Remote magnetic navigation in atrial fibrillation

References

• Lloyd-Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP et al. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 110(9), 1042–1046 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman A et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. Eur. Heart J. 27(8), 949–953 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnani JW, Rienstra M, Lin H et al. Atrial fibrillation: current knowledge and future directions in epidemiology and genomics. Circulation 124(18), 1982–1993 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in partnership with the European Society of Cardiology and in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 57(11), e101–e198 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Biase L, Fahmy TS, Patel D et al. Remote magnetic navigation: human experience in pulmonary vein ablation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50(9), 868–874 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang F, Bänsch D, Ernst S et al. Complete isolation of left atrium surrounding the pulmonary veins: new insights from the double-Lasso technique in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation 110(15), 2090–2096 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumagai K, Muraoka S, Mitsutake C, Takashima H, Nakashima H. A new approach for complete isolation of the posterior left atrium including pulmonary veins for atrial fibrillation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 18(10), 1047–1052 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nademanee K, McKenzie J, Kosar E et al. A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 43(11), 2044–2053 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappone C, Rosanio S, Oreto G et al. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia: a new anatomic approach for curing atrial fibrillation. Circulation 102(21), 2619–2628 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappone C, Manguso F, Vicedomini G et al. Prevention of iatrogenic atrial tachycardia after ablation of atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study comparing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation with a modified approach. Circulation 110(19), 3036–3042 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappato R, Negroni S, Pecora D et al. Prospective assessment of late conduction recurrence across radiofrequency lesions producing electrical disconnection at the pulmonary vein ostium in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 108(13), 1599–1604 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F et al. Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47(7), 1390–1400 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton AS, Jordaens LJ. Remote magnetic navigation for mapping and ablating right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia. Heart Rhythm 3(6), 691–696 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhardt JD, Saliba WI, Schweikert RA, Cummings J, Natale A. Remote magnetic navigation to map and ablate left coronary cusp ventricular tachycardia. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 17(10), 1142–1144 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuck KH, Reddy VY, Schmidt B et al. A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study. Heart Rhythm 9(1), 18–23 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura Y, Johnson SB, Bunch TJ, Henz BD, O’Brien CJ, Packer DL. A systematical analysis of in vivo contact forces on virtual catheter tip/tissue surface contact during cardiac mapping and intervention. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 19(6), 632–640 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 3(1), 32–38 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagres N, Hindricks G, Kottkamp H et al. Complications of atrial fibrillation ablation in a high-volume center in 1,000 procedures: still cause for concern? J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 20(9), 1014–1019 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spragg DD, Dalal D, Cheema A et al. Complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: incidence and predictors. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 19(6), 627–631 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauernfeind T, Akca F, Schwagten B et al. The magnetic navigation system allows safety and high efficacy for ablation of arrhythmias. Europace 13(7), 1015–1021 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim AM, Turakhia M, Lu J et al. Impact of remote magnetic catheter navigation on ablation fluoroscopy and procedure time. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 31(11), 1399–1404 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya A, Zaker-Shahrak R, Sommer P et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using remote magnetic catheter navigation: a case–control study. Europace 13(1), 45–50 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüthje L, Vollmann D, Seegers J et al. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 100(11), 1003–1011 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA et al. Prevalence and causes of fatal outcome in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53(19), 1798–1803 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsiyiannis WT, Melby DP, Matelski JL, Ervin VL, Laverence KL, Gornick CC. Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Am. J. Cardiol. 102(12), 1674–1676 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi MS, Oh YS, Jang SW et al. Comparison of magnetic navigation system and conventional method in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: is magnetic navigation system is more effective and safer than conventional method? Korean Circ. J. 41(5), 248–252 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun KR, Wissner E, Koektuerk B et al. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new irrigated-tip catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 3(5), 458–464 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki S, Shah AJ, Xhaët O et al. Remote magnetic navigation with irrigated tip catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 3(6), 585–589 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantinidou M, Wissner E, Chun JK et al. Luminal esophageal temperature rise and esophageal lesion formation following remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm 8(12), 1875–1880 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Frigoli E et al. Irrigated-tip magnetic catheter ablation of AF: a long-term prospective study in 130 patients. Heart Rhythm 8(1), 8–15 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorgente A, Chierchia GB, Capulzini L et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation: a single center comparison between remote magnetic navigation, cryoballoon and conventional manual pulmonary vein isolation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol. J. 10(11), 486–495 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faddis MN, Blume W, Finney J et al. Novel, magnetically guided catheter for endocardial mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation. Circulation 106(23), 2980–2985 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton AS, De Castro CA, van Deel E, van Beusekom HM, Jordaens L. An in vivo comparison of radiofrequency cardiac lesions formed by standard and magnetically steered 4 mm tip catheters. Neth. Heart J. 18(2), 66–71 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim E, Off MK, Hoff PI et al. Remote magnetic versus manual catheters: evaluation of ablation effect in atrial fibrillation by myocardial marker levels. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol. 32(1), 37–43 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmann D, Lüthje L, Seegers J, Hasenfuss G, Zabel M. Remote magnetic catheter navigation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with common-type atrial flutter. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2(6), 603–610 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuck KH. Comparison of catheter stability between magnetically guided and manual cooled-tip ablation catheters. Presented at Heart Rhythm. San Fransisco, CA, USA, 14–17 May 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt JD, Natale A. New technologies in atrial fibrillation ablation. Circulation 120(15), 1533–1541 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eick OJ. Factors influencing lesion formation during radiofrequency catheter ablation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol. J. 3(3), 117–128 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Augello G, Vicedomini G, Saviano M et al. Pulmonary vein isolation after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation: comparison between Lasso and three-dimensional electroanatomical assessment of complete electrical disconnection. Heart Rhythm 6(12), 1706–1713 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar