Exploring the Presence of Implicit Bias Amongst Healthcare Professionals Who Refer Individuals Living with COPD to Pulmonary Rehabilitation with a Specific Focus Upon Smoking and Exercise

References

• GOLD. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; 2020. Available from: www.goldcopd.org. Accessed June 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Yohannes AM, Alexopoulos GS. Depression and anxiety in patients with COPD. Vol. 23, European respiratory review. European Respiratory Society; 2014:345–349. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4523084/. Accessed June 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Alahmari AD, Patel ARC, Kowlessar BS, et al. Daily activity during stability and exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14(1):98. doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grønseth R, Erdal M, Tan WC, et al. Unemployment in chronic airflow obstruction around the world: results from the BOLD study. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(3):1700499. doi:10.1183/13993003.00499-2017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccarthy B, Casey D, Devane D, Murphy K, Murphy E, Lacasse Y. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006927.pub4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NACAP. National COPD Audit Programme: Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Time to Breathe Better. NACAP; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wagg K, Warrington V, Apps L, et al. A self-management programme of activity coping and education (SPACE) for COPD: 6 week results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J. 2012;40(Suppl 56):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horton E, Mitchell K, Johnson-Warrington V, Apps L, Young H, Singh S. Results of the SPACE FOR COPD programme in comparison to pulmonary rehabilitation at 6 months. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(Suppl 58):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourne S, DeVos R, North M, et al. Online versus face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e014580. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NACAP. National asthma and COPD audit programme: pulmonary rehabilitation clinical and organisational audit report 2019; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Barradell AC, Singh SJ, Houchen-Wolloff L, Robertson N, Bekker HL, Singh S. A pulmonary rehabilitation shared decision-making intervention for patients living with COPD: PReSent: protocol for a feasibility study. ERJ Open Res. 2022;8(2):00645–2021. doi:10.1183/23120541.00645-2021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charles C, Gafni WT. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–692. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barradell A, Bourne C, Alkhathlan B, Larkin M, Singh S. A qualitative assessment of the pulmonary rehabilitation decision-making needs of patients living with COPD. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2022;32(1):1–11. doi:10.1038/s41533-022-00285-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson S. Psi, perception without awareness, and false recognition. J Parapsychol. 2002;66(3):271–289.
   Google Scholar
• Banaji MR, Greenwald AG, Bhaskar R, et al. Implicit Gender Stereotyping in Judgments of Fame for Providing Oppor-Tunities for Classroom Testing; and Coomi. BarghPerdue & Gurtman; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald C, Hurst S. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):19. doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–349. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMA. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects – WMA – the World Medical Association; 2013. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed June 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• HRA. Good clinical practice; 2020 Available from: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/policies-standards-legislation/good-clinical-practice/. Accessed June 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(6):1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet G. PsyToolkit: a software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behav Res Methods. 2010;42(4):1096–1104. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet G. PsyToolkit: a novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teach Psychol. 2017;44(1):24–31. doi:10.1177/0098628316677643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson JE, Rudman LA, Greenwald AG. Using the implicit association test to investigate attitude-behaviour consistency for stigmatised behaviour. Cogn Emot. 2001;15(2):207–230. doi:10.1080/02699930125706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijding J, De Jong PJ, Wiers RW, Verkooijen K. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward smoking in a smoking and a nonsmoking setting. Addict Behav. 2005;30(5):949–961. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardin B, Perrissol S, Py J, Fos Y, Souchon N. Testing of a paper-and-pencil personalized single category implicit association test (SC-IAT-P). Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2016;29(1):31–44. doi:10.5334/irsp.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy DE, Hyde AL, Doerksen SE, Ribeiro NF. Implicit attitudes and explicit motivation prospectively predict physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 2010;39(2):112–118. doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9161-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry TR, Spence JC, Clark ME. Exercise is in! Implicit exercise and sedentary-lifestyle bias held by in-groups. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2011;41(12):2985–2998. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00857.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest LN, Smith AR, Fussner LM, Dodd DR, Clerkin EM. Using implicit attitudes of exercise importance to predict explicit exercise dependence symptoms and exercise behaviors. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2016;22:91–97. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevance G, Héraud N, Guerrieri A, Rebar A, Boiché J. Measuring implicit attitudes toward physical activity and sedentary behaviors: test-retest reliability of three scoring algorithms of the implicit association test and single category-implicit association test. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2017;31:70–78. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raosoft. Sample size calculator by Raosoft, Inc; 2004. Available from: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html. Accessed June 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. an improved scoring algorithm; 2003. Available from: http://www.yale.edu/implicit/. Accessed June 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. The effect size: r. In: Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, United States of America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988:83.
   Google Scholar
• Waters AJ, Carter BL, Robinson JD, Wetter DW, Lam CY, Cinciripini PM. Implicit attitudes to smoking are associated with craving and dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;91(2–3):178. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.05.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClinCalc LLC. Post‐hoc power calculator; 2018. Available from: https://clincalc.com/stats/Power.aspx. Accessed June 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Cox DR, Snell EJ. Analysis of Binary Data. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Nagelkerke NJD. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika. 1991;78(3):691–692. doi:10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde AL, Doerksen SE, Ribeiro NF, Conroy DE. The independence of implicit and explicit attitudes toward physical activity: introspective access and attitudinal concordance. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2010;11(5):387–393. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell N, Strachan D, Hubbard R, Gibson J, Gruffydd-Jones K, Jarrold I. S32 epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the UK: findings from the British lung foundation’s “respiratory health of the nation” project. Thorax. 2016;71(Suppl 3):A20.1–A20. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209333.38
   Google Scholar
• Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Platt S. Smoking and socioeconomic status in England: the rise of the never smoker and the disadvantaged smoker. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2012;34(3):390–396. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fds012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens D, Andreou P, Rainham D. Environmental correlates of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and self-rated health in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2022;42(3):190–195. doi:10.1097/HCR.0000000000000628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon AS, Dolmage TE, Stephenson A, Jackson B. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and SocioEconomic status: a systematic review. COPD. 2012;9(3):216–226. doi:10.3109/154125552011648030
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163–2196. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone PW, Hickman K, Steiner MC, Roberts CM, Quint JK, Singh SJ. Predictors of referral to pulmonary rehabilitation from UK primary care. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020;15:2941. doi:10.2147/COPD.S273336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald C, Martin A, Berner D, Hurst S. Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review. BMC Psychol. 2019;7(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sukhera J, Milne A, Teunissen PW, Lingard L, Watling C. The actual versus idealized self: exploring responses to feedback about implicit bias in health professionals. Acad Med. 2018;93(4):623–629. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DY. Voluntary controllability of the implicit association test (IAT). Soc Psychol Q. 2003;66(1):83–96. doi:10.2307/3090143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek BA, Greenwald AG, Banaji MR. The implicit association test at age 7: a methodological and conceptual review. - PsycNET. In: Social Psychology and the Unconscious: The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes. Psychology Press; 2007:265–292.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei AR. Validity and reliability of the IAT: measuring gender and ethnic stereotypes. Comput Human Behav. 2011;27(5):1937–1941. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmack U. The implicit association test: a method in search of a construct. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019;16(2):396–414. doi:10.1177/1745691619863798
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;97(1):17–41. doi:10.1037/a0015575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar