Constraint-induced movement therapy: from history to plasticity

References

• Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation123(4), e18–e209 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL. Revisiting constraint-induced movement therapy: are we too smitten with the mitten? Is all nonuse ‘learned’? and other quandaries. Phys. Ther.87(9), 1212–1223 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page S, Sisto S, Levine P, Johnston M, Hughes M. Modified constraint induced therapy: a randomized feasibility and efficacy study. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.38(5), 583–590 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Morris DM. Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep.3(4), 279–286 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris D, Crago J, DeLuca S, Pidikiti R, Taub E. Constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation9, 29–43 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz S, Light K, Clifford S, Patterson T, Behrman A, Davis S. Descriptive predictors of outcomes following constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis. Phys. Ther.86(6), (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Fritz SL, Light K, Patterson T, Behrman A, Davis S. Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Stroke36, 1172–1177 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijntjes M, Hobbeling V, Hamzei F et al. Individual factors in constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair19(3), 238–249 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Huang YH, Hsieh YW, Wu CY. Potential predictors of motor and functional outcomes after distributed constraint-induced therapy for patients with stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair23(4), 336–342 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ et al. The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke41(10), 2309–2315 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatt G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: answers and questions after two decades of research. Neurorehabilitation21(2), 93–95 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.80(6), 624–628 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltner W, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke30(3), 586–592 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med.46(4), 537–544 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in patients with stroke. Stroke41, e57–e58 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA296(17), 2095–2104 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi YX, Tian JH, Yang KH, Zhao Y. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus traditional rehabilitation in patients with upper-extremity dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.92(6), 972–982 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Crago J, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabil. Psychol.43(2), 152–170 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan P. Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top. Stroke Rehabil.3, 1–20 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL et al. Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS): a single-center RCT. Neurology73(3), 195–201 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier LV, Taub E, Mark VW, Perkins C, Uswatte G. Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy is independent of infarct location in chronic stroke patients. Stroke40(7), 2468–2472 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ogden R, Franz S. On cerebral motor control: the recovery from experimentally produced hemiplegia. Psychobiology1, 33–47 (1917).
   Google Scholar
• Franz SI, Scheetz ME, Wilson AA. Hemiplegia. J. Am. Med. Assoc.65(25), 2154 (1915).
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Blanton S, Baer H, Breshears J, Butler AJ. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist8(6), 325–338 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp H, Taub E, Berman A. Movements in monkeys with deafferented forearms. Exp. Neurol.7, 305–315 (1963).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. Exerc. Sport. Sci. Rev.4, 335–374 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation – a clinical review. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.36(3), 237–251 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons TP, Garraghty PE, Ommaya AK, Kaas JH, Taub E, Mishkin M. Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. Science252(5014), 1857–1860 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo S. Hemiplegic upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of the forced-use paradigm. Neurol. Rep.19, 17–21 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case design. Phys. Ther.61(7), 1022–1028 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf S, Lecraw D, Barton L. Forced use in hemiplegic upper extremities to reserve the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp. Neurol.104, 125–132 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (4), CD004433 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP et al. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol.7(1), 33–40 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Bond Q, Johnston MV. Stroke patients’ and therapists’ opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin. Rehabil.16(1), 55–60 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaumburg S, Pierce S, Gaffney K, Gershkoff A. Constraint induced therapy: moving research into practice. Presented at: American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Annual Meeting. Orlando, FL, USA, 11–15 October 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, McGrath RE. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.85(1), 14–18 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Chen CL, Tang SF, Lin KC, Huang YY. Kinematic and clinical analyses of upper-extremity movements after constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.88(8), 964–970 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caimmi M, Carda S, Giovanzana C et al. Using kinematic analysis to evaluate constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair22(1), 31–39 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massie C, Malcolm MP, Greene D, Thaut M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.90(4), 571–579 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodbury ML, Howland DR, McGuirk TE et al. Effects of trunk restraint combined with intensive task practice on poststroke upper extremity reach and function: a pilot study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair23(1), 78–91 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijland R, van Wegen E, Verbunt J, van Wijk R, van Kordelaar J, Kwakkel G. A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test. J. Rehabil. Med.42(7), 694–696 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Kolbel S, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.83(10), 1374–1377 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards L, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Davis S, Wu SS, Nadeau SE. Limited dose response to constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with chronic stroke. Clin. Rehabil.20(12), 1066–1074 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaplon RT, Prettyman MG, Kushi CL, Winstein CJ. Six hours in the laboratory: a quantification of practice time during constraint-induced therapy (CIT). Clin. Rehabil.21(10), 950–958 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, Uswatte G, Taub E, Weiller C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.86(2), 204–209 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Uhde I, Graf S, Leidner O, Weiller C. Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J. Neurol.248(4), 315–321 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friel KM, Heddings AA, Nudo RJ. Effects of postlesion experience on behavioral recovery and neurophysiologic reorganization after cortical injury in primates. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair14(3), 187–198 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friel KM, Nudo RJ. Recovery of motor function after focal cortical injury in primates: compensatory movement patterns used during rehabilitative training. Somatosens. Mot. Res.15(3), 173–189 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Wise BM, Sifuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science272, 1791–1794 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke31(6), 1210–1216 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Miltner WHR, Bauder H et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci. Lett.250(1), 5–8 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki L, Butler AJ, Leng X et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy results in increased motor map area in subjects 3 to 9 months after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair22(5), 505–513 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenberg GF, Chen R, Ishii K et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair17(1), 48–57 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenberg GF, Schaechter JD. The neural basis of constraint-induced movement therapy. Curr. Opin. Neurol.22(6), 582–588 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi N, Tada T, Toshima M, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Ikoma K. Inhibition of the unaffected motor cortex by 1 Hz repetitive transcranical magnetic stimulation enhances motor performance and training effect of the paretic hand in patients with chronic stroke. J. Rehabil. Med.40(4), 298–303 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi N, Tada T, Toshima M, Matsuo Y, Ikoma K. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over bilateral hemispheres enhances motor function and training effect of paretic hand in patients after stroke. J. Rehabil. Med.41(13), 1049–1054 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoykov ME, Corcos DM. A review of bilateral training for upper extremity hemiparesis. Occup. Ther. Int.16(3–4), 190–203 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Delden AL, Peper CL, Harlaar J et al. Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: the ULTRA-stroke program design. BMC Neurol.9, 57 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA292(15), 1853–1861 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart KC, Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Bilateral movement training and stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Sci.244(1–2), 89–95 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupar F, Pollock A, van Wijck F, Morris J, Langhorne P. Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.4, CD006432 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Chang YF, Wu CY, Chen YA. Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair23(5), 441–448 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognini N, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.6, 8 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport16(14), 1551–1555 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS et al. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology64(10), 1802–1804 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeroy VM, Cloud G, Tallis RC, Donaldson C, Nayak V, Miller S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and muscle contraction to enhance stroke recovery: a randomized proof-of-principle and feasibility investigation. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair21(6), 509–517 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staley K. Stroke: recovery inhibitors under attack. Nature468(7321), 176–177 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malcolm MP, Triggs WJ, Light KE et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to constraint-induced therapy: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil.86(9), 707–715 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Etraby AE, Hemeda M, Nasef AM, Razek AA. Long-term effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol. Scand.121(1), 30–37 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim YH, You SH, Ko MH et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke37(6), 1471–1476 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel F, Cohen LG. Improvement of motor function with noninvasive cortical stimulation in a patient with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair19(1), 14–19 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Nair D, Schlaug G. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology75(24), 2176–2184 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzei F, Liepert J, Dettmers C, Weiller C, Rijntjes M. Two different reorganization patterns after rehabilitative therapy: an exploratory study with fMRI and TMS. Neuroimage31(2), 710–720 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVetten G, Coutts SB, Hill MD et al. Acute corticospinal tract Wallerian degeneration is associated with stroke outcome. Stroke41(4), 751–756 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar