References
- TorreLABrayFSiegelRLFerlayJLortet-TieulentJJemalAGlobal cancer statistics, 2012CA Cancer J Clin20156528710825651787
- ArbynMVerdootFSnijdersPJAccuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysisLancet Oncol201415217218324433684
- CherneskyMAHookIIIMartinDHWomen find it easy and prefer to collect their own vaginal swabs to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infectionsSex Transm Dis2005321272973316314768
- SpackmanEPedersenJCMcKinleyETGelbJJrOptimal specimen collection and transport methods for the detection of avain influenza virus and Newcastle disease virusBMC Vet Res20132235
- DubeFSKabaMWhittakerEZarHJNicolMPDetection of Streptococcus pneumoniae from different types of nasopharyngeal swabs in childrenPLoS One201386e6809723840817
- DalmasoGBiniMParoniRFerrariMQualification of high-recovery, flocked swabs as compared to traditional rayon swabs for microbiological enviromental monitoring of surfacesPDA J Pharm Sci Technol200862319119918661868
- BenschpCCGWieboschDCKloostermanADSijenTPost-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typingForensic Sci Int Genet20104211512120129470
- JangDGilchristJPortilloESmiejaMToorRCherneskyMComparison of dacron and nylon-flocked self-collected vaginal swabs and urine for the detection of Trichomonas vaginalis using analyte-specific reagents in a transcription-mediated amplification assaySex Transm Infect201288316016222166474
- SharplesNormanCopanusa. COPANCopan Diagnostics Inc2017 Available from: http://www.copanusa.com/products/collection-transport/floqswabs-flocked-swabs/Accessed February 2, 2017
- EperonIVassilakosPNavarriaIRandomized comparison of vaginal self-sampling by standard vs. dry swabs for human papilloma-virus testingBMC Cancer20131335323875668
- KrechTCastricianoSJangDSmiejaMEndersGCherneskyMDetection of high risk HPV and Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal and cervical samples collected with flocked nylon and wrapped rayon dual swabs transported in dry tubesJ Virol Methods20091621–229129319703493
- JunJKLimMCHwangS-HComparison of DRY and WET vaginal swabs with cervical specimens in Roche Cobas 4800 HPV and Abbott Real Time High Risk HPV testsJ Clin Virol201679808427111579
- BrownlowRJDagnallKEAmesCEA comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methodsJ Forensic Sci201257371371722211626
- GageJCGhoshABorgonovoSA comparison of dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology specimen collectionActa Cytol2001554364367
- VassilakosPGriffinSMegavandECampanaACytoRich liquid-based cervical cytology test: screening results in a routine cytopathology serviceActa Cytol19984211982029479340
- VerdoodtFJentschkeMHillemannsPRaceyCSSnijdersPJArbynMReaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening program by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysisEur J Cancer201551162375238526296294
- NelsonEJMaynardBRLouxTFatlaJGordonRArnoldLDThe acceptability of self-sampled screening for HPV DNA: a systematic review and meta-analysisSex Transm Infect2017931566128100761
- LeinonenMKScheeKJonassenCMSafety and acceptability of human papillomavirus testing of self-collected specimens: a methodologic study of the impact of collection devices and HPV assays on sensitivity for cervical cancer and high-grade lesionsJ Clin Virol201799–1002230
- SultanaFGertigDMWredeCDA pilot study to compare dry cervical sample collection with standard practice of wet cervical samples for human papillomavirus testingJ Clin Virol20156921021326209409