Advancing PROMIS’s methodology: results of the Third Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS^®) Psychometric Summit

References

• Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care45(5 Suppl. 1), S3 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton RK. Item Response Theory. Kluwer, MA, USA (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Linden W, Glas C. Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Springer Netherlands, The Netherlands (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Reeve BB. Item response theory modeling in health outcomes measurement. Expert Rev. Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res.3(2), 131–145 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holland P. A framework and history for score linking. In: Linking and Aligning Scores and Scales. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences Part I, Springer, NY, USA, 5–30 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Thissen D, Varni J, Stucky B, Liu Y, Irwin D, Dewalt D. Using the PedsQL™ 3.0 athma module to obtain scores comparable with those of the PROMIS pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS). Qual. Life Res.20(9), 1497–1505 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cai L. A two-tier full-information item factor analysis model with applications. Psychometrika75(75), 581–612 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock R, Aitkin M. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika46(4), 443–459 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén B. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika49(1), 115–132 (1984).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocking ML, Lord FM. Developing a common metric in item response theory. Appl. Psychol. Meas.7(2), 201 (1983).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolen M, Brennan R. Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Teresi JA, Stewart AL, Morales LS, Stahl SM. Measurement in a multi-ethnic society. Overview to the special issue. Med. Care44(11 Suppl. 3), S3–S4 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teresi JA, Ocepek-Welikson K, Kleinman M et al. Analysis of differential item functioning in the depression item bank from the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS): an item response theory approach. Psychol. Sci. Q51(2), 148 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala BB, Bruce B. Improved responsiveness of physical function (disability) scales based upon item response theory. Arthritis Rheum.60(Suppl.), S229 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog KG, Goldberger AS. Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.70(351), 631–639 (1975).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carle A. Mitigating systematic measurement error in comparative effectiveness research in heterogeneous populations. Med. Care48(6), S68 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crane PK, Gibbons LE, Jolley L, Van Belle G. Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. DIFdetect and difwithpar. Med. Care44(11 Suppl. 3), S115–S123 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise S, Moore T, Haviland M. Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. J. Pers. Assess.92(6), 544–559 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise S, Morizot J, Hays R. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Qual. Life Res.16, 19–31 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai L, Du Toit SHC, Thissen D. IRTPRO: Flexible, Multidimensional, Multiple Categorical IRT Modeling. Scientific Software International, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson T. A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. Ann. Stat.1(2), 209–230 (1973).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn D, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat. Comput.10(4), 325–337 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox J, Glas C. Bayesian estimation of a multilevel IRT model using Gibbs sampling. Psychometrika66(2), 271–288 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckase M. Multidimensional Item Response Theory. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Hedeker D. Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika57(3), 423–436 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainer H, Bradlow E, Wang X. Testlet Response Theory and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Schilling S, Bock RD. High-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadrature. Psychometrika70(3), 533–555 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai L. High-dimensional exploratory item factor analysis by a Metropolis–Hastings Robbins–Monro algorithm. Psychometrika75(1), 33–57 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai L. Metropolis–Hastings Robbins–Monro algorithm for confirmatory item factor analysis. J. Educ. Behav. Stat.35(3), 307 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen D, Steinberg L, Wainer H. Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. In: Differential Item Functioning. Holland PW (Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, USA, 67–113 (1993).
   Google Scholar