The process of reconciliation: evaluation of guidelines for translating quality-of-life questionnaires

References

• Thiers FA, Sinskey AJ, Berndt ER. Trends in the globalization of clinical trials. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery7, 13–14 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Two R, Verjee-Lorenz A, Clayson D, Dalal M, Grotzinger K, Younossi ZM. A methodology for successfully producing global translations of patient reported outcome measures for use in multiple countries. Value Health13(1), 128–131 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuliś D, Arnott M, Greimel E, Bottomley A, Koller M. Trends in translation requests and arising issues regarding cultural adaptation. Expert Rev. of Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res.11(3), 307–314 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares MG, Pizzichini MM, Steidle LJ et al. The Asthma Control Scoring System: translation and cross-cultural adaptation for use in Brazil. J. Bras. Pneumol.36(6), 683–692 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koller, M. [Contributions of social psychology to the analysis and solution of problems in the German health care system. The example of practice guidelines]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie36, 47–60 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group Techniques for Program Planning. Scott, Foresman and Company, IL, USA (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici S. Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Berkowitz L (Ed.). New York: Academic Press, NY, USA (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Steiner ID. Group Processes and Productivity. Academic Press, NY, USA (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Cull A, Sprangers M, Bjordal K, Aaronson N. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group Translation Procedure (Second Edition). EORTC, Brussels, Belgium (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Bonomi AE, Cella DF, Hahn EA et al. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Qual. Life Res.5, 309–320 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Bosi Ferraz M. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine25(24), 3186–3191 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton DE. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J. Clin. Epidemiol.46(12), 1417–1432 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szecket N, Medin G, Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Barr RD, Depauw S. Preliminary translation and cultural adaptation of health utilities index questionnaires for application in Argentina. Int. J. Cancer12, 119–124 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health8(2), 94–104 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA project approach. J. Clin. Epidemiol.51(11), 913–923 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acquadro C, Conway K, Giroudet C, Mear I. Linguistic Validation Manual for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments. Mapi Research Institute, Lyon, France (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual. Life Res.11, 193–205 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartorius N, Kuyken W. Translation of health status instruments. In: Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Orley J, Kuyken W (Eds). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton RK, Patsula L. Increasing the validity of adapted tests: myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices J. Appl. Test. Technol.1, 1–30 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• EuroQol Group. Translation Guidelines for the EQ-5D Developed by the EuroQol Group. EuroQol Group, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Eremenco SL, Cella D, Arnold BJ. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Eval. Health Prof.28(2), 212–232 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewolf L, Koller M, Velikova G, Johnson C, Scott N, Bottomley A. EORTC Quality of Life Group Translation Procedure (Third Edition). EORTC, Brussels, Belgium (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Barofsky I. Quality. Its Definition and Measurement as Applied to the Medically Ill. Springer, NY, USA (2012).
   Google Scholar