Does additional hybridization also improve preimplantation genetic screening results?

References

• Jansen RP, Bowman MC, de Boer KA et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy. Hum. Reprod.23, 1476–1478 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mersereau JE, Pergament E, Zhang X et al. Preimplantation genetic screening to improve in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Fertil. Steril.90, 1287–1289 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staessen, C, Verpoest W, Donoso P et al. Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod.23(12), 2818–2825 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer LR, Klipstein S, Hazlett WD et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of preimplantation genetic screening in the ‘good prognosis’ patient. Fertil. Steril.91(5), 1731–1738 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod.19, 2849–2858 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J, Wale P, Surrey ES et al. Is aneuploidy screening for patients aged 35 or over beneficial? A prospective randomized trial. Fertil. Steril.82, S249 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debrock S, Melotte C, Spiessens C et al. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidy in embryos after in vitro fertilization (IVF) does not improve reproductive outcome in women over 35: a prospective controlled randomized study. Fertil. Steril.90, 1–10 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J et al.In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N. Engl. J. Med.357(1), 9–17 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardarson T, Hanson C, Lundin K et al. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod.23, 2806–2812 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG, Stevens J et al. Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial. Fertil. Steril.92, 157–162 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson R, Pickering S. The current status of preimplantation genetic screening: British Fertility Society Policy and Practice Guidelines. Hum. Fertil.11(2), 71–75 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ASRM. Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion. Fertil. Steril.90(5 Suppl.), S136–S143 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper J, Coonen E, De Rycke M et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. Hum. Reprod.25(4), 821–823 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colls P, Escudero T, Cekleniak N et al. Increased efficiency efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for infertility using “no result rescue”. Fertil. Steril.88(1), 53–61 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uher P, Baborova P, Kralickova M et al. Non-informative results and monosomies in PGD: the importance of a third round of re-hybridisation. Reprod. Biomed. Online19, 539–546 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS). Guidelines for good practice in PGD: programme requirements and laboratory quality assurance. Reprod. Biomed. Online16, 134–147 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mir P, Rodrigo L, Mateu E et al. Improving FISH diagnosis for preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening. Hum. Reprod.25(7), 1812–1817 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magli MC, Sandalinas M, Escudero T et al. Double locus analysis of chromosome 21 for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Prenat. Diagn.21(12), 1080–1085 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colls P, Sandalinas M, Pagidas K et al. PGD analysis for aneuploidy in a patient heterozygous for a polymorphism of chromosome 16 (16qh-). Prenat. Diagn.24, 741–744 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodrigo L, Mateu E, Mercader A et al. Rescue of false monosomies in a PGD program using subtelomeric probes. 32. 12th International Conference on Prenatal Diagnose and Therapy. Budapest, Hungary. Final program and abstracts book (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Hopman AH, Ramaekers FC, Raap AK et al.In situ hybridization as a tool to study numerical chromosome aberrations in solid bladder tumors. Histochemistry89(4), 307–316 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilton L, Thornhill A, Traeger-Synodinos J et al. The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD. Hum. Reprod.24(5), 1221–1228 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven PN, Bossuyt PM. Diagnostic accuracy: theoretical models for preimplantation genetic testing of a single nucleus using the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique. Hum. Reprod.25(10), 2622–2628 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen J, Wells D, Munné S. Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil. Steril.87(3), 496–503 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer CE, Osianlis T, Boekel K et al. Preimplantation genetic screening outcomes are associated with culture conditions. Hum. Reprod.24, 1212–1220 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercader A, Rubio C, Buendía P et al. Improvement of a preimplantation genetic screening program with the co-culture of embryos with a monolayer of endometrialepithelial cells. Hum. Reprod.24(Suppl. 1), i209 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Vanneste, E, Voet T, Le Caignec C et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat. Med.15(5), 577–583 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaidis P, Petersen MB. Origin and mechanisms of non-disjunction in human autosomal trisomies. Hum. Reprod.13(2), 313–319 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voullaire, L, Slater H, Williamson R et al. Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum. Genet.106(2), 210–217 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells D, Delhanty JD. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol. Hum. Reprod.6(11), 1055–1062 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seli E, Robert C, Sirard MA. OMICS in assisted reproduction: possibilities and pitfalls. Mol. Hum. Reprod.16(8), 513–530 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishel S, Gordon A, Lynch C et al. Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy – the future of IVF? Fertil. Steril.93(3), 1006.e7–1006.e10 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Treff NR, Levy B, Su J et al. SNP microarray based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH. Mol. Hum. Reprod.16(8), 583–589 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northrop LE, Treff NR, Levy B, Scott RT Jr. SNP microarray based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. Mol. Hum. Reprod.16(8), 590–600 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handyside AH, Harton GL, Mariani B et al. Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes. J. Med. Genet.47, 651–658 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DS, Cinnioglu C, Ross R et al. Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass. Mol. Hum. Reprod. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaq062 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar