Determining patient prognosis using computed tomography coronary angiography

References

• Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without nnown coronary artery disease: Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.52(21), 1724–1732 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.56(22), 1864–1894 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawber TR, Moore FE, Mann GV. Coronary heart disease in the Framingham study. Am. J. Public Health Nations Health47(4 Pt 2), 4–24 (1957).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation106(25), 3143–3421 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KM, Dowe DA, Brink JA. Traditional clinical risk assessment tools do not accurately predict coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden: a CT angiography study. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.192(1), 235–243 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir K, Michos ED, Blumenthal RS, Raggi P. Detection of high-risk young adults and women by coronary calcium and National Cholesterol Education Program Panel III guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(10), 1931–1936 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Michos ED, Vasamreddy CR, Becker DM et al. Women with a low Framingham risk score and a family history of premature coronary heart disease have a high prevalence of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Am. Heart J.150(6), 1276–1281 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michos ED, Nasir K, Braunstein JB et al. Framingham risk equation underestimates subclinical atherosclerosis risk in asymptomatic women. Atherosclerosis184(1), 201–206 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzoulaki I, Liberopoulos G, Ioannidis JP. Assessment of claims of improved prediction beyond the Framingham risk score. JAMA302(21), 2345–2352 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melander O, Newton-Cheh C, Almgren P et al. Novel and conventional biomarkers for prediction of incident cardiovascular events in the community. JAMA302(1), 49–57 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlSehri H, Small GR, Chow BJW. Cardiac CT, MRI, SPECT Echo and PET: what test when? Appl. Radiol.40(5), 13–22 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Passamani E, Davis KB, Gillespie MJ, Killip T. A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival of patients with a low ejection fraction. N. Engl. J. Med.312(26), 1665–1671 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnauskas E. Twelve-year follow-up of survival in the randomized European Coronary Surgery Study. N. Engl. J. Med.319(6), 332–337 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers WO, Schaff HV, Gersh BJ et al. Improved survival of surgically treated patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease and severe angina pectoris. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.97(4), 487–495 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf S, Zucker D, Passamani E et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet344(8922), 563–570 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Califf RM, Phillips HR 3rd, Hindman MC et al. Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.5(5), 1055–1063 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark DB, Nelson CL, Califf RM et al. Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty. Circulation89(5), 2015–2025 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP, Mitchell JD, Villines TC. Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.57(10), 1237–1247 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom MP, Gopal A, Ahmadi N et al. Mortality incidence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.52(16), 1335–1343 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.53(7), 623–632 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emond M, Mock MB, Davis KB et al. Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation90(6), 2645–2657 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genest J, McPherson R, Frohlich J et al. 2009 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult – 2009 recommendations. Can. J. Cardiol.25(10), 567–579 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Roth M, Newstein D, Guerci AD. Treatment of asymptomatic adults with elevated coronary calcium scores with atorvastatin, vitamin C, and vitamin E: the St. Francis Heart Study randomized clinical trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(1), 166–172 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation107(23), 2900–2907 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.49(1), 62–70 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan TP, Nair D, Schoenhagen P et al. Prognostic utility of 64-slice computed tomography in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J.30(3), 362–371 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chow BJW, Wells GA, Chen L et al. Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography: severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis and left ventricular ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.55(10), 1017–1028 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB et al. Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50(12), 1161–1170 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Dunning A, Achenbach S et al. Abstract 14571: prognostic value of 64-detector row coronary CT angiography for the prediction of all-cause mortality: results from 21,062 patients in the prospective multinational CONFIRM registry (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation For Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry). Circulation122, A14571 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Giroud D, Li JM, Urban P, Meier B, Rutishauer W. Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at prior angiography. Am. J. Cardiol.69(8), 729–732 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann JM, Davies MJ. Vulnerable plaque. Relation of characteristics to degree of stenosis in human coronary arteries. Circulation94(5), 928–931 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Feignoux J, Treutenaere J, Laperche T, Sablayrolles J. The prognostic value of multidetector coronary CT angiography for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events: a multicenter observational cohort study. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging26(6), 721–728 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.54(1), 49–57 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47(8), 1655–1662 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock MB, Ringqvist I, Fisher LD et al. Survival of medically treated patients in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry. Circulation66(3), 562–568 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orakzai SH, Orakzai RH, Nasir K, Budoff MJ. Assessment of cardiac function using multidetector row computed tomography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.30(4), 555–563 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf FR, van Werkhoven JM, van Velzen JE et al. Incremental prognostic value of left ventricular function analysis over non-invasive coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography. J. Nucl. Cardiol.17(6), 1034–1040 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L et al. Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode. Heart96(12), 933–938 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST et al. Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.49(18), 1860–1870 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Shibane JS. Cardiac CT Imaging. Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Diseases (2nd Edition). Springer, NY, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Blaha M, Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ et al. Absence of coronary artery calcification and all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging2(6), 692–700 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abidov A, Gallagher MJ, Chinnaiyan KM et al. Clinical effectiveness of coronary computed tomographic angiography in the triage of patients to cardiac catheterization and revascularization after inconclusive stress testing: results of a 2-year prospective trial. J. Nucl. Cardiol.16(5), 701–713 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Hadamitzky M, Distler R, Meyer T et al. Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography in comparison with calcium scoring and clinical risk scores. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging4(1), 16–23 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Nasir K, Ahmadi N et al. Cardiac computed tomographic angiography in an outpatient setting: an analysis of clinical outcomes over a 40-month period. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.3(2), 90–95 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O et al. Incremental prognostic value of multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography over coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J.30(21), 2622–2629 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Hendel RC et al. Prognosis by coronary computed tomographic angiography: matched comparison with myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.2(2), 93–101 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Danciu SC, Herrera CJ, Stecy PJ et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to identify patients with abnormal myocardial perfusion stress in whom diagnostic catheterization may be safely avoided. Am. J. Cardiol.100(11), 1605–1608 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Min JK, Lin FY, Gidseg DS et al. Determinants of coronary calcium conversion among patients with a normal coronary calcium scan: what is the ‘warranty period’ for remaining normal? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.55(11), 1110–1117 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow BJW, Osman A, Small GR et al. Prognosis in CABG patients. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging4(5), 496–502 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Chow BJ, Kass M, Gagné O et al. Can differences in corrected coronary opacification measured with computed tomography predict resting coronary artery flow? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.57(11), 1280–1288 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada DR, Ghoshhajra BB, Blankstein R et al. Direct comparison of rest and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion CT with rest and stress SPECT. J. Nucl. Cardiol.17(1), 27–37 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.54(12), 1072–1084 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cury R, Magalhães T, Borges A et al. Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am. J. Cardiol.106(3), 310–315 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology254(2), 410–419 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander JE, Chang AM, Shofer FS et al. One-year outcomes following coronary computerized tomographic angiography for evaluation of emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome. Acad. Emerg. Med.16(8), 693–698 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto N, Sato Y, Yoda S et al. Prognostic value of non-obstructive CT low-dense coronary artery plaques detected by multislice computed tomography. Circ. J.71(12), 1898–1903 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Fazel P, Peterman MA, Schussler JM. Three-year outcomes and cost analysis in patients receiving 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography for chest pain. Am. J. Cardiol.104(4), 498–500 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrovandi A, Maffei E, Palumbo A et al. Prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 24-month follow-up study. Eur. Radiol.19(7), 1653–1660 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadamitzky M, Freissmuth B, Meyer T et al. Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging2(4), 404–411 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay CS, Morse RJ, Morgan-Hughes GJ et al. Prognostic value of coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients with an intermediate probability of significant coronary heart disease. Br. J. Radiol.83(988), 327–330 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation115(13), 1762–1768 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaemperli O, Valenta I, Schepis T et al. Coronary 64-slice CT angiography predicts outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur. Radiol.18(6), 1162–1173 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lingen R, Kakani N, Veitch A et al. Prognostic and accuracy data of multidetector CT coronary angiography in an established clinical service. Clin. Radiol.64(6), 601–607 (2009).
   Google Scholar