1,112
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Validation of Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ) in the Taiwanese Population — Concurrent Validity with Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Module

, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2391-2403 | Published online: 09 Aug 2022

References

  • Climie RE, van Sloten TT, Bruno RM, et al. Macrovasculature and microvasculature at the crossroads between type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Hypertension. 2019;73(6):1138–1149. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11769
  • Bommer C, Heesemann E, Sagalova V, et al. The global economic burden of diabetes in adults aged 20–79 years: a cost-of-illness study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(6):423–430. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30097-9
  • Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the international diabetes federation diabetes atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843
  • Sheen Y-J, Hsu -C-C, Jiang Y-D, Huang C-N, Liu J-S, Sheu W-H-H. Trends in prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus from 2005 to 2014 in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019;118:S66–S73. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2019.06.016
  • da Rocha RB, Silva CS, Cardoso VS. Self-care in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2020;16(6):598–607. doi:10.2174/1573399815666190702161849
  • American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. 2021;45(Supplement_1):S17–S38.
  • American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 6. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. 2021;45(Supplement_1):S83–S96.
  • American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 12. retinopathy, neuropathy, and foot care: standards of medical care in diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. 2021;45(Supplement_1):S185–S194.
  • American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 11. chronic kidney disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. 2021;45(Supplement_1):S175–S184.
  • American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2022 abridged for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes. 2022;40(1):10–38. doi:10.2337/cd22-as01
  • Kao CC, Hsieh HM, Lee DY, Hsieh KP, Sheu SJ. Importance of medication adherence in treatment needed diabetic retinopathy. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):19100. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-98488-6
  • Shou-Hsia Cheng P, Lee T-T, Chen C-C. A longitudinal examination of a pay-for-performance program for diabetes care. evidence from a natural experiment. Med Care. 2012;50:109–116. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822d5d36
  • Sheen YJ, Kung PT, Kuo WY, Chiu LT, Tsai WC. Impact of the pay-for-performance program on lower extremity amputations in patients with diabetes in Taiwan. Medicine. 2018;97(41):e12759. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000012759
  • Chen YC, Lee CT, Lin BJ, Chang YY, Shi HY. Impact of pay-for-performance on mortality in diabetes patients in Taiwan: a population-based study. Medicine. 2016;95(27):e4197. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000004197
  • Wang RH, Hsu HC, Lee YJ, Shin SJ, Lin KD, An LW. Patient empowerment interacts with health literacy to associate with subsequent self-management behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a prospective study in Taiwan. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(10):1626–1631. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.04.001
  • Lee YJ, Shin SJ, Wang RH, Lin KD, Lee YL, Wang YH. Pathways of empowerment perceptions, health literacy, self-efficacy, and self-care behaviors to glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(2):287–294. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.021
  • Wang CY, Tu ST, Sheu WH, et al. National survey of ABC (A1C, blood pressure, cholesterol) of diabetes health promotion institutes in Taiwan: 2002–2018. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117(11):952–954. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2018.08.013
  • Dahal PK, Hosseinzadeh H. Association of health literacy and diabetes self-management: a systematic review. Aust J Prim Health. 2019;25(6):526–533. doi:10.1071/PY19007
  • Tang YH, Pang SM, Chan MF, Yeung GS, Yeung VT. Health literacy, complication awareness, and diabetic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):74–83. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04526.x
  • Kim S, Love F, Quistberg DA, Shea JA. Association of health literacy with self-management behavior in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(12):2980–2982. doi:10.2337/diacare.27.12.2980
  • Asmelash D, Abdu N, Tefera S, Baynes HW, Derbew C. Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards glycemic control and its associated factors among diabetes mellitus patients. J Diabetes Res. 2019;2019:2593684. doi:10.1155/2019/2593684
  • Garcia AA, Villagomez ET, Brown SA, Kouzekanani K, Hanis CL. The Starr county diabetes education study: development of the Spanish-language diabetes knowledge questionnaire. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(1):16–21. doi:10.2337/diacare.24.1.16
  • Hu J, Gruber KJ, Liu H, Zhao H, Garcia AA. Diabetes knowledge among older adults with diabetes in Beijing, China. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(1–2):51–60. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04273.x
  • Hawkins M, Cheng C, Elsworth GR, Osborne RH. Translation method is validity evidence for construct equivalence: analysis of secondary data routinely collected during translations of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):130. doi:10.1186/s12874-020-00962-8
  • Lin C-Y, Lee T-Y, Sun Z-J, Yang Y-C, Wu J-S, Ou H-T. Development of diabetes-specific quality of life module to be in conjunction with the World Health Organization quality of life scale brief version (WHOQOL-BREF). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):167. doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0744-3
  • Ebel RL. Procedures for the analysis of classroom tests. Educ Psychol Meas. 1954;14(2):352–364. doi:10.1177/001316445401400215
  • Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
  • Lin CY, Luh WM, Yang AL, Su CT, Wang JD, Ma HI. Psychometric properties and gender invariance of the Chinese version of the self-report pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0: short form is acceptable. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(1):177–182. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9928-1
  • Chang CC, Su JA, Chang KC, et al. Development of the Family Stigma Stress Scale (FSSS) for detecting stigma stress in caregivers of people with mental illness. Eval Health Prof. 2019;42(2):148–168. doi:10.1177/0163278717745658
  • Bukhsh A, Lee SWH, Pusparajah P, Khan AH, Khan TM. Psychometric properties of the urdu version of diabetes knowledge questionnaire. Public Health Front. 2017;5:139. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00139
  • Ćaćić M, Kruljac I, Mirošević G, Vrkljan M. Validation of diabetes knowledge questionnaire in Croatian with assessment of diabetes knowledge and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Diabetol. 2020;9(6):387–393. doi:10.5603/DK.2020.0054
  • Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol. 2014;105(3):399–412. doi:10.1111/bjop.12046
  • Marciano L, Camerini AL, Schulz PJ. The role of health literacy in diabetes knowledge, self-care, and glycemic control: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(6):1007–1017. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04832-y
  • Sharma PK, Rajpal N, Upadhyay S, Shaha D, Deo N. Status of diabetes control and knowledge about diabetes in patients. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr. 2021;68:716–727. doi:10.1016/j.endinu.2020.12.006
  • Drews CD, Greeland S. The impact of differential recall on the results of case-control studies. Int J Epidemiol. 1990;19(4):1107–1112. doi:10.1093/ije/19.4.1107