166
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Predicting the Stone-Free Status of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with the Machine Learning System

, , , ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 197-206 | Received 24 Jun 2023, Accepted 06 Sep 2023, Published online: 11 Sep 2023

References

  • Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1301–1320. doi:10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6
  • Abboud IA. Prevalence of Urolithiasis in Adults due to Environmental Influences: a Case Study from Northern and Central Jordan. Jordan J Earth Environ Sci. 2018;9(1):29–38.
  • Ganpule AP, Vijayakumar M, Malpani A, Desai MR. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review. Int J Surgery. 2016;36(PD):660–664. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.028
  • Kumar U, Tomar V, Yadav SS, et al. STONE score versus Guy’s Stone Score - Prospective comparative evaluation for success rate and complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Ann. 2018;10(1):76–81. doi:10.4103/UA.UA_119_17
  • Wu WJ, Okeke Z. Current clinical scoring systems of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14(8):459–469. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2017.71
  • Zhernovoi I, Shchukin D, Jundi M, Grabs D, Maranzano J, Nayouf A. Comparison of four transdiaphragmatic approaches to remove cavoatrial tumor thrombi: a pilot study. Cent European J Urol. 2022;75(2):145–152. doi:10.5173/ceju.2022.0277.R1
  • Jiang K, Sun F, Zhu J, et al. Evaluation of three stone-scoring systems for predicting SFR and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2019;19:1. doi:10.1186/s12894-019-0488-y
  • Zhao H, Li W, Li J, Li L, Wang H, Guo J. Predicting the Stone-Free Status of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With the Machine Learning System: comparative Analysis With Guy’s Stone Score and the S.T.O.N.E Score System. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.880291
  • Aminsharifi A, Irani D, Pooyesh S, et al. Artificial Neural Network System to Predict the Postoperative Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2017;31(5):461–467. doi:10.1089/end.2016.0791
  • Shabaniyan T, Parsaei H, Aminsharifi A, et al. An artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support system for large kidney stone treatment. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2019;42(3):771–779. doi:10.1007/s13246-019-00780-3
  • Aminsharifi A, Irani D, Tayebi S, Jafari Kafash T, Shabanian T, Parsaei H. Predicting the Postoperative Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Machine Learning System: software Validation and Comparative Analysis with Guy’s Stone Score and the CROES Nomogram. J Endourol. 2020;34(6):692–699. doi:10.1089/end.2019.0475
  • Hameed BMZ, Shah M, Naik N, Singh Khanuja H, Paul R, Somani BK. Application of Artificial Intelligence-Based Classifiers to Predict the Outcome Measures and Stone-Free Status Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Calculi: cross-Validation of Data and Estimation of Accuracy. J Endourol. 2021;35(9):1307–1313. doi:10.1089/end.2020.1136
  • Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons K. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):1. doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z
  • TIBCO Software. What is a Random Forest? Available from: https://www.tibco.com/reference-center/what-is-a-random-forest. Accessed August 19, 2023.
  • Pushkar Mandot. How exactly XGBoost Works? 2019. Available from: https://medium.com/@pushkarmandot/how-exactly-xgboost-works-a320d9b8aeef. Accessed August 19, 2023.
  • Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR. Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis. Investig Clin Urol. 2017;58(5):299–306. doi:10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.299
  • Rais-Bahrami S, Friedlander JI, Duty BD, Okeke Z, Smith AD. Difficulties with access in percutaneous renal surgery. Ther Adv Urol. 2011;3(2):59–68. doi:10.1177/1756287211400661
  • Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM. The Guy’s Stone Score—Grading the Complexity of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Procedures. Urology. 2011;78(2):277–281. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.026
  • Noureldin YA, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. External validation of the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system. J Canadian Urol Assoc. 2015;9(6):190–195. doi:10.5489/cuaj.2652
  • Ingimarsson JP, Dagrosa LM, Hyams ES, Pais VM. External validation of a preoperative renal stone grading system: reproducibility and inter-rater concordance of the Guy’s stone score using preoperative computed tomography and rigorous postoperative stone-free criteria. Urology. 2014;83(1):45–49. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.008
  • Smith A, Averch TD, Shahrour K, et al. A nephrolithometric nomogram to predict treatment success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2013;190(1):149–156. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.047
  • Srivastava A, Yadav P, Madhavan K, et al. Inter-observer variability amongst surgeons and radiologists in assessment of Guy’s Stone Score and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry score: a prospective evaluation. Arab J Urol. 2020;18(2):118–123. doi:10.1080/2090598X.2019.1703278