Molecular diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease

References

• Kohorn EI. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and evidence-based medicine. J. Reprod. Med.47(6), 427–432 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kohorn EI. Negotiating a staging and risk factor scoring system for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. A progress report. J. Reprod. Med.47(6), 445–450 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP. Clinical practice. Molar pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med.360(16), 1639–1645 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui P, Martel M, Parkash V. Gestational trophoblastic diseases: recent advances in histopathologic diagnosis and related genetic aspects. Adv. Anat. Pathol.12(3), 116–125 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genest DR. Partial hydatidiform mole: clinicopathological features, differential diagnosis, ploidy and molecular studies, and gold standards for diagnosis. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol.20(4), 315–322 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feltmate CM, Growdon WB, Wolfberg AJ et al. Clinical characteristics of persistent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after partial hydatidiform molar pregnancy. J. Reprod. Med.51(11), 902–906 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fukunaga M, Katabuchi H, Nagasaka T, Mikami Y, Minamiguchi S, Lage JM. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole. Am. J. Surg. Pathol.29(7), 942–947 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howat AJ, Beck S, Fox H et al. Can histopathologists reliably diagnose molar pregnancy? J. Clin. Pathol.46(7), 599–602 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Javey H, Borazjani G, Behmard S, Langley FA. Discrepancies in the histological diagnosis of hydatidiform mole. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.86(6), 480–483 (1979).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kajii T, Ohama K. Androgenetic origin of hydatidiform mole. Nature268(5621), 633–634 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bifulco C, Johnson C, Hao L, Kermalli H, Bell S, Hui P. Genotypic analysis of hydatidiform mole: an accurate and practical method of diagnosis. Am. J. Surg. Pathol.32(3), 445–451 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipata F, Parkash V, Talmor M et al. Precise DNA genotyping diagnosis of hydatidiform mole. Obstet. Gynecol.115(4), 784–794 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulman AE, Surti U. The syndromes of hydatidiform mole. I. Cytogenetic and morphologic correlations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.131(6), 665–671 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulman AE. Syndromes of hydatidiform moles. Partial vs. complete. J. Reprod. Med.29(11), 788–791 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs PA, Angell RR, Buchanan IM, Hassold TJ, Matsuyama AM, Manuel B. The origin of human triploids. Ann. Hum. Genet.42(1), 49–57 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs PA, Szulman AE, Funkhouser J, Matsuura JS, Wilson CC. Human triploidy: relationship between parental origin of the additional haploid complement and development of partial hydatidiform mole. Ann. Hum. Genet.46(Pt 3), 223–231 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajii T, Ferrier A, Niikawa N, Takahara H, Ohama K, Avirachan S. Anatomic and chromosomal anomalies in 639 spontaneous abortuses. Hum. Genet.55(1), 87–98 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wake N, Fujino T, Hoshi S et al. The propensity to malignancy of dispermic heterozygous moles. Placenta8(3), 319–326 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wake N, Seki T, Fujita H et al. Malignant potential of homozygous and heterozygous complete moles. Cancer Res.44(3), 1226–1230 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis JR, Surwit EA, Garay JP, Fortier KJ. Sex assignment in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.148(6), 722–725 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher RA, Lawler SD. Heterozygous complete hydatidiform moles: do they have a worse prognosis than homozygous complete moles? Lancet2(8393), 51 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher RA, Khatoon R, Paradinas FJ, Roberts AP, Newlands ES. Repetitive complete hydatidiform mole can be biparental in origin and either male or female. Hum. Reprod.15(3), 594–598 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helwani MN, Seoud M, Zahed L, Zaatari G, Khalil A, Slim R. A familial case of recurrent hydatidiform molar pregnancies with biparental genomic contribution. Hum. Genet.105(1–2), 112–115 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayward BE, De Vos M, Talati N et al. Genetic and epigenetic analysis of recurrent hydatidiform mole. Hum. Mutat.30(5), E629–E639 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Veyver IB, Al-Hussaini TK. Biparental hydatidiform moles: a maternal effect mutation affecting imprinting in the offspring. Hum. Reprod. Update12(3), 233–242 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodges MD, Rees HC, Seckl MJ, Newlands ES, Fisher RA. Genetic refinement and physical mapping of a biparental complete hydatidiform mole locus on chromosome 19q13.4. J. Med. Genet.40(8), e95 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Redline RW, Hassold T, Zaragoza MV. Prevalence of the partial molar phenotype in triploidy of maternal and paternal origin. Hum. Pathol.29(5), 505–511 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uchida IA, Freeman VC. Triploidy and chromosomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.151(1), 65–69 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lage JM, Mark SD, Roberts DJ, Goldstein DP, Bernstein MR, Berkowitz RS. A flow cytometric study of 137 fresh hydropic placentas: correlation between types of hydatidiform moles and nuclear DNA ploidy. Obstet. Gynecol.79(3), 403–410 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lage JM, Bagg A. Hydatidiform moles: DNA flow cytometry, image analysis and selected topics in molecular biology. Histopathology28(4), 379–382 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lage JM, Popek EJ. The role of DNA flow cytometry in evaluation of partial and complete hydatidiform moles and hydropic abortions. Semin. Diagn. Pathol.10(3), 267–274 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gschwendtner A, Neher A, Kreczy A, Muller-Holzner E, Volgger B, Mairinger T. DNA ploidy determination of early molar pregnancies by image analysis: comparison to histologic classification. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.122(11), 1000–1004 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaragoza MV, Surti U, Redline RW, Millie E, Chakravarti A, Hassold TJ. Parental origin and phenotype of triploidy in spontaneous abortions: predominance of diandry and association with the partial hydatidiform mole. Am. J. Hum. Genet.66(6), 1807–1820 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteban JM, Sheibani K, Owens M, Joyce J, Bailey A, Battifora H. Effects of various fixatives and fixation conditions on DNA ploidy analysis. A need for strict internal DNA standards. Am. J. Clin. Pathol.95(4), 460–466 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheville JC, Greiner T, Robinson RA, Benda JA. Ploidy analysis by flow cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in hydropic placentas and gestational trophoblastic disease. Hum. Pathol.26(7), 753–757 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yver M, Carles D, Bloch B, Bioulac-Sage P, Martin Negrier ML. Determination of DNA ploidy by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in hydatidiform moles: evaluation of FISH on isolated nuclei. Hum. Pathol.35(6), 752–758 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maggiori MS, Peres LC. Morphological, immunohistochemical and chromosome in situ hybridization in the differential diagnosis of hydatidiform mole and hydropic abortion. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.135(2), 170–176 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lescoat D, Jouan H, Loeuillet-Olivo L, Le Calve M. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on paraffin-embedded placental tissues as an adjunct for understanding the etiology of early spontaneous abortion. Prenat. Diagn.25(4), 314–317 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Surti U, Szulman AE, O’Brien S. Complete (classic) hydatidiform mole with 46,XY karyotype of paternal origin. Hum. Genet.51(2), 153–155 (1979).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohama K, Kajii T, Okamoto E et al. Dispermic origin of XY hydatidiform moles. Nature292(5823), 551–552 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohama K, Okamoto E, Nomura K, Fujiwara A, Fukuda Y. [Genetic studies of hydatidiform mole with 46,XY karyotype (author’s transl)]. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi33(10), 1664–1668 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher RA, Povey S, Lawler SD, Martin CA, Abeliovich D. The human chorionic gonadotrophin α subunit gene in gestational trophoblastic disease. 1. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in hydatidiform moles. Dis. Markers5(4), 237–245 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ko TM, Hsieh CY, Ho HN, Hsieh FJ, Lee TY. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis to study the genetic origin of complete hydatidiform mole. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.164(3), 901–906 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallace DC, Surti U, Adams CW, Szulman AE. Complete moles have paternal chromosomes but maternal mitochondrial DNA. Hum. Genet.61(2), 145–147 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler SD, Pickthall VJ, Fisher RA, Povey S, Evans MW, Szulman AE. Genetic studies of complete and partial hydatidiform moles. Lancet2(8142), 580 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan JB, Surti U, Taillon-Miller P et al. Paternal origins of complete hydatidiform moles proven by whole genome single-nucleotide polymorphism haplotyping. Genomics79(1), 58–62 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhivotovsky LA, Bennett L, Bowcock AM, Feldman MW. Human population expansion and microsatellite variation. Mol. Biol. Evol.17(5), 757–767 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins PJ, Hennessy LK, Leibelt CS, Roby RK, Reeder DJ, Foxall PA. Developmental validation of a single-tube amplification of the 13 CODIS STR loci, D2S1338, D19S433, and amelogenin: the AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR Amplification Kit. J. Forensic Sci.49(6), 1265–1277 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeln EC, Cornelisse CJ, Dreef EJ, Kuipers-Dijkshoorn NJ, Hogendoorn PC. Molecular identification of a partial hydatidiform mole. Diagn. Mol. Pathol.6(1), 58–63 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell KA, Van Deerlin V, Addya K, Clevenger CV, Van Deerlin PG, Leonard DG. Molecular genetic testing from paraffin-embedded tissue distinguishes nonmolar hydropic abortion from hydatidiform mole. Mol. Diagn.4(1), 11–19 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai CY, Chan KY, Khoo US et al. Analysis of gestational trophoblastic disease by genotyping and chromosome in situ hybridization. Mod. Pathol.17(1), 40–48 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popiolek DA, Yee H, Mittal K et al. Multiplex short tandem repeat DNA analysis confirms the accuracy of p57(KIP2) immunostaining in the diagnosis of complete hydatidiform mole. Hum. Pathol.37(11), 1426–1434 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McConnell TG, Murphy KM, Hafez M, Vang R, Ronnett BM. Diagnosis and subclassification of hydatidiform moles using p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping: validation and prospective analysis in routine and consultation practice settings with development of an algorithmic approach. Am. J. Surg. Pathol.33(6), 805–817 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy KM, McConnell TG, Hafez MJ, Vang R, Ronnett BM. Molecular genotyping of hydatidiform moles: analytic validation of a multiplex short tandem repeat assay. J. Mol. Diagn.11(6), 598–605 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deerlin VM, Leonard DG. Bone marrow engraftment analysis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Clin. Lab. Med.20(1), 197–225 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nollet F, Billiet J, Selleslag D, Criel A. Standardisation of multiplex fluorescent short tandem repeat analysis for chimerism testing. Bone Marrow Transplant.28(5), 511–518 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher RA, Nucci MR, Thaker HM, Weremowicz S, Genest DR, Castrillon DH. Complete hydatidiform mole retaining a chromosome 11 of maternal origin: molecular genetic analysis of a case. Mod. Pathol.17(9), 1155–1160 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McConnell TG, Norris-Kirby A, Hagenkord JM, Ronnett BM, Murphy KM. Complete hydatidiform mole with retained maternal chromosomes 6 and 11. Am. J. Surg. Pathol.33(9), 1409–1415 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baergen RN, Kelly T, McGinniss MJ, Jones OW, Benirschke K. Complete hydatidiform mole with a coexistent embryo. Hum. Pathol.27(7), 731–734 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wax JR, Pinette MG, Chard R, Blackstone J, DO, Cartin A. Prenatal diagnosis by DNA polymorphism analysis of complete mole with coexisting twin. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.188(4), 1105–1106 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Makrydimas G, Sebire NJ, Thornton SE, Zagorianakou N, Lolis D, Fisher RA. Complete hydatidiform mole and normal live birth: a novel case of confined placental mosaicism: case report. Hum. Reprod.17(9), 2459–2463 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sebire NJ, Foskett M, Paradinas FJ et al. Outcome of twin pregnancies with complete hydatidiform mole and healthy co-twin. Lancet359(9324), 2165–2166 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner L, Dunn J, Esposito N, Macpherson T, Surti U. P57KIP2 immunostaining and molecular cytogenetics: combined approach aids in diagnosis of morphologically challenging cases with molar phenotype and in detecting androgenetic cell lines in mosaic/chimeric conceptions. Hum. Pathol.39(1), 63–72 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Mittal S, Misra R, Vimala N, Das AK. Placental site trophoblastic tumor originating in a tubal ectopic pregnancy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.129(1), 92–94 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su YN, Cheng WF, Chen CA et al. Pregnancy with primary tubal placental site trophoblastic tumor – a case report and literature review. Gynecol. Oncol.73(2), 322–325 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo KT, Chen MJ, Lin MC. Epithelioid trophoblastic tumor of the broad ligament: a case report and review of the literature. Am. J. Surg. Pathol.28(3), 405–409 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hag IA, Ramesh K, Kollur SM, Salem M. Extrauterine placental site trophoblastic tumour in association with a lithopedion. Histopathology41(5), 446–449 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu ML, Yang B, Carcangiu ML, Hui P. Epithelioid trophoblastic tumor: comparative genomic hybridization and diagnostic DNA genotyping. Mod. Pathol.22(2), 232–238 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao J, Xiang Y, Wan XR, Feng FZ, Cui QC, Yang XY. Molecular genetic analyses of choriocarcinoma. Placenta30(9), 816–820 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar