(2), 100–107 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• De La Rosa R, De La Rosa S, Alonso A, Del Val L. Myo-Pong: a neuromuscular game for the UVa-neuromuscular training system platform. Proceedings of: The International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR 2008). Vancouver, BC, Canada, 25–27 August 2008, 61 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• De La Rosa R, De La Rosa S, Alonso A, Del Val L. The UVa-neuromuscular training system platform. Proceedings of: The 10th International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (IWANN 2009). Salamanca, Spain, 10–12 June 2009, 5518 LNCS (Monograph), p863–869.
   Google Scholar
• Trask S, Schreiner S, Correlation of the function of a training system and a myoelectric prosthesis. Proceedings of: The IEEE 31st Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, 2–3 April 2005, p87–88.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Jumaily A, Olivares RA. Electromyogram (EMG) driven system based virtual reality for prosthetic and rehabilitation devices. Proceedings of: The 11th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 14–16 December 2009, p582–586.
   Google Scholar
• Sebelius F, Eriksson L, Danielsen N, Balkenius C, Laurell T. Myoelectric control of a computer animated hand: a new concept based on the combined use of a tree-structured artificial neural network and a data glove. J. Med. Eng. Technol.30(1), 2–10 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith RJ, Huberdeau D, Tenore F, Thakor NV. Real-time myoelectric decoding of individual finger movements for a virtual target task. Proceedings of: The 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2–6 September 2009, p2376–2379.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso A, Hornero SR, Espino HP, De la Rosa SR, Liptak L. Myolectric prostheses trainer for hand and arm amputees. Mapfre Medicina13(1), 11–19 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Lovely DF, Hruczkowski TW, Scott RN. A microprocessor based trainer for both single-site and two-site myoelectric prostheses. J. Microcomputer Applications11(1), 31–45 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Lovely DF, Stocker D, Scott RN. A computer-aided myoelectric training system for young upper limb amputees. J. Microcomputer Applications13(3), 245–259 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda O, Tsuji T, Otsuka A, Kaneko M. Human supporting manipulator using neural network and its clinical application for forearm amputation. Proceedings of: International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Electronic Systems. Adelaide, Australia, 31 August–1 September 1999, p129–134.
   Google Scholar
• Soares A, Andrade A, Lamounier E, Carrijo R. The development of a virtual myoelectric prosthesis controlled by an EMG pattern recognition system based on neural networks. J. Intelligent Information Systems21(2), 127–141 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamounier JE, Lopes K, Cardoso A, Andrade A, Soares A. On the use of virtual and augmented reality for upper limb prostheses training and simulation. Proceedings of: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 31 August–4 September 2010, p2451–2454.
   Google Scholar
• Pons JL, Ceres R, Rocon E et al. Virtual reality training and EMG control of the MANUS hand prosthesis. Robotica23(3), 311–317 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hauschild M, Davoodi R, Loeb GE. A virtual reality environment for designing and fitting neural prosthetic limbs. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.15(1), 9–15 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi T, Wada T, Mukobaru M, Doi S. A training system for myoelectric prosthetic hand in virtual environment. Proceedings of: 2007 IEEE/ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering. Beijing, China, 23–27 May 2007, p1351–1356.
   Google Scholar
• Armiger RS, Vogelstein RJ. Air-Guitar Hero: a real-time video game interface for training and evaluation of dexterous upper-extremity neuroprosthetic control algorithms. Proceedings of: 2008 IEEE-BIOCAS Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference. Baltimore, MD, USA, 20–22 November 2008, p121–124.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim H, Armiger RS, Vogelstein RJ. WiiEMG: a real-time environment for control of the Wii with surface electromyography. Proceedings of: 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems: Nano-Bio Circuit Fabrics and Systems. Paris, France, 30 May–2 June 2010, p957–960.
   Google Scholar
• Li G, Schultz AE, Kuiken TA. Quantifying pattern recognition-based myoelectric control of multifunctional transradial prostheses. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.18(2), 185–192 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Gaggioli A, Amoresano A, Gruppioni E, Verni G, Riva G. A myoelectric-controlled virtual hand for the assessment and treatment of phantom limb pain in trans-radial upper extremity amputees: a research protocol. Stud. Health Technol. Inform.154, 220–222 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuiken TA. Consideration of nerve-muscle grafts to improve the control of artificial arms. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.15(2), 105–111 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bouwsema H. Learning to control opening and closing a myoelectric hands. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.91(9), 1442–1446 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker PA, Englehart KB, Hudgins BS. Control of powered upper limb prostheses. In: Electromyography – Physiology, Engineering, and Noninvasive Applications. John Wiley & Sons, NJ, USA, Chapter 18, 453–475 (2004).
   Google Scholar