The use of oxidized zirconium alloy in knee arthroplasty

References

• Felson DT. Epidemiology of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Epidemiol. Rev. 10, 1–28 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu SS, Della Valle AG, Besculides MC, Gaber LK, Memtsoudis SG. Trends in mortality, complications, and demographics for primary hip arthroplasty in the United States. Int. Orthop. 33(3), 643–651 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae DK, Song SJ, Park MJ, Eoh JH, Song JH, Park CH. Twenty-year survival analysis in total knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon. J. Arthroplasty doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.027 (2011) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Robertsson O, Bizjajeva S, Fenstad AM et al. Knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Acta Orthop. 81(1), 82–89 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioe TJ, Novak C, Sinner P, Ma W, Mehle S. Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 464, 83–87 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 404, 7–13 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, Engh GA. Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89(6), 1306–1314 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Northfield MR et al. Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 80(1), 54–59 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskin RS. An oxidized Zr ceramic surfaced femoral component for total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 416, 191–196 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Ollivere B, Wimhurst JA, Clark IM, Donell ST. Current concepts in osteolysis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 94(1), 10–15 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalzried TP, Jasty M, Harris WH. Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 74(6), 849–863 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA. A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 17(5), 649–661 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson JM, Hamer AJ, Stockley I, Eastell R. Polyethylene wear rate and osteolysis: critical threshold versus continuous dose–response relationship. J. Orthop. Res. 23(3), 520–525 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grupp TM, Kaddick C, Schwiesau J, Maas A, Stulberg SD. Fixed and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty – influence on wear generation, corresponding wear areas, knee kinematics and particle composition. Clin. Biomech. 24(2), 210–217 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morra EA, Greenwald AS. Polymer insert stress in total knee designs during high-flexion activities: a finite element study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87(Suppl. 2), 120–124 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McEwen HM, Barnett PI, Bell CJ et al. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J. Biomech. 38(2), 357–365 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshino T, Okamoto R, Takagi T, Yamamoto K, Saito T. Cemented ceramic YMCK total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis. J. Arthroplasty 17(8), 1009–1015 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bal BS, Garino J, Ries M, Rahaman MN. A review of ceramic bearing materials in total joint arthroplasty. Hip Int. 17(1), 21–30 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iida T, Minoda Y, Kadoya Y et al. Mid-term clinical results of alumina medial pivot total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1734-3 (2011) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergschmidt P, Lohmann C, Ganzer D et al. Total knee replacement with ceramic femoral components: a national prospective multicenter study of clinical and radiological outcomes. Orthopade 40(3), 224–230 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson JA. Characteristics of metal and ceramic total hip bearing surfaces and their effect on long-term ultra high molecular weight polyethylene wear. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 294, 361–378 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Patel AM, Spector M. Tribological evaluation of oxidized zirconium using an articular cartilage counterface: a novel material for potential use in hemiarthroplasty. Biomaterials 18(5), 441–447 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter G, Dickinson J, Herb B, Graham R. Creation of Oxidized Zirconium Orthopaedic Implants. Zardiackas LD, Kraay MJ, Freese, HL (Eds). American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Sheth NP, Lementowski P, Hunter G, Garino JP. Clinical applications of oxidized zirconium. J. Surg. Orthop. Adv. 17(1), 17–26 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hobbs LW, Rosen VB, Mangin SP, Treska M, Hunter G. Oxidation microstructures and interfaces in the oxidized zirconium knee. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Tech. 2(3), 221–246 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson JA, Poggie RA, Mishra AK. Abrasive wear of ceramic, metal, and UHMWPE bearing surfaces from third-body bone, PMMA bone cement, and titanium debris. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 4(3), 213–229 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spector BM, Ries MD, Bourne RB, Sauer WS, Long M, Hunter G. Wear performance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene on oxidized zirconium total knee femoral components. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 83-A(Suppl. 2 Pt. 2), 80–86 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher J, McEwen HM, Tipper JL et al. Wear, debris, and biologic activity of cross-linked polyethylene in the knee: benefits and potential concerns. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 428, 114–119 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Dowson D, Taheri S, Wallbridge N. The role of counterface imperfections in the wear of polyethylene. Wear 119, 277–293 (1987).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter G, Jones WM, Spector M. Oxidized Zirconium. Bellemans J, Ries MD, Victor J (Eds). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ezzet KA, Hermida JC, Colwell CW Jr, D’Lima DD. Oxidized zirconium femoral components reduce polyethylene wear in a knee wear simulator. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 428, 120–124 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ries MD, Salehi A, Widding K, Hunter G. Polyethylene wear performance of oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chromium knee components under abrasive conditions. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 84-A(Suppl. 2), 129–135 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• DesJardins J, Burnikel B, LaBerge M. UHMWPE wear against roughened oxidized zirconium and CoCr femoral knee components during force-controlled simulation. Wear 264, 245–256 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Burroughs BR, Bragdon CR, Christensen S, Lozynsky A, Harris WH. Knee simulator wear of polyethylene tibias articulating against explanted rough femoral components. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 428, 108–113 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Ruberti J, Melotti S, Spiegelberg SH, Greenbaum ES, Harris WH. Optical analysis of surface changes on early retrievals of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene tibial inserts. J. Arthroplasty 18(7 Suppl. 1), 42–47 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levesque M, Livingston B, Jones W, Spector M. Scratches on condyle innormal functioning total knee arthroplasty. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 23, 247 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Heyse TJ, Davis J, Haas SB, Chen DX, Wright TM, Laskin RS. Retrieval analysis of femoral zirconium components in total knee arthroplasty preliminary results. J. Arthroplasty 6(3), 445–450 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Casey D, Cottrell J, DiCarlo E, Windsor R, Wright T. PFC knee replacement: osteolytic failures from extreme polyethylene degradation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 464, 157–163 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cottrell JM, Townsend E, Lipman J, Sculco TP, Wright TM. Bearing surface design changes affect contact patterns in total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 464, 127–131 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heyse TJ, Chen DX, Kelly N, Boettner F, Wright TM, Haas SB. Matched-pair total knee arthroplasty retrieval analysis: oxidized zirconium vs. CoCrMo. Knee 18(6), 448–452 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui C, Salmon L, Maeno S, Roe J, Walsh W, Pinczewski L. Five-year comparison of oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chromium femoral components in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 93(7), 624–630 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Kim JS, Huh W, Lee KH. Weight of polyethylene wear particles is similar in TKAs with oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chrome prostheses. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468(5), 1296–1304 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bal BS, Greenberg DD, Buhrmester L, Aleto TJ. Primary TKA with a zirconia ceramic femoral component. J. Knee Surg. 19(2), 89–93 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Innocenti M, Civinini R, Carulli C, Matassi F, Villano M. The 5-year results of an oxidized zirconium femoral component for TKA. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468(5), 1258–1263 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallab N, Merritt K, Jacobs JJ. Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 83-A(3), 428–436 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrett S, Jacobs N, Yates P, Smith A, Wood D. Differences in metal ion release following cobalt-chromium and oxidized zirconium total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. Belg. 76(4), 513–520 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhotka C, Szekeres T, Steffan I, Zhuber K, Zweymüller K. Four-year study of cobalt and chromium blood levels in patients managed with two different metal-on-metal total hip replacements. J. Orthop. Res. 21(2), 189–195 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergschmidt P, Bader R, Mittelmeier W. Metal hypersensitivity in total knee arthroplasty: revision surgery using a ceramic femoral component – a case report. Knee 19(2), 144–147 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich KA, Mazoochian F, Summer B, Reinert M, Ruzicka T, Thomas P. Intolerance reactions to knee arthroplasty in patients with nickel/cobalt allergy and disappearance of symptoms after revision surgery with titanium-based endoprostheses. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 7(5), 410–413 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granchi D, Cenni E, Tigani D, Trisolino G, Baldini N, Giunti A. Sensitivity to implant materials in patients with total knee arthroplasties. Biomaterials 29(10), 1494–1500 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen M, Rozak M, Thomas P. Pain in a chromium-allergic patient with total knee arthroplasty: disappearance of symptoms after revision with a special surface-coated TKA – a case report. Acta Orthop. 82(3), 386–388 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourne RB, Laskin RS, Guerin JS. Ten-year results of the first 100 Genesis II total knee replacement procedures. Orthopedics 30(Suppl. 8), 83–85 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs P, Davidson JA. Chemical and Electrochemical Aspects of the Biocompatibility of Titanium and its Alloys. Brown SA, Lemons JE (Eds). American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM STP 1272), West Conshohocken, PA, USA (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Davidson JA, Asgian CM, Mishra AK, Kovacs P. Zirconia (ZrO2)-Coated Zirconium-2.5Nb Alloy for Prosthetic Knee Nearing Applications. Yamamuro T, Kokubo T, Nakamura T (Eds). Kobunshi Kankokai, Kyoto, Japan (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Sofka CM, Potter HG, Figgie M, Laskin R. Magnetic resonance imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 406, 129–135 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Harris CA, White LM. Metal artifact reduction in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 37(3), 349–359 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter HG, Foo LF. Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 37(3), 361–373 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KY, Slavinsky JP, Ries MD, Blumenkrantz G, Majumdar S. Magnetic resonance imaging of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 21(2), 172–178 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guermazi A, Miaux Y, Zaim S, Peterfy CG, White D, Genant HK. Metallic artifacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength. Clin. Radiol. 58(4), 322–328 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael B, Haims AH, Wu JS, Katz LD, White LM, Lynch K. MRI comparison of periprosthetic structures around zirconium knee prostheses and cobalt chrome prostheses. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 186(6), 1771–1777 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwege KH, Hellwege AM. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology – Diamagnetic Susceptibility. Bornstein L (Ed.). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Fruchart D, Fruchart R, Heritier PL. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology – Magnetic Properties of Metals. Bornstein L (Ed.). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Mosher TJ, Davis CM 3rd. Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 21(3), 460–463 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vessely MB, Frick MA, Oakes D, Wenger DE, Berry DJ. Magnetic resonance imaging with metal suppression for evaluation of periprosthetic osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 21(6), 826–831 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyse TJ, Chong LR, Davis J, Boettner F, Haas SB, Potter HG. MRI analysis of the component–bone interface after TKA. Knee 19(4), 290–294 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyse TJ, Chong LR, Davis J, Boettner F, Haas SB, Potter HG. MRI analysis for rotation of total knee components. Knee doi:10.1016/j.knee.2012.01.003 (2012) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter RD, Brilhault J, Majumdar S, Ries MD. Magnetic resonance imaging of in vivo patellofemoral kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 16(5), 332–336 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamishima T, Kitamura N, Amemiya M et al. Experimental MR imaging of zirconia ceramic joint implants at 1.5 and 3 T. Clin. Radiol. 65(5), 387–390 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kop AM, Whitewood C, Johnston DJ. Damage of oxinium femoral heads subsequent to hip arthroplasty dislocation three retrieval case studies. J. Arthroplasty 22(5), 775–779 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioe TJ, Sharma A, Tatman P, Mehle S. Do ‘premium’ joint implants add value?: analysis of high cost joint implants in a community registry. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 469(1), 48–54 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs G. Knee implant recall hits Smith & Nephew. The Guardian, 18th September (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein A, Nöbel D, Mayr HO et al. Inhibition of mineralization by a calcium zirconium phosphate coating. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 86(2), 422–429 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Göbel F, Ulbricht S, Hein W, Bernstein A. Radiological mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty with femoral components of different materials. Z. Orthop. Unfall. 146(2), 194–199 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Fujibayashi S, Nakagawa Y, Noda I, Nakamura T. Ability of zirconia double coated with titanium and hydroxyapatite to bond to bone under load-bearing conditions. Biomaterials 27(7), 996–1002 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohal RJ, Wolkewitz M, Hinze M, Han JS, Bachle M, Butz F. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20(4), 333–339 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papannagari R, Hines G, Sprague J. Long-Term Wear Performance of an Advanced Bearing Knee Technology. Presented at: Annual Meeting of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA). Dubai, UAE, 6–9 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett PI, Fisher J, Auger DD, Stone MH, Ingham E. Comparison of wear in a total knee replacement under different kinematic conditions. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 12(10–12), 1039–1042 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider H, Garvin K. Rotating platform versus fixed-bearing total knees: an in vitro study of wear. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 466(11), 2677–2685 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Rubash HE, Bragdon CR, Burroughs BR, Huang A, Harris WH. Simulated normal gait wear testing of a highly cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert. J. Arthroplasty 22(3), 435–444 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, Jasty M, O’Connor DO, Von Knoch RS, Harris WH. Knee-simulator testing of conventional and cross-linked polyethylene tibial inserts. J. Arthroplasty 19(7), 887–897 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker PS, Blunn GW, Perry JP et al. Methodology for long-term wear testing of total knee replacements. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 372, 290–301 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulé PE, Campbell PA, Walker PS et al. Polyethylene wear characteristics in vivo and in a knee stimulator. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 60(3), 411–419 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar