Development of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Patient Decision Aid for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study

References

• Shachar C, Engel J, Elwyn G. Implications for telehealth in a postpandemic future: regulatory and privacy issues. JAMA. 2020;323(23):2375–2376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omboni S, Ballatore T, Rizzi F, et al. Telehealth at scale can improve chronic disease management in the community during a pandemic: an experience at the time of COVID-19. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0258015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olloquequi J. COVID-19 Susceptibility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020;50(10):e13382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart J, Yadav K, Szymanski S, et al. Choice architecture in physician-patient communication: a mixed-methods assessments of physicians’ competency. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021;30(5):362–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• While A. Shared decision-making. Br J Community Nurs. 2019;24(5):250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jayakumar P, Moore MG, Furlough KA, et al. Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Patient Decision Aid vs Educational Material on Decision Quality, Shared Decision-Making, Patient Experience, and Functional Outcomes in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e2037107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccarus SD, Wiercinski K, Heidrich N. Shared decision-making to improve patient engagement in minimally invasive hysterectomy. Surg Technol Int. 2019;34:265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faller H. Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003;42(3):129–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose A, Rosewilliam S, Soundy A. Shared decision making within goal setting in rehabilitation settings: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph-Williams N, Abhyankar P, Boland L, et al. What Works in Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Routine Clinical Settings? A Rapid Realist Review and Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration. Med Decis Making. 2021;41(7):907–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(8):e13–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alison JA, Mckeough ZJ, Johnston K, et al. Australian and New Zealand Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guidelines. Respirology. 2017;22(4):800–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Guo J, Sun P, et al. Perceptions and experiences of older patients and healthcare professionals regarding shared decision-making in pulmonary rehabilitation: a qualitative study. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(11):1627–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen C, Tomkinson J. P120 Shared Decision Making In A Pulmonary Rehabilitation Setting For COPD Patients. Thorax. 2014;69(Suppl 2):A130–A1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kopecky KE, Urbach D, Schwarze ML. Risk calculators and decision aids are not enough for shared decision making. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(1):3–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Cochran N, Pignone M. Shared decision making-the importance of diagnosing preferences. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(9):1239–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinkunas LA, Klipowicz CJ, Carlisle EM. Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20(1):190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho HE, Baxter NB, Billig JI, et al. Task-specific patient preferences for shared decision-making in hand surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;149(2):229e–39e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alokozai A, Eppler SL, et al. Patient preferences for shared decision making: not all decisions should be shared. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(10):419–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg MB, Chopra D. Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life: Life-Changing Tools for Healthy Relationships [M]. PuddleDancer Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hoefel L, Lewis KB, O’connor A, et al. 20th anniversary update of the Ottawa decision support framework: part 2 subanalysis of a systematic review of patient decision aids. Med Decis Making. 2020;40(4):522–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease group, respiratory branch, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2013 Revision). Chine J Med Front. 2014;2(02):67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Liu F, Guo J, et al. Evaluating an intervention program using wechat for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(4):e17089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke J. Sus: a quick and dirty’usability. Usability Evaluation Industry. 1996;189(3):564.
   Google Scholar
• Schermuly CC, Scholl W. The Discussion Coding System (DCS)—A new instrument for analyzing communication processes. Commun Methods Meas. 2012;6(1):12–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins Virani AK, Creighton SM, Hayden MR. Developing a comprehensive, effective patient-friendly website to enhance decision making in predictive testing for Huntington disease. Genet Med. 2013;15(6):466–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer VA, Focella ES, Scherer LD, et al. Debiasing affective forecasting errors with targeted, but not representative, experience narratives. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(10):1611–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcqueen A, Kreuter MW, Kalesan B, et al. Understanding narrative effects: the impact of breast cancer survivor stories on message processing, attitudes, and beliefs among African American women. Health Psychol. 2011;30(6):674–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker HL, Winterbottom AE, Butow P, et al. Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;2(Suppl 2):S9.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk [M]. Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: part I. World Scientific. 2013;2:99–127.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhawt M, Shaker M, Winders T, et al. Development and acceptability of a shared decision-making tool for commercial peanut allergy therapies. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020;125(1):90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabrera C, Font A, Caro M, et al. Developing a decision aid to support informed choices for newly diagnosed patients with localized prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2015;38(1):E55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankolekar A, Vanneste BGL, Bloemen-Van Gurp E, et al. Development and validation of a patient decision aid for prostate Cancer therapy: from paternalistic towards participative shared decision making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Weert JC, Van Munster BC, Sanders R, et al. Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16(45):e6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nosek M, Durán M. Increasing Empathy and Conflict Resolution Skills through Nonviolent Communication (NVC) Training in Latino Adults and Youth. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(3):275–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Museux AC, Dumont S, Careau E, et al. Improving interprofessional collaboration: the effect of training in nonviolent communication. Soc Work Health Care. 2016;55(6):427–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz NG, Van Weert JCM, Peters E, et al. Testing the effects of modality and narration style on patients’ information use in a lung cancer treatment decision aid. Med Decis Making. 2020;40(8):990–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navar AM, Wang TY, Mi X, et al. Influence of cardiovascular risk communication tools and presentation formats on patient perceptions and preferences. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(12):1192–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar