Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: quo vadis?

References

• Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M et al.; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 119(3), e21–181 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachamovitch R, Rozanski A, Shaw LJ et al. Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Eur. Heart J. 32(8), 1012–1024 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 107(23), 2900–2907 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur. Heart J. 29(4), 480–489 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 379(9814), 453–460 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plein S, Greenwood JP, Ridgway JP, Cranny G, Ball SG, Sivananthan MU. Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 44(11), 2173–2181 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Ardle BA, Dowsley TF, deKemp RA et al. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Presented at: American College of Cardiology Conference. Chicago, IL, USA, 24–27 March 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Holly TA, Abbott BG, Al-Mallah M et al.; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Single photon-emission computed tomography. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 17(5), 941–973 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia EV. SPECT attenuation correction: an essential tool to realize nuclear cardiology’s manifest destiny. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 14(1), 16–24 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH et al.; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N. Engl. J. Med. 360(3), 213–224 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med. Decis. Making 11(2), 88–94 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemrak F, Petersen SE. Late gadolinium enhancement CMR predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 54(3), 215–229 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP et al.; American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation. 121(22), 2462–508 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al.; American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group; American College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 48(7), 1475–1497 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar