Recently tested strategies to reduce nosocomial infections in the neonatal intensive care unit

References

• Efird MM, Rojas MA, Lozano JM et al. Epidemiology of nosocomial infections in selected neonatal intensive care units in Colombia, South America. J. Perinatol.25(8), 531–536 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagata E, Brito AS, Matsuo T. Nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive care unit: incidence and risk factors. Am. J. Infect. Control30(1), 26–31 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pessoa-Silva CL, Richtmann R, Calil R et al. Healthcare-associated infections among neonates in Brazil. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.25(9), 772–777 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong IS, Jeong JS, Choi EO. Nosocomial infection in a newborn intensive care unit (NICU), South Korea. BMC Infect. Dis.6, 103 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Couto RC, Pedrosa TM, Tofani Cde P, Pedroso ER. Risk factors for nosocomial infection in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.27(6), 571–575 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman J, Stricof RL, Stevens TP et al. Development of a statewide collaborative to decrease NICU central line-associated bloodstream infections. J. Perinatol.29(9), 591–599 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz K, McMillan DD, Andrews W et al. Variations in rates of nosocomial infection among Canadian neonatal intensive care units may be practice-related. BMC Pediatr.5, 22 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perlman SE, Saiman L, Larson EL. Risk factors for late-onset health care-associated bloodstream infections in patients in neonatal intensive care units. Am. J. Infect. Control35(3), 177–182 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urrea M, Iriondo M, Thio M et al. A prospective incidence study of nosocomial infections in a neonatal care unit. Am. J. Infect. Control31(8), 505–507 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Zwet WC, Kaiser AM, van Elburg RM et al. Nosocomial infections in a Dutch neonatal intensive care unit: surveillance study with definitions for infection specifically adapted for neonates. J. Hosp. Infect.61(4), 300–311 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couto RC, Carvalho EA, Pedrosa TM, Pedroso ER, Neto MC, Biscione FM. A 10-year prospective surveillance of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care units. Am. J. Infect. Control35(3), 183–189 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas J, Larson E, Ross B, See B, Saiman L. Epidemiology and diagnosis of hospital-acquired conjunctivitis among neonatal intensive care unit patients. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.24(7), 586–589 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA et al. To tap or not to tap: high likelihood of meningitis without sepsis among very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics113(5), 1181–1186 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhoul IR, Sujov P, Smolkin T, Lusky A, Reichman B. Epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological characteristics of late-onset sepsis among very low birth weight infants in Israel: a national survey. Pediatrics109(1), 34–39 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics110(2 Pt 1), 285–291 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambiar S, Singh N. Change in epidemiology of health care-associated infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.21(9), 839–842 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ronnestad A, Abrahamsen TG, Medbo S et al. Late-onset septicemia in a Norwegian national cohort of extremely premature infants receiving very early full human milk feeding. Pediatrics115(3), e269–e276 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Association for Professionals in Infection Control/Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Recomm. Rep.51(RR-16), 1–45, quiz CE41–CE44 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessoa-Silva CL, Dharan S, Hugonnet S et al. Dynamics of bacterial hand contamination during routine neonatal care. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.25(3), 192–197 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittet D, Dharan S, Touveneau S, Sauvan V, Perneger TV. Bacterial contamination of the hands of hospital staff during routine patient care. Arch. Intern. Med.159(8), 821–826 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittet D. Improving adherence to hand hygiene practice: a multidisciplinary approach. Emerging Infect. Dis.7(2), 234–240 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss A, Widmer AF. No time for handwashing!? Handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance? Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.18(3), 205–208 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SM, Lubimova AV, Khrustalyeva NM et al. Use of an alcohol-based hand rub and quality improvement interventions to improve hand hygiene in a Russian neonatal intensive care unit. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.24(3), 172–179 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harbarth S, Pittet D, Grady L et al. Interventional study to evaluate the impact of an alcohol-based hand gel in improving hand hygiene compliance. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.21(6), 489–495 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tenorio AR, Badri SM, Sahgal NB et al. Effectiveness of gloves in the prevention of hand carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus species by health care workers after patient care. Clin. Infect. Dis.32(5), 826–829 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen B, Saiman L, Cimiotti J, Larson E. Factors associated with hand hygiene practices in two neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.22(6), 494–499 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lam BC, Lee J, Lau YL. Hand hygiene practices in a neonatal intensive care unit: a multimodal intervention and impact on nosocomial infection. Pediatrics114(5), e565–e571 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessoa-Silva CL, Hugonnet S, Pfister R et al. Reduction of health care associated infection risk in neonates by successful hand hygiene promotion. Pediatrics120(2), e382–e390 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Infection Control Programme. Lancet356(9238), 1307–1312 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won SP, Chou HC, Hsieh WS et al. Handwashing program for the prevention of nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.25(9), 742–746 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer C, Bik EM, DiGiulio DB, Relman DA, Brown PO. Development of the human infant intestinal microbiota. PLoS Biol.5(7), e177 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favier CF, Vaughan EE, De Vos WM, Akkermans AD. Molecular monitoring of succession of bacterial communities in human neonates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68(1), 219–226 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldmann DA, Leclair J, Macone A. Bacterial colonization of neonates admitted to an intensive care environment. J. Pediatr.93(2), 288–293 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berwick DM. The science of improvement. JAMA299(10), 1182–1184 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman J, Wirtschafter DD, Kurtin P. Neonatal intensive care unit collaboration to decrease hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: from comparative performance reports to improvement networks. Pediatr. Clin. North Am.56(4), 865–892 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffel G, Blumenthal D. The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations. JAMA262(20), 2869–2873 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berwick DM. Developing and testing changes in delivery of care. Ann. Intern. Med.128(8), 651–656 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plsek P. Innovative thinking for the improvement of medical systems. Ann. Intern. Med.131(6), 438–444 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plsek PE. Quality improvement methods in clinical medicine. Pediatrics103(1 Suppl. E), 203–214 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horbar JD. The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology. Pediatrics103(1 Suppl. E), 350–359 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogowski JA, Horbar JD, Plsek PE et al. Economic implications of neonatal intensive care unit collaborative quality improvement. Pediatrics107(1), 23–29 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbar JD, Rogowski J, Plsek PE et al. Collaborative quality improvement for neonatal intensive care. NIC/Q Project Investigators of the Vermont Oxford Network. Pediatrics107(1), 14–22 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbride HW, Wirtschafter DD, Powers RJ, Sheehan MB. Implementation of evidence-based potentially better practices to decrease nosocomial infections. Pediatrics111(4 Pt 2), e519–e533 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N. Engl. J. Med.355(26), 2725–2732 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MR, Griswold M, Harris JM et al. Decreasing PICU catheter-associated bloodstream infections: NACHRI’s quality transformation efforts. Pediatrics DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-1382 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Kacica MA, Horgan MJ, Ochoa L, Sandler R, Lepow ML, Venezia RA. Prevention of Gram-positive sepsis in neonates weighing less than 1500 grams. J. Pediatr.125(2), 253–258 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spafford PS, Sinkin RA, Cox C, Reubens L, Powell KR. Prevention of central venous catheter-related coagulase-negative staphylococcal sepsis in neonates. J. Pediatr.125(2), 259–263 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee BE, Cheung PY, Robinson JL, Evanochko C, Robertson CM. Comparative study of mortality and morbidity in premature infants (birth weight, < 1,250 g) with candidemia or candidal meningitis. Clin. Infect. Dis.27(3), 559–565 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feja KN, Wu F, Roberts K et al. Risk factors for candidemia in critically ill infants: a matched case–control study. J. Pediatr.147(2), 156–161 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kicklighter SD, Springer SC, Cox T, Hulsey TC, Turner RB. Fluconazole for prophylaxis against Candidal rectal colonization in the very low birth weight infant. Pediatrics107(2), 293–298 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman D, Boyle R, Hazen KC, Patrie JT, Robinson M, Donowitz LG. Fluconazole prophylaxis against fungal colonization and infection in preterm infants. N. Engl. J. Med.345(23), 1660–1666 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoni P, Stolfi I, Pugni L et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of prophylactic fluconazole in preterm neonates. N. Engl. J. Med.356(24), 2483–2495 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertini G, Perugi S, Dani C, Filippi L, Pratesi S, Rubaltelli FF. Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents invasive fungal infection in high-risk, very low birth weight infants. J. Pediatr.147(2), 162–165 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy CM, Campbell JR, Zaccaria E, Baker CJ. Fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight neonates reduces invasive candidiasis mortality rates without emergence of fluconazole-resistant Candida species. Pediatrics121(4), 703–710 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoni P, Arisio R, Mostert M et al. Prophylactic fluconazole is effective in preventing fungal colonization and fungal systemic infections in preterm neonates: a single-center, 6-year, retrospective cohort study. Pediatrics117(1), e22–e32 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoni P, Leonessa M, Galletto P et al. Routine use of fluconazole prophylaxis in a neonatal intensive care unit does not select natively fluconazole-resistant Candida subspecies. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.27(8), 731–737 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uko S, Soghier LM, Vega M et al. Targeted short-term fluconazole prophylaxis among very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics117(4), 1243–1252 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitkamp JH, Ozdas A, LaFleur B, Potts AL. Fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of invasive fungal infections in targeted highest risk preterm infants limits drug exposure. J. Perinatol.28(6), 405–411 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerihew L, Austin N, McGuire W. Prophylactic systemic antifungal agents to prevent mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.4, CD003850 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Long SS, Stevenson DK. Reducing Candida infections during neonatal intensive care: management choices, infection control, and fluconazole prophylaxis. J. Pediatr.147(2), 135–141 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy CM, Baker CJ, Zaccaria E, Campbell JR. Impact of fluconazole prophylaxis on incidence and outcome of invasive candidiasis in a neonatal intensive care unit. J. Pediatr.147(2), 166–171 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman D, Boyle R, Hazen KC, Patrie JT, Robinson M, Grossman LB. Twice weekly fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of invasive Candida infection in high-risk infants of <1000 grams birth weight. J. Pediatr.147(2), 172–179 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn DL, Neofytos D, Anaissie EJ et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 2019 patients: data from the prospective antifungal therapy alliance registry. Clin. Infect. Dis.48(12), 1695–1703 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen MH, Peacock JE Jr, Morris AJ et al. The changing face of candidemia: emergence of non-Candida albicans species and antifungal resistance. Am. J. Med.100(6), 617–623 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MF, LaRocco MT, Gentry LO. Fluconazole susceptibilities of Candida species and distribution of species recovered from blood cultures over a 5-year period. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.38(6), 1422–1424 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex JH, Rinaldi MG, Pfaller MA. Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.39(1), 1–8 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope W, Morton A, Eisen DP. Increase in prevalence of nosocomial non-Candida albicans candidaemia and the association of Candida krusei with fluconazole use. J. Hosp. Infect.50(1), 56–65 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis.48(5), 503–535 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar